Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Movement Rising PDF
A Movement Rising PDF
A Strategic Analysis of
Movement
U.S. Tobacco Control Advocacy
Rising
March 1999
Prepared by the
A DV O C A C Y INS TITUTE
About the Advocacy Institute Table of Contents
The Advocacy Institute is dedicated to strengthening the capacity of social and economic justice advocates, both Introduction 2
within the U.S. and internationally, to influence and change public policy.
A behind-the-front lines organization, the Advocacy Institute brings together seasoned advocates and community- Executive Summary 4
based leaders to help build their capacity to advocate for just and civil societies. Skills are enhanced, ideas are nur-
tured into cohesive strategies, and advocates gain greater maturity and skill as movement leaders. AdvantagesInternal Movement Strengths 8
The mission of the Advocacy Institute is realized primarily through its two programs: the Capacity Building
Program and the Tobacco Control Project.
ChallengesInternal Movement Weaknesses 12
The Capacity Building Program provides capacity strengthening opportunities to advocates globallythrough ThreatsExternal Threats to the Movement 19
training, strategic counseling, and the highly regarded Fellows Programs.
Founded in 1987, the Tobacco Control Project is dedicated to building an effective tobacco control movement OpportunitiesExternal Opportunities for the Movement 27
by developing and supporting the capacity of community-based tobacco control leaders to advocate effectively for
strong, comprehensive tobacco control policies. The Tobacco Control Project offers technical support to the Next Steps 33
movement such as strategic guidance and counseling, dissemination of critical information and analysis, and the
electronic networks SCARCNet and SMARTalk. Conclusion 37
The U.S. tobacco control movement has achieved monumental progress over the past decade. The Tobacco Control
Projects consistent focus on media and policy advocacy, and strategic analysis and planning, has helped define the Appendix 1 38
terms of this historic public health debate.
The Advocacy Institute is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Appendix 2 39
Service Code. Donations are tax-deductible to the fullest extent allowed by law. For more information about
A Movement Rising, the Tobacco Control Project, or the Advocacy Institute, please contact us at: Appendix 3 40
Advocacy Institute
1707 L St., NW Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
phone (202) 659-8475
fax (202) 659-8484
email tobacco@advocacy.org
I
n late 1998, with support from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the American Cancer Society, Errors of fact, we take full responsibility for. Perceived errors of judgment, we also take responsibility for
the Advocacy Institute undertook a comprehensive strategic analysis of the current United States tobacco although we are prepared to defend them.
control movement. This analysis was grounded upon an extensive series of consultations with veteran tobacco
control advocates. They were asked to view the movement in light of the proposed June 20, 1997 settlement, the We hope you find this analysis useful and thought-provoking.
failure of subsequent Congressional legislative efforts, the challenges and opportunities presented by the November
1998 multi-state settlement, and the successes and setbacks advocates have experienced at the state and local level.
The information gathering process for the analysis included: Mike Pertschuk Karla Sneegas Kay Arndorfer
Co-Director Consultant Director
One-on-one interviews (on the record, but anonymous) with more than 30 veteran state tobacco control coalition Advocacy Institute Advocacy Institute Tobacco Control Project
leaders, program managers, and advocates (see Appendix 1); Advocacy Institute
A series of confidential, transcribed interviews with 15 national tobacco control leaders and advocates (see
Appendix 2);
Insights and strategic observations drawn from Advocacy Institutes SMARTalk, a closed facilitated email list-serve Stephen Bobb Theresa Gardella Joel Papo
designed to help advocates secure funding for comprehensive state tobacco control programs; Program Associate Project Manager Research Associate
Tobacco Control Project Tobacco Control Project Tobacco Control Project
A one-day meeting of 12 veteran national and state advocates convened by Advocacy Institute on December 11,
Advocacy Institute Advocacy Institute Advocacy Institute
1998 (see Appendix 3); and
Extensive reviews of the strategic analysis drafts by more than two dozen national and state tobacco control
advocates and leaders.
The strategic analysis utilized the ACT-ON format (Advantages, Challenges, Threats, Opportunities and Next
Steps) to identify salient issues, and the steps that should be taken to build a stronger tobacco control movement.
The Advantages and Challenges sections address the internal strengths and weaknesses of the tobacco control
movement, while the Threats and Opportunities sections analyze the external influences that will have a direct
impact on our strategies over the next few years. In the Next Steps section, concrete actions are identified for
leaders of the tobacco control movement to consider in strengthening the national tobacco control movement
and advancing our policy objectives.
A Movement Rising: A Strategic Analysis of U.S. Tobacco Control Advocacy, March 1999 would not have been possible
without the help of our colleagues, many of whom thought we were nuts to undertake an analysis of the entire
tobacco control movement. Perhaps we are, but we did; and we are pleased to share the results with all of our
colleagues. It is our hope that this document will prove to be a stimulus and resource for the tobacco control
community as it now looks to the futureand that the utility of this analysis will be at least some measure
of reward for those who have been so generous in their counsel. We thank you all.
Before we begin, we offer three caveats:
1. By movement, we mean those people and efforts dedicated to changing public and private policies controlling
tobacco. This, of course, leaves out important activities contributing to a comprehensive tobacco control agenda,
such as perfecting and promoting effective cessation/treatment services, improving the effectiveness of school-based
education, care-provider intervention, and strengthening the quality of surveillance/evaluationexcept where such
objectives are themselves encompassed in policy or funding advocacy.
In addition, there are: This strategic analysis strongly indicates the need for additional long-term movement-building initiatives including:
Opportunities for exploiting the treasure chest of tobacco industry documents for media advocacy, renewing Unity-building strategies that encompass long-term strategic planning, priority setting and consensus building
public outrage at the tobacco industrys corrupt practices; through participatory and collaborative decision-making;
Accelerating litigation opportunities to unearth more damaging industry documents, to force settlements that Broadening movement leadership by nurturing and developing leadership capacity;
result in public health advances and to cause financial harm to the industry, precipitating tobacco price increases Rewarding political supporters and punishing political foes;
which discourage use; and Broadening policy objectives beyond a youth focus;
Opportunities for forming new partnerships and alliances with interest groups seeking a portion of the Strengthening intra-movement communications;
settlement funds.
Developing the capacity to engage in watch dog advocacy as states and the federal government implement new
tobacco control programs; and
Perhaps the most encouraging developments in 1998 occurred not in the United States but internationally.
These international opportunities include the ascension of the dynamic Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland to The integration of international and national tobacco control advocacy.
Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO). She has already set tobacco control as a top
priority and recruited an exemplary tobacco control team. WHOs priority initiativethe adoption of a Conclusion
worldwide International Framework Convention for Tobacco Control that includes an international model for There may never be a better opportunity than now to practice the lessons we have learned these past two years;
national tobacco control lawscan give impetus to U.S. domestic legislative efforts, as well as those in lesser never a better time to repair the breaches; and never a better moment for looking ahead with deliberation. Right
developed countries. now, there is agreement among advocates on the primacy of establishing strong state tobacco control programs and
an unprecedented, collaborative effort from all corners of the movement towards that end.
Next Steps
Further on the horizon lies the possibility of federal tobacco legislation. No serious Congressional initiative has yet
This analysis points the way to both short-term and long-term public policy initiatives and movement- surfaced, but that is all the more reason why now is the time for a deliberative and inclusive process to work
building needs. through the salient priorities for tobacco control, to identify those non-negotiable core principles, and to distill and
talk through principled differences. As we have seen, total consensus has not been and will never be possible, but
Short-term common ground policy initiatives:
reasoned debate, broad consensus on core issues, and civil agreement to disagree on other issues will be critical if the
As of January, 1999 and at least through the current legislative sessions, several priority campaigns command broad tobacco control movement hopes to grow and fulfill its mission. It is our hope that this analysis will help lead in
consensus: such direction.
T
advocates and our colleagues in other countries. and the development of the international Framework here may never be a better opportunity than now to practice the lessons we have learned these past two
Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), designed to years, painful as that learning process may have been, never a better time to repair the breaches, and never a
f) Strengthening intra-movement electronic guide national policiesincluding those of the U.S better moment for looking ahead with deliberation. Right now, there is agreement among advocates on the
communications to provide more civil, inclusive, that divide among advocates no longer makes sense. primacy of establishing strong state tobacco control programsand an unprecedented, collaborative effort from all
bottom-up, reliable, and user-friendly access to Thus, participation by U.S. advocates in such efforts as corners of the movement towards that end. This collaboration is in itself a healing balm for past disagreements
electronic advocacy-related data and ammunition. developing and launching a world wide campaign to and regrets.
One technique is the development and facilitation mobilize support for the FCTC at the 11th World
Further on the horizon lies the possibility of federal tobacco legislation. No serious Congressional initiative has yet
of limited time, limited participant, collaborative Conference in Chicago in August 2000, provides an
surfaced but some of the same factors that gave rise to tobacco legislation in 1998 persist, including a mounting
networks connecting experts and advocacy leaders opportunity to advance both international and
burden of private litigation, a federal lawsuit to recover billions in Medicare expenses, and the President's
on focused, strategic exchanges. The Advocacy domestic tobacco control efforts.
commitment to comprehensive tobacco control legislation.
Institutes SMARTalk, an electronic exchange
focused on the state legislative battles over the The White House, Congressional leadership, governors, trial lawyers, and tobacco industry all have incentives
disposition of settlement funds, is an example of to begin again the process of negotiation and possible compromise. That is all the more reason why now is the
such a collaborative network. time for a deliberative and inclusive process to work through the salient priorities for tobacco control; to identify
those non-negotiable core principles; and to distill and talk through principled differences. As we have seen,
g) Encouraging funding of prevention research total consensus has not been and will never be possible. But reasoned debate, broad consensus on core issues,
needs including community intervention trials to and civil agreement to disagree on other issues will be critical. It is our hope that this analysis will help lead in
test policy interventions in community settings and suchdirection.
comparative evaluations of the effectiveness of
"Hope. Realistic hope," wrote Erich Fromm, one of this century's greatest counselors, is a "decisive element in
differing state tobacco control programs.
any attempt to bring about social change." It is like "the crouched tiger" which is always ready to jump "when
the moment for jumping has come."
4. Preparing for the Shift from Policy Advocacy Have we gained enough wisdom so that when we leap, we win?
to Watch Dog Advocacy
As states and the federal government implement new
tobacco control programs, much of the focus of
tobacco control advocacy will shift from policy change
to overseeing and evaluating the effective implementa-
tion of those programs. That will necessarily involve
different forms of leadership, mobilization efforts,
and technical support. Planning for such a shift
should begin now. Advocates in the vanguard states
of California, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Arizona,
forced to contend with persistent industry efforts to
undermine strong programs, can point the way.
Melissa Albuquerque Larry Downs Judy Knapp Andre Stanley Anne Ford Matt Myers
CDC Office on Smoking New Jersey Breathes Minnesota Smoke Free SmokeLess States Manager of Federal Relations Executive Vice President and General Counsel
and Health Lawrenceville, NJ Coalition Program Office National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids
Atlanta, GA St. Paul, MN Chicago, IL Washington, DC Washington, DC
Pam Eidson
Amy Barkley Georgia Division of Lodie Lambright Carter Steger Cliff Douglas Jeff Nesbit
Coalition for Health Public Health ASSIST / Rhode Island American Cancer President Consultant
and Agricultural Atlanta, GA DOH Society Tobacco Control Law & Policy Consulting Washington, DC
Development Providence, RI Glen Allen, VA Ann Arbor, MI
Versailles, KY Monica Eischen Bill Novelli
CDC Office on Smoking Sally Herndon Malek Charyn Sutton David Kessler, MD President
Lynn Carol Birgmann and Health ASSIST / North Carolina Onyx Group Dean, Yale Medical School National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids
Kentucky ACTION / Atlanta, GA DOH Philadelphia, PA New Haven, CT Washington, DC
ALA Raleigh, NC
Louisville, KY Eric Gally Jeanne Weigum Witold Zatonsky John Seffrin
Consultant Marcia Nenno Association for Head, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie CEO
Michele Bloch Washington, DC American Cancer Society Nonsmokers Memorial Cancer Center and Institute American Cancer Society
American Medical Tampa, FL Minnesota of Oncology Atlanta, GA
Womens Association Donna Grande St. Paul, MN Warsaw, Poland
Rockville, MD Full Court Press Jane Pritzl Judy Wilkenfeld
Tucson, AZ ASSIST / Colorado DOH Phil Wilbur Russ Sciandra Special Advisor for Advertising Initiatives
Deborah Borberly Denver, CO Pacific Institute for Director Food and Drug Administration
ASSIST / New Mexico Kathy Harty Research & Evaluation Center for Tobacco Free New York Washington, DC
DOH SmokeLess States Jeanne Prom Bethesda, MD Albany, NY
Albuquerque, NM Program Office North Dakota Dept. Mitch Zeller
Chicago, IL of Health Seth Winick Julia Carol Associate Commissioner
Serena Chen Bismarck, ND American Cancer Society Co-Director Food and Drug Administration
ALA / Alameda County Ann Marie Holen Washington, DC Americans for Nonsmokers Rights Washington, DC
Oakland, CA Alaska Native Health Susan Schoenmarklin Berkeley, CA
Board American Cancer Society
Ralph DeVitto Anchorage, AK Milwaukee, WI Linda Crawford
American Cancer Society National Vice President
Tampa, FL Bob Jaffe Donna Scrutchins Federal and State Government Relations
Washington DOC AHA / Tobacco-Free American Cancer Society
Donna Dinkin Seattle, WA Illinois Project Washington, DC
Public Health Leadership Chicago, IL
Institute Jerie Jordan
Greensboro, NC American Cancer Society
Atlanta, GA
40 / Advocacy Institute