Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objection
O,1] To make films on Holy and Noble Personalities are trangrssions and to
watch them approches to Blasphamy, while normal Hollywood films are
transgressions but do not approach to Blasphamy and disgrace.
But the cunning mind of this Engineer cleverly hid this issue.
O,2] He Cleverly hid the Point that the Iranian Films are not based upon the
True Traditions of Books like Bukha:ri , Muslim etc. but on the fake books like
'Al Kafi, Nahj . So they cannot be trusted, since they did contain concocted
matterials from most unauthentic and unreliable sources of traditions.
Comment: This does unvail the conspiracy engineered by the Engineer.
[The niouns are used as anarthrous in Urdu , i.e with out any
articles'however in EngLISH TRANSLATIONS to convey the
exact meaning the articles , they are in square brackets
prior to nouns instead of writing nouns with anarthros].
According to Islamic Orthodox Creed [Ahlussunnah]Acts of
Human Beings, Jin Beings and Angel Beings are Creations Of
'ALL-H since ALL-H IS THE ONLY CREATOR OF ALL POSSIBLE
THINGS,ACTS,ATTRIBUTES AND EVENTS.
Mu"tazilites however denied that God is the Creator of acts
of Human , Jin etc. Beings since they opined that this means
that God maketh them to astray.
Imam Bukhari did write a Book Proving that acts of Human
Beings are Divine Creations [Creations Of Deity].
Things must be kept in mind that:=
ACTS OF DEITY ['ALL-H] ARE CREATIONS OF DEITY ['ALL-H].
But the converse of this is not true that is:
Any Created Act of God is Not Necessary the Act of Deity.
If a human beings are misguided or decieved or gone astray,
then the question is :
Who is te Creator of these Acts Of Human beings.
The Elder Mu"tazilite did not answered this question and
remained silence on this most critical Question.
But it is suggested that they held an irretional and illogical
view that:=
These Acts only have doers and agents but No Creator.
But latter Jabai explicitly stated that Human beings are the
Creators of their Acts whether they are good or evil or else,
SUMMARY:=
S,1]'ALL-H Is the Creator and Doer of His His Acts.
S,2]'ALL-H is the Creator but not the doer of Acts Of Rational
Supposita [ say Human Beings etc.] .
S.3]Rational Supposita [say Human Beings] are the Doers of
their Acts and Not the Creators of their Acts.
S,4]An Act which hath a Doer but no Creator is Intrinsically
Absurd and Rationally Impossible.
COMMENT:
The Sentence quoted above must be studied with care. We
are not going to give any benifit of doubt to the Engineer,
have believed in ,why shall this man not believe. This man Shall respond that
Ihave recieved a H:adith: and that he [This Man] shall not be impressed
[Dajja:l].
Apocryphal etc. But not words like Shameless etc other wise
it is implied that "the writers of them were Shameless other
wise they would not have coolected them".
It is correct that weak traditions cannot be used in any
argument in particular in the accusations against
S:ah:a:bah , but the very same "Ali: Mirza: never criticised
the book Khilafat va Mulukiat for incorporating weak and
Infrumature traditions against some S:ah:abah RD: .
Although the Great Heretic mind of the second decade of`the
twenty first century has misinterpreted Correct Traditions
according to the weak traditions collected by the Author Of
the Book Khilafat Va Mulukiat, instead of criticising this
author for collecting weak traditions.
But in several lectures "Ali: Mirza: has denied weak traditions
and it is hoped that he shall one day accept that the weak
traditions of the book stated above are unreliable and not
trustworthy.
SUMMARY:
If an Attribute of 'ALL-H is Not 'ALL-H THEN An
Attribute Of an Attribute Of 'ALL-H is not an Attribute
Of 'ALL-H.
RESULT:=
If it is supposed that Naqs UPON ALL-H and His
Atttributes are Muh:a:l Bidh:dh:a:t , it is Certainly NOT