Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PCNL
Ureteroscopy SWL
Study Cases
R L U stone: 14
mm
MET failed
L L U stone: 22
mm
Recommended treatment option (if indicated for active stone removal) (GR: A*)
Morbid obesity
Comorbidity
Patient choice (after failed minimally invasive procedures, a single procedure avoiding the risk of
multiple PNL procedures might be preferred by the case)
Stone in an ectopic kidney where percutaneous access and SWL may be difficult or impossible.
For the paediatric population, the same considerations apply as for adults.
Case Four
Case
Six
The stone was found embedded in the ureteropelvic
junction. Up to 50% of the stone was fragmented with
flexible LASER. Cloudy urines observed. JJ placed.
Treatment completed using delayed SWL.
Comments
Though MET and Open
Surgery are still practiced
due to the restricted financial
resources of patients as well as
the availability and the limits of
the technical platforms;
URS is gaining ground slowly!
All in
All
What are the appropriate treatment choices to be recommended?
Conclusions
Open surgery has been the main if not the only
treatment for stones in Algeria. Ureteroscopy has
opened a path towards minimally invasive surgery in
our country:
It has re-instated confidence in the use of conservative
treatments as a first option.
Algeria has embarked towards a path to negligibly
aggressive modern stone treatment.
The Algerian urologist is obliged to find the best solution to relieve his
patients sufferings; nevertheless reality is rather problematic!