Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hausenblas Erika
1 / 75
Outline
Outline 2 / 75
Stochastic differential equations
The Problem
Let F : [0, T ] × Rd → Rd a Lipschitz continuous function. We now consider a
differential equation given by
X : [0, ∞) −→ Rd
Motivation 3 / 75
A simple example
The Problem
Let F : [0, T ] × Rd → Rd a Lipschitz continuous function.
Let A := (Ω, F, P) be a probability space on which some noise is defined.
We now consider a differential equation given by
with initial condition X (0) = x0 . Here, noise is some random noise, usually not
predictable.
X : [0, ∞) × Ω −→ Rd
Motivation 4 / 75
Stochastic DEs ⇌ deterministic ODEs
Motivation 5 / 75
Stochastic DEs ⇌ deterministic ODEs
Motivation 6 / 75
Which Processes
1
1
0.5
0.5
0
0
-0.5
-0.5
-1
-1
-1.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -1.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
different tracectories of the Brownian motion density of the Brownian motion at different time points
1.5 0.8
1 0.7
0.5 0.6
0 0.5
-0.5 0.4
-1 0.3
-1.5 0.2
-2 0.1
-2.5 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
The Problem
Let A = (Ω, F, (Ft )t≥0 , P) be a filtered probability space and B a Brownian
motion defined on A.
Let F : [0, T ] × Rd → Rd a Lipschitz continuous function. We now consider a
differential equation given by
with initial condition X (0) = x0 . Here, noise is some random noise, usually not
predictable.
X : Ω × [0, ∞) −→ Rd
Histogramm <=1
16
14
12
2
F (x) = (x − 1)(x − 2)(x + 10/3) . 2
-2
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
some movies
Histogramm <=1
16 70 45
14 40
60
12 35
50
10 30
8 40
25
6 20
30
4 15
20
2 10
10
0 5
-2 0 0
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
50
σ = 7.5 σ = 3.5
140 350
45
120 300
40
35 100 250
30
80 200
25
60 150
20
15
40 100
10
20 50
5
0 0 0
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Definition
We call f : [0, ∞) × Ω → R a random step process, if there is a finite sequence
of numbers πn := {0 = t1 < · · · < tn < ∞} and square integrable random
variables η0 , . . . , ηn−1 such that ηj is Ftj –measurable and
Pn−1
(⋆) f (t) = j=0 ηj 1[tj ,tj+1 ) (t), t ∈ [0, ∞).
2
Let us denote the set of random step processes by Mstep ([0, ∞); R).
Definition
2
The stochastic integral of a random step process f ∈ Mstep ([0, ∞); R) of the form
(⋆) is defined by
Pn−1
I (f ) = k=0 ηj (B(tj+1 ) − B(tj )).
2
Linearity: the operator I : Mstep ([0, ∞); R) → L2 (Ω) is a linear map, i.e. for
2
and random step processes f , g ∈ Mstep ([0, ∞); R) and any α, β ∈ R we
have
I (αf + βg ) = αI (f ) + βI (g ).
Definition
We denote by M 2 ([0, ∞); R) the class of (progressively measurable) stochastic processes
f : [0, ∞) × Ω → R such that
E 0∞ |f (t)|2 dt < ∞,
R
Definition
We call I (f ) ∈ L2 (Ω) the Itô stochastic integral
(from 0 to ∞) of f ∈ M 2 if
limn→∞ E |I (f ) − I (fn )|2 = 0
2 ([0, ∞); R) of random step processes that approximates
for any sequence f1 , f2 , . . . ∈ Mstep
f ∈ M 2 , i.e. (∗) is satisfied. We will write
R∞
0 f (s) dB(s)
in place of I (f ).
N
X
f (s) := 1(ti ,ti+1 ] (s)fi , fi ∈ Fti .
i=1
N
X
(∗) I (f ) := fi Mti+1 − Mti .
i=1
Theorem
There exists a linear bounded operator
I : M2 ([0, ∞); R) → L2 (Ω, P; E R),
which is the unique extension of the operator (∗).
Proposition
For any f ∈ M2 ([0, ∞); R) the stochastic integral I (f ) is a square integrable
random variable, i.e. I (f ) ∈ L2 (Ω), such that
Z ∞
E|I (f )|2 = E |f (t)|2 dt.
0
Definition
For any t > 0 we denote by M 2 ([0, t]; R) the space of all stochastic processes
f : [0, t] × Ω → R such that
Theorem
The following properties hold for and f , g ∈ M2 ([0, ∞); R) and any α, β ∈ R
1 linearity
Z t Z t Z t
(αf (s) + βg (s)) dB(s) = α f (s) dB(s) + β g (s) dB(s)
0 0 0
2 isometry
Z t 2 Z t
2
E f (s) dB(s) =E |f (s)| ds
0 0
d
X (t) = aX (t), X (0) = x0
dt
The solution:
The solution:
σ2
X (t) = exp ν− t + σB(t) , t ≥ 0.
2
Geometric Brownian motion with sigma=0.2 Geometric Brownian motion with sigma=0.2
2.6 1.5
2.4
1.4
2.2
2
1.3
1.8
1.6 1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1
1
0.8
0.6 0.9
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Geometric Brownian motion with sigma=0.2 Geometric Brownian motion with sigma=0.05
1.25 1.2
1.2
1.15
1.15
1.1
1.1
1.05
1.05
1
0.95
1
0.9
0.85 0.95
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
10 4 Realizations of Geometric Brownian Motion with different variances Realizations of Geometric Brownian Motion with different variances
3.5 12000
1 1
2.5 2.5
0.25 0.25
3
10000
2.5
8000
2
$x$
$x$
6000
1.5
4000
1
2000
0.5
0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
$t$ $t$
Realizations of Geometric Brownian Motion with different variances Realizations of Geometric Brownian Motion with different variances
4500 3500
1 1
2.5 2.5
4000 0.25 0.25
3000
3500
2500
3000
2000
2500
$x$
$x$
2000
1500
1500
1000
1000
500
500
0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
$t$ $t$
Note
P limh→0 h1 (B(t + h) − B(t))2 = 1 = 1.
⇒ Itô Formula:
Z t
F (X (t)) = F (x0 ) + F ′ (X (s)) b(s) ds
0
Z t
1 t ′′
Z
′
+ F (X (s))σ(s) dB(s) + F (X (s))σ 2 (s) ds .
0 2
| 0 {z }
Itô correction term
Stochastic Differential Equations An example from finance 31 / 75
Application of the geometric Brownian motion
X (t + h)
∼ Normal distributed with variance σ 2 h
X (t)
then one ends up by the geometric Brownian motion without drift term.
Given
A filtered probability space, a Brownian motion B, and the equation
where F and σ are Lipschitz continuous. Then, there exists a unique solution
X = {X (t) : t ≥ 0} such that we have P-a.s.
Z t Z σ
X (t) = x0 + F (X (s)) ds + (X (s)) dB(s).
0 0