Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pencil & Pastel : Non-Formal Visual Arts Programming Using Univeral Design For Learning
Lindsay Heffernan
Post University
Pencil & Pastel : Non-Formal Visual Arts Leaning Using Univeral Design For Learning
Part I: Statement of Educational Philosophy
In 2009, Nicholas Bourriaud coined the term altermodern to refer to current trends in
contemporary art practice and theory. Bourriaud referred to altermodern as the next step in
artistic evolution after post-modernization following what he called the creolization of the world
(Bourriaud, 2009). He hypothesized that artists no longer begin from isolated cultural identities,
but are rather part of a globalized cultural exchange from the beginning that requires a critical
eye placed on where artistic ideas come from to limit the threat of an overarching mass culture
that eliminates the individual and the historical from artistic practice (Bourriaud, 2009). To
combat this impulse toward homogeneity, Bourriaud proposes that a dynamic and ever-changing
intercultural identity must be filtered through individual narratives (Bourriaud, 2009). While
Bourriaud was concerned with artistic production and process, scholars have applied the
altermodern to arts education to ensure that students understand how to relate art to their lives
and own artistic processes, a relationship that is supported by the use of Universal Design for
Learning strategies of curriculum development in its emphasis on learner agency.
Bourriauds theories as applied to arts education are supported by scholars such as
Hoekstra and Groenendijik (2015) who view Bourriauds altermodern as a rallying cry away
from multiculturalism, an arts education trope that has dominated the field since the 1980s that
emphasizes artistic origins over the broader dialogue artists in the global, intercultural world
have with one another (p. 216). Contemporary art practice requires artists to engage with fine
and mass cultural art, and students similarly engage with popular culture and media in a variety
of ways that informs their opinions and insight into what they see, feel and think (Hoekstra &
Groenendijik, 2015, p. 216). Cultural identity is not only dictated by a place of origin, but by
how one chooses to engage with media (Hoekstra & Groenendijik, 2015, p 218). The implication
for arts education then is that the arts objects and practices introduced to students must account
for the hybridity of cultural relationships and how individuals relate to those concepts or objects
based on their personal experience (Hoekstra & Groenendijik, 2015, p. 219). Building this notion
of interculturality into arts education is a necessity and one that can be achieved through processoriented projects that emphasize technique and intention over templates and products (Hoekstra
& Groenendijik, 2015, p.220). Such projects include authentic performance tasks that place
students into real world situations where intention becomes as key as product.
Atkinson (2007) posits the need of multiple perspectives and subjectivity in building
meaning for students in arts education classes (p. 113). These concepts allow for self-expression,
but also reinforce the dynamism of identity and the interrelationship in art between viewer and
creator, or in a classroom, between student and teacher. Atkinsons suggestion of multiple
perspectives supports Bourriauds theory that individual narratives must inform artistic practice
to build meaning. Individual narratives also support the need for student-driven curriculum that
engages students in terms of needs, strengths and preferences to achieve goals and reach learning
objectives. Altermodern arts education pushes for learner agency and autonomy toward bench
marks and goals requiring students to take responsibility for their artistic choices through
justification of their intention (Hoekstra & Groenendijik, 2015, p. 222). Projects and learning
strategies should thus ensure opportunities for multiple approaches based on individual needs
and desires. This does not eliminate consistent technical achievement, but allows for multiple
entry points toward such achievement while allowing for more freedom of expression through an
emphasis on critical thought and problem solving.
Part II: Rationale of Curriculum
Bourriauds theory and its relationship to arts education informs non-formal arts
education at museums and arts centers. Regional arts centers such as the Westport Arts Center
must face many unique challenges in attempting to generate learner-driven curricular units that
speak to this important shift away from traditional multiculturalism toward a more globalized,
altermodern approach to theory and creation. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) offers one
opportunity for planning programming that will cater to a non-formal audience while also
allowing for student-driven, life skills supporting arts education.
The Westport Arts Center is located in Westport, CT, an affluent suburb outside of New
York City. It offers non-formal arts education to children ages 2-18 through diverse programming
that offers introduction and cultivation of visual arts technique and production. Non-formal
education refers to education and related programming that takes place outside of a traditional
school where participation is not mandatory (Schwier, 2010, p. 90). Classes, workshops or camps
are prescribed and facilitated by an educator who likely has specialized training in a given field,
but students must make a decision about how, when and why they will participate (Schwier,
2010, p. 91). In many instances students at the Westport Arts Center will be predisposed to enjoy
art creation having made an active choice to participate. In other cases, they may be there due to
a parents choice or desire for them to experience such a class. Depending on the exact reason
one has chosen or been enlisted to participate in the class has a strong impact on how they will
perform in the class.
While this aspect of student variability is likely, it can be very difficult in a non-formal
setting like the Westport Arts Center to determine exact variability in a given class. Educators do
know based on past enrollment that approximately 92% of students come from Westport itself.
This number tells educators that largely students are affluent with a median household income of
$152,000, and that students are ethnically homogenous with 93% identifying as white, nonHispanic (Westport Demographics, n.d.). Parents are given the option during registration to
explain any special needs, helpful techniques or important student information that educators
may need, but Arts Center staff is not privy to school records, IEPs or other performance metrics
for students.
One of the most helpful tools that educators can use to understand their students is the
Student Learner Profile. Student Learner Profiles are diagrams or lists that place the educator in
the shoes of a given student or a group of students that correlates and analyzes techniques and
methods that have worked well for students in the past as a means of goal setting and curriculum
planning for these students (UDL Resource, 2013). In the non-formal setting where educational
standards and goals are less rigid than traditional settings, student learner profiles can offer
insight into not only the needs of students, but also the types of programming that will appeal
most to this student base. Student Learner Profiles can be generated in the non-formal setting
using student assumptions based on past experiences and students that are indicative of typical
class variability using informal, anecdotal observation among organizational educators.
Appendix A is one such learner profile generated for the Westport Arts Center that helps to shine
further light on the base that programming must cater to for success.
Using information such as that represented in Appendix A, the Westport Arts Center
recently came to the decision to add a dry media class that will help young students between the
ages of 5-8 to a solid foundation in observational drawing skills. Named Pencil & Pastel, this
class will seek to align with organizational standards for learning that call for students to make
sound visual choices based on knowledge of materials and how they should be handled. Subject
matter is loose with parameters that allow for self-expression within the frame of a prompt.
Pencil & Pastel will focus on the use of graphite, oil pastel and chalk pastel teaching students the
proper handling of each material while also giving them a solid foundation in mark making and
value building as appropriate. Students will be introduced to the concept of artistic intention, an
important milestone in understanding the visual artist and an element that supports strong verbal
skills in students by introducing comparative language and evidenced-based support. This
program like all others at the Westport Arts Center will employ Visual Thinking Strategies
(VTS), a type of teacher originated question and answer that requires students to analyze visual
material using evidence from the image to backup their discussion.
The goals above are outlined by the organization, but Universal Design for Learning
(UDL) can ensure that these goals are supported through backward design where activities and
experiences are built second (Jones, Vermette & Jones, 2009, p. 357). With the learning target of
teaching students to use dry media and understand artistic intention, one can next look at the
understandings, skills and understandings that will give students a basis of repeatable facts about
the material, a set of actions that use knowledge in hands-on settings, and an ability judge and
validate knowledge through meaning (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, p. 36-38). For Pencil & Pastel,
this information was compiled into a Planning Pyramid that helps to collate what some, most,
and all students should know at the end of the program as illustrated in Appendix B. This tool
highlights the range of ability that will be needed to reach different students while helping to set
some smaller goals under the concept of teaching students about the media and intention. This
Planning Pyramid is then used to develop the curricular unit further.
Activities will be arranged to build on each other with simpler artistic processes
preceding more advanced processes to ensure that students have a level playing field. Projects
will become more sophisticated as the program moves along with clear recall to past activities.
7
Part III: Unit Plan
Stage I
This program is designed for arts learners ages 5-8 taking non-formal classes at a regional arts
center. The unit will be presented over 7-weeks in 1-hour workshops. Each workshop
will feature a hands-on visual arts project that explores dry media with an emphasis
on graphite, charcoal, oil pastel and chalk pastel. Students will experiment with
materials in relation to art historical examples as inspiration.
STAGE 1- STANDARDS/GOALS
Content Standard
Content Standards
8
appropriate.
Enduring Understandings
Essential Questions
Skills
The students will be able to
Create an artistic composition that uses visual relationships, the elements of art and
appropriate materials to convey a personal intention.
Draw compositions in dry media using measurements and sound visual observation
Create different types of marks in each type of media to suggest depth and texture
through blending and shading.
10
Stage 2
A Audience
Who is the relevant audience?
S Situation
The context or challenge provided
to the student.
P Product, Performance
What product/performance will the
student
create?
Other Evidence
Through what other evidence (work samples,
observations, quizzes, tests, journals or other
means) will students demonstrate achievement
of the desired results? Formative and
summative assessments used throughout the
unit to arrive at the outcomes.
As this is a non-formal class, much of the
assessment will be gathered from observation
and in-class conversation as a group and oneon-one to ensure that students are gaining
insight into the content.
11
Student Self-Assessment
How will students reflect upon or self-assess
their learning?
12
Stage 3
13
materials will be incorporated as appropriate into lessons.
When possible visual aids either through photographs or
videos of the historical artists being referenced in class
will be used to illuminate ideas.
Lesson Title
1
Week 1:
Defining
Intention
Using Chance
(W) (H) (E)
14
Lesson Activities
Students will begin this curricular unit with a
discussion of chance. Students will look at 2
to 3 works of art by Joan Miro on Google Art
Project. This tool will allow them to easily
move through the painting zooming in and
moving side to side rather than a simple
printout. Students will work together on a
shared computer or tablet to allow for
collaboration in their process.
During this exploration, the educator will
facilitate questions that will ask them to
explain what they see while drawing attention
to:
Organic and geometric shapes
Chance and the definition of chance
Intention and the definition of
intention
Surrealism as an artistic process
Resources
1) Classroom
computer/tablet with
internet connection
2) Google Art Project
3) Visual Thinking
Strategies
4) Visual aids of
common organic and
geometric shapes
used by Joan Miro.
1) Art supplies as
described in the
lesson
2) Access to tablets to
revisit the Google Art
Project as needed
15
16
Week 2:
Northern
Lights
(R) (E) (E2)
1) Art Supplies
Week 2:
Recap, Share
and Connect
(R)
6
Week 3:
Types of Line
(W) (E)
17
Week 3 :
Mark Making
Using
Graphite
(E) (E2) (O)
1) Art Supplies
Week 3:
Woven
Ribbon
Graphite
Drawing
(E) (E2)
1) Art Supplies
10
Week 4: Mark
Making with
Oil Pastels
18
introduced in the previous class
Activity time: Approximately 10 mins
Students will replicate the mark making
activity from the previous week using oil
pastels. They must create the same types of
marks, but with this material.
1) Art Supplies
2) Last weeks mark
making activity
12
13
1) Art Supplies
1) Art Supplies
19
sight measurements again drawing the object
in front of them
They will consider why they are different and
why measuring is important.
14
Week 5:
Scaling Up
(R) (E2)
1) Art Supplies
Week 6:
Working
Artists and
Calls for
Entry
(W) (H)
1) Classroom computer
2) Entrythingy with
access to previous
juried shows
16
Week 6:
Analyzing a
CFE
1) CFE
2) Chalkboard
20
list on the chalkboard of what must be
included and what cant be included.
3) Art Supplies
18
19
(E) (E2)
Week 7:
Creating
Work
Week 7:
Choosing a
Work
(E) (E2)
Week 8:
Finishing
Touches
1) Art supplies
1) Art Supplies
(E) (E2)
Week 8: Artist
Statements
(R) (E) (E2)
(O)
21
Week 8: Share Students will share their work and find out
and score
who got into the show!
(R) (E2)
21
Comments
Adaptive Dimension:
Have I made purposeful
adjustments to the
curriculum content (not
outcomes), instructional
practices, and/or the
learning environment to
meet the learning needs and
diversities of all my
students?
Instructional Approaches:
Do I use a variety of teacher
directed and student
centered instructional
approaches?
The program will use Visual Thinking Strategies to promote discussion. VTS
is teacher originated question and answer that asks students to provide
evidence and justification in explaining the things that they see. This will
encourage dialogue that allows the student to take center stage. Additionally,
all project prompts will have clear parameters, but also opportunity for student
centered exploration of the materials to make and justify choices based on
knowledge.
Students will have access to a single classroom computer and tablet to help in
creating multiple entrypoints. As this program does not take place in a
traditional school, a computer lab or larger technology center are not available.
They will have access to visual material both in books and printouts,
classroom visual aids, and additional instructional aids as needed generated by
22
the educator and distributed in class.
All artists and historical references will be explored in full detail from both a
formalist standpoint and a socio-historic understanding that helps to full
illuminate cultures and gender bias throughout art history using age
appropriate terms. Students will have the opportunity to bring their own
perspective to their artwork and should be responsive to existing artwork by
using Visual Thinking Strategies, a method that will require students to think
about their own experiences including their cultural identity to develop
connections to visual media.
23
References
24
Appendix A
Sample Learner Profile
25
Appendix B
Planning Pyramid
26
Appendix C
GRASPS Rubric for APT Exercise
27
Appendix D
Self-Assessment Family Survey
Dear Parents,
As we complete the current session at the Westport Arts Center, we are always grateful to
have your feedback on the success of your child and their experience with us. Please take a few
moments to complete the following digital survey with your child. Your feedback will be
anonymous unless you would like to give your name or require any follow up. Thank you for
joining us this session an we hope to see you soon.
Question 1: As a parent, how would you rate the quality of work produced by your child in this
program? A) Excellent B) Satisfactory C) Average D) Below Average E) Poor
Question 2: As a student, how does your child describe the class? Please supply one or two
words that came to mind for your child.
Question 3: During this class, your child was given an extended project that featured a real world
scenario. How would you as a parent rate this activity? A) I liked it and hope to see more B) I
prefer more traditional curriculum C) No opinion
Question 3: How would your child describe the same scenario? A) Enjoyed it B) Didnt enjoy it
C) Uncertain
Question 4: Any other feedback youd like to give us?