Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
The role of an ethanol environment on the tribological behavior of non-hydrogenated DLC (NH-DLC) coatings sliding against Ti6Al4V was investigated. Pin-on-disk tests were performed under different test atmospheres consisting of dry argon (0% RH) and ambient air (40% RH) and also while the samples were
submerged in water (H2O) and ethanol (C2H5OH). The running-in friction of the NH-DLC coatings under
each condition was studied and the results were used to rationalize the drilling behavior of Ti6Al4V
by NH-DLC coated tools. The highest running-in coefcient of friction (R = 0.55) was observed under a
dry argon atmosphere. In ambient air, the R was 0.42, while a reduction in R to 0.21 was recorded
when the tests were carried out in H2O. The observed reductions in R were attributed to OH passivation
of the NH-DLC surfaces. Ethanol was effective in providing OH passivation, as evident from the lowest R
of 0.15. Consistent with the friction measurements, a 45% reduction in drilling torque was obtained
when 10% ethanol was blended with the metal removal uid (MRF) consisting of wateroil (1:3) mixture
compared to an ethanol free MRF.
2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
1. Introduction
Diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings have consistently displayed
low coefcient of friction, COF or , values when tested against technologically signicant lightweight aluminum, magnesium and titanium alloys. Several studies that used counterfaces coated with DLC have
shown that DLC coatings minimized the adhesion and restricted material transfer from the surfaces of these alloys. The DLC coatings provide
signicant opportunities for expanding the applications of lightweight
materials by improving their performance in components operating
under sliding contact conditions (e.g. powertrain elements in combustion engines). The use of DLC coated tools and dies was reported to improve the surface quality of aluminum and magnesium sheets or
castings during machining and shaping operations [18]. A shortcoming
of DLC coatings is the fact that their tribological properties are highly
sensitive to the environmental conditions as their friction, wear, adhesion behavior may change drastically with small changes in the composition of the gas or liquid atmospheres present in the tribosystem. The
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 519 253 3000x2602; fax: +1 519 973 7085.
E-mail address: aalpas@uwindsor.ca (A.T. Alpas).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.06.066
0257-8972/ 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
friction behavior of the hydrogenated (a-C:H or H-DLC) and nonhydrogenated DLC (a-C or NH-DLC) coatings was found to exhibit almost opposite trends under vacuum and inert (i.e. N2 or Ar) atmospheres. Among the studies conducted on ferrous materials, Erdemir
[9] showed that H-DLC coatings tested in dry N2 atmosphere against
H-DLC coated H13 grade steel disks generated a coefcient of friction
(COF), of 0.005, while the NH-DLC produced a of 0.75. The very
low value in the case of H-DLC was attributed to the passivation of
-carbon bonds at the contact surface by the hydrogen atoms. For aluminum alloys, Konca et al. [10] reported a high of 0.52 for NH-DLC
against an Al-6.5% Si alloy, under vacuum (6.65 104 Pa). The same
NH-DLC when tested in an ambient atmosphere (47% RH) produced a
low of 0.16. The of NH-DLC tested against Al alloys was shown to decrease with increasing the moisture in the surrounding environment [5,
13]. The decrease in of the NH-DLC coating in moist air was attributed
to the passivation of the dangling carbon bonds by the OH groups dissociated from the water vapor in the atmosphere during the tribological
contact as described in [10]. First principle atomistic study [11] provided
quantitative support for this mechanism, by showing that the dissociation of water to OH molecules at the interface is possible and the static
work of separation between the OH\C (111)/OH\C(111) atoms is
considerably lower than Al/non-passivated coating surface thus
resulting in lower magnitudes of in the case of OH passivated surfaces.
An ab initio study [12] based on density-functional theory (DFT) and
291
2. Experimental details
2.1. Material properties
NH-DLC coatings were deposited on AISI M2 grade tool steel disks
and WCCo drill using an unbalanced magnetron sputtering system
equipped with one chromium and two graphite targets. A 0.10 m Cr interlayer was deposited on 25.10 mm diameter M2 disks to promote
coating adhesion followed by the deposition of 1.50 m thick NH-DLC
coating on top. The hydrogen content of the NH-DLC coating measured
using elastic recoil detection (ERD) was b 2.00 at.%. The hardness and
the elastic modulus of the coatings were calculated from the loading
unloading curves obtained by a Berkovich type nano-indenter that penetrated to a maximum depth of 200 nm below the surface. Average
hardness and elastic modulus values were 13.00 1.10 GPa and
158.55 6.82 GPa. The NH-DLC coated coupons were tested against
Ti6Al4V pins with a rounded tip of 4.01 mm in diameter. Ti6Al4V
had the following composition (in wt.%): 5.506.75% Al, 0.08%
C, 0.4% Fe, 0.03% N, 0.2% O, 0.02% H, 3.504.50% V and the
balance Ti. The microhardness of the Ti6Al4V was 380.00 3.01 HV.
2.2. Pin-on-disk tests
Pin-on-disk type wear tests were performed on NH-DLC coated coupons using a CSM tribometer. Tests were done in four different environments consisting of (i) dry Ar atmosphere with 0% RH, (ii) ambient air
with 40% RH (iii) distilled water and (iv) anhydrous (99.9%) ethanol.
During the last two tests the NH-DLC coated M2 steel disks were
submerged in reservoirs lled with uid. Sliding tests were performed
at a linear sliding speed of 0.12 m/s and under the application of 5.00
N normal load (Hertzian contact pressure = 1095.5 MPa) for 3.00
103 cycles where the peak running in coefcient of friction (R), number
of revolutions of the running-in (tR) and the steady state coefcient of
friction (S) were recorded. Each test was repeated at least 3 times.
Following the sliding tests, the Ti6Al4V pin contact surfaces were
examined by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and their compositions were analyzed using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and micro-Raman analyzer.
The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectra were recorded
using an FEI Quanta 200 FEG SEM equipped with an EDAX SiLi detector
spectrometer. FTIR analyses were conducted using a Thermoelectron
Nicolet 760 spectroscope in reectance mode at two different spots
using a 100 m 100 m aperture. The Raman spectra of the transfer
layers were obtained using a 50 mW Nd-YAG solid state laser
(532.00 nm excitation line) through the 50 objective lens of a Horiba
Raman micro-spectrometer.
2.3. Drilling tests
Drilling tests were conducted on the Ti6Al4V alloy using NH-DLC
coated and uncoated WCCo drills with 6.35 0.01 mm diameter. The
drilling tests were performed at a cutting speed of 2500 rpm (50 m/
min) using a feed rate of 0.25 mm/rev. The time interval between consecutive holes was 5 s. The ow rate used for supplying MRF was
30,000 ml/h and the temperature of the MRF at the inlet was 18 C. A
total of 100 holes were drilled with a horizontal center to center spacing
of 10 mm between them. Each hole was 19 mm deep. The temperature
measurements presented in the paper are taken from the last hole. The
tests were conducted under the following conditions: (i) dry: drilling
without using MRF; (ii) ooded: drilling using a water based MRF,
consisting of a mixture of water and oil blended at a ratio of 1 to 3 and
(iii) ooded with 10 vol.% ethanol: drilling using the same water/oil
(1:3) based MRF as in (ii) but with an addition of 10 vol.% ethanol. Exploratory experiments that used different volume percentages of ethanol mixtures showed that MRF blended with 10% or greater
percentage of ethanol by volume showed no difference in the torque
292
response whereas the average torque increased by 20% for ethanol contents lower than 10%. Consequently, a 10% ethanol blend was used in
the drilling experiments with MRF.
The cutting torque was measured individually for each drilled hole
using a magneto-static sensor as described in [22]. In order to monitor
the drill tip temperature variations, a contact thermocouple was
inserted inside to the mid-point of the 100th hole drilled. The details
of temperature measurements are given in [8].
3. Results
3.1. Changes in tribological behavior of NH-DLC tested at different environmental conditions
The variations in values of the NH-DLC coatings tested against Ti
6Al4V, under dry argon (Ar) atmosphere with 0% RH, and ambient
atmosphere with 40% RH (ambient air), are shown in Fig. 1 as a function
of number of revolutions. Fig. 1 also shows the plots obtained while
the NH-DLC sample and the counterface were immersed in water and
ethanol. According to the friction plots in Fig. 1, testing the NH-DLC
using a dry Ar atmosphere produced a high R of 0.55. Following this
maximum initial R, the friction plot showed a decrease with an average
value of 0.40 0.06 for the next 4.00 102 cycles and decreased again
to an average of 0.37 0.02 occurred until 19.00 102 cycles and a
steeper decrease to 0.27 0.05 with large uctuations until the test
was stopped at 30.00 102 cycles. The uctuations in the friction plot
were always high and no S was observed in this and the two other
tests that were done under the same conditions. Under the ambient
atmosphere (with 40% RH) a maximum R of 0.42 was recorded during
the running-in period which lasted for 1.50 102 revolutions followed
by a decrease to a S of 0.11 0.01. The decrease in R and S is in agreement with the previously suggested surface passivation mechanism of
carbon bonds by H and OH molecules dissociated from the moisture
during sliding contact [10,23]. Both R and S further decreased for
tests conducted while the NH-DLC sample was immersed in water;
resulting in a low R peak of 0.22 followed by a low S of 0.08 0.02.
A signicant difference between these tests that showed a distinct running-in period and those conducted while NH-DLC was submerged in
ethanol was that in ethanol the running-in period was almost nonexistent. It should be noted that wear tests in ethanol and water were
conducted under the boundary lubrication regime conditions as determined from the ratio () of minimum lubricant thickness (hmin) and
the root mean square (r.m.s.) roughness (r*) of the surfaces in contact
Ambient
Ethanol
[24]. The r* value in the case of Ti-6Al-4V and NH-DLC at the start of
the wear tests was 0.575 m, which increased to 0.720 m at the end
of tests in ethanol and to 1.170 m at the end of tests in water. These
changes in the r.m.s. roughness of the surfaces in contact, as a result of
sliding wear, led to lower magnitudes of (=hmin/r*) as compared to
the beginning of the tests. The value of at 25 C was 0.0030 in
the case of tests in ethanol and 0.0027 for tests in water at the beginning of the tests. They decreased slightly to = 0.0023 in ethanol
and = 0.0013 in water at the end of the tests. The parameters
used to calculate for tests in water and ethanol are summarized
in Table 1. As the b 1, boundary lubrication conditions were satised throughout the tests. The running-in COF of NH-DLC in ethanol
(R = 0.14) was the lowest value of R for the all test conditions considered. The average S was low at 0.13 but higher than other testing
environments that produced a steady state friction regime. The salient observations, namely the reduction in both the running-in
and steady state COF in water and the elimination of R in ethanol,
are discussed in terms of passivation of surface carbon atoms and
formation of transfer layers on the counterface in Section 4.
Table 1
Parameters used to calculate the lubrication conditions ( values) for tests in water and
ethanol.
R (m)
U (m/s)
W (N)
E* (GPa)
0 (Pas)
r* (m)
2.29 108
0.57
0.01
(Ethanol)
Water
Fig. 1. Variations of COF with the number of revolutions for NH-DLC coating tested against
Ti6Al4V under different environmental conditions.
0.002
0.12
5.0
74.1
0.00089
(water)
R represents the radius of the Ti6Al4V pin in m, U represents the sliding velocity in m/s,
W represents the normal load in N, E* represents the composite elastic modulus in GPa, 0
and are the viscosity constants of water and ethanol, and r* is the r.m.s. surface roughness of the contacting surfaces before (0.57 m) and after the test (0.72 m).
293
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 2. Running-in COF ( R) and duration of the running in (tR) values of the NH-DLC coating sliding against Ti -6Al -4V in (a) dry Ar, (b) ambient air, (c) water and (d) ethanol. The tR and R
calculations have been shown in the rst column. Three friction curves are shown for each test environment each curve represents a different test on a new sample.
Table 2
Running-in coefcient of friction, duration and wear rate values and steady state COF of
NH-DLC coatings tested against Ti6Al4V at different environmental conditions.
Test
conditions
Test Duration of
no. running-in
(number of
revolutions, tR)
Highest
running-in
COF (R)
Steady state
COF (S)
Running-in
wear rate
(mm3/Nm)
Dry Ar
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
0.55
0.57
0.54
0.42
0.42
0.43
0.22
0.21
0.19
0.15
0.14
0.16
0.39
0.40
0.37
0.14
0.12
0.11
0.07
0.06
0.07
0.12
0.11
0.12
5.73
5.74
5.71
2.85
2.86
2.88
1.59
1.62
1.64
0.75
0.75
0.76
Ambient
(40% RH)
Water
Ethanol
185
180
180
50
50
50
30
40
30
10
10
10
0.023
0.031
0.042
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
294
Dry Ar
(a)
Wear Track
(b)
Ambient
Wear Track
Adhered Ti
Adhered Ti
Water
100 m
(c)
100 m
Ethanol
No adhesion
(d)
Adhered Ti
Wear Track
Wear Track
100 m
100 m
Fig. 3. Typical secondary electron images of wear tracks formed on the NH-DLC coating surfaces when tested against Ti6Al4V after the running-in period for test in
(a) dry Ar (t R = 185 revolutions), (b) ambient air (t R = 50 revolutions), (c) water (t R = 30 revolutions) and (d) ethanol (t R = 10 revolutions).
The wear rates of the NH-DLC for the running in period, WR, were
measured using a non-contact surface prolometry technique and
have been summarized in Table 2. In addition to Ti6Al4V adhesion,
damage to NH-DLC surface occurred by surface scratching, namely by
formation of longitudinal scratches along the wear track. Volume of
coating material removal was measured by taking an average of 24
readings from six different regions of the wear track. The details of the
volumetric wear loss measurements can be found in [25,26]. After the
running in period the wear rates decreased to very low values at the
steady state wear regime. Thus the cumulative wear, almost equal to
WR, was determined at the end of the running in period under each condition. In dry Ar atmosphere, the wear loss was 5.73 105 mm3/Nm
and decreased to 2.86 105 mm3/Nm in ambient atmosphere. The
measured wear rates were 1.62 10 5mm3/Nm for tests in water
and 0.75 10 5 mm3/Nm for tests in ethanol resulting in 45% and
75% reduction in wear rates respectively compared to the tests in
ambient air with 40% RH.
The Ti6Al4V pin contact surfaces were examined for wear damage
and also for possible occurrence of transfer layers. Tests in dry Ar atmosphere produced a wear track of diameter of 220 2 m and showed
scratch marks along the sliding direction. There is also evidence for material transfer from the coating surface with a dark gray appearance and
debris accumulation along the periphery of the worn area as shown in
Fig. 4(a). The EDS maps in Fig. 4 indicate that the darker gray area that
covered a part of worn Ti-6Al-4V contact surface was rich in C
(Fig. 4(b, c)) that should have been transferred from the DLC while it
was in sliding contact with the pin. Oxygen map is given as a reference
but no oxygen was detected as expected as the sliding tests were conducted in an inert atmosphere (Fig. 4(d)). In ambient atmosphere, the
dark gray transfer layers covered greater area percentage of the contact
(a)
Dry Ar
295
Ti
(b)
(c)
(d)
Ti
(f)
(g)
(h)
Transfer layer
100 m
Ambient
(e)
Transfer layer
100 m
Fig. 4. (a) Secondary electron image of the Ti6Al4V pin surface taken after sliding against NH-DLC coating in dry Ar atmosphere. The elemental EDS maps taken from the whole area
shown in (a) are for (b) Ti, (c) C and (d) O. (e) Secondary electron image of Ti6Al4V pin surface after the sliding test against NH-DLC coating in ambient air. The elemental EDS
maps taken from the whole area shown in (e) are for (f) Ti, (g) C and (h) O.
The micro-Raman spectra that were obtained from both the unworn
NH-DLC coating surface and the transfer layers that were formed on the
top of pin surfaces under different testing conditions are presented in
Fig. 7. The Raman spectra of the unworn NH-DLC coating showed a
broad peak between 1250 and 1650 cm1which is a common feature
of amorphous NH-DLC coatings [30]. On the other hand, the Raman
spectra of the transfer layers that were generated on the Ti6Al4V
pin surface showed a noticeable shift of the peak values in Fig. 7.
Deconvolution of the Raman spectra into two Lorentzian peaks indicated that the peaks centered at 1388 cm1 and 1583 cm 1 can be
assigned to the D and G bands of the carbon, respectively. The distinct
D and G bands observed for the transfer layers formed on the Ti6Al
4V pins under different test conditions as opposed to the single broad
peak observed in the case of the NH-DLC coating indicated an increase
in sp2 content. This may suggest sliding induced graphitization during
sliding as previously discussed in the literature [3133]. In addition to
the D and G bands, distinct peaks were also observed at 480, 1090,
1200, 1460 cm1 and 2950 cm 1 for transfer layers formed during
the tests in ethanol, which may be attributed to the adsorbed ethanol
296
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Fig. 5. (a) Secondary electron image of the Ti6Al4V pin surface taken after sliding against NH-DLC coating in water. The elemental EDS maps taken from the whole area shown in (a) are
for (b) Ti, (c) C and (d) O. (e) Secondary electron image of Ti6Al4V pin surface after the sliding test against NH-DLC coating in ethanol. The elemental EDS maps taken from the whole
area shown in (e) are for (f) Ti, (g) C and (h) O.
(a)
297
(b)
D
C-C-O
CH3
C-H
CH3
NH-DLC
Fig. 7. Micro-Raman spectra of the transfer layer formed on Ti6Al4V pins tested against
NH-DLC coating in dry Ar, ambient air, water, ethanol and as-deposited NH-DLC coating.
(c)
Fig. 6. FTIR spectra of the material transfer red on the Ti6Al4V pin wear track tested
against NH-DLC in (a) dry Ar, (b) water, and (c) ethanol. The CO2 gas peak at 2350 cm1
observed in this and other FTIR spectra was due to contamination from the surrounding
atmosphere [14,25].
the uncoated WCCo drills. The addition of ethanol to the MRF resulted
in a favorable drilling condition, an observation that mimics the results
of the tribological tests.
Fig. 9(a) shows the average torque values calculated from Fig. 8(a,
b). The NH-DLC coated drills showed a low and stable torque response
when the drilling was conducted in ooded conditions using water/oil
(1:3) based MRF. When this MRF was mixed with 10% ethanol, a 50% reduction in the average torque was observed. The uncoated WCCo drill
showed a prolonged tool life compared to the NH-DLC coated drill
under dry conditions; as shown in Fig. 9(b) the uncoated drill did
not fail during the course of tests that involved drilling 100 holes
(Fig. 9(a)). The average torque however was high. The addition of 10%
ethanol to the MRF initially decreased the drilling torque but no difference between the two ooded conditions (with or without ethanol)
was apparent after drilling the 45th hole (Fig. 9(b)). This result indicates
that ethanol addition to the MRF was not an advantageous for ooded
drilling using uncoated WCCo tools contrary to the use of NH-DLC
coated drills under the same ooded condition (Fig. 9(a)).
A sharp increase in the torque value, that manifested itself as a spike
in drilling torque vs. time curve, is usually accompanied by the rise in
local contact temperature causing high friction and adhesion [8].
Fig. 10(a) shows the temperature variations in the hole depth during
drilling of the Ti6Al4V using NH-DLC coated drills under each
machining environment. As shown in Fig. 10(a), during dry drilling of
Ti6Al4V using the NH-DLC coated drills the temperature increased
to 566 C. The drills, as reported earlier, failed at the rst hole. High temperatures generated during dry drilling cause softening of Ti6Al4V
promoting adhesion to the tool and consequently result in high drilling
torque. The NH-DLC coating was removed during frictional contact and
it was the WCCo substrate that came in contact with Ti6Al4V that
resulted in high temperatures and high adhesion (see end of
298
Dry
NH-DLC
WC-Co
Dry
Spike
Spike
Spike
Flooded
Spike
Flooded
Spike
Spike
Spike
Spike
(a)
(b)
Fig. 8. Torque proles generated during drilling in Ti6Al4V in dry, ooded and ooded with ethanol conditions using (a) NH-DLC and (b) uncoated WCCo.
(a)
NH-DLC
Dry
Flooded
Flooded + ethanol
(b)
Uncoated WC-Co
Dry
Flooded + ethanol
Flooded
Fig. 9. Variations of average torque with the number of holes using (a) NH-DLC and
(b) uncoated WCCo coated drills against Ti6Al4V under different drilling conditions.
Section 3.4). During the ooded drilling tests using MRF coolant, the
drilling-induced temperature did not exceed 280 C. When the
ooded drilling tests were conducted using MRF blended with
ethanol (10%) the highest temperature recorded was 102 C. Consequently lower friction and adhesion would be expected compared to
other conditions.
The temperature variations during drilling of Ti6Al4V using
uncoated WCCo drill are shown in Fig. 10(b). The temperature increase during dry drilling reached about 553 C whereas the maximum temperatures were 437 C and 388 C during drilling in ooded
conditions without and with ethanol addition. These are higher compared to those when NH-DLC coated tools were used under the same
conditions.
The results presented in Figs. 810 indicate that an MRF blended
with ethanol decreased the temperature and the average torque. It is
thus expected that there will be less adhesion during drilling of Ti
6Al4V using NH-DLC coated drills using the ethanol (10 vol.%)
blended with the MRF. These trends are reected in the SEM micrographs of the cutting edges shown in Fig. 11.
Adhesion of Ti6Al4V was observed on the NH-DLC coated WCCo
drills used in dry condition (Fig. 11(b)). The adhered titanium was as
thick as 410500 m at the cutting edge of NH-DLC coated drills
forming a built-up edge (BUE) generating high drilling torques
(Fig. 9(b)). The use of a water/oil (1:3) based MRF reduced the extent of Ti6Al4V softening by lowering the drilling induced temperature and consequently less material transfer to the cutting edge
occurred (Fig. 11(c)). The 50% reduction in the torque value and
near-complete mitigation of adhesion due to 10% ethanol blended
with water/oil (1:3) based MRF (Fig. 11(d)) may be explained on the
basis of effective passivating ability of the ethanol compared to water,
as will be explained in Section 4.
The BUE was as thick as 350460 m at the cutting edge of the uncoated WCCo drills (Fig. 11(e)). In the case of ooded and ooded
with ethanol conditions, using the uncoated WCCo drill led to low
(a)
299
NH-DLC
Dry
Flooded
Flooded+ ethanol
(b)
Uncoated WC-Co
Dry
Flooded
Flooded+ ethanol
Fig. 10. Variations of drilling temperature with the depth of holes using (a) NH-DLC coated
drills and (b) uncoated WCCo against Ti6Al4V under different drilling conditions.
300
(a)
(b)
(e)
(c)
(f)
(d)
(g)
Fig. 11. (a) Schematic representation of the location of SEM observations. Typical SEM secondary electron images of the drill cutting edges for NH-DLC under (b) dry, (c) ooded and
(d) ooded with ethanol conditions and for uncoated WCCo drills under (e) dry, (f) ooded and (g) ooded with ethanol conditions.
5. Conclusions
Pin-on-disk tests were performed on NH-DLC coatings sliding
against Ti6Al4V pins, where the Ti6Al4V/NH-DLC contact surfaces
were submerged in water and ethanol liquid media. Sliding wear tests
301
Fig. 12. Schematic representation of dissociation of water molecule and ethanol molecule leading to formation of OH molecules that are adsorbed by the NH-DLC coating surface. The bond
dissociation energy values represent the ease of OH bond cleavage from the parent molecule.
were also performed in dry argon (0% RH) and ambient air (40% RH)
atmospheres, to study the surface passivation mechanisms.
The main conclusions that arise from this work are as follows:
1. NH-DLC tested in dry Ar resulted in the highest running-in COF
(R) of 0.55 0.02. The R values reduced for tests in ambient
air to R = 0.42 0.01 and R = 0.21 0.01 for tests in water. Experiments performed in ethanol showed the lowest R = 0.15
0.01 lasting for the shortest duration of 10 sliding cycles (tR).
2. The low R in ethanol was attributed to passivation of surface carbon
atoms by OH molecules. The lower bond dissociation energy of the
C\O bond in ethanol as compared to the O\H bond in water was
suggested as a possible reason for effective passivation.
3. The passivation effect of ethanol was useful for machining of the Ti
6Al4V. Using NH-DLC coated drills in the presence of a lubricant
blend containing 10% ethanol in a conventional MRF (wateroil mixture), a 45% reduction in drilling torque occurred and eliminated
almost all material transfer from Ti6Al4V to the drill's cutting edge.
Conict of interest
There is no conict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this work was provided by Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through a Strategic
Network (CANRIMT) Grant.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] E. Konca, Y.T. Cheng, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 (7) (2006) 43524356.
[6] S. Bhowmick, M.J. Lukitsch, A.T. Alpas, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210 (2010)
21422153.
[7] A. Banerji, S. Bhowmick, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 241 (2014) 93104.
[8] S. Bhowmick, A.T. Alpas, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME 135 (2013) 0610191-15.
[9] A. Erdemir, Surf. Coat. Technol. 146147 (2001) 292.
[10] E. Konca, Y.T. Cheng, J.M. Dasch, A.T. Alpas, Wear 259 (2005) 795799.
[11] Y. Qi, E. Konca, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Sci. 600 (2006) 29552965.
[12] G. Zilibotti, M.C. Righi, M. Ferrario, Phys. Rev. B 79 (075420) (2009) 110.
[13] X. Meng-Burany, A.T. Alpas, Thin Solid Films 516 (2) (2007) 325335.
[14] A.A. Gharam, M.J. Lukitsch, Y. Qi, A.T. Alpas, Wear 271 (2011) 21572163.
[15] E. Konca, Y.T. Cheng, A.M. Weiner, J.M. Dasch, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 200
(2005) 17831791.
[16] E. Konca, Y.T. Cheng, A.T. Alpas, Diam. Relat. Mater. 15 (2006) 939943.
[17] E. Konca, Y.-T. Cheng, A.M. Weiner, J.M. Dasch, A.T. Alpas, Tribol. Trans. 50 (2)
(2007) 178186.
[18] S. Bhowmick, A.T. Alpas, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48 (2008) 14291443.
[19] S. Bhowmick, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 205 (2011) 53025311.
[20] M. Kano, Y. Yasuda, Y. Okamoto, Y. Mabuchi, T. Hamada, T. Ueno, J. Ye, S. Konishi, S.
Takeshima, J.M. Martin, M.I. De Barros Bouchet, T. Le Mognee, Tribol. Lett. 18 (2)
(2005) 245251.
[21] C. Matta, M.I. De Barros Bouchet, T. Le Mognee, B. Vachet, J.M. Martin, T. Sagawa,
Lubr. Sci. 20 (2) (2008) 137149.
[22] S. Bhowmick, A.T. Alpas, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48 (2008) 802814.
[23] H. Ronkainen, S. Varjus, J. Koskinen, K. Holmberg, Wear 249 (2001) 260266.
[24] A. Banerji, A. Edrisy, V. Francis, A.T. Alpas, Wear 311 (2014) 113.
[25] A. Banerji, H. Hu, A.T. Alpas, Wear 301 (2013) 626635.
[26] A. Banerji, H. Hu, A.T. Alpas, Adv. Mater. Res. 445 (2012) 503508.
[27] A.A. Gharam, M.J. Lukitsch, M.P. Balogh, A.T. Alpas, Thin Solid Films 519, 2010.
16111617.
[28] C.E. Bell Jr., D.F. Taber, A.K. Clark, Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry Laboratory: With Qualitative Analysis: Standard and Microscale Experiments,
3rd ed., Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, Pacic Grove, CA, 2001. 95.
[29] V.P. Tolstoy, I.V. Chernyshova, V.A. Skryshevsky, Infrared Spectroscopy of Thin
Layers in Silicon Microelectronics, Handbook of Infrared Spectroscopy of Ultrathin
Films, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2003. 448.
[30] E. Konca, Y.T. Cheng, A.M. Weiner, J.M. Dasch, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 200
(2006) 39964005.
[31] F.G. Sen, X. Meng-Burany, M.J. Lukitsch, Y. Qi, A.T. Alpas, Surf. Coat. Technol. 215
(2013) 340349.
[32] T.W. Scharf, J.A. Ohlhausen, D.R. Tallant, S.V. Prasad, J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 06352
1-11.
[33] A.C. Ferrari, J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 61 (2000)
1409514107.
[34] J.F. Mammone, S.K. Sharma, M. Nicol, J. Phys. Chem. 84 (23) (1980) 31303134.
302
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
J. Andersson, R.A. Erck, A. Erdemir, Surf. Coat. Technol. 163164 (2003) 535540.
J. Andersson, R.A. Erck, A. Erdemir, Wear 254 (2003) 10701075.
C. Donnet, A. Grill, Surf. Coat. Technol. 9495 (1997) 456462.
J.A. Dean (Ed.), Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 15th ed., McGraw Hill, New York,
1999, p. 8.81.
[39] Y. Kokaku, M. Kitoh, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 (3) (1989) 23112314.
[40] D.S. Kim, T.E. Fischer, B. Gallois, Surf. Coat. Technol. 49 (1991) 537.
[41] K. Hayashi, S. Sato, S. Bai, Y. Higuchi, N. Ozawa, T. Shimazaki, K. Adachi, J.M. Martin,
M. Kubo, Faraday Discuss. 156 (2012) 137146.
[42] Y.R. Luo, Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies, CRC Press, 2010.
255262.
[43] S.J. Blanksby, G.B. Ellison, Acc. Chem. Res. 36 (4) (2003) 255263.
[44] J.A. Dean (Ed.), Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 15th ed., McGraw Hill, New York,
1999, pp. 4.414.53.