Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BR 1705 PDF
BR 1705 PDF
J.J. Barna
Duke Power Co.
Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.A.
BR-1705
Presented to:
ASME International Joint Power Generation Conference
July 24-25, 2000
Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Introduction
Power plant owners and operators, especially those with coalfired capacity, are facing both significant opportunities and challenges. The move to deregulate the U.S. power industry presents an opportunity for existing coal-fired power plants because of their low fuel cost, and many are forecasting near-term
growth of this type of generation. The associated open market,
however, will force all power generators to control capital expenditures, reduce operating and maintenance (O&M) costs, and
maximize overall plant efficiency to remain competitive.
At the same time, plant operators and owners are facing the
need to meet significantly tighter nitrogen oxides (NOx) regulations as a result of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of
1990. Lower NO x emissions require both increased capital and
operating costs that produce a negative impact on overall plant
efficiency.
The winners in this race are those that drive costs down by
selecting technologies that meet the emissions requirements at
minimal capital and operating costs. Most technologies apply
some type of air staging, for the reduction of NOx emissions as
required by the Title IV Phases I and II of the CAAA with reasonable operating and capital costs. The anticipated further reduction in NO x emissions levels as a result of Title I (ozone
non-attainment) requirements further increases the pressure on
the utility boiler owners and operators. Depending on where
the final regulations are set, the use of more costly technologies
such as Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) may be required.
At Duke Power Co., a building block approach has been applied to the NO x strategy. The Duke project manager for his
effort also called upon and applied his personal religious convictions and beliefs to develop the best solution at the least cost.
In anticipation of more stringent Title I regulations, Duke
Power and Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) reworked the tangentially-fired Marshall Unit 3 with a low NOx combustion system
that will maximize NOx reductions thereby minimizing the costs
of future technology for NOx control.
Project Background
The Marshall Units 3 and 4 are tangentially-fired boilers
capable of generating 4,673,000 lbs/hr of steam at a pressure of
3615 psig and a temperature of 1005 F. Pulverized eastern bituminous coal is fed through six elevations of tilting tangential
nozzles through eight corners of the combustion chamber (see
Figure 1). The unit was supplied by Combustion Engineering in
the mid 1960s and burns eastern bituminous coal tangentially.
Fuel is introduced through six elevations of CE Raymond 863RS
pulverizers with combustion air being injected, alternating, at
levels above and below each coal injection nozzle. In 1995 Combustion Engineering reduced the NOx emissions with a LNCFS
Level 1 system resulting in a reduction of emissions from a typical level of 0.6 to 0.7 lbs/106 Btu fired to 0.45 lbs/106 Btu fired.
In order to carry out the LNCFS Level 1 work, the units top
coal elevation was moved to the air compartment located between the second and third upper most elevations (see Figure 2)
and the coal piping was rerouted to maintain the original fuel
firing order. This was required to allow for the use of the upper
windbox compartments as CCOFA (Close Coupled Overfire Air)
ports. Duke Power believed it could meet the early election
(grandfathered) Title IV limit of 0.45 lbs/106 Btu fired with this
work. It was also the first in a building block approach that could
later accept SOFA. Although it met its goal for Title IV regulations, one or two levels of SOFA did not provide flexibility for
maximum reductions in NOx emissions through combustion
controls. Specifically, concerns with additional air staging for
the system as it existed were:
Limited residence time
Increased combustible losses (unburned carbon and CO)
Increased burner zone heat release rates due to the clustering of the coal injection elevations resulting in higher
NO x levels and possible increases in corrosion.
Duke felt that reducing the heat released in the combustion zone and eliminating the clustering, relocating one of
the coal elevations below the main windbox, would result in
additional decrease in NO x emissions. To establish the effects of such a relocation, a study was undertaken by Duke
and B&W. The objectives of the study were twofold: (1)
evaluate the NO x reductions of LOFIR (LOwer Fire Incremental Respacing), SOFA and combinations of both, and (2)
evaluate their effect on boiler performance.
The primary method of evaluation was computational flow
modeling using B&Ws proprietary combustion modeling
code called COMO TM . COMO is a multi-dimensional, steady
state, turbulent fluid flow program with coupled heat transfer and combustion modules. The flow modules use a finite
difference formulation to solve the governing equations of
continuity, momentum, and energy. The heat transfer and
combustion modules use a continuous gas phase and a dispersed particle phase described in an Eulerian reference
frame.
The numerical model includes a NO x post-processor for
theoretical NO x predictions. This model is referred to as a
global model because it performs well when predicting global changes in the furnace such as staged combustion or the
addition of air ports. The numerical NO x model is used only
to evaluate the change from one OFA arrangement to another
and is not used for guarantees.
The numerical predictions are based on a finite volume
computational fluid dynamics code. The model accounts for
various inlets by establishing boundary conditions that represent the chemistry and physical flow phenomena calculated from performance predictions.
Convection pass banks are represented with a distributed
resistance model for the flow solution and heat transfer
boundaries to represent their thermal characteristics.
Inlets are represented with three dimensional vector components to maintain the mass, momentum, and aerodynamic
characteristics of the burning equipment. Inlet chemistry is
defined to represent the design fuel and air quantities.
Alternate arrangements are evaluated based on mixing
uniformity, port penetration, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides predictions. In general, arrangements with improved mixing effectiveness that do not increase NO x generation are considered superior. Other considerations are the
distribution of flue gas entering the convection pass, space
restrictions around the boiler setting, and furnace functional
limitations.
The numerical NO x predictions are based on user-specified reaction rates. For coal-fired applications the recommended mechanisms are fuel NO x projections and reduction,
thermal NO x projections, and reburn NO x reduction.
Modeling Results
The study evaluated a total of six options in addition to the
current design. The options consisted of the addition of OFA, the
unclustering of the coal elevations and a combination of the two.
Option 1: This involved the relocation of the upper-most elevation of coal nozzles to a level just above the boiler ash hopper
bottom. Moving the elevation to the lower elevation allows for
additional closed coupled OFA and decreases the burner zone heat
release rates. Both of these actions should allow for a reduction in
NOx emissions.
Figure 3 Graphical illustration of different fuel firing and OFA options tested with CFA modeling
Existing Firing
Pattern (Base)
Rear Wall
Option 1
Option 2
Option 3
Front Wall
2 ft Above Existing
Burner Windbox
CO
% vol.
Option 4
Option 5
Option 6
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0.5
0.1
0
and compares it to that achieved prior to the low NO x conversion. The reduction in NOx emissions was consistent throughout the boilers load range representing a reduction of 50 to
60% from baseline.
Further analysis of the results indicates that the LOFIR contributed approximately up to one third (~ 20 to 35%) of the total reduction in NOx emissions while the OFA ports contributed
the rest. The LOFIR contribution in reducing the NO x emissions is further attributed to a reduction in burner zone heat
release rates and increased combustion zone residence times.
The reductions in burner zone heat release rates were achieved
due to the de-clustering of the coal elevations resulting in
lower thermal zone production. Increased residence times allow for fuel NOx reducing reactions to take place.
An interesting operational point is that closing the CCOFA
on most of the Duke units can achieve a NOx rate near that
present prior to the Title IV implementation dates (i.e., units
not controlled for NO x). They range from 0.55 to 0.7 lbs/106
Btu for the tangential units. When closing all of the SOFA and
CCOFA at Marshall Unit 3, the NOx does not go above 0.4 lbs/
106 Btu as compared to 0.65 lbs/10 6 Btu prior to the original
Title IV project.
Conclusions
CFD modeling was used to provide the initial confirmation
that the addition of LOFIR and OFA will provide reduction in
Project Results
0.60
NOx Emissions, lbs/MBtu
Pre-Modification
Low NOx Conversion
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
200
400
600
800
NOx Emissions, lbs/MBtu
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Dave Styer, Steve Knach, and
Eddie Harwell of Duke Power and the Marshall Unit 3 operators for all their help during this conversion. The authors also
wish to thank Bruce McMahon, and Mel Albrecht of B&W for
their technical contributions in this project. Finally, J.J. Barna
would like to give glory to ElohimSupreme God and Creator
as the source of his success in this project.
References
1. Kitto, J. B. et.al., Low cost integrated NOx solutions Evaluating unit economics, presented at the EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined
Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium 1999, Atlanta, GA, August 1999.
2. Kokkinos, A. et. al., B&Ws low NOx burner operating experience, presented at the EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air
Pollutant Control Symposium 1999, Atlanta, GA, August 1999.