0 Up votes0 Down votes

0 views8 pagesBeams

Feb 01, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Beams

© All Rights Reserved

0 views

Beams

© All Rights Reserved

- Permutations, Combination and Binomial Theorem
- access steel example
- [Ensc 13] Problem Set 4 - Stresses in Beams
- r059210303 Mechanics of Solids
- Precast Frame - 5 Floor Diaphragms
- eugene talbot en375 unit plan lesson 1
- Lecture 13
- Beam Curved
- FEA Assignment - Lucas Dos Santos Almeida p13175018
- shear force
- Bend test
- 5.0 Variations
- Steel Column_Beams Calc
- Exemple Shear
- portfolio allcontent3
- Seismic Vulnerability of RC Bridge Piers
- 2. Civil - Ijcseierd - Civil Engineering Analysis - Sidramappa Dharane
- RSE Part II ANswers.docx
- a1a1
- Eliminition Method

You are on page 1of 8

WORK

Consider the segment of a beam shown in Figure 1, with length dx, referred to coordinate

axes x and z. The segment receives a distributed load p(x) and its left-hand side receives a

bending moment M, and shear force V. Note that these are the actions, on the segment,

from the rest of the beam to the left of the segment. Likewise, the right-hand side of the

segment receives actions from the rest of the beam to the right. However, the bending

moment and the shear force at the right may be slightly different from those at the left,

because from the left-hand side to the right-hand side there has been a change in the

coordinate x. Thus, we may have a bending moment M + (dM/dx) dx , and a shear force

V + (dV/dx)dx, using differential calculus to express the small change in these functions.

The beam must be in equilibrium, and any segment of the beam must also be in

equilibrium under the actions applied to it. Summation of vertical forces equal to zero,

and summation of moments equal to zero leads to the following equations of equilibrium:

dV

= p (x)

dx

dM

= V

dx

[1]

d 2M

= p( x)

dx 2

[2]

Now, the deformation of the beam in bending is assumed to be such that the beam crosssection remains flat and rotates as a rigid body. For small deformations, this angle of

rotation is further assumed equal to the slope of the deflected shape of the beam. If the

bending deflection is the function w(x), shown in Figure 1, then the rotation of the crosssection is the slope dw/dx or w(x).

Therefore, from geometry, the axial displacement u(z) at a distance z from the point O in

Figure 1, is

u ( z ) = z w' ( x)

[3]

and the strain at a distance z can be calculated from the rate of change of this

displacement along the x direction. That is,

( z ) = z w" ( x)

[4]

Now, the stresses in an elastic material are related to the strains by Hookes Law,

which says that the stresses are proportional to the strain, with the constant of

proportionality called the modulus of elasticity E. That is,

( z ) = E ( z )

[5]

The bending moment M is the resultant of the moment of these stresses with respect to

point O:

M = ( z ) z dA

[6]

where A is the area of the cross-section. Using equations [4] and [5] in [6], one obtains

M = EI w" ( x)

[7]

Equation [7] is a differential equation for the deflected shape w(x). If we know the

bending moment M(x) all along the beam, then equation [7] can be used to calculate the

deflected shape. However, this implies that it is possible to calculate the bending moment

M without having to use, in its calculation, the deformed shape w(x). This can only be

done for statically determined systems, when the bending moment M can be calculated

by equilibrium, without having to use the deformation of the structure.

Thus, Equation [7] can be used directly to calculate w(x) for statically determined

systems.

For more general, undetermined systems, equation [7] cannot be used as is. It must be

supplemented with other information which comes from equation [2] (equilibrium).

Then, combining both, and assuming that the product EI is constant,

d 4w

= p( x) / EI

dx 4

[8]

Equation [8] is another differential equation for w(x), but much more general than [7].

The right hand side is no longer the bending moment M but just the load function p(x).

And this is data for the problem. Thus, Equation [8] can be used to calculate the beam

deflection when just the applied load is given. This equation can be used for both

statically determined or undetermined systems, and it is called the beam equation.

Equation [8] is a fourth-order differential equation, requiring four conditions (support

conditions) to find the complete solution w(x).

It is important to note what happens when there is no load on the beam, and all actions

are applied at the ends. Then p(x) = 0, and Equation [8] says that then

d 4w

=0

dx 4

[9]

w( x) = A1 + A2 x + A3 x 2 + A4 x 3

[10]

with constants A1 through A4 to be determined from the required four support conditions.

The solution of the problem is then achieved, in general, by solving Equation [8]. When

this solution is known, it can be shown that it has some properties. One very important

property is what is known as the Principle of Virtual Work. Let us now study this

property of the solution to Equation [8].

For the solution w(x) there are corresponding strains and stresses . Let us consider

that we perturb the solution by increasing the deformation and the corresponding

strains (it does not matter the means to do this) by an amount . Let us call this

additional deformation, or perturbation, a virtual deformation resulting in virtual

strains.

During the virtual deformation, the stresses , which were already there, do some work.

This is called the internal virtual work Wi. It can be calculated by integrating the

work of the stresses along the virtual strains over the volume of the beam:

Wi = dV

[11]

For example, if the stresses and strains are replaced using Equations [4] and [5], the

internal virtual work for an elastic beam can be expressed as

Wi = EI w" w" dx

[12]

where w is the virtual curvature associated with the virtual displacements w and L the

beam length.

Now, let us prove the Principle of Virtual Work. We start with Equation [11] and

introduce in it Equation [4],

Wi = zw" dV

[13]

Wi = Mw" dx

L

[14]

Wi = [ Mw']0 +

dM

w' dx

dx

L

[15]

and, once again, this time using Equation [1] to replace dM/dx,

d 2M

w dx

dx 2

L

Wi = [ Mw']0 + [Vw]0

L

[16]

Now, the first two terms in Equation [16] are always zero. For example, a simple

supported end always has M = 0, a clamped end has w=0 (and therefore w = 0), in

either case, the first term is always zero. Similarly, the second term is zero because either

V = 0 at a free end, or w = 0 and w = 0 if the end is supported.

Thus, the internal virtual work contains only the third term in Equation [16]. But using

now Equation [2], we can write

Wi = p w dx = We

[17]

where we see that the third term is nothing but the work done by the applied load p(x)

along the virtual deformations (deflections) w. This is called the external virtual work

We .

We have thus shown the following principle of virtual work:

If the solution of the problem, the deflection w(x), is perturbed by adding a virtual

deformation compatible with the support conditions, then the work done by the internal

stresses along the virtual strains equals the external work done by the applied forces

along the virtual deformations.

This is a property of the true solution to the problem. Notice that, in its derivation, we

have not relied on Hookes law to link stresses and strain, only on equilibrium. Therefore,

the principle can be applied to non-elastic beams as well.

EI w" w" dx = p w dx

L

or

[18]

EI w" w" dx p w dx = 0

L

[19]

Suppose that we do not know the true solution, but we take a guess and assume a function

wo(x) to represent the solution. This is a guess that is feasible, that means, it has to satisfy

the support conditions. The assumption wo(x) is called a shape function. Now we say

that for this shape to be the solution it has to satisfy the principle of virtual work. That is,

we force wo(x) to satisfy Equation [19]:

EI w " w " dx p w

o

dx = 0

[20]

Integrating this by parts twice, as before, one can prove that Equation [20] becomes

d 4 wo

L ( EI dx 4 p)wo dx = 0

[21]

Equation [21] implies that, by forcing the principle of virtual work on wo(x), we enforce

that the complete integral be zero. Ideally, we would like the integrand to be zero,

because that is exactly the beam equation [8], and then wo would be exactly the solution

w. However, for any guess wo we can only satisfy the beam equation in an integral form,

as shown by [21]. If the beam equation is not satisfied, we then make an error which is

the integrand of [21]. We force that the integral (the sum) of those errors be zero. But still

there are errors from point to point, along x.

That is, the principle of virtual work allows us to obtain approximate answers to the

problem, by guessing a wo . The better the guess, the better the approximation.

For example, for a beam which is not loaded except at its ends, if we assume wo to be a

cubic polynomial, then we will obtain the exact solution, because our guess will agree

with the exact solution which we know is such a cubic polynomial.

This method of guessing shape functions is central to modern computer methods for

solving structural problems, particular the so-called finite element methods, all based

on different polynomial assumptions for the deflections.

Example:

Consider the following beam, simply supported, under a concentrated load P at midspan.

We use a guess wo(x) which is

wo ( x) = A sin x / L

[22]

Which satisfies wo = 0 at the ends x=0 and x=L, and could be seen to be a realistic

representation of the true deflected shape.

What is the exact solution? Over the first half of the beam there is no load, therefore the

solution must be a cubic polynomial. Similarly, over the second half of the beam there is

no load, so the solution there must be another cubic polynomial. The true solution is then

a sequence of two cubic polynomials matched in deflection and slope at the midspan

point. This is what the solution of the beam equation would give us. But we are trying to

approximate it with the sinusoidal assumption wo .

The constant A is unknown, and must be fixed so that virtual work is enforced. To do this

we replace the assumption [22] in Equation [20]. Notice that A is the deflection at

midspan, L/2.

How do we obtain a virtual displacement? We can use the same shape [22] except we

move (or perturb) the constant A to A, so that

wo ( x) = A sin x / L

[23]

Next we perform the required integral for the internal work, giving the left hand side of

the following equation,

EI 4 / L4 A A (L / 2 ) = P A

[24]

the right hand side being the external work done by the load P along the virtual

displacement A.

A cancels out in Equation [24], implying that it does not matter how big the virtual

displacement is, leaving A as

A=

PL3

PL3

=

4

48.7 EI

EI

2

[25]

which is the best value for A, and the best we can do with the approximation wo , in the

sense that virtual work principle will be satisfied. Since the sinusoidal approximation is

quite good, the answer has little error. In fact, the exact solution for this problem has a

denominator of 48 instead of 48.7.

In this course we will use shape functions to solve problems in an approximate manner.

- Permutations, Combination and Binomial TheoremUploaded byyrazs8021
- access steel exampleUploaded byvsbalint
- [Ensc 13] Problem Set 4 - Stresses in BeamsUploaded bylucas
- r059210303 Mechanics of SolidsUploaded byprakash.paruchuri
- Precast Frame - 5 Floor DiaphragmsUploaded byWahid Omar
- eugene talbot en375 unit plan lesson 1Uploaded byapi-304800863
- Lecture 13Uploaded byavenasha
- Beam CurvedUploaded byLumir Bobek
- FEA Assignment - Lucas Dos Santos Almeida p13175018Uploaded byLucas Almeida
- shear forceUploaded byThulasi Raman Kowsigan
- Bend testUploaded byAzan Safril
- 5.0 VariationsUploaded byjuriah binti ibrahim
- Steel Column_Beams CalcUploaded bytmssorin
- Exemple ShearUploaded bytarekhocine
- portfolio allcontent3Uploaded byapi-246444495
- Seismic Vulnerability of RC Bridge PiersUploaded byAWAKSEORANG
- 2. Civil - Ijcseierd - Civil Engineering Analysis - Sidramappa DharaneUploaded byTJPRC Publications
- RSE Part II ANswers.docxUploaded bynyaungzin
- a1a1Uploaded byshivaji_sarvade
- Eliminition MethodUploaded byUsman Zafar
- Tuga PapioUploaded byGenta Mahendra Dirgantara
- Moving LoadsUploaded byLouies Ungria
- TRANSFORMING PCOMP TO PSHELL.pdfUploaded byManoj Kumar
- Optimum Design of Launching Nose During Incremental Launching Construction of Same Span Continuous BridgeUploaded byPenyair Sufi
- Virtual Work Frame ExampleUploaded byJedidiahClement
- ENMAT101A Laboratory 5 BendingUploaded byShivpreet Sharma
- GAM DistributionOfLoads 1 Vertical LoadPathUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Son Vu et al_EngStruct_2014.pdfUploaded bySarain Alvarez
- Input Data Anchor2Uploaded bysonofalexander
- Enclosed,Thin SectionsUploaded byirinat101

- WoodwardUploaded byTamara Knox
- Twodof Base Disp Modal RevAUploaded byTamara Knox
- Modal Analysis SpreadsheetUploaded bytanha56313955
- Iast.lect19Uploaded bySachin Silmana
- Traffic Load Modeling Based on Structural Health Monitoring DataUploaded byTamara Knox
- SITE SPECIFIC WAVE PARAMETERS FOR TEXAS COASTAL BRIDGES: FINAL REPORTUploaded byTamara Knox
- Laplace.pdfUploaded byTamara Knox
- [Mantz Yorke] Grading Student Achievement in Higher EducationUploaded byTamara Knox
- Nodal ForcesUploaded bytimsyki
- longitudinalUploaded byTamara Knox
- Design Rating Rail Bridge Majedski 00006Uploaded byrkgcrri
- Extreme Value TheoryUploaded byTamara Knox
- ASCE LaTex User Guide 5.24.2016Uploaded byTamara Knox
- Civ l 436 Virtual WorkUploaded byTamara Knox
- pvw-intro.pdfUploaded byTamara Knox
- virt-wrkUploaded byJason Mak
- Examples Paper 4 SOLUTIONSUploaded byTamara Knox
- Examples Paper 4Uploaded byTamara Knox
- Sem.org IMAC XIII 13th 13-21-5 the Effects Window Functions Trigger Levels FRF Estimations FromUploaded byTamara Knox
- Condeck HP Composite Decking Product Technical ManualUploaded byTamara Knox
- Column SizingUploaded byTamara Knox
- 1031_Slice Forces and Moments in SolidsUploaded byTamara Knox
- Project III Notes 1011Uploaded byTamara Knox
- 109_BRIDGE Deck Behaviour Austroads04Uploaded byTamara Knox
- Instructors Solutions ManualUploaded byTamara Knox
- Shakedown algorithm.pdfUploaded byTamara Knox
- The New Dublin Port Master PlanUploaded byTamara Knox

- Integrate “Service Packs” with Windows and OfficeUploaded bybcdalai
- GridView - dropdownlist,checkbox,textbox.pdfUploaded bypbc3199
- 3727(2)Uploaded byVanidevi Mani
- Aspirating Smoke Detection InstallationUploaded byRizal KingRiz
- Introduction to Enterprise Systems ManagementUploaded byJijo George
- Turing TestUploaded byDave Devavrat
- Example Wikipedia FlowchartsUploaded byMichael Hambly
- php url encodeUploaded byRakesh Sharnagate
- Tables and Sample Data for TCAUploaded bySurajkl
- Presentation SAP TDMSUploaded byRicardo Nogueira da Silva
- Operating System Lab Manual - CS2257Uploaded bybobbyraina
- 6418C-ENU-TrainerHandbookUploaded byEngine Tuning Up
- Roots in RubyUploaded byJabari Zakiya
- HTML Programmmming.docxUploaded byvkocf
- HPC BenchmarksUploaded byriphh.cool
- Life Cycle ModelsUploaded byMunna Pehlwan
- Tbr ReportUploaded bymanik.ee
- Isogen InfoUploaded byNagarajan
- Parallelization of BFS Graph Algorithm Using CUDAUploaded byeditor_ijcat
- scibd docUploaded bysindhusm
- CISSP Combined NotesUploaded byAnonymous 9d1jFv
- Lecture 01Uploaded byziactn
- GREEDY CLUSTER BASED ROUTING FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKSUploaded byAnonymous Gl4IRRjzN
- Online Shopping Perceptions of Offline ShoppersUploaded byTushar Vasudev
- BK13110025 AMANDA AIZA BINTI AMRAN et al Tutorial 1.docxUploaded byRozianah Tompang
- Lab 19 - Network AnalysisUploaded byUno de Madrid
- DE04 Panel View 5000Uploaded byAlejandro Almonacid Rivas
- Avancier ESA 6 Reference ModelUploaded byJota
- Issue_16_2_8_PHUploaded bysupervenience
- Motherboard_Brochure_G31_v1.1Uploaded byAkanksha Khare

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.