We, the undersigned presidents and chancellors of colleges and universities,
recognize that intellectual freedom is the foundation of higher education. The freedom to raise questions, seek answers, pursue knowledge, examine evidence, analyze claims, frame hypotheses, express doubts, argue for and against conclusions, and hold the expressions of others up to the light of reasoned criticism is indispensable to scholarship, teaching, and learning. We understand that the exercise of intellectual freedom can and often does result in controversy. Parties outside the university may object to some of what is said under the rubric of intellectual freedom, and parties within the university may also object. With that in mind we believe it is important from time to time for the leaders of colleges and universities to affirm strongly the principle of intellectual freedom. In light of the controversies that often follow from exercises of intellectual freedom, we affirm our responsibility to teach students and to remind faculty members and university staff why freedom of inquiry and freedom of expression are fundamental. Without these freedoms, the university stultifies into intellectual and social conformity. We believe the university should be a place of vibrant exchange of ideas, not an enforcer of orthodoxies. Colleges and universities do of course uphold distinctive educational missions. A commitment to intellectual freedom does not compromise a colleges right to shape its own curriculum, hire its own faculty, or in the case of sectarian colleges, to profess a religious doctrine. The principle of intellectual freedom does, however, impose on institutions a presumptive burden of neutrality in matters where there is serious disagreement among well-informed people and a position has not been laid down as a founding doctrine of the college. Exceptions to intellectual freedom should be few, transparent, and known in advance to all who choose to participate in the life of a college or university. The rightful limits to intellectual freedom lie only in the need for colleges and universities to maintain the conditions for open and civil dialogue, and appropriate intellectual order in the curriculum and in class.