Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
TA ( x) TB ( x) , I A ( x) I B ( x) , FA ( x) FB (x)
x, min (TA ( x), FB ( x)) , min( I A ( x),1 I B ( x)) , max(FA ( x), TB ( x))
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE
OVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
Page 219
www.ijird.com
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
0N
T A c ( x ) = F A ( x) , I Ac ( x ) = 1 I A ( x ) , F Ac ( x) = T A ( x)
1N A .
Where,
:,; , 9
(
<,=
:,; , 9
(
<,=
2, 3
& = 8, 9, :,; , 9, :,; , 9, :,; , 9 / , 9 6?
(
(
(
4, 5
:,; , 9
(
<,=
Whenever 0
:,; , 9
(
<,=
+
<,=
<,=
:,; , 9
(
<,=
:,; , 9
(
<,=
<,=
3 , 9 6
The choice of the t-norms and t-conorms 2, 3, 4, 5in the previous definition, is evidently conditioned by the fulfilment of
0 :,; , 9 + :,; , 9 + :,; , 9 3 , 9 6.
(
<,=
(
<,=
(
<,=
Page 220
www.ijird.com
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
1CD = 7
, , =
1) The relation ! is called the relation of identity if , , = B
0CD
1CD = 7
0CD = 7
B
, , = B
0CD
1CD
Definition2.12: [3]
0CD = 7
0CD = 7
1CD = 7
, , = B
, , = B
.
1CD
1CD
0CD
Definition 3.1:
Let X be a set and let P, Q FNR ( X ). Then the composition
x, y X
TQo P ( x, y ) = [TP ( x, z ) TQ ( z , y )] , I Qo P ( x, y ) = [ I P ( x, z ) I Q ( z , y )] and FQo P ( x, y ) = [ FP ( x, z ) FQ ( z , y )]
zX
zX
zX
Definition 3.2:
Let X be a set and let R1 , R2 , R3 , Q1 , Q2 FNR ( X ) .Then
(1) ( R1 o R2 ) o R3 = R1 o ( R2 o R3 )
(2) If R1 R2 and Q1 Q2 ,then R1 o Q1 R2 o Q2 .In particular, if Q1 Q2 ,then R1 o Q1 R2 o Q2 .
(3) R1 o ( R2 R3 ) = ( R1 o R2 ) ( R1 o R3 ) (4) R1 o ( R2 R3 ) = ( R1 o R2 ) ( R1 o R3 )
Proposition 3.1:
Let P and Q be any fuzzy neutrosophic relations on a set X .If Q o P = P o Q ,then (Q o P ) o (Q o P ) = (Q o Q ) o (P o P )
Proof:
Proof follows from definition 3.2(1)
Definition 3.3:
A fuzzy neutrosophic relation R on a set X is called a fuzzy neutrosophic equivalence relation (in short FNER) on X if it satisfies
the following conditions:
(i)
It is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive, (i.e.,) R ( x , x ) = (1,1,0 ) for each x X
1
(ii)
It is fuzzy neutrosophic symmetric (i.e.,) R = R
(iii)
It is fuzzy neutrosophic transitive (i.e.,) R o R R
We will denote the set of all FNERs on X as FNE(X ) .
The following proposition is the immediate result of definition 3.1.
Proposition 3.2:
Let X be a set and let R, Q FNR( X )
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
If R is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive (respectively symmetric, transitive) then R is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive
(respectively symmetric, transitive)
If R is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive (respectively symmetric, transitive), then R o R is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive
(respectively symmetric, transitive)
If R is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive, then R R o R
1
Page 221
www.ijird.com
If R and
(vi)
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
Proof:
It is the immediate result of definition 3.3.
The following two results are easily seen.
Proposition 3.4:
Let X be a set. If R FNE(X ) then R o R = R .
Proposition 3.5:
Let {R } be a non-empty family of FNERs on a set X .Then I R FNE ( X ) .However , in general, U R need
not be a FNER on X .
Example 3.1:
X = {a, b, c} .Let P and Q be the FNRs on X represented by matrices are given below
a
b
c
P
(1,1,0)
(0.7,0.4,0.2) (0.6,0.3,0.1)
a
b (0.7,0.4,0.2 )
(1,1,0)
(0.6,0.3,0.1)
c (0.6,0.3,0.1) (0.6,0.3,0.1)
(1,1,0)
a
b
c
Q
(1,1,0)
(0.7,0.4,0.2)
(1,1,0)
a
b (0.7,0.4,0.2 )
(1,1,0)
(0.6,0.3,0.1)
c
(1,1,0)
(0.6,0.3,0.1)
(1,1,0)
Then clearly P, Q FNE( X ) and P Q is the fuzzy neutrosophic relation on X represented by the following matrix
a
b
c
P Q
(1,1,0)
(0.7,0.4,0.2)
(1,1,0)
a
b
(0.7,0.4,0.2)
(1,1,0 )
(0.6,0.3,0.1)
c
(1,1,0)
(0.6,0.3,0.1)
(1,1,0)
I ( PQ )o( PQ ) (b, c ) = 0.4 > 0.3 = I P Q (b, c ) and F( P Q )o( PQ ) (b, c ) = 0 < 0.1 = FPQ (b, c )
Thus (P Q ) o (P Q ) P Q .So
Proposition 3.6:
Let P and Q be fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive relations on a set X .Then
.
Proof:
Let x X .Then
TQo P ( x, x ) = [TP ( x, t ) TQ (t , x )]
t X
FQo P ( x, x ) = [ FP ( x, t ) FQ (t , x )]
t X
Page 222
www.ijird.com
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
FP ( x, x ) FQ ( x, x ) = 0
Thus
Proposition 3.7:
Let X be a set and let P, Q FNE( X ). If Q o P = P o Q then
Proof:
Let x X .Since P and
P o Q FNE(X ) .
TPoQ ( x, x ) = [TQ ( x, y ) TP ( y , x )] TQ ( x, x ) TP ( x, x ) = 1
yX
FPoQ ( x, x ) = [ FQ ( x, y ) FP ( y, x )] FQ ( x, x ) FP ( x, x ) = 0
y X
Thus
yX
= TQo P ( z , x ) = TPoQ ( z , x ) [ Q P o Q = Q o P]
Similarly
I P oQ ( x , z ) = I P o Q ( z , x )
FPoQ ( x, z ) = [ FQ ( x, y ) FP ( y , z )] = [ FP ( z , y ) FQ ( y , x )] = FQ o P ( z , x) = FPoQ ( z , x )
yX
y X
( P o Q) o ( P o Q) = ( P o P) o (Q o Q)
(By proposition3.1)
PoQ
(Since P and Q are fuzzy neutrosophic transitive)
P o Q FNE(X )
Hence
Definition 3.4:
Let R be a fuzzy neutrosophic equivalence relation on a set X and let a X .We define a complex mapping
I I as follows : for each x X , Ra ( x) = R(a, x) .Then clearly RaFNS (X ) .The fuzzy neutrosophic set
Ra : X
Ra in
X is called a fuzzy neutrosophic equivalence class of R containing a X .The set {Ra : a X } is called the fuzzy neutrosophic
quotient set of X by R and denoted by X / R .
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Theorem 3.1:
Let X be a set and let
a X
(iv)
Page 223
www.ijird.com
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
x X .Then
Definition 3.5:
Let X be a set, let R FNR(X ) and let
{R }
R .
Definition 3.6:
R FNR(X ) .Then the fuzzy neutrosophic transitive closure of R ,denoted by R ,is defined as
n
n
follows: R = U R ,where R = R o R o R.... o R in which R occurs n times.
Let X be a set and let
nN
Proposition 3.7:
Let X be a set and let
R FNR(X ) .Then (i) R is the smallest fuzzy neutrosophic transitive relation on X containing
R.
(ii)If there exists
Example 3.2:
Let
a
b
(0.3,0.3,0.6)
(0.2,0.3,0.8) (0.2,0.3,0.8)
R 2 = R 3 .So R = R R 2
R
a
Moreover R o R R .
b
c
(0.1,0.2,0.9)
.
(0,0,1)
(0.3,0.2,0.7 )
a
(0.8,0.4,0.1)
(0,0,1)
b
(0.8,0.4,0.1)
(0.3,0.3,0.6)
(0.2,0.3,0.8) (0.2,0.3,0.8)
a
(0.8,0.4,0.1)
(0,0,1)
b
(0.8,0.4,0.1)
(0.1,0.2,0.9)
.Thus
(0,0,1)
(0.3,0.2,0.7)
Page 224
www.ijird.com
R o R
a
b
January, 2016
a
(0.8,0.4,0.1)
b
(0.8,0.4,0.1)
(0,0,1)
(0.3,0.3,0.6)
(0.2,0.3,0.8) (0.2,0.3,0.8)
Vol 5 Issue 1
(0.1,0.2,0.9)
2
.Hence R = R R is fuzzy neutrosophic transitive.
(0,0,1)
(0.3,0.2,0.7)
Proposition 3.9:
If R is fuzzy neutrosophic symmetric,then so is
Proof:
For n 1 and
TR n ( x , y ) =
z1 , z 2 ,... z n 1
R .
x, y X
[TR ( x, z1 ) TR ( z1 , z 2 ) ..... TR ( z n1 , y )] = z
[TR ( y, z n1 ) ..... TR ( z1 , x )] = TR n ( y , x)
n 1 ,... z1
Similarly, I R n ( x, y ) = I R n ( y , x) .
FR n ( x, y ) =
z1 , z 2 ,... z n 1
[FR ( x, z1 ) FR ( z1 , z 2 ) ..... FR ( z n1 , y )] = z
n 1 ,... z1
( y, x ) . Thus
Another proof:
1
It is clear that R = R is fuzzy neutrosophic symmetric. Suppose R is fuzzy neutrosophic symmetric for
is fuzzy neutrosophic symmetric.Let x, y X .Then
TR k +1 ( x, y ) = TRo R k ( x, y ) = TR k ( x, z ) TR ( z , y ) = TR k ( z , x) TR ( y, z )
zX
zX
= TR k ( y, z ) TR ( z.x) = TR k o R ( y, x ) = TR k +1 ( y , x)
zX
Similarly, I R k +1 ( x, y ) = I R k +1 ( y , x ) and
FR k +1 ( x, y ) = FRo R k ( x, y ) = FR k ( x, z ) FR ( z , y ) = FR k ( z , x) FR ( y, z )
zX
zX
= FR k ( y, z ) FR ( z , x) = FR k o R ( y , x ) = FR k +1 ( y, x )
zX
So
Proposition 3.10:
Let X be a set and let
(2)If
Proof:
P 2 Q 2 ,by definition 3.2(2). Suppose P k Q k for any k > 2. Then by definition 3.2(2) P k +1 Q k +1
.Hence P Q
(2) Suppose
k +1
k 2 .Then
Theorem 3.2:
If R is a fuzzy neutrosophic relation on a set X,then
R e = R R 1 .
Page 225
www.ijird.com
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
Proof:
Thus TQ ( x, x ) = 1, I Q ( x, x) = 1, FQ ( x, x ) = 0 .So
Proposition 3.11:
Let X be a set and let
P Q FNE(X ) .
.Then
Proof:
By proposition 3.8, P Q is fuzzy neutrosophic transitive. Let
= (1 1) , (1 1) , (0 0 ) = (1,1,0)
nN
Thus
nN
nN
P Q is fuzzy neutrosophic reflexive. Now let x, y X . Since P and Q are fuzzy neutrosophic symmetric,
( [
= TP ( y, x) TQ ( y, x) , I P ( y, x) I Q ( y, x) , FP ( y, x) FQ ( y, x)
nN
nN
nN
] ) = (P Q )( y, x)
n
Thus
Theorem 3.3:
Let X be a set and let
Proof:
Let x, y X .Then
= TQ ( x, y )
Similarly, I P oQ ( x, y ) = I Q ( x, y )
FPoQ ( x, y ) = FQ ( x, z ) FP ( z , y ) FQ ( x, y ) FP ( y, y ) = FQ ( x, y ) 0 = FQ ( x, y )
zX
PoQ Q .
Similarly, we have P o Q R .So P o Q is an upper bound for {P, Q} with respect to .
Now let R be any fuzzy neutrosophic equivalence relation on X such that R P and R Q .Let x, y X .Then
TPoQ ( x, y ) = [TQ ( x, z ) TP ( z , y )] [TR ( x, z ) TR ( z , y ) ] = TRo R ( x, y ) TR ( x, y )
Thus
zX
zX
zX
Page 226
www.ijird.com
Thus
January, 2016
Vol 5 Issue 1
P o Q R .So P o Q is the least upper bound for {P, Q} with respect to . Hence P o Q = P Q .
Proposition 3.11:
Proof:
Suppose
Corollary 3.1:
Let X be a set. If P, Q FNE( X ) such that
P o Q = Q o P ,then P Q = P o Q.
4. References
i. I.Arockiarani, I.R.Sumathi and J. Martina Jency., Fuzzy Neutrosophic Soft Topological Spaces., International journal of
mathematical archives ,4(10),2013., 225-238
ii. I.Arockiarani, J. Martina Jency., More on Fuzzy Neutrosophic sets and Fuzzy Neutrosophic Topological spaces, International
journal of innovative research and studies. May (2014), vol 3, Issue 5,643-652.
iii. I.Arockiarani, J. Martina Jency.,Fuzzy neutrosophic relations(Communicated)
iv. K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and systems ,1986,20:87-96
v. K. Atanassov, More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and systems,1989,33(1):37-46.
vi. T.T .Buhaescu, Some observations on Intuitionistic fuzzy relations, Intimerat Seminar on Functional equations,111-118.
vii. Bustince .H, P.Burillo,Structures on intuitionistic fuzzy relations, Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol.78,1996,293-303.
viii. Chakraborthy.M.K, M. Das, Studies in fuzzy relation over fuzzy subsets, Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol .9,1983,79-89.
ix. Deschrijver.G., E.e. Kerre, On the composition of intuitionistic fuzzyrelations, Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol .136,2003,333361.
x. D.Dubois and H. Prade, a class of Fuzzy measures based on triangular norms,Inst.J. General systems ,8,43-61(1982).
xi. Mukerjee.R, Some observations on fuzzy relations over fuzzy subsets, Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol .15,1985,249-254.
xii. Murali.V, Fuzzy equivalence relations, Fuzzy sets and systems, (30) (1989),155-163
xiii. F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic set, a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Inter.J. Pure Appl.Math.,24 (2005),287
297.
Page 227