Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Report Final (Rashmi) 1.Pdf1112
Project Report Final (Rashmi) 1.Pdf1112
COMPANY PROFILE
1.1) VISION
Wockhardt Hospitals will strive with excellence to fulfill the needs of the
community in its field of medical treatment
1.2) MISSION
To serve and enrich the quality of life of patient suffering from diseases,
Through the efficient deployment of technology and human expertise , in a caring and
nurturing environment with the greatest respect for human dignity and life.
1.3) WOCKHARDT LTD
Wockhardt Ltd, Indias leading transnational Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Company
set up its first hospital in 1989. Since then the Wockhardt hospital and Heart Institute has
become a renowned tertiary level health center providing cardiac care to patients of all
age groups including new born. The hospital gives structure to a 30 year tradition of
integrate and innovative care.
A long standing reputation for cardiovascular excellence along with premier
diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities enable Wockhardt to treat the most complex and
high risk cardiac patients, a factor which has resulted in the institute being recognized
amongst the best heart hospitals in India and a treatment destination for cardiac patients
from neighboring countries.
1.4) HISTORY
Wockhardt is global, pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Company that has grown by
leveraging two powerful trends impacting the world of medicine globalization and
biotechnology.
The company has a market capitalization of over US $ 1 billion and an annual
turnover of US$ 650 million. Wockhardt pace of growth and momentum permeates
every mindset, system and technology within the organization.
Wockhardt today, is distinguished by a strong and growing presence in the
worlds leading markets, with more than 65% of its revenue coming from Europe and the
United States. Wockhardt market presence covers formulations, biopharmaceuticals,
nutrition products, vaccines and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
The company has its headquarters in India, and has 14 manufacturing plants in
India, UK, Ireland, France and US Subsidiaries in US, UK, Ireland and France Marketing
offices in Africa, Russia, Central and South East Asia.
Wockhardt has a strong track record in acquisition management, with five
successful acquisitions in the European market. These acquisitions have strengthened
Wockhardt position in the high-potential markets of Europe, and have expanded the
global reach of the organization.
A key growth driver at Wockhardt is its state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary
research capability backed by a team of 500 skilled scientists. Consistent efforts have
resulted in six breakthrough biotechnology products, 750+ patent filings and a pipeline of
promising new molecules
Wockhardt strategies are aligned towards being a significant player in the
emerging global biopharmaceuticals market. In order to achieve this goal, the company
has set up the Wockhardt Biotech Park, Indias largest biopharmaceuticals complex, with
six dedicated plants built to international standards.
Wockhardt Hospital group for devising and executing programs to improve patient
centered quality care, particularly in the areas of :
Facility development
Leadership development
Nursing excellence
Quality management
Operation Theater
CHAPTER 2
positive attitude in the employees. The resource use up in human resource training is an
investment in human assets & the skills acquired in the process is an advantage for both
the enterprise & the employees.
Training is different than education & development. Training is not broad like education
& does not carry an emphasis on individual growth. The term education is wider in scope
& more general, while training is work oriented & is aim imparting specific skills for
doing a particular job. Development, in contrast is considered to be more general than
training & more oriented to individual needs & it is most often aimed toward
management people.
2.2) DEFINITIONS
Training is defined as the systematic development of the knowledge, skills & attitude
required by an individual to perform a given task or job successfully.
Some management thinkers specifically define training as below:
1.
The term training is used to indicate only the process by which the aptitudes,
Training is the act of the increasing the knowledge & skills of an employee for
& adequate learning situation is able to shorter learning period & encourages higher
productivity from new employee.
2.
accidents.
4.
organization. He is introduce to his colleagues, to new set up etc. & is familiarized with
rules & regulations & other particulars. Induction training helps personal adjustments for
new employee to the new setting & to build up cordiality in the group.
2.
Job training: This is carried out to increase the knowledge & skills of doing the
job with which the employee is related. This also helps in acquainting the employee with
specific procedures, sequences etc. That are followed in the organization.
3.
Refresher Training: This training helps the worker to keep abreast with the latest
that is happening in the field which adds to their self confidence, efficiency & removes
obsolescence
1. Role Playing
2. Mentoring / Coaching
3. Vestibule Training
3. Business Games
4. Sensitivity Training
5. Apprenticeship training
5. Conference method
6. Job Rotation
6. Programme instructions
7. Demonstration / Simulation
7. Case Studies
Higher performance: Training helps to improve the quantity & quality of work
output, increase knowledge, skills, & productivity of both employees & an organization
as a whole.
Lesser learning period: It helps to reduce the learning time & cost required
reaching the acceptable level of performance. The employees need not waste time in
learning through trial or error or by observing others.
the work can be standardized & taught to all employees, which helps to improve the
quality of performance.
& economical use of materials & equipment, thus wastage will be low. Also, the rate of
industrial accidents & damages to machinery & equipment will be minimum. This in turn
will lead to low cost of production per unit.
6
Less supervision: It reduces the need for detailed & constant supervision of
workers by making them self-reliant in their work as they know what to do & how to do
it.
developing in them positive attitude, making them more cooperative & loyal to the
organization. It enables them to utilize & develop their full potential. With improvement
in industrial discipline & relations, rates of absenteeism & labour turnover are reduced.
2.8) TRAINING PROCESS
Training process consists of six steps:
1.
The first step in training process in an organization is the assessment of its objectives &
strategies. What business are we in? At what level of Quality do we wish to provide this
product or service? Where we want to be in the future? It is only after answering these &
other related questions that the organization must assess the strengths & weaknesses of its
human resources.
7
2.
Once training needs are assessed, training & development goals must be established.
Without clearly-set goals, it is not possible to design a training & development program
&, after it has been implemented, there will be no way of measuring its effectiveness.
Goals must be tangible, verifiable, & measurable. This is easy where skills training
involved.
4.
Every training & development programme must address certain vital issues:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Evaluation of Result:
Since huge sums of money are spend on training & development, has been useful must be
judge/ determined. Evaluation helps determine the results of the training & development
programme.
Reaction of student - what they thought and felt about the training
Behaviour
extent
of
behaviour
and
capability
improvement
and
implementation/application
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's
performance
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in
organizations, although their application broadly increases in complexity, and usually
cost, through the levels from level 1-4.
evaluation
evaluation
and
practicability
measured)
Reaction
'Happy
Reaction
evaluation is how
delegates
training
learning
experience.
Learning
Learning
the
surveys
or or to analyze.
questionnaires.
evaluation is Typically
measurement
the increase
clear-cut
for
quantifiable skills.
after.
Behaviour
extent
and Measurement
to
of
change
assess typically
requires
and line-managers.
sustainability of change.
Results
Results
via
and reporting
normal unlike
systems organization.
-
the
challenge is to relate to
the trainee.
10
whole
Process
must
attribute
clear accountabilities.
CHAPTER 3
The Training & Development plan shall be linked with the performance year.
Training programmes shall be classified broadly into four main categories viz.
11
The training need identification shall be done at the end of the performance year
immediately after the performance review is over, also occur when job responsibilities
changes / new equipment is introduced.
The training needs shall be identified through three main sources viz. Business
departments e.g. if the business suffered due to lack of leadership or could not steer out
effectively from some crisis then leadership skills and crisis management will be the
required training inputs.
most employees from a particular function e.g. if there are customer complaints on
quality of service from a particular department then customer management skills will be
the required training input.
individual employee.
e. g. if an employee could not achieve his/her goals due to lack of assertiveness then
assertiveness skill will be the required training input.
Individual training needs can also be identified through succession planning e.g. if
Once the training needs are identified a training calendar shall be prepared by the
HR Executive shall get the approval from Hospital Head and Corporate HR Head
12
WOCKHARDT
HOSPITALS
LTD.,
NASHIK
ARE
AS
FOLLOWS
General Induction
Departmental Induction
Fire Safety
Personal Hygiene
Employee Rights
Code Blue
Patient Rights
13
3.8)
Ventilator
Material Management
Hand Hygiene
Cath
Hepatitis-B
Cardiac Support
Brady Arthymmias
Procedure
Management In Tachycardia
Transfer Procedure
Catheter Care
ABG
Management In Bradycardia
Quality Assurance
Medication Error
Lab
Procedures
&
Radiation Safety
Admission
&
Discharge
14
CHAPTER 4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4.1) DEFINITIONS
4.1.1) RESEARCH
Research is a careful enquiry of examination in seeking facts or principles, a diligent
investigation to ascertain something.
enquiry.
knowledge.
The scope/range of this project report is not too far stretching to the whole of
Wockhardt Hospital, Nashik rather it only covers the training and development activities
conducted By Hospital for its employees.
My project mainly deals with the present method of training given at Wockhardt
This project covers the study of concepts like training, training programmed, and
training evaluation and excludes all other human resource activities conducted before and
after training.
16
I tried to perform this project in best possible manner to avoid any lacuna.
In spite of all
my efforts in this regard but due to the far stretching activities conducted at Wockhardt
Hospitals, Nashik, my project lack in some of the following heads.
Where there is a chance of further elaborating study on the same subject.
Top-level strategic type of decisions and information too are not taken under
My project does not concerned about the designing and planning of training
activities which forms a crucial and major part of this field hence a full fledge study can
be done in this area.
Due to Time Constraints, I was not able to touch all aspects of training and
development.
Due to security reasons, I could not attend the training conducted which would
Sample Size: Total number of employees: 24(out of 20, 3 employees from each of the 8
selected training programmes that is 8x3=24)
17
Questionnaire
Interview and Discussion with employees
Observation
Reference Books
Internet
HR documents at Hospital like Competency Assessment Sheets, Training Cards,
Training Feedback Forms, Performance Review, Job Descriptions & Specifications, etc.
18
CHAPTER 5
DATA ANALYSIS
Primary data was collected by feedback form and evaluation form that was circulated
through the sample of 24 employees and their respective heads respectively on a random
basis. Several parameters are taken into consideration while studying the effectiveness of
training and development. The tabulation, calculation and graphical representation of
these parameters which helped to analyze and comment on the survey are given below:
In this project 8 types of training programmes are considered for evaluation out of 12
major trainings. The evaluation is conducted with the help of kirkpatriks model. In this
model 4 levels are divided into 2 groups that is Reaction & Learning and Behaviour &
Result. The over all effectiveness of both the groups is evaluated on the basis of 8 types
of training programmes separately and finally combined effectiveness of both the groups
is evaluated.
Rating scale used for questions is as follows:
Table No: 3 Rating scale used for feedback form
RATING
POINTS
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
POINTS
Almost/probably
Somewhat/not sure
Not at all
1
19
TOTAL
%AGE
12
100
11
91.67
Adherence to Schedule
11
91.67
Presentation quality
11
91.67
11
91.67
11
91.67
75
10
83.33
75
95
87.96
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, ratings for Physical comfort at the
venue was found 100% and that of Relevance of contents for on the job
performance & Overall quality of programme was 75% which had lesser ratings.
TOTAL
%AGE
75
10
83.33
Adherence to Schedule
75
Presentation quality
75
75
10
83.33
75
75
75
83
76.85
SUMMATION
20
TOTAL
%AGE
12
100
12
100
Adherence to Schedule
12
100
Presentation quality
12
100
12
100
12
100
12
100
12
100
12
100
108
100
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, ratings for all the parameters was found
100%.
1
0
2
0
3
1
4
2
TOTAL
11
%AGE
91.67
11
91.67
Adherence to Schedule
11
91.67
Presentation quality
11
91.67
11
91.67
11
91.67
11
91.67
11
91.67
11
91.67
99
91.67
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, ratings for all the parameters was found
91.678%.
21
TOTAL
%AGE
75
10
83.33
Adherence to Schedule
10
83.33
Presentation quality
10
83.33
75
10
83.33
10
83.33
75
10
83.33
87
80.55
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, ratings for almost parameters was found
83.33% .
TOTAL
%AGE
83.333
91.67
Adherence to Schedule
91.67
Presentation quality
91.67
91.67
91.67
91.67
91.67
91.67
27
90.74
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average ratings for all parameters was
found 90.74%.
22
TOTAL
%AGE
100
91.67
Adherence to Schedule
91.67
Presentation quality
91.67
91.67
91.67
75
83.33
75
27
87.96
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, ratings for Physical comfort at the
venue was found 100% and that of Relevance of contents for on the job
performance & Overall quality of programme was 75% which had lesser ratings.
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
3
TOTAL
3
%AGE
100
91.67
Adherence to Schedule
91.67
Presentation quality
91.67
91.67
91.67
75
83.33
75
27
87.96
SUMMATION
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, ratings for Physical comfort at the
venue was found 100% and that of Relevance of contents for on the job
performance & Overall quality of programme was 75% which had lesser ratings.
23
BIOMEDICA
INFECTION
UTI
OF
CATHETA
PATIENT'
CONTROL
BUNDL
HEART
CRITICAL
PRACTICES
CARE
RIGHTS
CARE
BLS
100
75
100
91.67
75
83.33
100
100
91.67
83.33
100
91.67
83.33
91.67
91.67
91.67
Schedule
91.67
75
100
91.67
83.33
91.67
91.67
91.67
Presentation quality
91.67
75
100
91.67
83.33
91.67
91.67
91.67
91.67
75
100
91.67
75
91.67
91.67
91.67
91.67
83.33
100
91.67
83.33
91.67
91.67
91.67
75
75
100
91.67
83.33
91.67
75
75
83.33
75
100
91.67
75
91.67
83.33
83.33
programme
75
75
100
91.67
83.33
91.67
75
75
AVERAGE
87.96
76.85
100
91.67
80.55
90.74
87.96
87.96
Parameter
L
EQUIPMENT
Physical comfort at
the venue
Explanation on the
Schedule of
the Training
Programme
Adherence to
Level of interaction
with faculty
Quality of
presentation content
Relevance of
contents for
on the job
performance
Quality of study
material / handouts
Overall quality of
24
BIOMEDICAL
EQUIPMENTS
BLS
CRITICAL
CARE
PATIENTS'
RIGHTS
Presentation quality
CATHETAR
CARE
PHISIOLOGY
OF HEARTS
Adherence to Schedule
UTI BUNDLE
Explanation on the Schedule of
the Training Programme
INFECTION
CONTROLPRACTICES
20
40
60
80
100 120
25
Parameter
AVERAGE
90.625
90.477
Adherence to Schedule
89.585
Presentation quality
89.585
88.543
90.626
83.333
85.416
83.333
Adherence to Schedule
Presentation quality
86
80
26
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new level
of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer his/her
learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the trainee
being able to perform his/her duty in the
organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of work
he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
3 2
TOTAL %AGE
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
50
41.67
41.67
7
average
58.33
54.165
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 54.165%
27
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new level
of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer his/her
learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the trainee
being able to perform his/her duty in the
organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of work
he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4
3
TOTAL %AGE
10
83.33
12
100
75
75
12
100
11
91.67
75
12
100
75
9
average
75
88.33
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 88.33%
28
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new level
of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer
his/her learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the
trainee being able to perform his/her duty
in the organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of
work he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4 3
TOTAL
%AGE
75
12
100
75
75
12
100
12
100
10
83.33
12
100
11
91.67
9
75
AVERAGE 87.5
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 87.5%
29
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new
level of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer
his/her learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the
trainee being able to perform his/her duty
in the organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of
work he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4
3
TOTAL
%AGE
10
83.33
12
100
75
75
12
100
10
83.33
11
91.67
12
100
12
100
9
average
75
88.33
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 88.33%
30
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new
level of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer
his/her learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the
trainee being able to perform his/her duty
in the organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of
work he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4
3
TOTAL
%AGE
75
66.67
50
66.67
66.67
10
83.33
75
10
83.33
75
8
66.67
AVERAGE 70.83
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 70.83%
31
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new level
of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer his/her
learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the trainee
being able to perform his/her duty in the
organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of work
he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4 3
TOTAL
%AGE
10
83.33
75
58.33
75
75
11
91.67
10
83.33
10
83.33
10
83.33
9
75
AVERAGE 78.33
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 78.33%
32
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new level
of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer his/her
learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the trainee
being able to perform his/her duty in the
organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of work
he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4 3
TOTAL
%AGE
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
50
41.67
41.67
7
58.33
AVERAGE 54.165
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 54.165%
33
Parameter
Did the trainee put his/her learning into
effect when back on the job?
Were the relevant skills and knowledge
used?
Was there noticeable and measurable
change in the activity and performance of
the trainee when back in his/her roles?
Was the change in behaviour and new level
of knowledge sustained?
Would the trainee be able to transfer his/her
learning to another person?
Is the trainee aware of his/her change in
behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
After undergoing this training, is the trainee
being able to perform his/her duty in the
organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions
towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Is there any improvement in quality of work
he/she performs?
Has the training programme benefitted the
organization
Rating
4 3
TOTAL
%AGE
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
50
41.67
41.67
7
58.33
AVERAGE 54.165
INTERPRETATION: As per the above table, average percentage for all parameters was
found 54.165%
34
BIOMEDIC
OGY
CATHE
AL
CONTROL
UTI
OF
TAR
PATIENTS'
CRITICAL
PRACTICES
BUNDLE
HEARTS
CARE
RIGHTS
CARE
BLS
TS
58.33
83.33
75
83.33
75
83.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
100
100
100
66.67
75
58.33
58.33
58.33
75
75
75
50
58.33
58.33
58.33
58.33
75
75
75
66.67
75
58.33
58.33
58.33
100
100
100
66.67
75
58.33
58.33
58.33
91.67
100
83.33
83.33
91.67
58.33
58.33
50
75
83.33
91.67
75
83.33
50
50
41.67
100
100
100
83.33
83.33
41.67
41.67
41.67
75
91.67
100
75
83.33
41.67
41.67
organization?
58.33
75
75
75
66.67
75
58.33
58.33
AVERAGE
54.17
85
87.5
88.33
70.83
78.33
54.17
54.17
Parameter
EQUIPMEN
the
change
in
change
behaviour,
in
knowledge,
skill level?
After
undergoing
training,
trainee
is
being
this
the
able
to
the
training,
his/her
has
contributions
the
organization
increased?
Is there any improvement
in quality of work he/she
performs?
Has
the
training
35
AVERAGE
Has the training programme
benefitted the
BIOMEDICAL
EQUIPMENTS
BLS
CRITICAL
CARE
PATIENTS'
RIGHTS
CATHETAR
CARE
PHISIOLOGY
OF HEARTS
UTI
BUNDLE
INFECTION CONTROL
PRACTICES
20
40
60
80
100 120
36
PARAMETER
AVERAGE
Did the trainee put his/her learning into effect when back on the job?
71.87
77.08
Was there noticeable and measurable change in the activity and performance of the
trainee when back in his/her roles?
63.54
67.71
77.08
78.12
After undergoing this training, is the trainee being able to perform his/her duty in the
69.79
organization?
After the training, has his/her contributions towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
73.96
68.75
67.71
AVERAGE
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
AVERAGE
37
%AGE
TRAININGS
REACTION
OF %
AGE
OF %AGE
OF
& BEHAVIOUR
EFFECTIVEN
LEARNING
& RESULTS
ESS
87.96
54.165
71.06
76.85
85
80.93
100
87.5
93.75
CATHETAR CARE
91.67
88.33
90
PATIENTS' RIGHTS
80.55
70.83
75.69
CRITICAL CARE
90.74
78.33
84.54
BLS
87.96
54.165
71.06
87.96
54.165
71.06
87.96
71.56
79.76
INFECTION
CONTROLPRACTI
CES
UTI BUNDLE
PHISIOLOGY
OF
HEARTS
BIOMEDICAL
EQUIPMENTS
AVERAGE
38
%AGE OF EFFECTIVENESS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
%AGE OF EFFECTIVENESS
39
CHAPTER-6
FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS
The training provided on Physiology Of Hearts was more effective than any
After training trainees are not in condition to fill the feedback forms.
Trainees are not interested to attend the programme because the trainings are
40
CHAPTER-7
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusion:
While preparing this project report, I learnt and also got a practical exposure to many
concepts of TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT like Training Needs Analysis, Designing
a Training Programme, Training Evaluation, etc.
I have done this project with reference to Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd., Nashik & found
many facts while working on this project which has added valuable experience in my life.
Perceptions of the status of training & development system & the effectiveness of
training & development system had an impact on how valuable respondents perceived
training & development.
Employee groups in this sample differed in their perceptions of the status &
effectiveness of training & development system & value of training & development
within the organization.
Respondents to this survey believe that training & development system enjoyed a
very high status within the organization & was effective in helping them on the job.
41
Recommendations:
on rotation basis, as it improves the quality of work & indirectly helps them in achieving
their goals.
More training programmes should be arranged for middle & top level employees
training) like role playing, job rotation, conference, vestibule & so on.
42
ANNEXURE 1
TRAINING FEEDBACK FORM
(Please fill this form and hand it over to Faculty immediately after Training
Programme)
Name :
Date:
Department:
Title of Programme:
Sr. no.
Parameter
Remarks
1
Adherence to Schedule
Presentation quality
43
Rating
3
ANNEXURE-2
TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION FORM
(To be filled by the HODs)
To help us improve the quality of our training, we would appreciate your feedback!
Date: ___________
Course Title:
Name (Optional) :
Trainer: __________________________
Please TICK the response option that best reflects your evaluation of the training
provided:
Behaviour evaluation:
1.Has the trainee put his/her learning into effect when back on the job?
Yes, very much
Almost
Somewhat
ineffective
2.Has the relevant skills and knowledge been used?
Definitely
Probably
Not really
3.Is there any noticeable and measurable change in the activity and performance of the
trainee when back in his/her roles?
Yes, very much
Almost
Somewhat
ineffective
4.Has the change in behaviour and new level of knowledge been sustained?
Yes, very much
Almost
Somewhat
ineffective
44
Probably
Not sure
6.Is the trainee aware of his/her change in behaviour, knowledge, skill level?
Yes, very much
Almost
Somewhat
Not at all
Results evaluation:
1.After undergoing this training, is the trainee able to perform his/her duty in the
organization?
Yes, very much
Almost
Somewhat
ineffective
2.After the training, has his/her contributions towards achieving the goal of the
organization increased?
Yes, absolutely
He/She has made significant contribution
His/Her contributions have remained the same
3.What is the extent of advancement or change in the trainee after the training, in the
direction or area that was intended?
Almost
Somewhat
ineffective
45
5.Has the training programme benefitted the organization by achieving Greater job
satisfaction / Reduction in labour turnover / Reducing wastages of resources / Improved
quality of work life / Improved human relations / Increased profits / Fewer grievances /
Lower absenteeism / Higher employee morale / Fewer accidents ?
Yes, very much
Almost
Somewhat
ineffective
Explain:
7.Additional Comments:
HOD's Signature
46
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS REFERRED:
RELATIONS
Sanjay
Kavishwar
&
Vilas
Chopde
PRINCIPLES
OF
BUSINESS
MANAGEMENT.
WEBSITE VISITED:
http://www.wockhardthospitals.com/nashik-superspeciality-hospital
http://www.businessballs.com/kirkpatricklearningevaluationmodel.htm
www.citehr.com/research.php?q=krick-patrick-model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Training_and_development
http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&gbv=2&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=3547l16438l0l19172
l18l18l7l0l0l1l296l2343l0.2.8l10l0&q=training%20and%20development%20project&ct
=broad-revision&cd=4&ie=UTF-8&sa=X
47