Knapp 1

Rachel Knapp

D. Jizi

UWRT 1104

28 March 2017

Peer feedback

Hannah McAbee:

Everything looks really good

based on criteria^^^^

Summary paragraph meets all of the requirements as well

The second paragraph on relevance is good

For the credibility paragraph, I would maybe take out the fact it came from the library

because that isn't technically credible but the rest is fine

Ernest Meland:

Your summary is very well constructed and it includes plenty of detail that describes the

source.
 Knapp 2

The second paragraph was pretty nice but I had trouble understanding what point of your

inquiry the source is emphasizing or even what your inquiry topic is.

The fact that the article is from the library doesn't mean its credible although the fact that

the University the authors attended is known is a plus and adds credibility

My response to feedback:

I understand that now the library is not a very credible source so I need to find more

reliable information on the article before I use it. I will also try to specify in my second

paragraph some more.