Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
2 4 A MODEL ON KANSEI ENGINEERING METHODOLOGY
Although all of these methods are concerned with sub- The expression Semantic Space was addressed for the rst
jective impact, none of them can translate this impact to time by Osgood et al.. He posed that every artifact can
design parameters suciently. This can, however, be ac- be described in a certain vector space dened by seman-
complished by Kansei Engineering. Kansei Engineering tic expressions (words). This is done by collecting a
(KE) has been used as a tool for aective engineering. It large number of words that describe the domain. Suit-
was developed in the early 70s in Japan and is now widely able sources are pertinent literature, commercials, man-
spread among Japanese companies. In the middle of the uals, specication list, experts etc. The number of the
90s, the method spread to the United States, but cultural words gathered varies according to the product, typically
dierences may have prevented the method to enfold its between 100 and 1000 words. In a second step the words
whole potential. are grouped using manual (e.g. Anity diagram, com-
pare: Bergman and Klefsj, 1994) or mathematical meth-
ods (e.g. factor and/or cluster analysis, compare: Ishi-
3 Kansei Engineering Procedure hara et al., 1998). Finally a few representing words are
selected from this spanning the Semantic Space. These
words are called Kansei words or Kansei Engineering
As mentioned above, Kansei Engineering can be consid-
words.
ered as a methodology within the research eld of Af-
fective Engineering. Some researchers have identied
the content of the methodology. Shimizu et al. state that Span the Space of Properties
Kansei Engineering is used as a tool for product devel-
opment and the basic principles behind it are the follow- The next step is to span the Space of Product Proper-
ing: identication of product properties and correlation ties, which is similar to the Semantic Space. The Space
between those properties and the design characteristics. of Product Properties collects products representing the
According to Nagasawa, one of the forerunners of Kansei domain, identies key features and selects product prop-
Engineering, there are three focal points in the method: erties for further evaluation. The collection of products
representing the domain is done from dierent sources
such as existing products, customer suggestions, possible
1. How to accurately understand consumer Kansei
technical solutions and design concepts etc. The key fea-
2. How to reect and translate Kansei understanding tures are found using specication lists for the products
into product design in question. To select properties for further evaluation,
a Pareto-diagram (compare Bergman and Klefsj, 1994)
3. How to create a system and organization for Kansei can assist the decision between important and less impor-
orientated design tant features. Synthesis In the synthesis step, the Seman-
tic Space and the Space of Properties are linked together,
as displayed in Figure 3. Compared to other methods
4 A Model on Kansei Engineering in Aective Engineering, Kansei Engineering is the only
Methodology method that can establish and quantify connections be-
tween abstract feelings and technical specications. For
every Kansei word a number of product properties are
In Japanese publications, dierent types of Kansei En- found, aecting the Kansei word.
gineering are identied and applied in various contexts.
Schtte examined dierent types of Kansei Engineering
and developed a general model covering the contents of Synthesis
Kansei Engineering.
The research into constructing these links has been a core
Choice of Domain part of Nagamachis work with Kansei Engineering in the
last few years. Nowadays, a number of dierent tools is
Domain in this context describes the overall idea behind available. Some of the most common tools are :
an assembly of products, i.e. the product type in general.
Choosing the domain includes the denition of the in- Category Identication
tended target group and user type, market-niche and type,
and the product group in question. Choosing and den- Regression Analysis /Quantication Theory Type I
ing the domain are carried out on existing products, con- Rough Sets Theory
cepts and on design solutions yet unknown. From this, a
domain description is formulated, serving as the basis for Genetic Algorithm
further evaluation. The process is necessary and has been
described by Schtte in detail in a couple of publications. Fuzzy Sets Theory
After doing the necessary stages, the nal step of valida- Fahrvergngen
tion remains. This is done in order to check if the pre-
Japanese quality
diction model is reliable and realistic. However, in case
of prediction model failure, it is necessary to update the Kansei Studies
Space of Properties and the Semantic Space, and conse-
quently rene the model. The process of renement is
dicult due to the shortage of methods. This shows the 7 References
need of new tools to be integrated. The existing tools can
partially be found in the previously mentioned methods
Akao, Y., History of Quality Function Deployment
for the synthesis. Software Tools for Kansei Engineer-
in Japan. International Academy for Quality Books
ing Kansei Engineering has always been a statically and
Series. Vol. 3. 1990: Hansa Publisher.
mathematically advanced methodology. Most types re-
quire good expert knowledge and a reasonable amount of Baumgarten, A.G., Aesthetica. 1961, Hildesheim:
experience to carry out the studies suciently. This has Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.
also been the major obstacle for a widespread application
ENGAGE, European Project on Engineering Emo-
of Kansei Engineering. In order to facilitate application
tional Design Report of the State of the Art- Round
some software packages have been developed in the re-
1. 2005: Valencia.
cent years, most of them in Japan. There are two dierent
types of software packages available: User consoles and Green, E.P. and V. Rao, Conjoint Measurement for
data collection and analysis tools. User consoles are soft- Quantifying Judgemental data. Journal of Market-
ware programs that calculate and propose a product de- ing Research, 1971: p. 61-68.
sign based on the users subjective preferences (Kanseis).
However, such software requires a database that quanti- Grimsaeth Kjetil, Kansei Engineering Linking
es the connections between Kanseis and the combina- Emotions and product features, 2005, Norwegian
tion of product attributes. For building such databases, University of Science and Technology.
data collection and analysis tools can be used. This part of Hirata Ricardo, Nagamachi Mitsuo, Ishihara
the paper demonstrates some of the tools. There are many Shigekazu, Satisfying Emotional Needs of the Beer
more tools used in companies and universities, which Consumer through Kansei Engineering (Case Study
might not be available to the public. User consoles with Hiroshima International University Students),
7th International QMOD Conference 2004, Uni-
versity of Linkping and ITESM, Monterrey, NL,
5 Kansei Engineering software pp. 219227, Mxico.
Hirata Ricardo, Nagamachi Mitsuo, Ishihara
As described above, Kansei data collection and analy- Shigekazu, Nishino Tatsuo,Translation of customer
sis is often complex and connected with statistical anal- Kansei and emotional needs into products, 2nd In-
ysis. Depending on which synthesis method is used, dif- ternational Conference on Applied Human Factors
ferent computer software is used. Kansei Engineering and Ergonomics (AHFEI) 2008, Las Vegas, USA.
Software (KESo) uses QT1 for linear analysis. The con-
Imamura, K., et al., An Application of Virtual Kan-
cept of Kansei Engineering Software (KESo) Linkping
sei Engineering to Kitchen Design, in Kansei Engi-
University in Sweden (www.kanseiengineering.net). The
neering 1, M. Nagamachi, Editor. 1997, Kaibundo
software generates online questionnaires for collection of
Publishing Co., Ltd.: Kure. p. 63-68.
Kansei raw-data
Another Software package (Kn6) was devleoped at the Kano, N., N. Seraku, and F. Takahashi, Attractive
Politechnical University of Valencia in Spain. quality and must be quality, in Quality. 1984. p.
39-44.
Both software packages improve the collection and evalu-
tation of Kansei data. In this way even users with no spe- Kant, I., Kritik av det rena frnuftet. 2004, Stock-
cialist compentence in advanced statistics can use Kansei holm: Thales.
Engineering Kller, R., Semantisk Milj Beskrivning (SMB).
1975, Stockholm: Psykologifrlaget AB Liber
Tryck Stockholm.
6 See also Matsubara, Y. and M. Nagamachi, Kansei Virtual
Reality Technology and Evaluation on Kitchen De-
Aective computing sign, in Manufacturing Agility and Hybrid Automa-
tion - 1, R.J. Koubek and W. Karwowski, Editors.
Gandhian engineering - for low cost, frugal, large 1996, IEA Press: Louisville, Kentucky, USA. p.
distribution product design. 81-84.*
4 8 EXTERNAL LINKS
Mori, N., Rough set approach to product design so- Nishino, T., Exercises on Kansei Engineering.
lution for the purposed Kansei. The Science of 2001: Hiroshima International University.
Design Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Kansei
Engineering, 2002. 48(9): p. 85-94. Nishino, T., et al. Internet Kansei Engineering
System with Basic Kansei Database and Genetic
Nagamachi, M., Kansei Engineering. 1989, Tokyo: Algorithm. in TQM and Human Factors. 1999.
Kaibundo Publishing Co. Ltd. Linkping, Sweden: Centre for Studies of Humans,
Technology and Organization.
Nagamachi Mitsuo, Kansei Kogaku no Ohanashi
(Introduction to Kansei Engineering), Japan Stan- Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum,
dard Association, (in Japanese). The measurement of meaning. 1957, Illinois: Uni-
versity of Illinois Press. 346.
Nagamachi, Mitsuo, Kansei Engineering: A New
ergonomic consumer oriented technology for prod- Schtte, S., et al., Concepts, methods and tools
uct development, International Journal of Industrial in Kansei Engineering. Theoretical Issues in Er-
Ergonomics 15, 3-11, 1995. gonomics Science, 2004. 5: p. 214-232
Nagamachi, M., and Lokman, A.M., Kansei Inno- The Japan Society of Kansei Engineering
vation, Practical Design Applications for Product
and Service Development, 2015, CRC Press LLC, The Malaysian Research Intensive Group for Kan-
USA. sei/Aective Engineering
9.2 Images
File:Ambox_important.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Ambox_important.svg License: Public do-
main Contributors: Own work, based o of Image:Ambox scales.svg Original artist: Dsmurat (talk contribs)
File:Edit-clear.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f2/Edit-clear.svg License: Public domain Contributors: The
Tango! Desktop Project. Original artist:
The people from the Tango! project. And according to the meta-data in the le, specically: Andreas Nilsson, and Jakub Steiner (although
minimally).
File:Unbalanced_scales.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Unbalanced_scales.svg License: Public do-
main Contributors: ? Original artist: ?