Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Immediate Effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques vs. Autogenic Drainage for Airway
Clearance in Subjects with Bronchiectasis A Randomized Cross Over Study
MS. SMRITI
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
MANGALORE-575002
1
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science, Karnataka, Bangalore
ANNEXURE II
MANGALORE-575002
2
6. BRIEF RESUME OF THE INTENDED WORK
3
expiratory flow with minimal airway closure, starting with the small airways and
moving secretions from smaller to larger airways in 3 phases: unsticking, collection,
and evacuation. The patient moves mucus with a relaxed sighing exhalation,
regulating airflow and velocity with use of expiratory muscles, avoiding unnecessary
expiratory resistance. Optimal level of airflow is achieved without forcing the
expiration.6
There is little research done to study the effects of Autogenic drainage in
comparison with other airway clearance techniques and none comparing it with ACBT
in Bronchiectasis.
Operational Definitions
ACBT is a cycle of techniques of breathing control (tidal breathing at the
patient's own rate and depth, encouraging use of the lower chest with
relaxation of the upper chest and shoulders), thoracic expansion exercises
(deep breathing exercises emphasizing inspiration with or without a breath
hold; expiration is quiet and relaxed) and the forced expiration technique (one
or two huffs combined with periods of breathing control.7
Autogenic drainage is breathing at different lung volumes and expiration is
used to move the mucus. The aim is to maximize expiratory flow. Breathing at
low lung volumes, in the individual patient, is used to mobilize (unstuck) more
peripherally situated mucus. Breathing around the individual's tidal volume is
said to collect mucus in the middle range, and, with breathing around high lung
volumes expectoration of secretions (evacuated) from the central airways is
promoted. When sufficient mucus has reached the upper airways, it may be
cleared by a cough.8
Conventional chest physical therapy(PT) is an airway clearance technique
that combines manual percussion of the chest wall by a therapist, strategic
positioning of the patient for mucus drainage, and cough and breathing
techniques (diaphragmatic breathing).9
4
Research Question
Which of the two techniques (ACBT or Autogenic Drainage) is more effective for
airway clearance in subjects with Bronchiectasis?
Null hypothesis
Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques has same immediate effect as Autogenic
Drainage for airway clearance in subjects with Bronchiectasis.
Hypothesis
Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques has better immediate effect as Autogenic
Drainage for airway clearance in subjects with Bronchiectasis.
5
6.2 Review of Literature
Currie et al. in their study on Impaired tracheobronchial clearance in
Bronchiectasis concluded that all the patients with Bronchiectasis expectorated
purulent sputum daily, had reduced FEV 1 and were unable to avoid coughing during
the six hour observation period. The study was done in thirty- seven subjects who were
non- smokers and measurements were done for PFT and weight of sputum.10
Mortensen J and colleagues in their study found that Positive Expiratory Pressure
(PEP) or Postural Drainage (PD) measured under similar circumstances in the study
were equally effective. The study recruited ten subjects. Measurements of PFT and
weight of the sputum. The total or overall benefits of these physiotherapy techniques
on lung clearance is not found because of a statistically significant increase in numbers
of productive coughs during and after PEP and PD for the first 30 minutes compared
with the control experiment and radio aerosol techniques are preferable to simple
indices such as weight of sputum expectorated.11
Another study was conducted on Airway Clearance in Bronchiectasis comparing
ACBT and Acapella which concluded that Acapella is as effective a method of airway
clearance as ACBT and may offer a user-friendly alternative to ACBT for patients with
Bronchiectasis. Twenty patients were included for the study and they measured
spirometry, Spo2, breathlessness before and after treatment. They also recorded weight
of the sputum, number of coughs and patient preference. Majority of patients preferred
Acapella technique for airway clearance.12
In another crossover study done to compare ACBT and conventional chest physical
therapy on airway clearance in Bronchiectasis, the conclusion was ACBT in
therapeutic positions is found to be equally effective as conventional chest physical
therapy on airway clearance in patients with Bronchiectasis. 35 patients were recruited
in the study and measurement of PFT, weight and volume of sputum, patient
preference was done. Patients rated ACBT as more comfortable than conventional
therapy, and hence can be used as preferred modality for airway clearance in
Bronchiectasis patients.9
Thompson C S and colleagues in their study on comparison of Flutter and ACBT
in seventeen patients concluded that daily use of the Flutter device in the home is as
6
effective as ACBT in patients with non-cystic fibrosis Bronchiectasis and has a high
level of patient acceptability. The outcome measures taken were weight of sputum,
PEFR and breathlessness on Borg scale. Health status (Chronic Respiratory Disease
Questionnaire) and ventilator function did not change significantly during either
treatment period. There was no significant change in peak expiratory flow rate or in
breathlessness (Borg score) after individual physiotherapy sessions with either
technique.13
Miller S and colleagues in their study on Cystic Fibrosis explained that autogenic
drainage cleared mucus from the lungs faster than ACBT over the whole day and more
patients had an improved forced expiratory flow from 25% to 75% with autogenic
drainage while more showed improved forced vital capacity with ACBT. The study
was done on 18 patients with cystic fibrosis and the outcome measures were sputum
weight, PFT, Spo2, patient preference and heart rate.14
Savci et al. in their study found that Autogenic drainage is as effective as the
ACBT in cleaning secretions and improving lung functions. The study was done on
thirty patients for twenty days. The effects of long-term treatment was assessed using
PFT, 6- minute walk test, arterial blood gases and dyspnoea perception.15
To compare the effects of ACBT and autogenic drainage (AD) for airway
clearance in patients with Bronchiectasis.
7
7. MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study Design:
Sample Procedure:
The patients who are diagnosed with Bronchiectasis and referred to physiotherapy and
fulfill the inclusion criteria will be included in the study. Written informed consent will
be obtained from the subjects.
Sample Size, Methodology:
26 subjects will be selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria based on
purposive sampling technique. The sample size was calculated based on the
previous studies and power analysis was done. Routine respiratory assessment will
be done for all the subjects. All the subjects will receive ACBT and Autogenic
drainage treatment. The sequence of Autogenic drainage and ACBT will be
randomized. The outcome measures SpO2, breathlessness, PFT, respiratory rate,
heart rate will be measured before the treatment. On 1st and 2nd day, all the subjects
will receive either ACBT or Autogenic drainage and measurement of all outcome
measures along with weight of the sputum will be taken. All the medication and
routine treatment will not be altered on both the days. At the end of the 2nd day,
patient preference will be asked by the patient in their local language. All the
subjects will be given conventional chest physiotherapy. SpO 2 will be monitored
throughout the treatment session. Comparison of the outcome measures will be done
to find the effects of both the airway clearance techniques in Bronchiectasis.
9
DAY 1 DAY 2
ACBT or AD ACBT or AD
9. SIGNATURE OF CANDIDATE
DEPT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
11.2 SIGNATURE
THE DEPARTMENT
PROFESSOR
11.4 SIGNATURE
12.2 SIGNATURE
10
INFORMED CONSENT
Mangalore-575002
We will clarify any of your queries regarding the study. Your Identity
will remain confidential. You are free to leave this study at any time.
11
DATA COLLECTION FORM
Age: Sex:
Referred by:
Occupation:
Present history:
Past history:
Smoking history:
Allergic history:
Drug History:
Surgical history:
12
DAY 1 DAY 2
TYPE OF TREATMENT
Weight of sputum
SpO2
Breathlessness
FEV1
PEFR
Respiratory rate
Heart rate
13
14