Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WELDED CONNECTION DESIGN & COST welded during the erection stage. Research has been done by academia to
determine strength of different types of welds. This resulted in equations
ESTIMATION specified by steel design codes for determining strength of welds for an
acceptable safety index. Ultimately these equations are used by engineers to
design welded structural steel connections. Unfortunately, not much energy has
been put into developing a tool which automates design and cost estimates of
such connections. This report focuses on developing a spreadsheet tool for
design and cost estimation of welded steel connections.
Acknowledgements
Rick Hawkins, Estimator at a local steel fabrication shop.
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT........................................................................................................ 1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................. 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 2
2.0 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 3
3.0 INTRODUCTION TO WELDING ............................................................ 3
3.1 BASICS OF WELDING TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 3
3.2 TYPES OF WELDS ....................................................................................... 6
3.3 ADVANTAGES OF WELDING ....................................................................... 7
3.4 DISADVANTAGES OF WELDING .................................................................. 7
4.0 INVESTIGATED CONNECTIONS .......................................................... 8
4.1 BRACED CONNECTIONS.............................................................................. 8
4.2 BEAM COLUMN CONNECTIONS .................................................................. 9
5.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY .................................................................... 10
5.1 GOVERNING CODE ................................................................................... 10
Abstract 5.2 FORMATTED SPREADSHEET TOOL ............................................................ 10
Welds are commonly used in structural steel connections to provide rigidity and 5.3 DESIGN PROCEDURE ................................................................................ 11
continuity between connecting elements. Fabricated structural steel assemblies 5.3.1 Design Strength of Welds ................................................................ 11
are typically shop welded and shipped to site, where they are bolted or field 5.3.2 Flange and Web Strength of Wide Flange Sections ........................ 13
Various cost parameters such as layout, cutting, fit up, welding and are heated to extreme temperatures. A mixture of molten metal is
cost minimization tactics are discussed in section six. created which initiates a metallurgical bond between the two
connecting pieces. This happens as base metal and filler material
2.0 Objectives cool together to initiate this bond. After cooling, a region called the
Current selection of software available to the engineer Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) is created around the weld. This region
provides means of designing various elements for welded has a different microstructure than the weld and base metals and is
connections. However, such software are expensive, limited and typically harder and more brittle. Figure 3-1 shows a cut section
not very flexible. The spreadsheet has been recognized as a through a weld illustrating the HAZ.
powerful, yet simple and easy-to-use tool in various fields of
engineering. This report aims to provide the engineer with an
efficient and flexible tool for design and cost estimation of welded
connections by means of using Excel. Four design spreadsheets are
prepared, which take into account numerous variables in the design
space such as connection dimensions, material properties, forces
and moments. Design calculations are based on the Canadian steel
design code. Moreover, cost parameters are determined and
included in each spreadsheet.
from a DC power source, whereas the pulsed process uses periodic separate filler which is typically fed by hand. TIG welding can use
impulses in order to lower heat and current input. This way, both AC and DC power source. Typically Argon gas is used in
thinner materials under 4mm which could not be welded by the combination with AC power. This setup is typically used for light
conventional method, can be welded using the pulsated method. gauge material between 0 and 5mm thick. Helium is used with DC
According to WeldingEngineer.com [7], common problems with power to be used for welding thicker materials.
MIG welding are: irregular wire feed, porosity, burn back and Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) is used for welding
unstable arc. Moreover, this process is sensitive to wind speed pieces 10mm and thicker. In this process, gas flux is fed
above 5mph and requires shelters to keep wind away from freely continuously with the electrode. Flux is fed continuously along
discharged shielding gas. with filler material to shield and protect the weld. Flux then turns
Flux Cored Arch Welding (FCAW) is quite similar to MIG into removable slag on the weld. Figure 3-4 illustrates the SAW
welding. However, in this case, the electrode, which is also a process.
consumable filler material, contains a flux core. The flux produced
protects the weld in addition to shielding gas. This process is not
sensitive to wind speed. Figure 3-3 illustrates the FCAW method.
Figure 3-4
SAW Process, Cooper [2]
Figure 3-5
SMAW Process, Cooper [2]
Figure 3-6a
Fillet Weld Positions, Cooper [2]
3.2 Types of Welds
There are two types of welds: full and partial penetration. Partial
penetration welds have fusion through part of the thickness of the
joining pieces. In full penetration welds, fusion is all through the
full thickness of the joining pieces. The abovementioned weld
types branch into different kinds of welds, which are discussed in
this chapter.
Fillet welds fall within the partial penetration category.
Figure 3-6b
They can be used to join pieces in various positions such as tee Fillet Weld X-sections, Cooper [2]
(90° bends), skewed and lap joints. Weld geometry and
specifications are prepared in for each position and weld type. Groove welds can either be partial or full penetration
These are called “welding procedures”, which are designed by a welds. In structural steel connections where full strength is
certified welding engineer. Figure 3-6a and 3-6b show various required, such as moment beam-column connections, full
welding positions and cross sections through the welds penetration groove welds are required. In order to add strength, full
respectively. penetration groove welds are combined with “reinforcing” fillet
welds. Sometimes full penetration can be achieved from one side,
“with the help of a backup plate that prevents the first pass from
blowing through at the bottom.” [2] There are many different It is an economical way to connect elements and fabricate
welding procedures for groove welds. Figure 3-7a and 3-7b assemblies.
illustrate some more common full and partial penetration groove Different weld types and procedures add to flexibility of
weld cross-sections respectively. welding operations.
With the right knowledge of the welding process, tight
tolerances can be achieved during fabrication and erection.
Imperfections in rolling of plates can result in micro cracks common in trusses, where a wide flange section is used for the top
which reduce ductility in directions perpendicular to direction of and bottom chords and HSS member are used as diagonal bracing
rolling [2]. This phenomenon is called Lamellar Tearing. High members. Similar to type 1, all brace axial loads are transferred as
tensile stresses initiated at welded joints can cause progressive shear through a large gusset plate, which is fitted and welded to
cracks and final tearing of the fusion face. This is more common in slotted HSS members. A heavier connection type 3 is common in
thick plates. Figure 3-9 shows how lamellar tearing can result in trusses where larger loads need to be carried. In this case all
connection failure. bracing members are wide flange sections. No gusset plate is used
in this connection, as bracing members are directly welded to the
chord. Stiffeners are commonly used to strengthen the webs of
chords in such connections in order to carry the high shear loads.
Figures 4-1a, b and c show production drawings for connection
types 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Figure 3-9
Lamellar Tearing, Cooper [2]
Figure 4-1c
Truss Connection with WF Braces & Chords (Type 3)
Design tensile strength of complete penetration groove welds is in compression or overload column flange in tension. Buckling of
calculated by equation below as per clause 13.13.3.1. column webs are undesirable in since buckling failure comes with
little warning. In this case horizontal and/or diagonal stiffener
Tr = φA g Fy (5-7) plates must be used to reinforce column web and flange. Moreover,
where: Φ =0.9 extra shear load may have to be taken by the column if beam and
Ag = gross cross-section of weld column moments are not balanced. If column shear capacity is not
Fy = base metal yield strength. enough, a doubler plate must be used to increase web thickness.
Figure 5-4a and b illustrate how beam-column connections
Tensile strength of partial penetration groove welds is calculated perform with and without stiffeners.
by clause 13.13.3.2 as per the following equation:
Tr = φw An Fu ≤ φAg Fy (5-8)
All terms have their usual meaning. It should be noted that the
code requires the connection strength to be no more than yield
strength of the base metal. This is to ensure ductility in the
connection.
Lastly, groove welds may be reinforced by fillet welds, in
order increase strength. In this case, tensile strength is calculated
by clause 13.13.3.3 as par the following equation:
Tr = φ w ( An Fu ) 2 + ( Aw X u ) 2 ≤ φAg Fy (5-9)
Vr = 0.55φwdFy (5-13)
Column web crippling and yielding capacity for interior loads on a
beam or a column are calculated by equations in clause 14.3.2 as
shown below.
Figure 5-4b
Beam column connection with Stiffeners, Blodget [5] Br = φ bi w( N + 10t ) Fy (5-14)
Br = 1.45φbi w 2 Fy E (5-15)
After calculating concentrated tension and compression
loads on the column, column flanges should be checked for where: Φbi = 0.8
bearing resistance in both tension and compression as per clause w = web thickness
21.3 equations shown below. N = length of bearing
t = flange thickness
For flanges in compression:
Br = φ bi wc (t b + 10t c ) Fyc (5-10) If concentrated tension/compression loads on the column exceed
any of the above values, horizontal or diagonal stiffeners must be
except for columns of class 3 and 4 provided as shown in figure 5-5.
640000φ bi wc (t b + 10t c )
Br = (5-11)
h
( c)
wc
For flanges in tension:
Br = φ 7t c Fyc
2
(5-12)
where: Φ = 0.9
Φbi = 0.8
fabricate and erect ends up costing more because more time and
effort needs to be spent in detailing, fabrication and erection.
A cost estimation study was performed by interviewing an
estimator from a local fabrication shop. To make the cost estimate
applicable in different context, number of labor hours is estimated
for each connection. The final cost can be calculated based on
number of fabricators and shop’s hourly rate, which may differ
from shop to shop.
6.1 Assumptions
Determining accurate price estimates for fabrication and
erection of steel structures is more of an art than science. It
involves knowledge based on past experience. For the purpose of
this report, several assumptions are made in order to simplify the
estimating process within reasonable accuracy. Research was
conducted by interviewing estimators from the industry to verify
Figure 5-5 these assumptions, which include:
Beam column connection with Stiffeners, HSC [4]
1. Material costs make up a small portion of total costs for
Moreover, if shear capacity of column is exceeded, a welded connections when compared to labor costs and can
doubler plate must be provided. The above equations have been be neglected.
programmed in formatted spreadsheets for each connection. It 2. Labor costs can be estimated based on length of welds in
should be noted that stiffeners are not limited to welded beam- each connection.
column connections. They may be used in brace connections where 3. Fabricating a connection in the field could cost as much as
several members frame into a column or a truss chord through three times the cost of fabrication in the shop.
gusset plates that is welded in line with column/chord web.
These assumptions are elaborated in the following sections.
6.0 Cost Estimation
A well-designed connection not only transfers load 6.2 Cost Parameters
efficiently between members, but is also economical. During the Economy of fabricating any type of structural steel
design phase, considerations should be given to fabrication in the connection involves two parameters: material and labor. An
shop and installation in the field. A connection which is difficult to interesting point is that material costs and shop fabrication labor
can affect each other in ways that may not be so obvious to the
designer. For example, common notion is that lighter material 6.2.2 Labor
weighs less and is more economical. However, very light material Labor cost makes up a larger portion of the total costs
tends to warp and distort due to weld shrinkage, and may cost associated with production of welded connections. Total labor cost
more money to control in the fabrication phase. On the other hand, is calculated based on the total number of hours allocated to a
overly heavy material, not only costs more, it is also harder to connection, number of fabricators allocated to each task, and shop
handle during fit up and may end up costing more during hourly rate for each task. In many cases an estimator has to
fabrication also. The next sections explain how material and labor visualize all the steps required during fabrication in order to give
affect the overall cost of welded connections. an accurate estimate of the fabrication costs. However, fabrication
generally follows these three steps in order:
6.2.1 Material 1. Cutting,
Material costs are calculated based on the total weight of 2. Fitting or fit up and
required material. An estimator looks at design drawings and 3. Welding.
calculates weights of different elements that make up the In order to simplify the procedure, labor time associated with
connection. These elements typically include: gusset plates, cutting, fitting and welding are calculated based on length of welds
stiffeners, shear tabs, beam seats and top/bottom beam moment associated with each member. Total cost is calculated by formulae
plates. Total cost is calculated by the following equation: shown below.
Geometry data is fed electronically to these automatic burning Another factor that impacts the cost of welds is access. Welds that
tables and they are very cost effective for mass production are located in hard to get areas are more expensive to do. A good
purposes. Members themselves are usually cut by saws. Most fabricator has to think about sequence of welding steps of different
welded HSS braces require slotting the HSS members in order to elements in order to minimize areas that are hard to access.
weld them to gusset plates. This is usually done by an Environment also impacts welding costs. Field welding
oxyacetylene torch. costs more than shop welding because of the following reasons:
After members are cut, they are fit together as per shop
drawings. A well-drawn shop drawing shows reference dimensions 1. Welding setup costs are higher in the field than in the shop
which control geometry of the connection. Complex connections and depending on location and situation, welding platforms
require more time to fit and put together. Fit up is critical in may need to be designed and installed.
fabrication. Errors and mistakes during fitting in the shop will 2. Some connections may be restricted and difficult to access
reflect as fitting problems in the field. Sometimes a connection on the erected structure, resulting in longer setup time.
may have to be completely modified in order to make it work in 3. Welding tents often need to be setup to protect the work
the field. from elements such as wind and water.
Welding costs are controlled by type, size, position of 4. If required, stress relieving is more expensive and requires
welds and environment. For example, fillet welds up to 8mm in special equipment in the field.
size can be done in one pass. Larger welds have to be done in two 5. Welding equipment such as generators, gas bottles and
or more passes and require more time. Also welds done in the welder machines must be purchased or rented in addition to
vertical position cost as much as 50% more than welds in the shop equipment.
horizontal. Table 6-1 below summarizes welding rates for fillet 6. Erection crew would consist of certified welders who may
welds of different sizes in the flat position for the FCAW process. be required to pass tests on coupons prior to welding on
special connections. Members of welding gang may fail
Table 6-1 Fillet Weld Rates for FCAW Process tests, resulting in delays and ultimately higher costs.
Fillet Size Rate (minutes/inch of weld) Due to the abovementioned reasons, field welding can cost as
1/4” 0.35 much as three times more than welding in the shop. Therefore,
5/16” 0.44 field fabrication costs have been factored by three times for
3/8” 0.88 connection types 4 and 5 in the formatted spreadsheets.
1/2” 1.32 Distribution of time allocated to each of the three tasks
(cutting, fitting and welding) differs from connection to
Full penetration groove welds are more expensive than connection, depending on size of members and connection
partial penetration fillet welds because they require special configuration. Each formatted spreadsheet includes a breakdown of
preparation and more passes, hence more time to complete. tasks and estimated time for fabricating each component in the
connection. It was observed that for shop fabricated connections connections. A flexible tool has been developed using the
such as connection types 1, 2 and 3, fitting ranked first in formatted spreadsheet, which not only determines strength of
consuming the most fabrication time. Welding and cutting ranked welded connections, but also calculates a cost estimate. Five
second and third, respectively. Using this observation, one can typical welded connections were chosen and a design/estimation
come up with ways to minimize fabrication time. A few tips for spreadsheet program was written for each connection. Research
minimizing costs have been suggested in the next section. was done on labor cost estimation of welded connections and
incorporated into these spreadsheets. Such tool can assist the
6.3 Suggested Methods of Cost Minimization engineer in designing cost-effective connections.
As mentioned in the previous section, labor makes up most
of the cost of fabricating welded structural steel connections. In
order to minimize connection costs, the engineer must design the
connection, bearing in mind ways to reduce fabrication time. Here
are a few cost minimization tips for the engineer:
7.0 Conclusion
Welding has been long recognized as an efficient way of
creating continuous metal connections. The Canadian steel code
prescribes equations for determining strength of welds. These
equations are used in order to determine strength of welded
8.0 Appendices
Appendix A: Project Milestone
Appendix B: References
[2] Cooper, Sol. E., 1985. Designing Steel Structures Methods and
Cases. Prantice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.