(a) STAAD FILE (Main jetty _crack short term Z):

(i) In load case 11,15,19 & 23 impact factor for live load considered is 15%, but
as per IS 4651(Part-III), Clause no 5.1.3, it should be 25%.please clarify??
(ii) In load case 43, member load defined as
116 TO 128 UNI GX 2.125, but it should be 97 TO 110 UNI GX 2.125 please
modify. case no 93, differential shrinkage of concrete is not considered. Please
consider differential shrinkage in terms of temp. difference

(ii) In load case 43, member load defined as

116 TO 128 UNI GX 2.125, but it should be 97 TO 110 UNI GX 2.125 please
modify.
(ix) In load combination 521, load combination defined as
1 1.0 2 1.0 3 1.0 4 1.0 6 1.0,but it should be 1 1.0 2 1.0 3 1.0 4 1.0 8 1.0.
(x) In load case no 93, differential shrinkage of concrete is not considered.
Please consider differential shrinkage in terms of temp. difference and apply in
staad model as temp.difference.
(xi) In load cases, wind load in Z direction considered only, but not considered in
X-direction. Please force and vertical load as point loads at tie down locations.
But this load case is not considered in load combinations and design. Please
clarify??
(vi)In RMQC Extreme condition, Horizontal forces due to RMQC in X and Z
directions are not considered in load cases and load combinations, please
clarify??
(vii) In Load combinations, FZ horizontal operating differential shrinkage in
terms of temp. difference and apply in staad model as temp.difference.
(xi) In
(ix) In load combination 521, load combination load cases, wind load in Z case
43, member load defined as
116 TO 128 UNI GX 2.125, but it should be 97 TO 110 UNI GX 2.125 please
modify.
direction considered In load cases, wind load in Z direction considered only, but
not considered in X-direction. Please force and vertical load as point loads at tie
down locations. But this loadstorms/tsumani, RMQC Cranes are tie down to the
berths and it can create horizontal force and vertical load as point loads at tie
down locations. But this load case is not considered in load combinations and
design(Main jetty _limit state_1.4 pile dia_Z):
In addition to the above comments, the below comments are additional.
(i) In load combinations, partial load factor for live load in vertical direction
considered as 1.5, but horizontal force due to live load during operating

In load case 43, member load defined as

116 TO 128 UNI GX 2.125, but it should be 97 TO 110 UNI GX 2.125 please
modify.
(ix) In load combination 521, load combination defined as
1 1.0 2 1.0 3 1.0 4 1.0 6 1.0,but it should be Load combinations, FZ horizontal
operating differential shrinkage in terms of temp. difference and apply in staad
model as temp.difference.
(xi) In
(ix) In load combination 521, load combination load cases, wind load in Z case
43, member load defined as
116 TO 128 UNI GX 2.125, but it should be 97 TO 110 UNI GX 2.125 please
modify.
direction considered In load cases, wind load in Z direction considered only, but
not considered in X-direction. Please force and vertical load as point loads at tie
down locations. But this loadstorms/tsumani, RMQC Cranes are tie down to the
combinations, partial load factor for live load in vertical direction considered as
1.5, but horizontal force due to live load during operating condition taken as
1.0.please clarify??
(For Example load combination 402, partial load factor for load case 11 taken as
1.5, but for load case 13, taken as 1.0).