Report Format For Weight Control of Offshore Structures PDF

SAWE Paper No.
3483
Category No. 17
REPORT FORMAT FOR WEIGHT CONTROL OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

by
Stein Bjrhovde
BAS Engineering AS / ShipWeight
For Presentation at the

71st Annual Conference
of
Society of Allied Weight Engineers, Inc.
Bad Ggging and Manching Bavaria, Germany
05-10, May, 2012
Permission to publish this paper, in full or in part, with credit to the author and the Society may
be obtained, by request, to:
Society of Allied Weight Engineers, Inc.
P.O. Box 60024, Terminal Annex
Los Angeles, CA 90060
The Society is not responsible for statements or opinions in papers or discussions at the meeting.
This paper meets all regulations for public information disclosure under ITAR and EAR
Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures
PAPER No : 3483
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................................................... ii
Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract..........................................................................................................................................................................1
Background....................................................................................................................................................................2
The goal of this Paper ....................................................................................................................................................2
ISO 19901-5: Weight control during engineering and construction ..............................................................................2
Statoil requirement TR2352: Weight control requirements for topsides and substructures ..........................................2
Identification (key) and description fields .................................................................................................................3
Unique identification of items ............................................................................................................................... 3
Topics for further discussion and consideration ....................................................................................................3
Quantity, weight and co-ordinate fields .....................................................................................................................3
Net weight vs. gross weight ...................................................................................................................................4
Content and co-ordinates .......................................................................................................................................4
Local coordinates ...................................................................................................................................................4
Information fields ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
Additional fields needed to comply to ISO standard ............................................................................................. 5
Weight report content ....................................................................................................................................................6
Layout of printouts and tables ...................................................................................................................................7
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.1
Major assemblies..........................................................................................................................................7
1.2 Cut-off date ...................................................................................................................................................... 7

1.3 Weight information provided by others ...........................................................................................................7
1.4 List of reported loading conditions ..................................................................................................................8
2.1 Main summary .................................................................................................................................................9
2.2 Weight and load budget (WLB) ..................................................................................................................... 10
2.3 Global CoG plot................................................................................................................................................. 10
2.4 Main variations from the previous report .......................................................................................................... 11
2.5 Weight forecast .................................................................................................................................................. 12
2.5.1 General............................................................................................................................................................ 12
2.5.2 Main trend graphs ........................................................................................................................................... 13
2.6 Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline ................................................................................... 14
2.7 As built / weighing data ..................................................................................................................................... 15
3.1 Variation from last report by area and discipline ............................................................................................... 16
3.2 Trend graphs by area ......................................................................................................................................... 17
3.3 CoG plots ........................................................................................................................................................... 18
PAPER No : 3483
3.4 Area weight printouts ........................................................................................................................................ 19

5.1 Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................................... 20
5.1.1 General assumptions ....................................................................................................................................... 20
5.1.2 Discipline assumptions ................................................................................................................................... 20
5.2.1 Global origin ................................................................................................................................................... 21
5.2.2 Area designations............................................................................................................................................ 22
5.3 Weight allowance and contingency ................................................................................................................... 23
5.4 Report codes ...................................................................................................................................................... 23
5.4.1 Weight installation codes ................................................................................................................................ 23
5.4.2 Weight phase codes ........................................................................................................................................ 24
5.4.3 Weight status codes ........................................................................................................................................ 24
5.4.4 Area codes ...................................................................................................................................................... 24
Automatic generated weight reports ............................................................................................................................ 25
Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 25
Requirements ........................................................................................................................................................... 25
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Terms and definitions .................................................................................................................................................. 26
Appendix 1: Examples of Main Summary tables from various Weight Reports. ........................................................ 27
Example 1: Jacket topside ....................................................................................................................................... 27
Example 2: FPSO topside ........................................................................................................................................ 28
Example 3: Jacket topside ....................................................................................................................................... 28
Example 4: Semi-submersible total platform .......................................................................................................... 29
Example 5: FPSO topside and vessel ...................................................................................................................... 30
Appendix 2: Example of chapter mapping between ISO standard chapters and weight reports from past projects .... 31
Table of Figures
Figure 1: Major Assemblies printout ............................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 2: Loading Conditions printout .......................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 3: Main Summary printout .................................................................................................................................9
Figure 4: Weight and Load Budget printout ................................................................................................................ 10
Figure 5: Global CoG printout ..................................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 6: Main Variations printout .............................................................................................................................. 11
Figure 7: Weight Forecast printout .............................................................................................................................. 12
Figure 8: Main Trend Graphs printout ......................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 9: Area & Discipline Summary printout .......................................................................................................... 14
Figure 10: As-built / Weighing Data printout .............................................................................................................. 15
PAPER No : 3483
Figure 11: Variation from Last Report by Area & Discipline printout ........................................................................ 16
Figure 12: Trend Graphs by Area printout .................................................................................................................. 17
Figure 13: CoG Plots printout...................................................................................................................................... 18
Figure 14: Area Weight printout .................................................................................................................................. 19
Figure 15: Discipline Assumptions printout ................................................................................................................ 20
Figure 16: Global Origin printout ................................................................................................................................ 21
Figure 17: Area Designations printout......................................................................................................................... 22
Figure 18: Weight Allowance and Contingency printout ............................................................................................ 23
Figure 19: Weight Installation Codes printout............................................................................................................. 23
Figure 20: Weight Phase Codes printout ..................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 21: Weight Status Codes printout ..................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 22: Area Codes printout ................................................................................................................................... 24
PAPER No : 3483
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to suggest standard layouts for printouts to be included in the weight report for
engineering and construction of offshore structures. The proposals are based on a systematic review of
weight reports for existing oil platforms built for the North Sea and Gulf of Mexico during the last 10 year.
The content of these weight reports are systemized according to the ISO standard for weight control, as
well as the Statoil requirement for weight control.
Requirements for weight control of offshore structures are described in the ISO standard 19901-5
Petroleum and natural gas industries Specific requirements for offshore structures Part 5: Weight
control during engineering and construction. This document includes definitions, weight control classes,
weight- and load budgets, weight reporting, requirements for suppliers, requirements for weighing in
addition to various appendixes. In this paper we will focus on chapter 6.3 Requirements to the weight
report. The content of existing weight reports are systemized and mapped to the defined chapters
(printouts/tables) that are required according to the ISO standard.
The Norwegian energy company Statoil has a technical requirement for weight control titled TR2352
Weight control requirements for topside and substructures. This document specifies among others which
data fields the weight database should include as a minimum. One of the results of this paper is an
overview of which data fields are included in the various weight report chapters required by the ISO
standard.
This paper can serve as a specification of the data fields and printouts that should be included in a weight
control system for offshore structures to fulfill the requirements of the ISO-19901-5. The layouts of the
printouts are in focus. In this paper it is also discussed whether its realistic to design a weight control
system that automatically or semi-automatically produces the weight reports.
Stein Bjrhovde is one of the founders and head of development of BAS Engineering. Mr. Bjrhovde has a
Master of Science Degree in Ship Design, and has been developing the weight engineering software
ShipWeight since 1993. He has also been involved in development of other weight control software, in
addition to being a consultant doing weight estimation and monitoring in the offshore industry. He has
more than 15 years experience in weight estimation of new ship designs for several Norwegian and
international ship designers and yards.
PAPER No : 3483
Background
A weight report for offshore structures is typically released every second month during the engineering and
construction period. A large offshore project can take years to complete and the numbers of revision of the
weight report can be significant. The amount of work put in to preparing these weight reports is therefore
also quit significant, and it might be that more standardization can reduce time consumption and increase
quality both when it comes to reliability of the figures, but also in terms of readability.
In the Norwegian offshore industry the content of a weight report has been quite standardized due to
Norwegian Standards (NS 2128 NS2131 from 1994) that have been around for a long time, and oil
companies having similar requirements. But even though the overall content has been standardized, the
order and format of the figures, tables and text can differ quit a lot. And when the industry has become
more internationalized over the years, the demand of standardization is even higher.
A key document when it comes to standardization is the ISO standard for weight control for offshore
structures during engineering and construction from 2003. In addition to this standard the oil companies
will have separate requirements when it comes to weight control and reporting. A standardized format for a
weight control report must be based on these two requirement sources.
The goal of this Paper

The main goal of this paper is to present suggestions to formats of printouts included in the weight reports
according to the report content specified in the ISO standard.
A second goal is evaluate whether weight reports can be generated automatically from the weight control
system, as a replacement of todays practice of putting together a document from a word processing system.
ISO 19901-5: Weight control during engineering and construction

Requirements for weight control of offshore structures are described in the ISO standard 19901-5
Petroleum and natural gas industries Specific requirements for offshore structures Part 5: Weight
control during engineering and construction. This document includes definitions, weight control classes,
weight- and load budgets, weight reporting, requirements for suppliers, requirements for weighing in
addition to various appendixes. In this paper we will focus on chapter 6.3 Requirements to the weight
report.
The ISO standard defines three different weight control classes. In this paper we will only look into class A
which involves projects with high sensitivity when it comes to weight and center of gravity.
Chapter 6.3 in the ISO standard document describes requirements for weight reporting. The content of a
weight report is divided into 5 main chapters with several subchapters:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Main summary
Summary and conclusions to the report
Area/module reports
Special reports
Annexes to the report
Statoil requirement TR2352: Weight control requirements for topsides

and substructures
The Norwegian energy company Statoil has a technical requirement for weight control titled TR2352
Weight control requirements for topside and substructures. This requirement document cover new
building projects in the engineering and construction phase. The technical requirement TR1244 Technical
requirements for cost estimate classes offshore projects with appendixes A1-4 covers Pre-Feed and
modification projects.
The TR1244 document refers to the ISO standard 19901-5 both in general and when it comes to more
specific topics. TR1244 requires that weight control is performed according to class A.
PAPER No : 3483
The TR2352 document specifies among others which data fields the weight database should include as a
minimum for each weight record. These fields are described and discussed in the following chapters.
Identification (key) and description fields
Drawing number (key): The drawing number from which the weight has been identified or
calculated.
Piece number (key): The unique piece within a drawing number, e.g. plate girder M10-2356
shown on a structural deck drawing. The data field is a text field with maximum 20 characters.
Weight phase code (key): A coding to identify during which phase a piece number will be
installed and present.
Piece designation: The designation of the piece number, e.g. HE200A, Pl 20 mm.
Date: The date when a piece number was entered or revised in the weight control database.
Unique identification of items

The combination of the three fields Drawing number, Piece number and Weight phase code shall uniquely
identify a record. The logic behind this is that a piece of material (item) has a unique position number on a
drawing. For a unique item e.g. weight and CoG can vary in different phases of the project because of
temporary location due to transport, infill areas, partially installation etc. For these reasons the same item
can occur as several records in the database; with identical Drawing and Piece number, but varying Phase
codes.
Equipment
For equipment items both drawing and piece numbers must be identical to the tag number for the weight
carrying item (skid). But the use of both drawing number and piece number it not logical to identify
equipment items because the tag number is unique by itself and theres not necessarily one specific drawing
describing an equipment skid.
Data from 3D systems

More and more weight information are these days exported from 3D data models. Identification and
traceability on item level can be challenging. Each item in the 3D model is uniquely identified for the
model, but the ID is often a complex strings giving no other meaning than identifying the 3D object in the
data model. Globally unique identifiers (GUID) can be used for this purpose and this ID is a 32-character
hexadecimal string, often randomly generated. The Statoil requirement specifies maximum 20 characters
for the piece number and this is a potential conflict.
Topics for further discussion and consideration

It might be more practical to use one large field for unique identification of records instead of both drawing
number and piece number, due to handling of 3D model data and equipment data.
It might also be practical to have a field for identifying the person entered the record in the database.
Quantity, weight and co-ordinate fields
Number off: Number of identical pieces. Only integer numbers shall be used.
Size: The size of each piece, e.g. 2,350 m for the length of an HE200A-beam.
Unit weight: Unit weight for the piece, e.g. 42, 3 kg for unit length (1m) of an HE200A-beam.
Dry weight: The dry weight of each piece in kg, that is the product of Number off x Size x Unit
weight, e.g. 1 x 2,350 x 42,3 = 99 kg for one HE200A with a length of 2,350 m.
Content: The weight of the content in kg in a piping line, vessel, tank etc.
PAPER No : 3483
Co-ordinates: The co-ordinates in the platform north direction, the platform east direction and
Elevation.
Net weight vs. gross weight

Net weight for an item is weight without any contingencies or allowances. According to the ISO standard
gross weight is net weight including allowances while contingency is the difference between the gross
weight and the budget weight. But its not unusual that the terms contingency and allowance are mixed
when applying percentage factors to the net weight to obtain the reported weight. Anyway, it is the reported
weights that are used in all calculation of totals and subtotals throughout the weight report. The percentage
factors used to calculate gross weight are dependent on weight status and usually also on discipline. When
gross weight is not stored in a separate field for each record, there is no direct relation between the weights
in the database and the results in the report without doing a calculation.
In the ISO standard gross weight is referred to as reported weight.
Content and co-ordinates

Content weight is applied to equipment items to calculate operating weight. Operating weight is defined as
gross weight including content. But the center of gravity for the equipment item itself (dry weight) and the
content are seldom identical. If not two sets of co-ordinate fields are applied to each record, dry weight and
content has to be defined as two different records. And if this is the case, the need for a separate field for
content can be discussed because content could be identified by other existing fields like ItemType which is
used to identify bulk, equipment and structure.
Local coordinates
Local co-ordinates for equipment skids are specified by the supplier on a weight datasheet. The global coordinate for the skid will refer to the origin of the item, often located in the southwest corner of the support
structure. If there are only one set of co-ordinates in the item database, these will refer to total co-ordinates
which are global- plus local co-ordinates.
But if the equipment arrangement is relocated, orientation is changed or local coordinates are updated on
new revisions of weight datasheet (e.g. du to weighing), it will be difficult to enter new total co-ordinates
without referring backup information. It should therefore be considered whether the weight record should
contain fields for both local and global co-ordinates and whether total co-ordinates also should be stored.

It should be considered to implement a separate field for weight records for gross weight. In cases where
several factors / percentage are added to the net weight to calculate gross weight (both allowance and
contingency) there might be a need for separate fields for these calculated add-ons.
It should also be considered whether it is necessary to have a separate field for content weight, and if so
how different coordinate for dry weight and content weight shall be handled.
Fields for local and global co-ordinates in addition to total are also an issue.
Information fields
Originator code: The originator code according to the Engineering Numbering System (ENS) of
the organization or contractor who have calculated or revised the weight data for a piece number.
Discipline code: The discipline code according to the ENS.
System code: The system code according to the ENS.
Area code: The area code according to the ENS.
Drawing revision: The revision of the drawing from which the weight has been identified or
calculated.
PAPER No : 3483
Weight status code: A coding to identify the level of accuracy of the weight data of each piece
number. See sub-section 2.4.2 of this document.
Weight installation code: A coding to identify whether a piece is installed or not on a
module/installation.
The Physical Breakdown Structure (PBS): A hierarchical structure which defines the
physical/functional component of a project. For all projects at the Norwegian Continental Shelf
(NCS) the PBS shall be used at level four in accordance with NORSOK Z-014. For other projects
the NORSOK Z-014 is a recommended guideline.
Code of Resources (COR): A hierarchical structure which defines project resources. For all
projects at the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) the COR shall be used at level three in
accordance with NORSOK Z-014. For other projects the NORSOK Z-014 is a recommended
guideline.
Package number: The procurement package number.
Compensation code: Contract Appendix B compensation cost item code at lowest level (for
modification projects).
Additional fields needed to comply to ISO standard

The information fields listed in the Statoil requirement document are considered a minimum. These fields
are those necessary to generate content for the compulsory chapters in the weight report according to the
ISO standard.
Lift code
One of the chapters that are considered optional according to the ISO standard is lifting reports. A field for
Lifting code is not listed in TR2352 and should therefore be considered. Especially because Statoil in
chapter 5.1 of TR 2352 list lift report as one of the minimum required topics included in weight reports.
Lift code is neither included in specifications for Master Equipment list or Material Take-off list in Statoil
requirement TR1244 covering weight reporting for modification and early phase projects.
Displacement code
For floaters it is required to report lightship weight (ref. ISO 19901-5, ch. 6.3.2.1). Lightship is normally
complete dry weight included content from some systems. It will therefore be necessary to identify all
items included in the lightship weight (LW) with a specific code. All other items should be either
deadweight or temporary. This is also an argument for keeping content in separate records, ref. previous
discussion.

As mentioned, fields for Lift code and Displacement should be considered added to the minimum field
requirement.
Appendix 4 for the Statoil TR1244 requirement covering modification project specifies several more fields
for Master Equipment List (MEL) and Material Take-off lists. And this is fields not only related to
modification phases and packages. It should therefore be considered to update the list of required record
fields in TR2352 according to those record fields required in TR 1244.
PAPER No : 3483
Weight report content

According to the ISO standard the following topics / chapters should be included (as a minimum) in a
weight report:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction
1.1. Major assemblies
1.2. Cut-off date
1.3. Weight information provided by others
1.4. List of reported loading conditions
1.5. Discrepancies
Summary and conclusion to the report
2.1. Main summary
2.2. Weight and load budget (WLB)
2.3. Global CoG plot
2.4. Main variations from the previous report
2.5. Weight forecast
2.5.1. General
2.5.1.1. Approved design changes not included
2.5.1.2. Proposed design changes
2.5.1.3. Possible weight changes
2.5.2. Main-trend graphs
2.6. Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline
2.7. As built / weighing data
Area / module report
3.1. Variation from last report by area and discipline
3.2. Trend graphs by area
3.3. CoG plots
3.4. Area weight printouts
Special reports (optional)
4.1. System reports
4.2. Sub-area report or sub-assemblies report
4.3. Secondary lift report
5.1. Assumptions
5.1.1. General assumptions
5.1.2. Discipline assumptions
5.2. Area designations and global origin
5.3. Weight allowance and contingency
5.4. Report codes
5.4.1. Weight installation codes
5.4.2. Weight phase codes
5.4.3. Weight status codes
5.4.4. Area codes
5.5. References
5.6. Other descriptions
A systematic review of a number of weight report from North Sea and Gulf of Mexico for the last 10-15
years has given us a good overview of how the content of these report comply with the topics specified in
PAPER No : 3483
the ISO standard. An overview of mapping between ISO standard chapters and chapter numbering in
weight reports from some past offshore projects can be seen in Appendix 2.
In general terms it can be said that the content of the weight reports corresponds good with what the ISO
standard describes as necessary content for a weight report, but the order of how this content appears in the
reports and the actual layouts and formats varies a lot.
The ISO standard forms a template of how the chapters of a weight report can be organized.
Layout of printouts and tables

When it comes to layout of printouts and tables, we have tried to pick out the best cases from these weight
reports we have reviewed as a basis for this paper.
A key content of a weight report is the main summary and as the examples from various weight reports in
appendix 1 shows, the layout and content of the summary tables varies a lot.
In the following subchapters layout suggestions for printouts relevant for the ISO specified weight report
chapters are presented. These are marked as hyperlinks in the above list.
1. Introduction
All weight reports shall have an introduction giving information necessary to understand the content of
and background to the report. ISO 19901-5: 2003
1.1 Major assemblies

a) Which major assemblies are included ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
Weight Control Report
MAJOIR ASSEMBLIES
Code
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Title
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
Description
Living quarter L00 includes helideck
Includes subareas D10, D20, D30 og D40 (tower)
Figure 1: Major Assemblies printout
1.2 Cut-off date

b) The cut-off date ISO 19901-5: 2003
1.3 Weight information provided by others

c) Weight information provided by others ISO 19901-5: 2003
PAPER No : 3483
1.4 List of reported loading conditions

d) List of reported loading conditions ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
LOADING CONDITIONS
Code
LC50
LC60
LC70
LC90
Title
Description
Transport to offshore field
Weight of lifting slings and spreader bars etc. are included
Lift at offshore field
Weight of lifting slings and spreader bars etc. are NOT included.
Offshore dry installed
Future operating installed (max load)
Figure 2: Loading Conditions printout
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
PAPER No : 3483
2.1 Main summary

The main summary shall contain all current main-weight data, including CoG, and comparisons between
those data and the WLB. The reported weights shall reflect all relevant loading conditions and all main
assemblies. Any major problems that need to be highlighted shall also be included here.
For floating structures, a block diagram showing all major elements of the displacement, lightship and
deadweight may be included. An example of such a block diagram is given in Annex D. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
MAIN SUMMARY
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
LC50 - Transport to offshore field

WEIGHT
Last month Variation This month Budget
Margin CoG East
Last month Variation This month
C00 - Deckbox
10 250
30
10 280
10400
120 C00 - Deckbox
331,600
0,400
332,000
L00 - Living quarter
1 315
5
1 320
1400
80 L00 - Living quarter
277,200
-0,200
277,000
U00 - Utility modules
4 270
-20
4 250
4400
150 U00 - Utility modules
303,800
0,200
304,000
P00 - Process modules
1 720
30
1 750
1900
150 P00 - Process modules
328,100
-0,100
328,000
D00 - Drilling modules
6 450
0
6 450
6250
-200 D00 - Drilling modules
372,200
-0,200
372,000
F00 - Flare
235
5
240
250
10 F00 - Flare
390,700
0,300
391,000
T00 - Topside
24 240
50
24 290
24600
310 T00 - Topside
334,880
0,149
335,028
COMMENTS:
CoG North
This report shows an increase in the reported dry weight of 50 tonnes since last
C00 - Deckbox
119,600
-0,100
119,500
report. The margins are 310 tonnes.
120,300
0,100
120,400
121,100
0,100
121,200
The margins for CoG East are negative by 2,417 meters.
119,000
-0,500
118,500
121,400
-0,200
121,200
The margins for CoG North are negative by 0,233 meters.
F00 - Flare
120,500
-0,300
120,200
T00 - Topside
120,347
-0,115
120,233
CoG Elev.
C00 - Deckbox
508,300
0,200
508,500
535,600
-0,100
535,500
528,200
0,800
529,000
530,200
1,300
531,500
527,000
1,200
528,200
F00 - Flare
528,800
-0,300
528,500
T00 - Topside
520,015
0,625
520,640
Budget
330,000
280,000
300,000
330,000
370,000
395,000
332,612
Budget
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
Budget
510,000
540,000
527,000
530,000
527,000
530,000
520,815
Margin
-2,000
3,000
-4,000
2,000
-2,000
4,000
-2,417
Margin
0,500
-0,400
-1,200
1,500
-1,200
-0,200
-0,233
Margin
1,500
4,500
-2,000
-1,500
-1,200
1,500
0,175
LC60 - Lift at offshore field

WEIGHT
Last month Variation This month Budget
Margin CoG East
C00 - Deckbox
10 100
30
10 130
10250
120 C00 - Deckbox
331,600
0,400
332,000
965
5
970
1050
80 L00 - Living quarter
277,200
-0,200
277,000
4 170
-20
4 150
4300
150 U00 - Utility modules
303,800
0,200
304,000
1 670
30
1 700
1850
150 P00 - Process modules
328,100
-0,100
328,000
6 300
0
6 300
6100
-200 D00 - Drilling modules
372,200
-0,200
372,000
F00 - Flare
185
5
190
200
10 F00 - Flare
390,700
0,300
391,000
T00 - Topside
23 390
50
23 440
23750
310 T00 - Topside
335,552
0,153
335,706
COMMENTS:
CoG North
This report shows an increase in the reported dry weight of 50 tonnes since last
C00 - Deckbox
119,600
-0,100
119,500
report. The margins are 310 tonnes.
120,300
0,100
120,400
121,100
0,100
121,200
The margins for CoG East are negative by 2,527 meters.
119,000
-0,500
118,500
121,400
-0,200
121,200
The margins for CoG North are negative by 0,228 meters.
F00 - Flare
120,500
-0,300
120,200
T00 - Topside
120,345
-0,117
120,228
CoG Elev.
C00 - Deckbox
508,300
0,200
508,500
535,600
-0,100
535,500
528,200
0,800
529,000
530,200
1,300
531,500
527,000
1,200
528,200
F00 - Flare
528,800
-0,300
528,500
T00 - Topside
519,737
0,635
520,372
Budget
330,000
280,000
300,000
330,000
370,000
395,000
333,179
Budget
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
Budget
510,000
540,000
527,000
530,000
527,000
530,000
520,497
Margin
-2,000
3,000
-4,000
2,000
-2,000
4,000
-2,527
Margin
0,500
-0,400
-1,200
1,500
-1,200
-0,200
-0,228
Margin
1,500
4,500
-2,000
-1,500
-1,200
1,500
0,125
Figure 3: Main Summary printout
PAPER No : 3483
2.2 Weight and load budget (WLB)

Known changes to the WLB, if relevant (including reasons for them), shall be documented. Expected
changes to the WLB and their potential consequences shall also be included. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
WEIGHT & LOAD BUDGET
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
LC70 - Offshore dry installed

Area
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Description
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
Rep.dry
wgt.
9 880
920
3 850
1 650
6 200
190
22 690
Budget
Margin
10 000
120
1 000
80
4 000
150
1 800
150
6 000
-200
200
10
23 000
310
Change
Order
65
5
35
5
75
0
185
Inital
Company
Budget
Reserves
9 935
199
995
20
3 965
79
1 795
36
5 925
119
200
4
22 815
456
Future
2 866
-15
956
969
1 957
-4
6 729
Not to
Exceed
13 000
1 000
5 000
2 800
8 000
200
30 000
Figure 4: Weight and Load Budget printout
2.3 Global CoG plot

Global CoG plots shall be included if applicable to the project. The global location shall be presented
relative to the various CoG envelopes. Weight and CoG shall also be presented in relation to each other.
ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
GLOBAL COG PLOT
Contractor:RIG CONSTRUCTOR
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Vertical envelope
North
Horizontal envelope
521,0
Envelope
120,5
Budget
01F
East
120,0
333,0
334,0
335,0
336,0
337,0
Budget
520,0
01F
02F
02F
03F
519,0
East
05F
06F
119,5
Rev.
Budget
01F
02F
03F
04F
05F
06F
CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

333,609
120,000
520,435
333,500
119,800
518,200
333,800
120,100
518,900
334,500
120,200
519,200
335,600
120,300
519,450
336,000
120,342
519,661
336,152
120,223
520,296
Figure 5: Global CoG printout
03F
04F
04F
05F
518,0
333,0
334,0
335,0
336,0
337,0
06F
PAPER No : 3483
2.4 Main variations from the previous report

Only the major changes in weight and CoG shall be included. A short explanation of why the changes
occurred shall be given. If the changes relate to more than one phase in the project, the explanation shall
give details of this. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
MAIN VARIATIONS

Area
Type
Discipline
C00
Equipment
Bulk
Electrical
Safety
Instrument
Architect
Piping
Surface protection
Structural Outfitting structure
Total
D00
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Change
Temp containers and equipment
Cables updated
Passive fireprotection
components and cables
Coating and insulation
Pipe support updated
New takeoff on paint
Outfitting updated from As built drawings, temp located hookup material
Equipment See drilling wgt.rep.

Bulk
See drilling wgt.rep.
Structural See drilling wgt.rep.
Equipment
Bulk
Structural
No changes
Minor adjustements
Minor adjustements
Equipment
Bulk
Telecom
Structural
No changes
Temporares for hookup phase
Reinforcement due to transport
0
-2
7
5
Equipment
Bulk
Piping
Surface protection
Structural
Temp. containers and equipment

Temporaires for hookup phase
New take-off
Temp. located hookup material
5
-40
5
10
-20
Equipment
Bulk
Piping
Surface protection
Structural
New weight certificate

Pipe support updated
New take-off
Temp. located hookup material
Total
L00
Total
U00
Total
P00
5
6
2
1
2
6
1
7
30
0
0
0
0
Total
F00
Rep.wgt.
0
2
3
5
Total
5
10
5
10
30
Grand total
50
Figure 6: Main Variations printout
PAPER No : 3483
2.5 Weight forecast

2.5.1 General
The weight forecast shall be included in the report as an aid to weight management, and to give an early
warning of weight trends.
As a minimum, the following shall be included, where applicable:
a) approved design changes not yet included in the reported weights;
b) proposed design changes not yet approved;
c) possible weight changes relating to any design change under review or any alternative to the design
which has a potential weight impact. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
WEIGTH FORECAST
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Area
C00
Type
Discipline
Equipment
Bulk
Electrical
Safety
Instrument
Architect
Piping
Surface protection
Description
Frequency control HVAC motors
Upgraded MOB boat system
PEN
Equipment
Bulk
Structural
Replacement of crane arrangement
54
Replacement of crane arrangement
14
68
0
2
15
3
1
2
21
15
3
1
2
21
184
86
New walls
New walls
MOB boat system
PEN
Total
L00
Equipment
Bulk
Safety
Structural
Helideck surface
PEN
Total
P00
Equipment
Bulk
Piping
Instrument
Total
Gran total
Figure 7: Weight Forecast printout
Increased size of test separator

Test separator
Test separator
Test separator
45
45
27
Total
D00
Company
reserve
Wgt. impact impact
15
15
VOR
status
APP
PEN
PEN
PEN
PEN
1
3
91
3
63
PAPER No : 3483
2.5.2 Main trend graphs

Main-trend graphs shall be produced and presented for all relevant loading conditions.
Trend graphs shall, as a minimum, contain reported weight and WLB data. Dry weight and operating
weight shall be shown where applicable. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
MAIN TREND GRAPHS
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:

32 000
30 000
Rep. wgt.
28 000
Not to exceed
Company budget
26 000
Contractor budget
Rep.dry.wgt
24 000
22 000
20 000
Revision
Date
Not to exceed
Future
Company budget
Company reserves
Change Order
Contractor budget
Margin
Rep.dry.wgt
01F
02F
03F
04F
05F
06F
01.07.2011
01.09.2011
01.11.2011
01.01.2012
01.03.2012
01.05.2012
30 000
30 000
30 000
30 000
30 000
30 000
6 729
6 729
6 729
6 729
6 729
6 729
23 271
23 271
23 271
23 271
23 271
23 271
271
221
191
126
86
86
0
50
80
145
185
185
23 000
23 050
23 080
23 145
23 185
23 185
1 500
1 315
1 035
930
725
495
21 500
21 735
22 045
22 215
22 460
22 690
Figure 8: Main Trend Graphs printout
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
PAPER No : 3483
2.6 Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline

The printout summaries shall, as a minimum show the total assembly weight for all relevant loading
conditions. CoGs shall also be included. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
AREA & DISCIPLINE SUMMARY
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F

Area
Description
EQUIP.
Total
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
335,028
120,233
520,640

Area
Description
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
335,028
120,233
520,640

Area
Description
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
335,028
120,233
520,640
HVAC
207
25
150
80
160
0
622
165
0
10
2
30
3
210
33
15
60
30
55
0
193
19,9 %
Eq./Tot.
10,0 %
3,4 %
3,1 %
Inst.
365
1
25
40
55
0
486
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
335,028
120,233
520,640
Surf.prot.
Telecom
Total
2 200
5
190
130
420
15
2 960
80
5
35
15
60
1
196
10
20
15
5
0
0
50
3 280
411
930
452
1 150
19
6 242
7,8 %
24,4 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
47,4 %
3,1 %
0,8 %
25,7 %
Bulk/Tot.
Safety
HVAC
205
20
140
80
155
0
600
165
0
10
0
30
0
205
30
10
55
30
50
0
175
20,3 %
Eq./Tot.
9,9 %
3,4 %
2,9 %
Inst.
350
1
25
40
50
0
466
Architect.
Primary
struct.
2 200
600
1 100
448
3 000
170
7 518
Surf.prot.
Telecom
Total
2 180
4
185
120
410
12
2 911
80
4
30
15
60
1
190
10
15
15
5
0
0
45
3 240
354
900
440
1 120
13
6 067
7,7 %
24,3 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
48,0 %
3,1 %
0,7 %
25,9 %
Bulk/Tot.
EQUIP.
Safety
HVAC
1 950
28
900
270
1 400
3
4 551
200
20
130
80
150
0
580
160
0
10
0
30
0
200
30
10
50
30
50
0
170
20,1 %
Eq./Tot.
10,1 %
3,5 %
2,9 %
Inst.
340
1
20
40
50
0
451
Architect.
Primary
struct.
2 130
450
1 050
440
2 940
139
7 149
Safety
HVAC
Surf.prot.
Telecom
Total
2 150
4
170
110
400
12
2 846
80
4
30
15
60
1
190
10
14
10
5
0
0
39
3 085
333
820
420
1 100
13
5 771
7,8 %
22,4 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
49,3 %
3,3 %
0,7 %
25,4 %
Bulk/Tot.
4 100
28
1 600
1 230
3 380
3
10 341
250
20
150
80
155
0
655
180
0
10
0
30
0
220
30
10
60
30
50
0
180
34,8 %
Eq./Tot.
9,9 %
3,3 %
2,7 %
430
1
25
40
50
0
546
Architect.
Second.
struct.
1 100
0
500
300
440
30
2 370
Outf.
struc.
Surf.prot.
Telecom
Total
2 600
4
200
120
410
12
3 346
80
4
30
15
60
1
190
10
14
15
5
0
0
44
3 800
333
940
440
1 120
13
6 646
8,2 %
22,0 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
50,3 %
2,9 %
0,7 %
22,4 %
Bulk/Tot.
Rep. wgt.
10 280
1 320
4 250
1 750
6 450
240
24 290
1 680
136
710
240
320
5
3 091
TOTAL
Total
4 910
586
2 260
980
3 700
174
12 610
Primary
struct.
2 115
430
1 000
440
2 940
139
7 064
Second.
struct.
1 080
0
480
300
440
30
2 330
Outf.
struc.
Rep. wgt.
10 130
970
4 150
1 700
6 300
190
23 440
1 650
129
650
220
320
5
2 974
TOTAL
Total
4 845
559
2 130
960
3 700
174
12 368
Rep. wgt.
9 880
920
3 850
1 650
6 200
190
22 690
57,1 %
18,8 %
24,0 %
54,5 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
STRUCTURAL
Piping
220
280
450
150
365
0
1 465
Figure 9: Area & Discipline Summary printout
5 000
869
2 320
998
3 800
216
13 203
STRUCTURAL
Piping
115
280
400
140
360
0
1 295
Inst.
1 700
269
720
250
350
6
3 295
TOTAL
Total
56,7 %
18,8 %
24,5 %
53,8 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
BULK
Electrical
1 100
0
500
300
450
40
2 390
Outf.
struc.
56,9 %
18,1 %
25,0 %
54,4 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
BULK
Electrical
Second.
struct.
STRUCTURAL
Piping
220
300
440
150
365
0
1 475
LC90 - Future operation installed (max load)

Area
Description
EQUIP.
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
STRUCTURAL
Piping
BULK
Electrical
1 980
30
990
280
1 480
3
4 763
Total
Architect.
220
340
445
150
370
0
1 525
EQUIP.
Total
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Safety
2 000
40
1 000
300
1 500
5
4 845
Total
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
BULK
Electrical
Primary
struct.
2 200
430
1 050
440
2 940
139
7 199
Second.
struct.
1 100
0
500
300
440
30
2 370
Outf.
struc.
1 680
129
760
240
320
5
3 134
TOTAL
Total
4 980
559
2 310
980
3 700
174
12 703
56,7 %
18,7 %
24,7 %
42,8 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
Rep. wgt.
12 880
920
4 850
2 650
8 200
190
29 690
PAPER No : 3483
2.7 As built / weighing data

Summaries of final weighing results shall be included where relevant. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
Unit
L10 - Living quarter structure
Predicted
Weighed
Difference
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
WEIGHING DATA
Date
Comment
13.11.2011
15.11.2011
Implemented in database
D10 - Drilling module

Predicted
Weighed
Difference
12.12.2011
14.12.2011
D40 - Derrick
Predicted
Weighed
Difference
27.01.2012
28.01.2012
F00 - Flare tower

Predicted
Weighed
Difference
14.02.2012
17.02.2012
C00 - Deckbox
Predicted
Weighed
Difference
03.03.2012
06.03.2012
Negleced
Neglected
Neglected
Implemented in database
Figure 10: As-built / Weighing Data printout
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:
Weight
CoG East
CoG North.
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
CoG Elev.
620
586
-34
-5,5 %
275,567
275,220
-0,347
120,476
120,550
0,074
535,756
2 122
2 150
28
1,3 %
352,765
353,110
0,345
122,987
122,550
-0,437
515,345
1 256
1 274
18
1,4 %
355,423
354,990
-0,433
125,300
123,900
-1,400
540,812
201
205
4
2,0 %
390,700
390,320
-0,380
120,200
120,000
-0,200
528,800
8 587
8 345
-242
-2,8 %
331,400
330,400
-1,000
119,600
120,600
1,000
508.3
PAPER No : 3483
3.1 Variation from last report by area and discipline

The variations from the previous report shall describe the weight changes (and reasons for them) per
discipline by area. Comparisons to the WLB may be included and various project loading conditions shall
be reflected where relevant. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
AREA & DISCIPLINE VARIATION
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F

Area
Description
EQUIP.
BULK
Total
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
0,149
-0,115
0,625

Area
Description
Electrical
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.

Area
Description
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
50,0 %
Eq./Tot.
-50,0 %
-16,7 %
0,0 %
CoG East
CoG North
CoG Elev.
0,145
-0,128
0,658
-8,3 % -16,7 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
EQUIP.
Surf.prot.
Telecom
2
-22
-2
183,3 %
-8,3 %
16,7 %
Total
Primary
struct.
18
-2
-40
10
0
2
-12
-40,0 %
Bulk/Tot.
Second.
struct.
Safety
HVAC
Inst.
Piping
Surf.prot.
Telecom
1
-2
5
5
-40
10
15
2
-22
-2
50,0 %
Eq./Tot.
-50,0 %
-16,7 %
0,0 %
183,3 %
-8,3 %
16,7 %
-8,3 % -16,7 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
EQUIP.
Safety
HVAC
Inst.
Piping
Surf.prot.
Telecom
1
-2
5
5
-40
10
15
50,0 %
Eq./Tot.
-50,0 %
-16,7 %
0,0 %
Total
Primary
struct.
18
-2
-40
10
0
2
-12
-40,0 %
Bulk/Tot.
-8,3 % -16,7 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
2
-22
-2
183,3 %
-8,3 %
16,7 %
Total
Second.
struct.
Safety
HVAC
Inst.
Piping
Surf.prot.
Telecom
1
-2
5
5
-40
10
15
50,0 %
Eq./Tot.
-50,0 %
-16,7 %
0,0 %
Total
7
7
10
3
0
0
27
17
Rep. wgt.
-8,3 % -16,7 %
Bulk/Tot.bulk.
2
-22
-2
183,3 %
-8,3 %
16,7 %
Figure 11: Variation from Last Report by Area & Discipline printout
Total
18
-2
-40
10
0
2
-12
-40,0 %
Bulk/Tot.
30
5
-25
18
0
2
30
11,1 %
63,0 %
25,9 %
90,0 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
Primary
struct.
Second.
struct.
TOTAL
Outf.
struc.
Total
7
7
10
3
0
0
27
7
10
3
17
Rep. wgt.
30
5
-25
18
0
2
30
11,1 %
63,0 %
25,9 %
90,0 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
STRUCTURAL
Architect.
TOTAL
Outf.
struc.
7
10
18
-2
-40
10
0
2
-12
-40,0 %
Bulk/Tot.
30
5
-25
18
0
2
30
11,1 %
63,0 %
25,9 %
90,0 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
BULK
Electrical
STRUCTURAL
Architect.
17
Rep. wgt.
7
7
10
3
0
0
27
BULK
Electrical
Total
STRUCTURAL
Architect.
TOTAL
Outf.
struc.
7
10
BULK
Electrical
Total
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
Piping
-40
10

Area
Description
EQUIP.
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
STRUCTURAL
Architect.
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
-2,543
-0,119
-0,636
15
Total
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Inst.
-2
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
0,153
-0,117
0,635
HVAC
5
5
Total
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Safety
Primary
struct.
Second.
struct.
TOTAL
Outf.
struc.
Total
7
7
10
3
17
Rep. wgt.
7
7
10
3
0
0
27
11,1 %
63,0 %
25,9 %
90,0 %
Struc./Tot.struc.
Tot.st./Tot.
30
5
-25
18
0
2
30
PAPER No : 3483
3.2 Trend graphs by area

Trend graphs by area shall be included where relevant. These trend graphs shall contain reported weights,
and the WLB shall be included if established. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
TREND GRAPHS BY AREA
Contractor:
Page:
Rev.date:
Revision:
C00 - Deckbox
13 500
13 000
12 500
Rep. wgt.
12 000
Not to exceed
11 500
Company budget
Contractor budget
11 000
Rep.dry.wgt
10 500
10 000
9 500
9 000
Revision
Date
Not to exceed
Future
Company budget
Company reserves
Change Order
Contractor budget
Margin
Rep.dry.wgt
01F
02F
03F
04F
05F
06F
01.07.2011
01.09.2011
01.11.2011
01.01.2012
01.03.2012
01.05.2012
13 000
13 000
13 000
13 000
13 000
13 000
2 734
2 734
2 734
2 734
2 734
2 734
10 266
10 266
10 266
10 266
10 266
10 266
331
319
308
285
266
201
0
12
23
46
65
65
9 935
9 947
9 958
9 981
10 000
10 000
435
317
148
196
150
120
9 500
9 630
9 810
9 785
9 850
9 880
Figure 12: Trend Graphs by Area printout
RIG CONSTRUCTOR
x of 50
01.05.2012
06F
PAPER No : 3483
3.3 CoG plots

CoG plots by area may be included where relevant.
The CoG location for a fixed structure shall be presented relative to the lifting control envelope, the lifting
points, the support point or the axis, as appropriate. Weight and CoG coordinates shall also be presented.
The inclusion of CoG plots for a floating structure is optional. Where included, they shall be presented
relative to the requirements of the project. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
AREA CoG PLOTS
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
C00 - Deckbox
North
511,0
Budget
120,0
Budget
510,0
01F
01F
02F
02F
509,0
03F
03F
119,5
04F
East
119,0
329,0
Rev.
Budget
01F
02F
03F
04F
05F
06F
Envelope
Vertical envelope
Horizontal envelope
120,5
330,0
331,0
332,0
CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

330,000
120,000
510,000
329,600
119,500
508,050
329,600
119,900
508,140
330,450
120,320
508,420
330,830
119,830
508,380
331,600
119,600
508,300
332,000
119,500
508,500
Figure 13: CoG Plots printout
333,0
05F
06F
508,0
04F
East
507,0
329,0
330,0
331,0
332,0
333,0
05F
06F
PAPER No : 3483
3.4 Area weight printouts

Area printouts shall be included for the relevant loading conditions. These printouts should as a minimum,
contain the WLB, reported weight and CoG by discipline, together with any variations from the previous
report. Temporaries shall either be included on these printouts, or printed separately. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
AREA WEIGHT
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F

Area
Description
THIS PERIOD
Net.dry.
wgt.
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
Allowance/
Contingency
10 108
1 299
4 150
1 691
6 190
240
23 678

Area
Description
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
Allowance/
Contingency
9 961
955
4 053
1 643
6 046
190
22 846

Area
Description
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
169
15
97
57
254
0
594
9 715
906
3 760
1 594
5 950
190
22 114
Allowance/
Contingency
165
14
90
56
250
0
576
10 130
970
4 150
1 700
6 300
190
23 440
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
12 665
906
4 736
2 560
7 869
190
28 926
Figure 14: Area Weight printout
Allowance/
Contingency
215
14
114
90
331
0
764
BUDGET
Rep. dev.
10 250
1 315
4 270
1 720
6 450
235
24 240
30
5
-20
30
0
5
50
Rep.dry
wgt.
Rep. dev.
10 100
965
4 170
1 670
6 300
185
23 390
9 880
920
3 850
1 650
6 200
190
22 690
Rep.dry
wgt.
30
5
-20
30
0
5
50
30
5
-20
30
0
5
50
LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry
wgt.
12 880
920
4 850
2 650
8 200
190
29 690
Rep.dry
wgt.
12 850
915
4 870
2 620
8 200
185
29 640
COORDINATES
Rep.dev.
10 400
1 400
4 400
1 900
6 250
250
24 600
-120
-80
-150
-150
200
-10
-310
CoG East
Rep.dry
wgt.
Rep.dry
wgt.
-120
-80
-150
-150
200
-10
-310
CoG East
Rep. dev.
30
5
-20
30
0
5
50
13 000
1 000
5 000
2 800
8 000
200
30 000
CoG North
332,000
277,000
304,000
328,000
372,000
391,000
335,706
-120
-80
-150
-150
200
-10
-310
CoG East
CoG Elev.
119,500
120,400
121,200
118,500
121,200
120,200
120,228
CoG North
332,000
277,000
304,000
328,000
372,000
391,000
335,706
BUDGET
Rep.dry
wgt.
508,500
535,500
529,000
531,500
528,200
528,500
520,640
508,500
535,500
529,000
531,500
528,200
528,500
520,372
COORDINATES
Rep.dev.
10 000
1 000
4 000
1 800
6 000
200
23 000
CoG Elev.
119,500
120,400
121,200
118,500
121,200
120,200
120,233
COORDINATES
Rep.dev.
10 250
1 050
4 300
1 850
6 100
200
23 750
CoG North
332,000
277,000
304,000
328,000
372,000
391,000
335,028
BUDGET
Rep. dev.
9 850
915
3 870
1 620
6 200
185
22 640
Rep.dry
wgt.
BUDGET
LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry
wgt.

Area
Description
THIS PERIOD
Net.dry.
wgt.
Rep.dry
wgt.
LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry
wgt.
THIS PERIOD
Net.dry.
wgt.
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
10 280
1 320
4 250
1 750
6 450
240
24 290
THIS PERIOD
Net.dry.
wgt.
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
172
21
100
59
260
0
612
LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry
wgt.
CoG Elev.
119,500
120,400
121,200
118,500
121,200
120,200
120,228
508,500
535,500
529,000
531,500
528,200
528,500
520,372
COORDINATES
Rep.dev.
-120
-80
-150
-150
200
-10
-310
CoG East
332,000
277,000
304,000
328,000
372,000
391,000
336,790
CoG North
119,500
120,400
121,200
118,500
121,200
120,200
120,190
CoG Elev.
508,500
535,500
529,000
531,500
528,200
528,500
520,307
PAPER No : 3483
5.1 Assumptions
The assumptions for the report shall be split into two main sections, one for general assumptions and one
for discipline asssumptions. ISO 19901-5: 2003
5.1.1 General assumptions

The general assumptions shall include information concerning layout, construction philosophy, inclusions
at various project loading conditions, temporaries for various phases, residual fluid content, any bridges to
adjacent facilities etc. ISO 19901-5: 2003
5.1.2 Discipline assumptions

The discipline assumptions shall include information about the basis for discipline work, any
discrepancies according to general reporting instructions, any interdiscipline assumptions, any special
hook-up assumptions etc. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
DISCIPLINE ASSUMPTIONS
Code
E
F
H
I
L
M
O
P
R
SA
SB
SC
T
Description
Electrical
Safety
HVAC
Instrument
Architect
Mechanical
Marine
Piping
Surf.prot.
Primary str.
Sec. struct.
Outf. struc.
Telecom
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Assumption
Cable ladders, Lighting, Transits and Cables imported from Engineering Database
Discipline MTO data based on drawing information imported from Engineering Database
MTO import from Engineering Database
MTO import from Engineering Database
Co-ordinates are transferred from the 3D model or entered manually by the disciplines if not modelled yet.
Piping lines MTO import from Engineering Database, Pipe support MTO from PDMS, MTO for insulation based on calculations
MTO based on input from structural and piping drawings.
Co-ordinates for MTO quantities are transferred from the 3D model.
Co-ordinates for estimated by the Structural discipline by utilising info from the 3D model.
Telecom imported from Engineering Database
Figure 15: Discipline Assumptions printout
PAPER No : 3483
5.2.1 Global origin

The annex shall also show the location of global origin relative to axis and levels of the main structure.
ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
GLOBAL ORIGIN & MAIN AREA CODES
Figure 16: Global Origin printout
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
PAPER No : 3483
5.2.2 Area designations

This report annex shall describe all project main areas/modules and sub-areas, including their location,
size, code and name. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
AREA DESIGNATIONS
Figure 17: Area Designations printout
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
PAPER No : 3483
5.3 Weight allowance and contingency

If weight allowances and contingencies are applied to the net weights, these shall be reported
ISO 19901-5:
2003
Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
WEIGHT ALLOWANCES AND CONTINGENCIES
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Disc. Code Disc. Name
BULK (B)
B0
E
F
H
I
L
M
O
P
R
SA
SB
SC
T
X
Electrical
Safety
HVAC
Instrument
Architect
Mechanical
Marine
Piping
Surf. prot.
Piping
Struct.primary
Struct.second.
Struct.outfitting
Multi disc.
B1
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
B2
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
7,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
EQUIPMENT (E)
B3
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
4,0
5,0
5,0
5,0
B4
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
2,0
3,0
3,0
3,0
B5
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
1,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
E0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
E1
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
0,0 -
E2
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
10,0
-10,0
10,0
-
E3
7,0
7,0
7,0
7,0
7,0
E4
4,0
4,0
4,0
4,0
4,0
-
7,0
4,0
7,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
-
2,0
-
4,0
-
E5
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
2,0
0,0
-
2,0
-
0,0
-
Figure 18: Weight Allowance and Contingency printout
5.4 Report codes

All definitions, abbreviations and codes used in the report shall be fully explained.
The codes used may include, but not be limited to:
-
weight installation codes

weight phase codes
weight status codes
area codes ISO 19901-5: 2003
5.4.1 Weight installation codes

Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
INSTALLATION CODES
Code
I
N
Description
Installed
Not installed
Figure 19: Weight Installation Codes printout
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
PAPER No : 3483
5.4.2 Weight phase codes

Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
STATUS CODES
Code
LC50
LC60
LC70
LC90
Description
Transport to offshore field
Lift at offshore field
Offshore dry installed
Future operating installed (max load)
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Figure 20: Weight Phase Codes printout
5.4.3 Weight status codes

Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
STATUS CODES
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
Code
B0
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
E0
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
Description
Estimate based upon historical data from other projects.
Weight take-off from drawings and 3D-models issued in Front end engineering design (FEED).
Weight take-off from drawings and 3D-models issued in the Project execution
Weight take-off from drawings and 3D-models issued in the Project execution period after inter discipline check (IDC).
Weight take-off from drawings approved for construction and as-built.
Weighed weights.
Estimate based upon historical data from other projects.
Estimate based upon concept specific preliminary process data.
Estimate based upon information from equipment data sheets.
Weight data as supplied by vendor.
Confirmed weight data from vendor based on fabrication drawings and catalogue data for standard equipment.
Weighed weights.
Figure 21: Weight Status Codes printout
5.4.4 Area codes

Client:
Doc.no.:
Doc.title:
Printout:
OIL COMPANY
XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX
STATUS CODES
Code
C00
L00
U00
P00
D00
F00
T00
Description
Deckbox
Living quarter
Utility modules
Process modules
Drilling modules
Flare
Topside
Figure 22: Area Codes printout
Page:
x of 50
Rev.date: 01.05.2012
Revision: 06F
PAPER No : 3483
Automatic generated weight reports

Background
A lot of the time consume during production of weight reports are related to copying and pasting data from
the weight control system into a spreadsheet to format tables and printout and further into the final word
processor document. A better workflow would be to if the final report document could be produced directly
from the weight control system. This would make it possible to increase the time spent on investigating the
status and reasons for changes, instead of manual editing of spreadsheets and word processing documents. I
would also significantly reduce the chances of getting errors prone to missing updates between the various
sources and formula errors in the spreadsheets.
Requirements
Automatic generated weight reports can only be possible if all necessary information is present in the
weight database. One of the goals of this paper was to get an overview of how much of the information of
weight reports that can be presented as printouts / tables from the system and how much must be produced
manually.
Until now we have not found any information that cannot be systemized and stored in the weight database.
On the contrary, systemizing all information of a weight report would be of great benefit because that
makes it possible to quickly search up all related information from previous projects.
But there is no doubt that it would be significant amount of work to define all the queries and formats thats
necessary to produce weight reports with proper layout. It is therefore of vital importance that the content
and layout of the weight report are standardized.
Conclusion
There is good correlation between the ISO standard for weight control, ISO 19901-5, and the Statoil weight
control requirement, TR2352, when it comes to weight reporting. The Statoil requirement document focus
on which data fields should be included in the database, while the ISO standard is specific when it comes to
what information should be included in the various sessions of a weight report. While most reviewed past
weight reports includes all the information required by the ISO standard, the order of this information is
presented in the reports, and the formatting of printouts and tables are varying a lot. It should be considered
to extend the ISO standard 19901-5 with an appendix specifying contents and formats for printouts and
tables due to the requirements specified in chapter 6.3 of the standard.
A report format specification would also make it possible to automatic generate weight reports from the
weight control system. But without this standard specification, it will probably be too much work
implementing different format templates customized to the oil companies different requirements and
practice.
Terms and definitions
CoG: Center of gravity

ENS: Engineering Numbering System
GUID: Globally Unique Identifier
Net weight: Weight without any allowance or contingency factor applied
Gross weight: Net weight including allowance/contingency factor
NS: Norwegian Standard
PAPER No : 3483
PAPER No : 3483
Appendix 1: Examples of Main Summary tables from various Weight

Reports.
Example 1: Jacket topside
Example 2: FPSO topside
Example 3: Jacket topside
PAPER No : 3483
Example 4: Semi-submersible total platform
PAPER No : 3483
Example 5: FPSO topside and vessel
PAPER No : 3483
PAPER No : 3483
Appendix 2: Example of chapter mapping between ISO standard

chapters and weight reports from past projects
ISO ch.
6.3.1
6.3.1a
6.3.1b
6.3.1c
6.3.1d
6.3.1e
6.3.2
6.3.2.1
6.3.2.2
6.3.2.3
6.3.2.4
6.3.2.5
6.3.2.5.1
6.3.2.5.1a
6.3.2.5.1b
6.3.2.5.1c
6.3.2.5.2
6.3.2.6
6.3.2.7
6.3.3
6.3.3.1
6.3.3.2
6.3.3.3
6.3.3.4
6.3.4
6.3.4.1
6.3.4.2
6.3.4.3
6.3.5
6.3.5.1
6.3.5.1a
6.3.5.1b
6.3.5.2
6.3.5.3
6.3.5.4
6.3.5.4a
6.3.5.4b
6.3.5.4c
6.3.5.4d
6.3.5.5
6.3.5.6
Chapter
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.5.1
2.5.1.1
2.5.1.2
2.5.1.3
2.5.2
2.6
2.7
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
5
5.1
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4.1
5.4.2
5.4.3
5.4.4
5.5
5.6
Description
Introduction
Major assemblies
Cut-off date
Weight information provided by others
List of reported loading conditions
Discrepancies
Summary and conclusions to the report
Main summary
Weight and load budget (WLB)
Global CoG plot
Main variations from the previous report
Weight forecast
General
Approved design changes not included
Proposed design changes
Possible weight changes
Main-trend graphs
Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline
As built / weighing data
Area / module reports
Variation from last report by area and discipline
Trend graphs by area
CoG plots
Area weight printouts
Special reports (optinal)
System reports
Sub-area report or sub-assemblies report
Secondary lift report
Assumptions
General assumptions
Discipline assumptions
Area designations and global origin
Weight allowance and contingency
Report codes
Weight installation codes
Weight phase codes
Weight status codes
Area codes
References
Other descriptions (incl. VO)
SemiModule/
Jacket Topside Jacket Topside Jacket Topside submersible modification
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1
1
Missing
1
1
1
1
1
5.6
1
2
5
9
10
2.2.3
2.2
7.8-7.9
2.3
2.3.1-4+2.4
2.3.1-4+2.4
Missing
2.3.1-4+2.4
3.1
Missing
4.2.3
2.2
7
NA
NA
NA
8
2.1
7.1
8.6
NA
NA
NA
8.7
9.2
Missing
3.1
NA
NA
NA
6.6
4.2
4.1.1
2.1
3
6.5
3
4
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
8.18.2
7.2
7.1.1+10.2
Missing
8
9.2+9.3
5
8.2
7.7
7.8-7.9
6.1
6.5
6.6
Missing
7.3+8.3
7.3
Missing
Missing
9.1-9.6
Missing
4.1.1
4.2.1-3
NA
Missing
A.1
A.2-A.8
Missing
6.1
7
Missing
Missing
5.4
Missing
Missing
NA
NA
4.1
4.1
A.10
4.1
1.2
3.1
A-C
A-A
3.1
3.2
Missing
6.4-
10.4
5.3
Missing
Missing
11
A.10
4.1
6.2
Missing
1.1
A-A
A-C
1.3
10
Missing
1.1
Missing
Missing
1.3
Missing
10.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
4.1.1
3.1
Missing
5.7-8
5.6
5.5
5.4
2.1
3.3

Report Format For Weight Control of Offshore Structures PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report Format For Weight Control of Offshore Structures PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SAWE Paper No.

REPORT FORMAT FOR WEIGHT CONTROL OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

For Presentation at the

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

1.2 Cut-off date ...................................................................................................................................................... 7

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

3.4 Area weight printouts ........................................................................................................................................ 19

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

The goal of this Paper

ISO 19901-5: Weight control during engineering and construction

Statoil requirement TR2352: Weight control requirements for topsides

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Identification (key) and description fields

Unique identification of items

Data from 3D systems

Topics for further discussion and consideration

Quantity, weight and co-ordinate fields

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Net weight vs. gross weight

Content and co-ordinates

Topics for further discussion and consideration

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Additional fields needed to comply to ISO standard

Topics for further discussion and consideration

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Weight report content

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

Layout of printouts and tables

1.1 Major assemblies

Includes subareas D10, D20, D30 og D40 (tower)

Figure 1: Major Assemblies printout

1.2 Cut-off date

1.3 Weight information provided by others

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

1.4 List of reported loading conditions

Figure 2: Loading Conditions printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

2.1 Main summary

LC50 - Transport to offshore field

LC60 - Lift at offshore field

Figure 3: Main Summary printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

2.2 Weight and load budget (WLB)

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

Figure 4: Weight and Load Budget printout

2.3 Global CoG plot

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Figure 5: Global CoG printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

2.4 Main variations from the previous report

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

Equipment See drilling wgt.rep.

Temp. containers and equipment

New weight certificate

Figure 6: Main Variations printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

2.5 Weight forecast

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

Replacement of crane arrangement

Replacement of crane arrangement