Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. I NTRODUCTION
Change detection is primary and important task in many
computer vision understanding, video analysis and smart
surveillance systems. Many methods have been proposed for
change detection and they are able to segment changing
region successfully with static background in real time. The
task of moving object detection and segmentation remains
challenging when there are moving/changing background,
variation in illumination, shadow effects and multiple moving
objects(crowded sequence). The detail description of challenges in detecting changes between frame sequence can be
found in [1].
Many methods for change detection have been proposed in
literature to deals with situation specic issues. Background
subtraction is widely used approach for detection of changes
between frames by subtracting target frame from background
model of a scene. While existing methods are able to detect
changes with static background and they can resolve problem
specic issues, they are not effective for many practical situations where background is not static. It generates false positive
set of pixels when background show dynamic characteristics
that decline the result of further processing steps like tracking
and activity recognition.
This paper proposed a adaptive codebook model by estimating the variation in decision threshold used for segmenting
dynamic pixels and spatial context for pixels is utilized to
disparate uncovered static background from dynamic background. Proposed method can reduce erroneous positive pixels
detected conventionally as ghost region while pixel belongs
978-1-4673-9721-6/15 $31.00 2015 IEEE
DOI 10.1109/SITIS.2015.89
110110
2
rk R + g k G + bk B
colordist(xt , vi ) = (R2 + G2 + B 2 )
rk2 + gk2 + b2k
and
logical
brightness
function
is
dened
I
=
brightness I, I,
as
true
f alse
otherwise
(1)
colordist(x,cm )
I
= true
brightness I, I,
111111
(2)
2
m,t = m,t1 + (1 )m,t
(3)
(4)
2
is curWhere m,t denotes mean color distance and m,t
rent color distance value belongs to codeword cm at pixel
xt . To adaptively update variance to match codeword with
2
of each codeword is formulated
background model the m,t
as given in Eq. 5.
(7)
2
m,t
= (1
2
),t1
2
m,t
(5)
As different lighting condition and global effects shows illumination variation and background dynamics may show high
variation in color distance. It may cause false detection even
without any moving object. To make model adaptive the color
distance formula is modied as given in Eq. 1.
colordist(xt , vi ) =
abs(i )
(6)
112112
Fig. 5: Adaptive parameters for pixel specied in image across the frame sequence.
(8)
(9)
113113
(10)
R2 + G2 + B 2 do
Find a matching codeword to xt in background codebook M
if found then
Match=1, then update the codeword
if f reqm T hH igh then
for each codeword Mt {Mt |t Nx } do
Try to nd matching codeword in Mt with xt
if found then
Add match codeword in uncovered background layer U .
end if
end for
end if
end if
end for
V. E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
In this section, we show results of the proposed
approach and its comparison with other state of the
114114
VI. C ONCLUSION
R EFERENCES
[1] Toyama, K.; Krumm, J.; Brumitt, B.; Meyers, B., Wallower: principles
and practice of background maintenance, Computer Vision, 1999. The
Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on , vol.1,
no., pp.255,261 vol.1, 1999.
[2] Wren, Christopher Richard, et al. Pnder: Real-time tracking of the
human body. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 19.7 (1997): 780-785.
[3] Stauffer, Chris, and W. Eric L. Grimson. Adaptive background mixture
models for real-time tracking. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1999. IEEE Computer Society Conference on.. Vol. 2. IEEE, 1999.
[4] Zivkovic, Zoran. Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction. Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. Proceedings
of the 17th International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2004.
[5] KaewTraKulPong, Pakorn, and Richard Bowden. An improved adaptive
background mixture model for real-time tracking with shadow detection. Video-based surveillance systems. Springer US, 2002. 135-144.
[6] Elgammal, Ahmed, David Harwood, and Larry Davis. Non-parametric
model for background subtraction. Computer VisionECCV 2000.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. 751-767.
[7] Mittal, Anurag, and Nikos Paragios. Motion-based background subtraction using adaptive kernel density estimation. Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE
Computer Society Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2004.
[8] Barnich, Olivier, and Marc Van Droogenbroeck. ViBe: A universal
background subtraction algorithm for video sequences. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 20.6 (2011): 1709-1724.
[9] Kim, Kyungnam, et al. Real-time foregroundbackground segmentation
using codebook model. Real-time imaging 11.3 (2005): 172-185.
[10] Sigari, Mohamad Hoseyn, and Mahmood Fathy. Real-time background
modeling/subtraction using two-layer codebook model. Proceedings of
the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.
Vol. 1. 2008.
[11] Guo, Jing-Ming, et al. Hierarchical method for foreground detection
using codebook model. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology,
IEEE Transactions on 21.6 (2011): 804-815.
[12] Van Droogenbroeck, Marc, and Olivier Paquot. Background subtraction: Experiments and improvements for ViBe. Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, 2012.
[13] Goyette, N.; Jodoin, P.; Porikli, F.; Konrad, J.; Ishwar, P., Changedetection.net: A new change detection benchmark dataset, Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer
Society Conference on , vol., no., pp.1,8, 16-21 June 2012.
115115
Fig. 8: The qualitative results for frame number 1500 of fall video.
116116