Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EVALUATION REPORT
PRE-QUALIFICATION
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SR. NO. EVALUATION PARAMETERS COMPLIANCE
2
12.
Brochure of MHU Yes / No
13.
Satisfactory past performance of the sole agent for execution of
Yes / No
14. after sales services for the last three years (attach certificates)
COMMENTS
a. The firm submitted two proposals which is the violation of PPR 2014.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
7. AHMAD MEDIX (Local)
3
a. The firm submitted the proposal for local unit while the advertisement was for the foreign
manufacturer which is not as per requirements.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
8. RAZMAK INDUSTRIES (Local)
a. The firm submitted the proposal for local unit while the advertisement was for the foreign
manufacturer which is not as per requirements.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.
9. COMPUTER MARKETING COMPANY/ HEALTH SOLUTIONS ( ? ? ? )
a. The firm is a computer based company which made a joint venture with a firm which
constructs the hospitals. Both have no relevancy with the Mobile Health Units.
b. This venture did not submit any proposal for any manufacturer.
Decision:
The firm is not recommended for its pre-qualification.