Welcome to Scribd!
Academic Documents
Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hobbies & Crafts Documents
Personal Growth Documents
E = 3957 ~ wb tlerance (neal = R-ks, ZF 24.876 +/ tay tras = 204 d2 = te “eae Yinee To does ust Lu) pe hon gntside the vejection bounds of © 2,064 Bet) a we Bul to reject He,\ 7 — “Daegu we papas ol yp ay age ous jams Ho 9BHe se pe pana au nde; no Sup ey ne BN at oe Pas ony px! xi uaap ‘aun mG Sutin nak une sono jo eve eoney sun wast ove en Yea peak a ey Aaa Ae ws po oa (8g 01 sueadde asauy yo © 30 apa aur oy awor aned pue soje8uy 507 uy aayod BY) Wo BuIUUTY axe nO, ‘roquer sz + eHanD + zozrze aeUSE2044cuid 2 102013 save SDLUTION ‘A meta fabricator would ike to krow ifthe ifessan of two efferent brands of meta saw blades citfers sufficiently to justly the cifference in cost. A paired tests performed on 9 samples of arcraft-grade ‘aluminum and the results are presented below. ‘Aluminum Sample # | Blade 1 Wespan hour) | Bade a6 a5. Ex 823, 392 86.6 35.0 309) 327 Use this information to develop a confidence interval onthe mean ofthe eifference in observation pairs atthe a= 0.10 level of significance. Hint: space has been provided in the table for the addtion of useful ‘information. What canbe inforred from te calculated bounds ofthe confidence interval? 2 7 ad > Sy * e100 #1 IF wrong, eux showess sng ate ¢ at. “bom Wot inclise ze, Hone 5 Leyitely A SiqniGcant ditlerene in Vifesspans at wis © lpwot Geanihiowee 2SaruTlany ISE 2241 + Quie 9» 11 JUL 2013 name <> © Recall the problem 2 few quizae ago in which ve wore interested inthe differences inthe mean and variance of aircraft wiring coating thickness fortwo different precestes. Steen samples ofeach rocess were anayze wth the flowing resus: 5» 82 um, 62 pm, #2 BHM, 52% 3.8 yn. Test {the folowing hypotheses on the citference invariance of coating thickness atthe c= Ute significance and state whether you would reject ofall to reject He: Hoo? = of Hea? # a2 wl fer eftore pavameler (CT wouthit be -bo particular a beut Ui 2 the whole test aa pak does it >) is uk how he(s€2211 + quet20 «28,0. 2012 name SOLUTION A series of measurements has been taken regarding the relationship between the numberof turns of Wire ona certain ol an¢ the co's measured inductance. The results ae presented below: rant barf Fors ofWie GT indostner nang) 2 For a0 a bvious ann a vast = Ose arror > im a5 Shouse 062. 83 SO Wort 015 Duet got ———— ae eke OSLEEY ) Fst, determine the east squares estimates for the slope (2) and intercept) ofthe simple near regression mode, as appli to this a. You wl probaby want to determine the cenominatr (Su) and numerator) terms eas computation. Adana, oul eed #2649. ye ~ nha 2_ (28 PV R18 Sa Bat BE Cy ymo SIEM hom ay go ‘ 12 WSxy s Say 15, capapg _ 7200 8F | neo oi =430.9 — 1200. ’ zany a 28 14 L ABT Se Goes ~ 6:35 «10 a Po <7 254 =L,g5 40°. £00 = — m CB = HTP x HBr + Bsuot x Aw aera Ty resin nei observed value oY fr.x9=1500-turns of wire __ Hla: vou wil nees toate te vale a) QF tre-esresion model you developed, above. SST y SSe, and GoM = -024198 - 9 0cu)= toons 4 Sxy 002933 - 6.96 »/9-S 414 = LPG «0-4"e721 Fatiom + suk 2013 wwe SOLUTION G2 sy ranastr manufacturer clans that parla ransstor has @ current ain rater han or equal too, ity wang are randomly sected nd ete. The messed cer gis hve sme mean Z = JX dil sample standard deviation s= 24 Test the flowing hypotheses and state whether you would reject or fall to reject the nul typothesis Sttbet= OT nce. Additionally, find the p-value ys t= 100 Hise 200 Zo > ime . og ain Tal ; lower owe-sided ¢ 0& P= 0. 0002 fam et the ul bypetlesrs fee ang sien fiemnce louel d dd? level gentler Hn. 00022) Two different batches f magnetic recording tape were analyzed and the magnetic coercivity ‘measured for ine samples ofeach batch: ‘Batch 7 Sample ‘Baich ZSample | Coereivityin Gersteds 344 369 343, a7 37 370 359 382, 367, Lee i Assuming population variances are unknown but assumed ta be equal, test the folowing hypotheses and state whether you would reject or fall to rjee the rullhypothasi atthe = 0.05 level af ‘significance. Note: this snot a pared test. Hawi de #0 Hi i Ha # Og Ky * 37156 Xn = 362 4 uw S, = 7297 3° 7:282° & y1q9" 9-2 = Xi-Re-Ae _ 32nspesuaald be 1.459 1 (+) e wAmim-a = tins y ~ 9,100 iL_dp_cgect He, Since ko dees wat exces tonsa Me+94 3) tis believed that there sa connection between turns ratio and leakage inductance in transformer esign. Three diferent turns ratios were replicated in four transformers each and the leakage Inductance measured The results are presented below: n= ina aicana EN ‘Tums Ratio | “ogsereio7i)| Obsenation? | Obserations | Obsenationa | TOS er as 98 93, 20 10.1 38% 7S = iao [a3 [a9 | as a S31 bs27s Sago [pa aa | 9a | ni eo =i. 5 Flin the ANOVA ale. Oo not worry abou values. State whether you wd elector fit rec the ruilhypothessthatry=etyetend. (0) Qf >, 0) Zz 195,25 2-51 + SStrechuert = 295, )-2 90, doh = a(n) = 3¢ Trertmes < SSrrenewts - 370-955 Ft MSc = S82 < ACh) £ 2 MS treatnauts, Me ‘Froa,, = B.0r ws we Ly Shmuly eclect HoNow calculate Fichar's ast Significant Diference and determine which, i any, pais af treatment ‘means show significant cifference atthe a= 001 level LSD = tafe neaMSe Ce weno Cr tonya aster (449) * 3.250 \| 28950 cy) - 1651 H+5 us. Jp Ife -ye-l = /a55- 15-2975) * 3.725 > L3r 2) 18 vs. 1330 —» gis Gs} = | 465-93.045) « ise] 2 113.275-23.095|7 48 PLSD 13,525 usp Velo Wa [90 Toy, = 47 = @ Clore are Siopfieent I ferences he hueen all paies