Inventory Sheet on SLM Approaches Date:

Contributor:
Country/region:
(name, institution, project, email)

Local Land user/local communities

Name of Approach For which Location Area Type of Approach Stakeholders involved Objectives involvement
land use type Initiation
Implementation phase
phase
1

Give name of the Approach (be Choose one of the following: Name of Area Choose one of the Choose one or two of the What are the main objectives of the Choose one of the following types:
specific to ensure that the location/ covered by following types: following: Approach
C cropland none
Approach can be distinguished region; Approach
G grazing land traditional/ local land passive
from similar ones) coordinates in km2
F forest/ woodlands
(if
indigenous users/local active: payment/ external support
M mixed (mixture of
available) recent communities active: interactive
land use types local community-based active: self-mobilization For
within same land initiative/ organizations
unit) innovative SLM definitions see QACore3.2
S settlements, project/ programme specialists/agricultural
infrastructure based advisers
W waterways, other (specify) researchers
waterbodies, teachers/schools
wetlands children/students
X mines, NGO
extractive private sector
industry local government
U unproductive land national government
For definitions see QT Core3.2 international

Short description of Approach (containing key characteristics of the Approach)

1

1
 External material
Technical support Motivation of land users to implement SLM Impact Potential for spread
support
1

State if technical support State if external material Choose from the following and list in order of Choose from the list below (or consult the full list of impacts in QA Core 6.1 for more categories): Assess what the potential of the
has been provided. support has been importance: Did the Approach: Approach is to be spread/ taken
Choose: provided. Choose: up widely by land users.
increased production help land users to implement and maintain SLM Technologies?
no no Choose from the following:
increased profitability improve coordination and cost-effective implementation of SLM?
yes, specify (e.g. yes, specify reduced land degradation high potential: +++
mobilize/ improve access to financial resources for SLM implementation?
medium potential: ++
training, capacity (subsidies, reduced risk of disasters improve knowledge and capacities of land users to implement SLM?
building, compensations, reduced workload low potential: +
advisory service, build/strengthen institutions, collaboration between stakeholders?
labour, payments/ subsidies mitigate conflicts?
research) agricultural rules and regulations (fines)/ enforcement improve issues of land tenure/ user rights that hindered implementation of SLM?
inputs, prestige, social pressure/ social cohesion
equipment etc.) lead to improved food security/nutrition?
affiliation to movement/project/ group/ networks improve access to markets?
environmental consciousness
lead to improved access to water and sanitation?
customs and beliefs, morals
enhanced SLM knowledge and skills
improve land users resilience to climate changes and extremes?
other (specify) other (specify)

Strengths of Approach Weaknesses of Approach Name of related Technology (if existing)

1