You are on page 1of 4

MOBILE HEALTH UNITS

EVALUATION REPORT
PRE-QUALIFICATION

(FINANCIAL YEAR 2015-16)

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB


PRIMARY & SECONDARY HEALTHCARE
DEPARTMENT
PUNJAB CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE
Evaluation Report

Subject: PRE QUALIFICATION OF SOLE AGENTS/ PARTNERS OF FOREIGN


MANUFACTURERS OF MOBILE HEALTH UNITS.
Primary & Secondary Healthcare Department, Government of the Punjab invited proposals for pre-
qualification from sole agents/ Partners of foreign manufacturers for the purchase of Mobile Health
Units (Qty:12) during financial year 2015-2016 to be provided in various districts. Accordingly, an
advertisement was published in the press and on PPRA web site as well. The pre-qualification
proposals were opened on 13.05.2016. A total of 09-firms participated in the process as under;

1. MEDI URGE (Lamboo, Netherlands)


2. MEDEQUIPS (IPS, Germany)
3. MEDICAL COACHES, USA with local partner MEDILAND (Medical Coaches, USA)
4. NEOTECH (Toutenkamion, France)
5. SIEMENS (Odulair, USA)
6. DIGIONICS (Two quotes: Binz, Germany & Odulair, USA)
7. AHMAD MEDIX (Local)
8. RAZMAK INDUSTRIES (Local)
9. COMPUTER MARKETING COMPANY/ HEALTH SOLUTIONS ( ? ? ? )

EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SR. NO. EVALUATION PARAMETERS COMPLIANCE

Pre- qualification fee Yes / No


1.
Valid NTN Yes / No
2.
Valid GST Registration Yes / No
3.
Valid Sole Agency Certificate of foreign manufacturer Yes / No
4.
Minimum five years manufacturing history of Mobile Health Unit of
Yes / No
5. the manufacturer of similar nature.

Compliance of international quality certification of European/


Japanese/ USA in respect of Prime Mover, Trailer and medical Yes / No
6.
equipment. (attach certificates)

Minimum three year business history of Mobile Health Unit or


Yes / No
7. Similar nature Medical Equipment.

After sales service arrangements for Prime Mover +Trailer +


Yes / No
8. Equipment ( give detail arrangements/ strategy)

Support Structure relevant to the scope of project Yes / No


9.
Submission of complete application form Yes / No
10.
Submission of manufacturers Declaration Form Yes / No
11.
Submission of Supplier Declaration Form Yes / No

2
12.
Brochure of MHU Yes / No
13.
Satisfactory past performance of the sole agent for execution of
Yes / No
14. after sales services for the last three years (attach certificates)

PNRA Registration Certificate; if applicable Yes / No


15.
Remarks: (Eligible/ Not Eligible)

COMMENTS

1. MEDI URGE (Lamboo, Netherlands)


a. The firm complies with above mentioned criteria.
Decision:
The firm is recommended for its pre-qualification.
2. MEDEQUIPS (IPS, Germany)
a. The firm complies with above mentioned criteria.
Decision:
The firm is recommended for its pre-qualification.
3. MEDICAL COACHES, USA with local partner MEDILAND (Medical Coaches, USA)
a. The firm substantially complies with above mentioned criteria.
Decision:
The firm is recommended for its pre-qualification.
4. NEOTECH (Toutenkamion, France)
a. The Committee physically inspected the premises of the firm and found that none of the
person was relevant to the Mobile Health Unit. There was neither any tool nor any person for
after sales services.
b. The firm does not have three years business history.
c. No support structure.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
5. SIEMENS (Two proposals: Odulair, USA & Kentucky Trailer, USA)
a. The firm submitted two proposals which is the violation of PPR 2014.
b. The firm has no authorization from any of the firms.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
6. DIGIONICS (Two proposals: Binz, Germany & Odulair, USA)

a. The firm submitted two proposals which is the violation of PPR 2014.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
7. AHMAD MEDIX (Local)
3
a. The firm submitted the proposal for local unit while the advertisement was for the foreign
manufacturer which is not as per requirements.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
8. RAZMAK INDUSTRIES (Local)

a. The firm submitted the proposal for local unit while the advertisement was for the foreign
manufacturer which is not as per requirements.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
9. COMPUTER MARKETING COMPANY/ HEALTH SOLUTIONS ( ? ? ? )

a. The firm is a computer based company which made a joint venture with a firm which
constructs the hospitals. Both have no relevancy with the Mobile Health Units.
b. This venture did not submit any proposal for any manufacturer.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.

You might also like