Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Low Cost MPPT Algorithms For PV Application: PV Pumping Case Study
Low Cost MPPT Algorithms For PV Application: PV Pumping Case Study
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Outline
Maximum power point tracking
Conclusions
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Introduction
Water pumping is probably one of the most
important applications of PV systems
Particularly in rural areas with no grid supply
Low power pumps ranging from 200W to 2kW
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
800 W/m2
600 W/m2
400 W/m2
Maximum power line
200 W/m2
PV array current-voltage curves
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
MPPT Circuit
IPV
PV
generator
V PV
VPV IPV
CL
IL
C VL
RL
Duty Ratio
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
MPPT Algorithms
Mapping or Model Based algorithms
A model of the system is developed to map the operating
characteristics and identify the MPP
Simple models are not very effective
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Outline of Presentation
Experimental investigation of the performance of
Maximum power point tracking algorithms for
pumping applications
Constant Voltage Algorithm
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Experimental Set Up
Experimental investigation of the performance of
Maximum power point tracking algorithms for
pumping applications
Constant Voltage Algorithm
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Experimental Set Up
1080-Wp PV array facing south at a tilt angle of 54
w.r.t. the horizontal
Two parallel branches of 3 series connected 180-Wp solar
modules
31 Jan 2012
Experimental Set Up
Step-down dc-dc converter
470F link capacitance and 10kHz PWM frequency
31 Jan 2012
Experimental System
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Experimental System
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Experimental System
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Experimental System
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Circuit Diagram
ia Ra
iPV
SS
La
PWM
vPV
iPV
DSP Based
vPV
MPPT
CL
470F
va
II I
1080 Wp Selector Step Down DC-DC
PV Array Switch
Converter
eb
Te
TP
Motor-Pump
Set
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
System Description
31 Jan 2012
System Description
31 Jan 2012
200
Array/Motor Current
180
6
5
140
Array/Motor Voltage
120
100
80
Current (A)
Voltage (V)
160
60
40
20
0
0
0
Time (sec)
31 Jan 2012
60
Flow Rate
250
50
200
40
150
30
= 736 W/m2, TC = 22.1 C
100
20
50
10
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Speed (rad/sec)
Motor Speed
Time (sec)
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
62.7%
31 Jan 2012
51.3%
31 Jan 2012
Outline
Introduction
System Description
Directly Connected PV Pumping Systems
PV Pumping systems with MPPT
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
91.3%
31 Jan 2012
91.1%
31 Jan 2012
Conclusions I
Directly connected PV pumping systems eliminate
the use of power electronics converters but suffer
from low energy utilization efficiency.
Simple constant voltage MPPT algorithm offers
significantly higher energy utilization efficiencies
(about 91%).
For more significant improvements in energy
utilization, more efficient MPPT control algorithms
that take into account the effects of insolation and
temperature variations on the MPP voltage would be
required.
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Outline
Introduction
System Description
Directly Connected PV Pumping Systems
PV Pumping systems with MPPT
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
MPPT
Control
vref
iPV
-
PI
Controller
PV
System
vPV
vPV
iPV
vPV
MPPT
Control
PV
System
vPV
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
200
160
120
80
=857.1W/m2, Tc=27.9oC
40
Power (W)
Current (A)
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0
10
15
Time (sec)
20
25
30
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
900
800
700
C O A
=857.1W/m2, Tc=27.9oC
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Array Voltage (V)
140
160
180
200
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
200
160
120
80
40
0
8
Current (A)
Voltage (V)
6
4
1000
800
600
400
200
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
Power (W)
d=5%, fMPPT=1Hz
5
10
15
Time (sec)
Duty Ratio
Optimum Duty Ratio
20
25
30
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Voltage (V)
160
120
80
d=2%, fMPPT=1Hz
=973.2W/m2, Tc=42.5oC
40
0
200
Voltage(V)
160
120
80
d=2%, fMPPT=10Hz
=860.1W/m2, Tc=31.8oC
40
0
0
10
15
Time (sec)
20
25
30
31 Jan 2012
Voltage (V)
160
120
80
=760.3W/m2, Tc=26oC
40
0
200
Voltage (V)
160
120
80
=938.6W/m , Tc=27.6 C
40
0
0
10
15
Time (sec)
20
25
30
31 Jan 2012
=889.1W/m2, Tc=41.3oC
100
Array Current (A)
8
d=5%, fMPPT=4Hz
6
4
2
95
Confusion due to system
dynamics
85
75
Confusion due to branch
disconnection
65
55
0
3
4
Time (sec)
31 Jan 2012
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
200
160
120
97.2%
80
40
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
200
400
600
Time (sec)
800
1000
1200
31 Jan 2012
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
200
160
120
80
97%
40
0
10
0
0
200
400
600
Time (sec)
800
1000
1200
31 Jan 2012
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
200
150
100
50
170
99%
160
150
200
400
600
800
1000
0
8
6
4
d=2%, fMPPT=10Hz
2
0
0
200
400
600
Time (sec)
800
1000
1200
31 Jan 2012
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
200
150
100
97.9%
d=2%, fMPPT=10Hz
50
0
8
6
4
2
0
0
200
400
600
Time (sec)
800
1000
1200
31 Jan 2012
Conclusions II
The P&O MPPT algorithm is a simple algorithm that
does not require previous knowledge of the PV
generator characteristics or the measurement of
solar intensity and cell temperature.
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Conclusions II
With reference voltage perturbation, the system has a faster
transient response to irradiance and temperature
transients.
However, stability is lost if the MPPT algorithm is operated at
high perturbation rates or if low pass filters are used to reject
noise from the array current and voltage feedback signals.
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Conclusions II
Direct duty ratio control offers better stability characteristics
and higher energy utilization efficiency at a slower transient
response and worse performance at rapidly changing
irradiance.
Noise has significant impact on the algorithm
performance, especially with low step sizes where
the system response to noise is comparable to that
of MPPT perturbations.
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Outline
Introduction
System Description
Directly Connected PV Pumping Systems
PV Pumping systems with MPPT
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Power (W)
800
600
dP
0
dV
dP
0
dV
400
dP
0
dV
200
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Voltage (V)
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Power (W)
800
600
dIdP
I
0
dVdV V
dI dP I
0
dVdV V
400
dI
I
dP
0
dV
dV
V
200
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Voltage (V)
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
MPPT
Control
vref
iPV
-
PI
Controller
PV
System
vPV
vPV
iPV
vPV
MPPT
Control
PV
System
vPV
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
31 Jan 2012
97.6%
31 Jan 2012
94.9%
31 Jan 2012
98.5%
31 Jan 2012
96.8%
31 Jan 2012
Conclusions III
The INC algorithm is less confused by noise and system
dynamics compared to the P&O algorithm. However, contrary
to general perceptions, it was found to exhibit worse confusion
than the P&O algorithm in rapidly changing weather
conditions.
Both algorithms offer high energy utilization
efficiencies of up to 99% depending on weather
conditions. The efficiency is marginally lower for
rapidly changing irradiance due to the energy loss
during the confusion and recovery periods.
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
More Details
M. A. Elgendy, B. Zahawi and D. J. Atkinson,
Comparison of Directly Connected and Constant
Voltage Controlled Photovoltaic Pumping Systems,
IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, Vol. 1, No.
3, pp. 184-192, Oct. 2010
M. A. Elgendy, B. Zahawi and D. J. Atkinson,
Assessment of Perturb and Observe MPPT
Algorithm Implementation Techniques for PV
Pumping Applications, IEEE Transactions on
Sustainable Energy, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 21-33, Jan. 2012
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012
Thank you
Bashar Zahawi
E-mail: bashar.zahawi@ncl.ac.uk
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY
31 Jan 2012