Looking at LAPS by comparing/contrasting the following two lists: What research and surveys show works for life-long learners in the 21st century, versus traditional school practices that have been around for a long time.
What are our strengths? Where are the gaps? What needs to change in order for school to be more relevant for students and teachers?
What Works for Learning Today vs. Traditional Practices
Safe environment Sitting in rows Personal investment 45/60/88 minute blocks Real world application One-sized curriculum Fun One subject area focus Relevance to students lives Age-grouped co-learners Social/Relationships No real world application Interesting questions from students Teacher controlled Positive, nurturing environment Someone elses questions Real audience Standardized assessments Passion Emphasis on grades Teachers as mentors Carrots and sticks Student Autonomy and agency Minimal student autonomy Challenging/Rigor Lack of relevance No time constraints Handing it in
Borrowed/adapted from Will Richardsons TedTalk The Surprising Truth About Learning in Schools. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxyKNMrhEvY&sns=em