This document provides an overview of the 2006 Tertiary Entrance Examination for Political and Legal Studies in Australia. The exam consisted of two parts: Part A included short answer questions testing students' knowledge of concepts like the constitution, parliamentary committees, and the roles of courts and ministers. Part B required students to write two essays on topics such as the lawmaking roles of parliament and courts, reforms to the federal parliamentary system, and debates around implementing a bill of rights in Australia. The document provides a brief outline of the questions asked in each part and the average marks students received for answering each question.
This document provides an overview of the 2006 Tertiary Entrance Examination for Political and Legal Studies in Australia. The exam consisted of two parts: Part A included short answer questions testing students' knowledge of concepts like the constitution, parliamentary committees, and the roles of courts and ministers. Part B required students to write two essays on topics such as the lawmaking roles of parliament and courts, reforms to the federal parliamentary system, and debates around implementing a bill of rights in Australia. The document provides a brief outline of the questions asked in each part and the average marks students received for answering each question.
This document provides an overview of the 2006 Tertiary Entrance Examination for Political and Legal Studies in Australia. The exam consisted of two parts: Part A included short answer questions testing students' knowledge of concepts like the constitution, parliamentary committees, and the roles of courts and ministers. Part B required students to write two essays on topics such as the lawmaking roles of parliament and courts, reforms to the federal parliamentary system, and debates around implementing a bill of rights in Australia. The document provides a brief outline of the questions asked in each part and the average marks students received for answering each question.
Examiners Report on 2006 Tertiary Entrance Examination Political and Legal Studies 1
2006 TERTIARY ENTRANCE EXAMINATION
SUBJECT: POLITICAL AND LEGAL STUDIES PART A: Short Answers (attempt 5 questions. Each 10 marks) Question 1 (Mean 6.46) (a) What is a constitution? (b) Distinguish between exclusive, concurrent and residual powers of the Australian Constitution. (c) Discuss how two High Court judgements have contributed to changing the balance of power between the Federal and State Parliaments. Question 2. (Mean 5.08) (a)What is co-operative federalism? (b) Indicate which political leaders attend the Council of Australian Governments (COAG). What is the main role of COAG? (c) Discuss one main positive and one main negative characteristic of Australias federal system. Question 3. (Mean 5.86) (a) What is a parliamentary conscience vote? (b) Describe three main roles of Parliamentary Committees. (c) To what extent is it valid to describe the Cabinet as the engine room of government? Question 4. (Mean 5.78) (a) What is meant by the term stare decisis? (b) Briefly describe three techniques that can be used by a court in order to avoid following a precedent. (c) Describe and evaluate the literal rule of statutory interpretation as a tool for determining the meaning of an Act. Question 5. (Mean 5.14) (a) In a dictionary of Political and Legal Studies terms, what might be the definition of the public service? (b) Distinguish between individual ministerial responsibility and collective ministerial responsibility. (c) Explain why it is sometimes claimed that Ministers shield themselves behind their departments and or statutory authorities. Question 6. (Mean 5.43) (a) What is meant by the phrase standard of proof? (b) Distinguish between interrogatories and discovery in the civil pre-trial process. (c) Identify and evaluate one recently proposed reform of the criminal trial process.
Question 7. (Mean 5.25)
(a) What is meant by the term remand? (b) Briefly explain how economic factors can result in barriers to citizens participating equally in the legal system. (c) With reference to one particular group within Australian society, discuss at least one advance in gaining access and equity in the legal system and one setback. Part B: Essays (Write two essays from this section. Each worth 25 marks) Question 8 (Mean 12.17) In the Australian legal system, parliament is the primary law maker but the courts also have a lawmaking role. Discuss the validity of this claim. Question 9. (Mean 13.29) Broadly outline the main roles of the Federal Parliament. Assess whether reform of the Federal Parliament and/or its electoral system would enable at least one of these roles to be better fulfilled. Question 10. (Mean 10.32) In the light of decreasing political party membership and increasing pressure group politics in contemporary Australia, discuss the effectiveness of strategies which political parties and pressure groups have employed to achieve their aims. Question 11. (Mean 13.92) It is claimed that, after ten years as Prime Minister, John Howard has demonstrated an understanding of the powers and limitation of the office of Prime Minister. Question 12. (Mean 13.67) In recent times some Australians have argued for a Bill of Rights. I believe this would be a big mistake (Prime Minister, John Howard, 25 January 2006). Assess whether the protection of human rights in Australia could be strengthened by either a legislative or constitutional Bill of Rights.