THE EFFECT OF THE SPEED TO THE POSSIBILITY

TO AVOID THE ACCIDENT

1

X
"
"'

: ,
, -
, , , .
-
.

: ,
, ,
,

Abstract: Properly defined speed limit , the correct calculation

of the speed of the participants of the accident according to the
time and distance criteria, are of high importance for the traffic
accident analysis because the expert, by comparing these
speeds, defines the fault of accident participants. Properly
defined faults of all the participants in an accident by traffic
accident expert are in most cases, the basis for the Court
decision.

KEY WORDS:

1
2

TRAFFIC ACCIDENT EXPERTISE,

EXPERT, SPEED, SPEED LIMIT, FAULTS
OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENT PARTICIPANTS

, , , duskopesic@sf.bg.ac.rs
Traffic Safety Group, d.o.o., Beograd, marko.trifunovic01@gmail.com

2011.

134

X '' ''

1.
- ,
( , ),
. , , , 2.5. ( ,
) 2.6., , .

- , ,
, - . , , , .

, -
.
2.5.
( , ). ,
( V), (V1) (Vs).
() ,
.
- , , ( 2.6 ), ,
,
/ . ,
.
- ,
,
,
.

2.
, :

2011.

X '' ''

135

, 10 km/h 120 km/h.

, '' '' .

120 km/h, 100 km/h ( - ), 80 km/h.
, 7500 kg,
, 80 km/h,
100 km/h. 80 km/h. , 7500 kg, 70 km/h,
90 km/h.
, , ,
50 km/h. 40 km/h,
30 km/h .
,

km/h , .
.
90% .
50 km/h.
, , . , , (120 km/h
100 km/h 80 km/h ).
,
.
,
.
2011.

136

X '' ''

'' 30'', ,
.
,
.

3.
, . ,
. ,
( Vo), (V1)
(Vs). , , ,
- .
,
, , , , .

, . , .
, , .
, . ,

, .
,
20 m, 60 km/h. ,
60 km/h 20 30 m, 5 % - 10 %,
30 m 60 km/h, 10 % 15 %. , .
. ,
, (
) .
. , 2011.

X '' ''

137

,
. ,
,
. .
,
,
( ) ,
. ,
.

4.
, , (), , .
- , , , , .
,

. -
-
, .
,
, , , , ,
(Srs)
:

Vu (b ts )2 + 2 b Srs b ts

(1)

, (1), ,
.
, (trs) ,
:
Vu b (trs ts )

(2)

(V), (Vb) (1)

/ (2) ( Vu),
2011.

138

X '' ''

. : '' ?'',
(
), : '' ,
,
( )?''.
. , 25 m, 1,6 s, 60 km/h, , .
, , , 25 m ( (1)) 44 km/h.
(2) , ,
, 1,6 s,
13 km/h. 30 km/h, ,
40 km/h.

,
,
, ,
(( b (trs ts ) )<( (b ts )2 + 2 b Srs b ts )).
,
,
, .

,
, .
, ,
.
, , ,
. , '' '' , .
, , ,
,
, , . ,
, ,
.

2011.

X '' ''

139

5.
, .
, :
, . (Va), ( Vo)
() (Vb), (
)
(Vb)
3
, .''

(Vub) .
( Vu)
(Vub) .

(Va), (Vb) (1)

/ (2) ( Vub (Vu), . ,
(Va), () (Vb) (Vu), . :
Va Vub ( ), , .
Vub < Va Vb ( ), () ,
.
Vub < Vb < V ( ) () ,
, , .
3

10 '' '' '''', -, '' '', je o

.
2011.

140

X '' ''

Vb Vub < Va () ( ), , ( ) , . .

6.
:

,
( ,
)

. , , . , .
2.5. ( , ). () , .
- , / , ,
. , . , , ,
, .
(Va
Vo), (Vb) ( Vub
(Vu)), .

:
[1]

, ., . , . : '' - '',
VII - , , 2009.

[2]

, ., , , , 2001.
2011.

X '' ''

141

[3]

, ., . . : ''
'', Veritas,
, 2004.

[4]

, ., . , . . : '' '', , 2009.

[5]

, ., , ., II , ,
, 2002.

[6]

, ., III , ,
, 2000.

[7]

, ., . , . ,
, VII - , ,
2009.

[8]

, ., ''
'', , . 1, 2000.

[9]

, .
, , , 2000.

[10] , ., , ,
, , 2006.
[11] ., . , . , '' '', VII - , , 2009.
[12] .
[13] ( . 41/09, 29.05.2009. ).

2011.