Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2016;84(1):9---14
CIRUGA y CIRUJANOS
rgano de difusin cientfica de la Academia Mexicana de Ciruga
Fundada en 1933
www.amc.org.mx www.elsevier.es/circir
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Servicio de Oftalmologa, Clnica de Estrabismo, Hospital General de Mxico Dr. Eduardo Liceaga, Secretaria de Salud, Mxico,
D.F., Mexico
KEYWORDS Abstract
Strabismus; Background: In psychomotor retardation there is an abnormal development of mental, sensory
Psychomotor and motor skills associated with ocular manifestations. There are biological and psychoso-
disorder; cial risk factors that predispose an individual to neurological damage. From 50% to 80% of
Risk factors patients with strabismus retardation have special features that differentiate it from the rest of
strabismus in healthy patients.
Objective: To determine the most common type of strabismus in patients with psychomotor
retardation and their clinical features.
Material and methods: Patients with psychomotor retardation and strabismus were included.
An ophthalmological examination was performed, as well as an evaluation of the characteristics
of strabismus, including perinatal and post-natal history.
Results: Esotropia was the most frequent squint with 65.3%, followed by exotropia with 32.7%.
The variability in the squint magnitude was 60% in both types, and 6 patients had dissociated
vertical deviation. Most of the patients started to present strabismus since they were born.
The most frequent perinatal risk factors were threatened miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, foetal
distress, and hypoxia.
Conclusions: Esotropia is the most common type of strabismus in psychomotor retardation. The
variability of squint magnitude is a characteristic in these patients. The moderate variability
is the most frequent in both esotropia and exotropia. The most common refractive error is
hyperopic astigmatism in esotropia and the myopic kind in exotropia.
2015 Academia Mexicana de Ciruga A.C. Published by Masson Doyma Mxico S.A. This
is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Please cite this article as: Arias-Cabello B, Arroyo-Yllanes ME, Prez-Prez JF, Fonte-Vzquez A. Caractersticas clnicas del estrabismo
2444-0507/ 2015 Academia Mexicana de Ciruga A.C. Published by Masson Doyma Mxico S.A. This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
10 B. Arias-Cabello et al.
Small < 15 PD Medium 16-45 PD Large > 45 PD Figure 3 Perinatal risk factors (prenatal, natal, postnatal).
UTI: urinary tract infection; TM: threatened miscarriage; Preec:
Figure 1 Estrabismus and variability. pre-eclampsia; FD: foetal distress; NA: neonatal asphyxia; Hbil:
PD: prismatic diopters; ET: esotropia; XT: exotropia. hyperbilirubinaemia; S: seizures.
angle esotropia.11 According to Daz et al.,11 variability injury; 28% of our sample did not have a history of
of medium magnitude (16---45 PD) is more common. Here risk.6
variabilities of esotropia were analysed, medium esotropia
presented in 70.45%, followed by small, and nally large
Conclusions
esotropia. In our study similar results were obtained with
a medium variable in 59.1%, small in 31.8% and large in
- Esotropia is the most common type of strabismus in psy-
9---1%.
chomotor retardation.
Brodsky8 mentions that children with neurological dam-
- Variability of the magnitude of deviation is a characteristic
age have a higher incidence of constant exotropia with
of strabismus in patients with psychomotor retardation.
superior oblique muscle hyperfunction, compared with stra-
- Medium variability is the most frequent both in esotropias
bic children without neurological damage. In this study
and in exotropias.
a different percentage was encountered, as 62.5% of the
- The most common refractive defect is compound hyper-
exotropias presented variability, medium exotropia being
metropic astigmatism in esotropias and myopic in
the most common in 80%, and small in 20%. With regard
exotropias.
to vertical muscle hyperfunction, only 2 patients had hyper-
function of the superior oblique muscles and 2 of the inferior
oblique muscles, and therefore this is not a signicant per- Conict of interests
centage.
With regard to refractive defects in these patients, in line The authors have no conict of interests to declare.
with other authors, most had a tendency towards hyperme-
tropia, the maximum sphere being +8.00 in one patient; in
References
addition to hypermetropia, the relationship with stigmatism
was also signicant: it was found that the most negative
1. Snchez-Z niga ME, Prez-Madero GC, Martn-Lpez ML, Prez-
cylinder was 4.00. It is important to mention that in the
Moreno JC. Factores de riesgo y signos de alarma para da no
esotropias compound hypermetropic astigmatism presented neurolgico en ni nos menores de un a no de edad. Reporte de
more frequently, whereas this was compound myopic astig- 307 casos. Rev Mex Neuroci. 2009;10(4):259---63.
matism in the exotropias.12,13 2. Prez-Olarte P. Evaluacin y manejo del ni no con retraso psico-
It is mentioned that parity is associated with toxaemia or motor. Pediatr Integral. 2003;7(8):557---66.
pre-eclampsia in pregnancy. Primiparous women are at most 3. Vidal-Pineda R, Prez-Garca NP, Hernndez-Quezada CA. Ter-
risk, 4---5 times higher than multiparous women. This data apia visual en ni
nos con retraso psicomotor. Rev Mex Oftalmol.
was corroborated in the study since 25% of the primigravi- 2009;83(2):90---5.
das (20 mothers) had pre-eclampsia; in this sample none 4. Guas Diagnsticas de Fsica y Rehabilitacin. N. 8 Retraso
psicomotor. Hospital General de Mxico; 2011. p. 42---9.
of the multiparous women had pre-eclampsia.14 The per-
Available from http://www.hgm.salud.gob.mx/descargas/
centage of mothers of the appropriate age for conception
pdf/area medica/rehabili/retraso psicomotor.pdf [accessed
and giving birth (18---35) was 53.1%, followed by adolescent 09.08.12].
mothers (< 18) at 28.6%. This data draws attention as in pre- 5. Sweeney JK, Swanson MW. Neonatal care and follow-up for
vious studies it has been found that adolescent mothers are infants at neuromotor risk. In: Umphered DA, editor. Neuro-
more at risk of difcult labours, premature births, and foetal logical rehabilitation. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1990. p.
distress.15 203---62.
Snchez et al.1 performed a study with 307 patients 6. Castellanos-Navarro KE, Ruz-Chvez J, Flores-Nava G. Mor-
and found that the main causes of neurological dam- bilidad neonatal en ni nos con factores de riesgo de da no
age, in descending order were: neonatal asphyxia (53.7%), neurolgico. Rev Mex Pediatr. 2010;77(5):189---93.
7. Clark BJ, Lee WR, Doyle D, Arngrimsson R, Tolmie JL, Stephen-
hyperbilirubinaemia (22.14%), foetal distress (18.24%),
son JB. A novel pattern of oculocerebral malformation. Br J
threatened miscarriage (11.7%), urinary tract infection
Ophthal. 1997;81:470---5.
(11.4%) and pre-eclampsia (9.7%). However in our study 8. Brodsky CM. Complex ocular motor disorder in children. In: Pedi-
we only agree that neonatal asphyxia is the most common atric neuro-ophthalmology. 2nd ed. Springer Science & Business
cause at 40.8%, followed by urinary tract infection at 34.7%, Media; 2010. p. 309---11.
seizures 28.5%, foetal distress 22.4%, hyperbilirubinaemia 9. Arroyo-Yllanes ME, Prez-Prez JF, Murillo-Murillo L. Result-
20.4%, and nally pre-eclampsia at 10.2%. Foetal distress ados con la aplicacin de toxina botulnica en pacientes
encompasses perinatal asphyxia, which develops in utero, con endotropia y retraso psicomotor. Cir Ciruj. 2009;77(1):
and neonatal asphyxia, which presents at birth, and is con- 9---12.
rmed by metabolic alterations. It is one of the main causes 10. Jirn-Silva P, Costas-Moragas C, Botet-Mussons F, de Cceres-
Zurita M. Estudio del comportamiento neonatal en el
of perinatal morbimortality with a frequency of 1.6---5.3
sufrimiento fetal agudo mediante la escala de Brazelton. An
per hundred live newborns. The incidence of this condi-
Esp Pediatr. 1998;48(2):163---6.
tion varies with the gestational age, at 0.5% in infants born 11. Daz-Castaneda A, Fuentes-Cata no MC, Villasenor-Solares J.
at term which contrasts with the 50% in infants born after Endotropia de ngulo variable asociada a retraso psicomotor.
less than 30 weeks gestation. However, in our sample there Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2009;83(2):81---3.
was no difference between the gestational ages.1 In their 12. Sobrado P, Surez J, Garca-Snchez FA, Usn E. Refractive
review, Castellanos et al.,6 mention that around 4 in every errors in children with cerebral palsy, psychomotor retardation,
10 (43%) infants with a history of neurological risk, even and other non-cerebral palsy neuromotor disabilities. Dev Med
if they had perinatal asphyxia, might have a neurological Child Neurol. 1999;41(6):396---403.
14 B. Arias-Cabello et al.
13. Saunders KJ, Little JA, McClelland JF, Jackson AJ. Prole of et al. Factores de riesgo de mortalidad en el hijo de madre
refractive errors in cerebral palsy: impact of severity of motor toxmica. Gac Med Mex. 2004;140(1):33---45.
impairment (GMFCS) and CP subtype on refractive outcome. 15. Vzquez-Mrquez A, Prez-Llorente LM, Guerra-Verdecia C,
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):2885---90. Almirall-Chvez M, de la Cruz-Chvez F. Morbilidad y mor-
14. Gmez-Gmez M, Danglot-Banck C, Garca-de la Torre GS, talidad perinatal en el embarazo precoz. Rev Cubana Obstet
Antonio-Ocampo A, Fajardo-Gutirrez A, Snchez-Garca ML, Ginecol. 1998;24(3):137---44.