Romeo and Juliet Presentations Rubric

Excellent (10)

Well Done (8)

Covered it (6)

Almost There (4)

Hard to Meet (2)

Accuracy of
Information

All references are to

reliable and trusted
sources, information
factually correct, and
claims are supported
with direct evidence.

All references are to

reliable and trusted
sources, information is
factually correct, and
most claims are
supported with direct
evidence.

Presentation makes
clear how the
information relates to
the characters or
understanding of the
play, adding original
ideas or
interpretations.

Presentation makes
clear how the
information relates to
the characters or
understanding of the
play.

References are
generally connected
with a specific source,
information is
generally correct but
contains errors, there
is lacking direct
textual evidence.
Presentation makes
few general
connections to the
play or its characters,
but they are either
unclear or
underdeveloped.

References are not

connected to any
sources, information is
factually incorrect, or
there is no specific
textual evidence.

Relation to Romeo
and Juliet

All references go
back to a well known
and generally trusted
source, information is
generally correct with
minimal errors, some
claims are supported
with direct evidence.
Presentation makes
some connections to
the characters or the
play, and our
understanding of it.

Presentation is
creative in its style,
clear in its delivery,
and captivates its
audience! (Not just
me).
All group members
appear to have
contributed to the
presentation in an
equitable fashion.

Presentation is
creative in style,
generally clear in its
delivery, and holds
the attention of its
audience.
All group members
have participated in
the presentation, but
one or two voices
dominate the
presentation.
There are few
grammatical or
spelling errors in the
presentation materials
that do not hinder
understanding.

Presentation conveys
the informational in a
clear and organized
manner, generally
holds the attention of
its audience.
All groups members
appear to have done
work on the
presentation, but the
work was not
distributed equally.
There are
grammatical or
spelling errors that
may cause some
confusion, but overall
to do detract from the
overall presentation.

Presentation has
required information,
but may be hard to
follow or unclear in its
delivery.

Presentation is lacking
in information,
organization, and
clarity to the point
that it hinders
understanding.
The group did not
work collaboratively
on the project, as
evidence by lack of
presentation time or
research quality.
Presentation has not
been proof-read, and
grammar and spelling
errors are enough to
hinder understanding
of the information.

Creativity in
Presentation

Balance of Work Load

Formalities (Grammar,
punctuation)

All elements of the

presentation have
been proof-read and
polished.

Some groups
members did not
participate in the
project.

There are
grammatical or
spelling errors that
cause confusion or
prevent
understanding.

Presentation makes
no connections to the
play or the
characters.

Total:

/50