Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fatigue PDF
Fatigue PDF
S-N Curve (alternating stress amplitude (Sa) versus number of cycles (Nf)
to failure)
800
Sa = a
(MPa)
600
e= Se endurance limit
400
103
104
105
106
107
108
Nf , cycles to failure
Some materials, such as steel, show an endurance limit stress
below which the fatigue life is essentially infinite. Other materials
may not show such behavior but an effective endurance limit may
be specified at some large number of cycles
stress
a
a
time
max
min
= max min
max min
=
2
2
+ min
m = max
2
a =
stress range
alternating stress
mean stress
max
min
max
A= a
m
R=
stress ratio
amplitude ratio
min
fully reversed
R = 1 A =
zero to max
R=0
A =1
zero to min
R=
A = 1
100
100
200
m = 400 MPa
106
Nf
107
u
-100
200
400
600
ultimate stress
a m
+
=1
e y
a m
+
=1
e u
a
e
+ m =1
u
a m
+
=1
e f
yield stress
ultimate stress
f
e
e
c
a
true fracture
stress
effective
alternating
stress at failure
for a lifetime of
Nf cycles
General observations
1. Most actual test data tend to fall between the Goodman and Gerber
curves.
2. For most fatigue situations R<1 ( i.e. small mean stress in relation
to alternating stress), there is little difference in the theories
3. In the range where the theories show large differences (i.e. R
values approaching 1) there is little experimental data. In this case
the yield stress may set the design limits.
4. The Soderberg line is very conservative and seldom used
"unsafe"
"infinite" life curve
"safe"
Use of empirical curves and S-N data for an finite life design
1. A given combination of mean and alternating stresses is taken
to lie on a constant life curve such as the Goodman line:
e
a
a m
+
=1
e u
solve for
a
e
Nf
cycles to failure
C.C. Osgood
R.C. Juvinall
A.F. Madayag