The document introduces the topic of lift in flight and discusses common misconceptions. While wings are often described as generating lift due to their airfoil shape, this is misleading as wings can fly upside down and generate lift without an airfoil shape. The document uses examples of successful wing designs that violate descriptions relying on wing shape, such as early aircraft and aerobatic planes, to demonstrate that wing shape has little to do with how lift is actually generated.
The document introduces the topic of lift in flight and discusses common misconceptions. While wings are often described as generating lift due to their airfoil shape, this is misleading as wings can fly upside down and generate lift without an airfoil shape. The document uses examples of successful wing designs that violate descriptions relying on wing shape, such as early aircraft and aerobatic planes, to demonstrate that wing shape has little to do with how lift is actually generated.
The document introduces the topic of lift in flight and discusses common misconceptions. While wings are often described as generating lift due to their airfoil shape, this is misleading as wings can fly upside down and generate lift without an airfoil shape. The document uses examples of successful wing designs that violate descriptions relying on wing shape, such as early aircraft and aerobatic planes, to demonstrate that wing shape has little to do with how lift is actually generated.
F light is a relatively simple and widely studied phenomenon. As
surprising as it may sound, though, it is more often than not misunderstood. For example, most descriptions of the physics of lift fixate on the shape of the wing (i.e., airfoil) as the key factor in understanding lift. The wings in these descriptions have a bulge on the top so that the air must travel farther over the top than under the wing. Yet we all know that wings fly quite well upside down, where the shape of the wing is inverted. This is demonstrated by the Thunderbirds in Figure I.1, with wings of almost no thickness at all. To cover for this paradox, we sometimes see a description for inverted flight that is different than for normal flight. In reality, the shape of the wing has little to do with how lift is generated, and any description that relies on the shape of the wing is misleading at best. This assertion will be discussed in detail in Chapter 1. It should be noted that the shape of the wing does has everything to do with the efficiency of the wing at cruise speeds and with stall characteristics. Let us look at three examples of successful wings that clearly violate the descriptions that rely on the shape of the wing as the basis of lift. During World War II, the length The first example is a very old design. Figure of a belt of 50-caliber machine I.2 shows a photograph of a Curtis 1911 Model gun bullets was 27 feet. When a D type IV pusher. Clearly, the air travels the pilot emptied his guns into a same distance over the top and under the bot- single target, he was giving it the tom of the wing. Yet this airplane flew and was whole nine yards. the second airplane purchased by the U.S. Army in 1911. Figure I.3 shows the symmetric wing on an aerobatic airplane. The wing is thick and has a great deal of curvature on the top and bottom to give it good stall characteristics and to allow slow flight. The jets in