Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2nd Order Transfer Function PDF
2nd Order Transfer Function PDF
n2 n2
H() = = ej
n2 w2 + 2nw
(n2 2)2 + 4 2 n2 2
2n
with tan =
n2 2
The Bode plot is :
H, dB
1
For = 2 we have the sharpest
10
corner without a maximum. = 0.1
0
1 =2
For < 2 there is a peak in the plot of -10
magnitude = 1
1 -20 2
|H|max = 5
2
12 -30
Impulse Responses
y(t) 2/n
= 0 Undamped 1/n
-1/n
Step responses
y(t)
= 0 Undamped 2
t
2 4 6 8 10
y(t)
> 0 Damped
1
1 0.8
y(t) = 1 + [ s2 exp(s1t) s1 exp(s2t) ]
2 1 0.6
0.4
0.2 t
10 15
1
y(t) = ( 1 exp( nt ) [1 + nt] )
t
2 4 6 8 10
Perhaps unkindly I leave derivations to the reader. The general response is:
1 n2
Y = H(s) 2 = 2 2
s s (s + 2 n s + n2 )
= 0 Undamped
y(t)
Y = 2 2
1 1
10
s s + n
2
8 Response
6
sin(nt )
y=t 4
n 2
y=t
t
Plot is for n =1; y = t sin(t) 2 4 6 8 10
Note: s1s2= n2 ; s1 + s2 = 2 n
Y(t)
= 1 Critically Damped 8
1 2 n
Y = 2n s + s+ +
2 6
n s
b (s+n)2 4
Response
2
1 t
y = (n t 2 + (2 + nt ) ent) 2 4 6 8 10
n
-2 t- 2
The plot is for n = 1. n
< 0 Underdamped: d = n
1 2 y(t)
2 2(s+ n ) n(122)d 8
Y = 2n s +
1 d
(s+n)2s+n2(12)
Response
n s 6
4
1 t - 2
y= 2 n
n t
n
nt 2+ent[2cos(dt)d (122) sin( dt)] 2 4 6 8 10
As an example consider the mass, damper and spring acted on by a force, f(t). We had for
the displacement, y :
m y" + c y' + k y = f
Take the Laplace transform ( with no initial values ) :
m s2Y + c s Y + k Y = F
c k
or s2Y +
m s Y + m Y = F/m
m and
k c
which with n = = becomes If we redefine F F/n2m = F/k:
2
km
F n2
and so H(s) = Y = 2 1
s + 2 n s + n2
This equation 1 is a standard form for any second order transfer function. Whatever the
physical variables it helps to turn the expression to this format early in the analysis.
Poles
Poles, s1, s2 are the values of s for which the denominator is zero.
2n
4 2 n2 4 n2
s1,s2 =
2
= n (
2 1 ) 3
Cases; j
Bode Plot
n2
From eq. 1 H(s) = 2
s + 2 n s + n2
n2
and putting s j H() = 2 4a
n 2 + j 2n
= |H()| exp( j) 4b
n2
with |H()| = 4c
( n2 2)2 + 4 2 n2 2
2n
and tan = 4d
n2 2
0 = n
|H| 1 1 2
2 n2
0 2
1
For < 2 there is a peak in the | H | curve. It is easier to find the peak of |H|2 which is at
1
the same value of as the peak of |H|. And easier still to find the minimum of 2 whic
|H|
occurs at teh same value of as the peak in |H|
d 1 d
n4 d 2 = d (( n2 2)2 + 4 2 n2 2) = 2(n2 2)(-2) + 82n2
|H|
= 4 ( 2 n2 ( 122))
d 1
so d 2 = 0 if = 0; or if = n
1 2 2
|H|
1
In the latter case |H| =
( 1 1+ 22)2 + 4 2( 12 2)
1 1
= = 5
4 2( 12) 2
12
Note that if = 0 then the peak of | H | . This is the undamped case. Note also that the
1
peak is at a frequency close to but slightly less than n. There is no peak if > 2 since then
the frequency is imaginary.
This is illustrated in the next figures with n = 1. Note that the frequency scale has been
extended in the phase plot to show the approach to the limits.
In the magnitude plot note (i) the roll of rate is 40 dB per decade.
H, dB
10
= 0.1
0
=2
-10
= 1
-20 2
-30
-40
-0.1 1 10
Frequency, rad s-1
Phase,
degrees
0
= 0.1
-45
= 1
-90 2
=2
-135
-180
0.01 0.1 1 10 50
Frequency, rad s-1 ( log scale )
Impulse Responses
f(t)
Consider the Dirac impulse, (t), as an input.
2 n (t)
= 0. Y = 2 n 2 1 = 2n
s + n s + n2
y(t) 2/n
n
-n
s1,s2 = n (
2 1 ) ; s1 > s2 3
n2
Thus the response is Y = (ss )(s-s ) 1
1 2
n2 1 1
s1 s2 s-s1 ss2
=
n
and y(t) = ( exp(s1t) exp(s2t))
2
2 1
The response below is for n = 1 and = 2. The coefficients of the component exponentials
is omitted in the figure. The formula is : y = 0289( e027 t e37 t)
n2 n2
=1 Y= 1 =
(s + n)2 (s + n)2
so y(t) = n2 t exp( -n t)
< 1 This is a bit more complicated. We need to complete squares in the denominator.
n2
Y = H(s) 1 = 2
s + 2 n s + n2
n2
=
(s + n)2 2n2 + n2
n2
= 6
(s + n)2 + d2
with d = n
1 2 7
2 d
Thus Y = n
d (s + n)2 + d2
2
so, from the tables y(t) = n exp(-nt) sin(dt) 8a
d
n
= exp(-nt) sin(dt) 8b
12
y(t)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
10 25 t
5 15 20
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
2
The period of the oscillation, T = . The ratio of succeeding positive peaks is then:
d
exp(-nt) 2
= exp n
2 d
expn t +
d
2n 2n
The logarithm of this ratio is = d = 12
n
2
so = 2 if << 1 9
12
n2 1
Y= s 10
s + 2 n s + n
2 2
Cases
n2 A Bs + C
=0 Y= + 2
s( s2 + n2 ) s s + n2
Y = s 2
1 s
s + n
2
and y(t) = ( 1 cos(n t))
t
2 4 6 8 10
> 1 The transfer function is factorisable and the roots are real. As before eq. 3 gives the
roots:
s1,s2 = n (
2 1 ) ; s1 > s2 3
n2 1
and the response is Y = (ss )(s-s ) s
1 2
2` A B B
We have Y = s(ss n)(s-s ) s + s-s + s-s
1 2 1 2
1 1 s2 s1
So Y= s + ss ss ) ; since s1 s2 = n2 ; s1 s2 = n
2 1
n
2 1 1 2
1
and y(t) = 1 + [ s2 exp(s1t) s1 exp(s2t) ])
n
2 1
noting s1,s2 = n (
2 1 ) ; s1 > s2
y(t)
With n =1 and = 2 this becomes
1
y(t) = 1 + 0077 e373 t 1077 e027 t 0.8
0.6
which is illustrated on the right. 0.4
0.2 t
10 15
n2 1 n2
=1 Y= =
(s +n)2 s s(s + n)2
A B C
s + s+ + , say
n (s+n)2
Thus n 2 (s + n)2 + Bs(s + n) + Cs
Put s = 0 : n = A n A =1. Put s = n : n2 = C n C = n
2 2
Coeff. s2 : 0=A+B B = A = 1
1 1 n
Y = s s+
n (s + n)2
y(t)
Thus from the Tables: 1
y(t) = 1 exp( nt ) [1 + nt ]
< 1 The more complicated but more interesting case. From eq. 1 we have
n2 1
Y= 2 s
s + 2 n s + n 2
n2
=
s(s2 + 2 n s + n2 )
A Bs + C
=s + , say.
s2 + 2 n s + n2
1 s + 2n
= s : completing the square as in eq. 6
(s + n)2 + d2
n
(s + n) + d
1 d
= s : making the numerator to suit the Tables
(s + n) + d2
2
with d = n
1 2
Thus y(t) = 1 exp( n t) cos( d t) + n sin(d t) 11
d
we have 2
1+ e-t
5 10 15 20
y(t)
MP
Overshoot,
OP
1
Period,
T = 2
t
d
Tp 10 Ts 20
Overshoot
dy n2
The derivative = exp(nt) sin(dt)
dt d
is remarkably simple. It is equal to the impulse response. Indeed it is generally the case that
the derivative of the step response of any linear system is the impulse response.
dy n n nT
dt = 0 when d t = n or when t = = = 2
d n
1-2
2 2
where the period of the oscillations is T= =
d n
1-2
n
The value of y at these extrema is Y = 1 + exp
12
The first of these when n = 1 gives the peak of the overshoot ( often simply called the
overshoot.
Overshoot, Op
P = 1 + exp
12
1
0.4
P = y 1 = exp 12a
12
0.2
occurring at 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
T
TP = = =2 12b Damping,
n
1-2 d
We may be interested in the time to reach and stay within a certain 'distance' from the final
value. The deviation of the nth extremum is
n n n
= exp which occurs at tn = or = tnn
1 2 n
1 2
1 2
n
so = exp = exp( n tn)
1 2
ln()
and Ts = tn =
n
Strictly tn should be an integral number of half periods but the discrepancy is usually
ignored.
4
For = 002, i.e., 2% Ts
n
3
and for = 005, i.e., 5% Ts
n
We may also consider an overall expression of deviation from the final value. The root
mean square seems a suitable choice.
y(t) - 1 (y-1)2
1
1
0.8
0.6
t
0.4
5 10 15 20
0.2
t
-1 5 10 15 20
The deviation and its square are illustrated above for the previously shown response. We
take then as a measure of the overall deviation as
=
1+4 2
4n
1.4
1.2
This rather simple expression is
valid for all , i.e., 0 < < . It has 1.0
1
a minimum value of 1 when = 2 . 1 2 3 4 5
t
5 10 15
There are other measures of the error. To put emphasis on the approach to the final value on
might weight erros by muptiplying by time. The integral of this de-emphasises the initial
approach to the final value.. Thus we have
t (y - 1)2
The root of the integral of time weighted
total square erroe is
0.8
1/2 0.6
Erts = t ( y 1)2 dt
0 0.4
0.2
t
1 1+ 8 4
= 2 5 10 15 20
n 2
The overshoot is
1
This has a minimum of 1/4 when
2 n exp = exp 98%
1 2 221
1 1/4
= 8 0595
d = n
12 = constant. s
So Constant frequency in 1
response
s
Fixed envelope
y =1 exp( n t) 1
OP = exp
12
t
Note: = sin where is
marked in the figure.
1.4
1.2
20 40 60 90