Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/translate_f
Gratings
Quality Assurance
RAL-GZ 638
1 of 1 10-06-2013 12:50
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
Standards-Download-Beuth-Meiser Vogtland-OHG-KdNr.7431708 LfNr.4236823001-2008-11-
13 13:24
Page 2
Publisher
RAL German Institute for
Quality Assurance and Certification eV
Victory Str 39
53757 Sankt Augustin
Tel: (02241) 16 05-0
Fax: (02241) 16 05 -11
E-mail: RAL-Institut@RAL.de
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
13 13:24
Page 3
Gratings
Quality Assurance
RAL-GZ 638
Quality Association
Gratings eV
High Street 113-115
58095 Hagen
Tel: (0 23 31) 20 08-0
Fax: (0 23 31) 20 08 40
E-mail: info@gitterroste-online.de
Internet: www.gitterroste-online.de
This quality assurance is of RAL German Institute for Quality Assurance and labelin
drawing eV within the principles for a quality mark in recognition method
in cooperation with the relevant professional and trade circles and the competent au
the jointly developed. In June 2008, in collaboration with the Quality Association
Community gratings eV is a revision of the basic goodness.
Page 4
Page 5
Table of Contents
1 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.1 General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Terms and definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
2 Quality regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1 Materials
.5 and dimensions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Versions.
5 ............................................5
2.2.1 Welded gratings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.2 Gratings.
5 ...............................................
2.2.3 Slot
5 grids. ..............................................
2.2.3.1 Einsteckroste.
5 ...........................................
2.2.3.2 Through
..5 Hole grids. ......................................
2.2.3.3 Dimensions.
.....5 ............................................
2.2.4 Grating
5 stair treads. ......................................
2.3 Design
5 and Auwahlkriterien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3.1 Dimension of the mesh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.2 Edging.
.6 .........................................6
2.4 Tolerances. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5 Corrosion
.6 protection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....6
3 Detection methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1 Load
. 6 types. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2 Proof by the method of partial factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3 Design values. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3.1 Design values for exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.2 Design
6 values for resistors / material properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.4 The ultimate limit state. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.5 Limit state of serviceability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4 Berechungsgrundlagen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..7
5 Calculation examples. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1 Legend.
..7 ..........................................7
5.2 Compilation formula for calculation bases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.3 Examples of calculations for gratings made of steel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.1 Calculation
. . . . . . . . 8example 1 - welded gratings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.1.1 Lastanordung
.8 1..........................................
5.3.1.2 Lastanordung
.8 2..........................................
5.3.2 Calculation
.9 Example 2 - gratings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.2.1 Lastanordung
..9 1 . . . . ......................................
5.3.2.2 Lastanordung
.9 2..........................................
5.3.3 Calculation
10 example 3 - gratings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.4 Calculation
10 Example 4 - welded gratings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.5 Calculation
. 11 Example 5 - Plug grids. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 11
6 Test Specifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1 Initial test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
Page 6
Table of Contents
Page 7
Q
a
Quality and Inspection I
for gratings
Page 8
Quality and Inspection
2.3.2 edging
3.3 design values
Gratings are embedded in non-load bearing and cross bar direction with
edged of a frame, this also applies to sections. The 3.3.1 Design values of
Edge rods are welded together at the corners. actions
The design value F d an exposur
net:
Fd = ΓF· Fk
2.4 Tolerances
Where:
In the preparation of the gratings, only the corresponding
Annex 1 listed manufacturing and supply tolerances to- γF The partial safety factor
permeable. Fk the characteristic value o
For the ultimate limit state is in th
Rule γ F= ΓQ = 1.5 is set when it
2.5 Corrosion Protection is a traffic load.
Gratings made of steel condition, unless otherwise agreed, For limit state of serviceability
corrosion protection by galvanizing according to DIN EN γ is typically
ISO 1461. F= 1.0 is set, ie
Γ value of the action F is then d
sungswert used.
Page 9
Q
a
Ed ≤ C d Table 1 - Number of co-supportI
It is
Bearing bar height Number "m
Ed the design value of the load, here the (Mm) the crossba
maximum deformation,
Welded gratings
Cd The design value of Gebrauchstauglichkeitskrite- Mesh spacingM
Ministry, here are the allowable deformation. (34 x 38) (A
20 2.25
25 2.19
30 2.13
4 Basis of calculation 35 2.06
40 2.00
45
The following procedure shall be demonstrated for grid computing 1.94
grates in section 2.2.1 to 2.2.4 50 1.88
55 1.81
- The characteristic value for the allowable voltage 60 1.75
f is y, k= 23.5 kN / cm2and 235 N / mm2 in comparison65 1.69
use of material S235JR according to DIN EN 10025, 70 1.63
- The allowable deflection, f 'working load be- 75 1.56
contributes L/200 of the span, maximum 4 mm. 80 1.50
85 -
When using other materials, such as DC01 C590, S355 90 -
J2G3 (see section 1.1), the corresponding allowable 95 -
Use stress and modulus. 100 -
On the basis of test series carried out with a load-
cube of 200mm x 200mm, at the most unfavorable point is the Table 2 - Dimensions supporting
Number n 'of the loaded support bars, taking into account the experiments carried out
shear lag supporting rods, m 'is calculated by the following formula:
Bearing b
[Mm]
n= +M
Welded gratings 2 and 3
4
Explanation: m '= number of through the load distribution 5
Crossbars co-supporting bearing bars according to Table 1
Here are the values determined on two digits after the Bearing bar
Decimal rounding up or down. Gratings 20-60
For rectangular load area is the most unfavorable load position 61 to 80
demonstrated (see, for example, [Figure 1]). 81-100
As with all grills can span the clear-span of a * Bearing bar heights acc.
be set. Table 1
Bearing ba
a) welded gratings Gratings 2
In determining the carrying rod modulus, W '
3
or supporting rod moment of inertia, l 'are the Tragstabab-
4 and 5
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
Standards-Download-Beuth-Meiser Vogtland-OHG-KdNr.7431708 LfNr.4236823001-2008-11-
13 13:24
Page 10
Page 11
Q
a
I
Page 12
Staff
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
Standards-Download-Beuth-Meiser Vogtland-OHG-KdNr.7431708 LfNr.4236823001-2008-11-
13 13:24
Page 13
Q
a
6 Test Specifications I
6.1 Initial type testing
Of the Quality Association is for
monitoring the State Material Tes
another professionally oriented in
le commissioned.
The representative of the applica
made gratings according to the q
5.3.4 Calculation Example 4
The applicant shall provide proof
Welded gratings provide evidence that he is alread
distributed load capacity = 5 kN / m2 performs.
Span = 105 cm He names the name of the Qualit
Bearing bar pitch = 3.43 cm ity responsible personnel.
Cross bar pitch = 3.81 cm
The ultimate limit state
6.2 Surveillance
Each user has the quality mark fo
self-monitoring and testing neces
perform the statistical principles a
term and to create records for at
re kept.
The self-monitoring to demonstra
the quality and testing in accorda
Staff
7 Marking
Gratings that this quality and test
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
Page 14
As far as labeling is not a product of circumstances Formalities for the request for aw
is possible, then the following simplified labeling Chen and the leadership of the ch
lation. Rules for granting and
All quality assured gratings can "RAL638" and the the quality mark of quality comm
MPN is in neutral, such as
"RAL638/27".
The labeling can be done by:
- Embossing, 8 changes
- Welding of embossed flakes, Changes to this quality and testin
- Adhesive labels, tional nature, require the prior wr
tion of RAL.
- Color temple.
Notification
You will aftertoathe quality mark
reasonable periob
The font size should be 6 to 10 mm. the quality of community enacted
Page 15
Q
a
Appendix 1 I
Production and supply specifications
Current production and delivery tolerances are maintained for the production of all grids accordi
- For carrying rods ≤ 100 mm x 5 mm,
- Mesh spacing maximum of 68 mm and a minimum of 11 mm,
- Rust size maximum of 2.02,mA lateral dimension, must not be greater than 2000 mm.
Page 16
to Appendix 1
Permitted tolerances for gratings
The tolerances occurring under load (deformation) are not included.
Gratings
Deviation for convex max xt. = 1 with dimensions of length> 600 mm: max.
max. 3 mm 200
8 mm smaller dimensions than 600 mm:
Deviation for concave ot max. = 1 with dimensions of length> 600 mm: max.
max. 3 mm 200
8 mm smaller dimensions than 600 mm:
Deviation for convex xq max. = 1 the width at dimensions> 600 mm: max.
max. 3 mm 200
8 mm smaller dimensions than 600 mm:
Deviation for concave oq max. = 1 the width at dimensions> 600 mm: max.
max. 3 mm 200
8 mm smaller dimensions than 600 mm:
Page 17
Q
a
to Appendix 1 I
Deviation for convex max xt. = 1 with dimensions of length> 450 mm: max.
max. 3 mm 150
8 mm dimensions smaller than 450 mm:
Page 18
to Appendix 1
Deviation for concave oq max. = 1 with dimensions of length> 600 mm: max.
max. 3 mm 200
8 mm smaller dimensions than 600 mm:
The tolerances occurring under load (deformation) is not included.
4 Monitoring
2 Awards 4.1 The Quality Assurance
Use of
to the
Association
2.1 The Quality Assurance Association gratings Foundation awards quality markand
is entitled
manufacturers and com
turer at the request of the right to the label gratings to To monitor
obliged to test specifications.
lead. monitoring
The continuityis the
of RAL by a moni
the over-
and independent testing institute d
2.2 The application of the quality mark is awarded to the
Office of the 4.2 every quality mark itself
Quality community gratings eV, that
makeheprovision
adheres to forthe quality and
High Street 113, 58095 Hagen, carefully
He has the perform operational self
zuzeichnen.
to be addressed. The application is a legally binding under Draw-
tion
The at any time
quality inspector
committee theitsrecor
agen
ter commitment form (sample 1) to be attached. user quality
The submitsmarkits quality assured p
2.3 The application shall be examined by the Quality Committee. The goodness-
Surveillance audits by the Quality
Committee may invite experts or a state-certified sen Officer in accordance with th
recognized testing with these tasks entrusted. With the relevant requirements of the qual
examining officer has before his Prüfaufga- bears the costs of testing.
He
tion to legitimize. The external monitoring body checks inappropriately
4.3 Auditor may at any time
reported the products of the applicant in accordance with the quality
Request
during theoroperation
remove user's
of sample
and testing. It may operate by the applicant
see
You also commercially
can sample
Gütezeichenbe- or at the c
inspect and take samples of products, the
mentioned in the quality and test documentation to- RentabilitatChanged samples are
Requested
operation
Reviewersatcan any time during the o
call and see. About the test result, it provides a lighter-
Gen.
nis from which she the applicant and the quality of community
delivered. The test costs borne by the applicant. 4.4 If a check is negative or
2.4 If the test is positive, gives the goodness Community objected
products to the quality committee
The quality mark can also be a re
community to the applicant upon proposal of the quality committee
the quality mark. The award will be certified (sample 2). require testing.
If the test is negative the Quality Committee of the About 4.5 each test result is a
Complaint. He must justify the deferral in writing. issue th institute.
testimony of the commissioned-
Quality mark
The quality ofeach receive a copy
the community and
4.6 Where products objected
Objectionable,
unjustified, carriesthe the
testing costs,
3 use det, she wears the affected qualit
3.1 Users may sign the label for products
Nisse use, which corresponds to the quality and testing
speak.
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Translated version of ral-gz638-2009.pdf
Page 20
Implementing rules
5.2 The right to use the certification mark will be The appeal has no suspensive eff
ekes or permanently for serious or repeated sion of the quality committee is fi
The develop-
Violations withdrawn.
5.3 The quality of a community can Ahndungsmaßnahme
decide if the character user tests delayed
or prevented.
5.4 Before any measures concerned must be heard. 7 regranting
5.5 The quality mark against which in a sense- A quality mark, the right to use o
these statutes final Ahndungsmaßnahme ausgespro- Quality label has been removed t
chen is, has all led by its violation to- the deadline to apply for a re aw
to wear attributable costs, especially as cash outlays If continual withdrawal of the app
Evaluators, testing and travel expenses. The cost is 2 data is provided.
Weeks due to requirements - without prejudice by Einle- Provisions for the will
Both applications initial
beaward of
in accor
tion of a complaint and the like. treated.
5.6 In urgent cases, the Chairman of the Gütege- Express
The board conditions for the
may specify re-pre
additiona
Community the quality mark provisionally with immediate effect
escape. This is within 14 days by the Board of
To confirm quality community.
8 changes
These rules, together with pattern
6 Complaint tion bill, award certificate) are re
Changes, including editorial, requ
6.1 Quality mark against Ahndungsbeschei can- ness the prior written consent of
en within 4 weeks after they are delivered, the quality- occur
They within a reasonable time af
Insert Committee Complaining. the Quality Association have bee
Page 21
Pattern 1 to
the
implementing
rules
Certificate of Obligation
Bestowal certificate
(The company)
of the RAL German Institute for Quality Assurance and Labelling eV, Sankt Augustin,
recognized and registered with the German Patent and Trademark Office as a collective
PATTERN protected
Page 23
HISTORY
The German private sector and the then German government established in 1925
as a joint initiative of the Reich Committee on Delivery (RAL).
The common goal was the unification and clarification of technical
Delivery. Connections necessary to defined quality requirements and their
Control - the system of quality assurance was created. For its implementation was the
Creation of a neutral institution as a self-governing body of all the market participants
necessary. Thus was the birth of RAL. Since then, the competence is
the creation of RAL quality mark for.
RAL TODAY