INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : LAURA M. BUSCANO Name of Rater : MELANIE

Position : TEACHER - II Position : M
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT Date of Review : APRIL
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURIN

Timeli Weight ACTUAL
RATING
MFOs KRAs Objectives per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,Efficincy,Timeliness) RESULTS
ne Q
1.Teaching 40%
Learning Process
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

1.1. Prepared180daily June 5 All daily lesson plans had the following
parts: Objective, Content,Learning
130% and above of the required
number of days DLL/Lesson Plan
130% of the DLL submitted on
time or before the deadline
5
2016
lesson plan and daily March Resources, Procedures, Remarks, Submitted
Reflection
logs of activities within 2017
the rating period
4 Had 5 of the six parts 115-129% of the required number of Submitted 1 day after the
days DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted prescribe dates

10% 3 Had 4 of the six parts 100-114% of the required number of

days DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted
Submitted 2 days after the
prescribe dates

2 Had 3 of the six parts 51-99% of the required number of Submitted 3 days after the
days DLL/Lesson Plan Submitted prescribe dates

1 Had 2 and below of the six parts 50% and below of the required Submitted 4 or more days
number of days DLL/Lesson Plan after the prescribe dates
Submitted
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Instructional Competence shows an 130% and above of the required One Class Observation per
1.2 Facilitated learning in Overall Rating of Five (5) Outstanding number Instructional Supervision
were observed by the School Head
grading period
school/classes evaluated
(Except for more than the
with functional prescribed)
lesson/daily logs and June
2016- 10%
innovative teaching
strategies through an April
observer with the use of 2017
Instructional Supervision
Tool (IST) 1 Observation
per grading period.
1.2 Facilitated learning in
school/classes evaluated
with functional
lesson/daily logs and June
2016-
innovative teaching
strategies through an April
observer with the use of 2017
Instructional Supervision
Tool (IST) 1 Observation
per grading period.
(per Div.Memo. no.
744,s2014)
10%
4 Instructional Competence shows an
Overall Rating of Four (4) VS
3 Instructional Competence shows an
Overall Rating of Three (3) S
2 Instructional Competence shows an
Overall Rating of Two (2) UnSat
115-129%% of the required number
of Instructional Supervision were
observed by the School Head
100-114% of the required number of
Instructional Supervision were
observed by the School Head
51-99% of the required number of of
Instructional Supervision were
observed by the School Head
Two class observations was 5
made in one grading period
(Except for more than the
prescribed)
Three (3) for compliance class
observation were made in
one or two grading periods.
(Except for more than the
prescribe)
Four or more class
observations were made at
the last grading period for
compliance.
 1 Instructional Competence shows an 50% and below of the required Four (4) class observations
Overall Rating of One (1) Poor number of Instructional Supervision were done at the first or last
were observed by the School Head grading period for
compliance.

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Have made conferences and resolve the Students were guided in the
issue of students with disciplinary observation of classroom rules and
Within the rating period 5
concerns. guidelines was 130% evident in the
certification from the Grade Head /
School head (for HS Department /Cur.
Head)

1.3 Implemented
positive discipline to 10%
4 Have made conferences and resolve the Students were guided in the
100% of the students by issue withthe Grade Head of students observation of classroom rules and
instituting classroom with disciplinary concerns. guidelines was115-129% evident in the
rules, guidelines, certification from the Grade Head /
June School head (for HS Department /Cur.
individual and group 2016- Head)
tasks within the rating April
period 2017
3 Have made conferences and resolve the Students were guided in the
issue with the Grade Head and observation of classroom rules and
Guidance Counselor of students with guidelines was100-114% evident in the
disciplinary concerns. certification from the Grade Head /
School head (for HS Department /Cur.
Head)

2 Have made conferences and resolve the
issue with the Grade Head, the Guidance
counselor and School Head for students
with disciplinary concerns.
Students were guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines was 51-99% evidentin the
certification from the Grade Head /
School head (for HS Department /Cur.
Head)

1 Have made no conferences and did not
resolve the issue of students with
disciplinary concerns
Students were guided in the
observation of classroom rules and
guidelines was 50% and below evident
in the certification from the Grade
Head / School head (for HS
Department /Cur. Head)

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Conducted interventions such as ADM, Daily attendance of students has been Submitted of form 2 on or
DLP, etc and other similar programs carried out (100%) before the deadline
4.3
June
2016-
1.4 Monitored the
April
checking of attendance 4 Conducted home visitations to parents Attendance checking was carried out Submitted 1 day after
2017 5% of SARDO or have submitted only 9 out of 10 deadline
and it was 100% Form 2
systematically carried out
through the submission - Has 1 dropout of all classes handled
of Form 2 and Daily
attendance of students.
Has Zero dropout rate.
 checking of attendance
and it was 100%
systematically carried out
through the submission
of Form 2 and Daily
attendance of students. 3 Conducted school conferences to Attendance checking was 100-114% Submitted 2 days after
Has Zero dropout rate. parents of SARDO carried or have submitted only 8 out deadline
of 10 Form 2
3
-Has 2 dropouts of all classes handled

2 Identified Students At Risk of Dropping Attendance checking was carried but Submitted 3 days after
Out (SARD) but no action taken have submitted only 7 out of 10 Form deadline
2

1 Have no intervention at all Attendance checking was carried out Submitted 4 days or more or
or have submitted only 6 and below more after deadline
out of 10 Form 2

1.5 Monitored safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall
physical atmosphere
conducive for learning,
cleanliness and
orderliness of classroom
including proper waste
disposal daily and was
observed to have at least
Good(3) rating every June
month within the rating 2016-
period April
2017
2. Student
Outcomes
2.1. Monitored, June
evaluated, and 2016-
maintained students April
progress as evident in 2017
the submission of reports
such as
(1)Formative/Summative
Assessment Plans,(2) TQs
(3) TOS, and (4) Class
Record every quarter
within the rating period.
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5 Overall (1)physical atmosphere,(2)
cleanliness and orderliness of classroom,
Organized/structured classroom
setting allows for planned teacher-
(3) toilet (4)assigned area, (5) proper learner and learner -learner
waste disposal were maintained interaction where cleanliness and
orderliness inside and outside the
classroom was observed as (5)
Excellent
4 Only 4 of the five areas were maintained The Classroom was observed as (4)
Very Good
4 Only 4 of the five areas were maintained The Classroom was observed as (4) 4.3
Very Good
2 Only 2 of the five areas were maintained The classroom was observed (2)Basic
3 Only 3 of the five areas were maintained The classroom was observed (3)
Good
2 Only 2 of the five areas were maintained The classroom was observed (2)Basic
1 Only 1 of the five areas were maintained The classroom was observed (1) Below
5% Basic
30%
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5% 5 Monitoring and Evaluation of Students
progress was systematically carried
Evidences showed that the teacher Updated within the rating
purposely plans assessments through period
out ,without error or revisions submitted (1)Formative/Summative
Assessment Plans,(2) TQs (3) TOS, and
(4) Class Record every per subject /
grading period
4 Monitoring and Evaluation of Students Evidences showed that the teacher
progress was carried out but with one submitted only 3 out of 4 indicators
with one week lapses 4
error or revision per subject / grading period
3 Monitoring and Evaluation of Students Evidences showed that the teacher with two weeks lapses
progress was carried out but with two submitted only 2 out of 4 indicators
errors or revisions per subject / grading period
2 Monitoring and Evaluation of Students Evidences showed that the teacher with three weeks lapses
progress was carried out but with three submitted only 1 out of 4 indicators
errors or revisions per subject /grading period
1 Monitoring and Evaluation of Students No Evidences showed per grading with four weeks or more
progress was carried out but with four period lapses
errors or revisions
 Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5 Evidences showed that the teacher have 130% and above of the students who Conducted within the time
conducted remediation with the were under remediation have frame of every quarter (fifth
following MOVs (1)Simple analysis of improved their performance with a week of every quarter)
students needing academic assistance or passing grade in the Remedial Class
those who excel in classs,(2) Attendance Mark / or Enhancement report
2.2 Conducted Sheet (3)Lesson Plan (4) Learning
Activity Sheet (5) Certification of the
remediation program to Remedial Class Mark or enhancement
improveat least 75% of progress report
students needing
academic assistance. Or June
Enrichment activities for 2016-
students who excel in April
class. 2017 10%
4 Evidences showed that the teacher
submitted only 4 out of 5 indicators
115-129% of the students who were
under remediation have improved
Conducted one week after
the time frame of every
4
their performance with a passing quarter
grade in the Remedial Class Mark /
enhancement report

3 Evidences showed that the teacher
submitted only 3 out of 5 indicators
100-114%of the students who were
under remediation have improved
their performance with a passing
grade in the Remedial Class Mark /
enhancement report
Conducted two weeks after
the time frame in every
quarter

2 Evidences showed that the teacher
submitted only 2 out of 5 indicators
51-99% of the students and below who Conducted three weeks after
were under remediation have the time frame in every
improved their performance with a quarter
passing grade in the Remedial Class
Mark / enhancement report

1 Evidences showed that the teacher
submitted only 1 out of 5 indicators
50% and below of the students and conducted three weeks or
below who were under remediation more after the time frame in
have improved their performance with every quarter
a passing grade in the Remedial Class
Mark / enhancement report

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

2.3Attained the required
NAT MPS of at least
70.95% (Elem) / 54.38%
(HS)for SY 2016-2017 June
2016-
April
2017
5 5% and above increase in MPS Made all the required students Always observed
10% records
4 4% increase in MPS One of the required students Moderately observed 3
records is lacking
3 3% increase in MPS Two of the required students Sometimes observed
records are Lacking
2 2% increase in MPS Three of the required students Seldom observed
records are lacking

June
2016-
April
2017
2.4 Attained the required
GSA for grade level and
learning areas, at least
75% (Efficiency) of the
students achieved 80%
(quality) and above
proficiency.
1 1% increase in MPS /maintained
previous SYs NAT result, or decreased
Scale Quality
5 Achieved 90-100 GSA (outstanding) of
all students handled
5%
4 Achieved 85-89 GSA (Very Satisfactory)
of all students handled
3 Achieved 80-84 GSA (Satisfactory) of all 100-114% of the students passed the
students handled
2 Achieved 75-79 GSA (Fairly Satisfactory) 51-99% of the students passed the
of all students handled
Four or more of the required
students records are lacking
Efficiency
130% of the students passed the
subject at the end of the school year
115-129% of the students passed the
subject at the end of the school year
subject at the end of the school year
subject at the end of the school year
Never
Timeliness
Submitted Grading Sheets,
Class Record before the
deadline
Submitted Grading Sheets,
Class Record during the
3
deadline
Submitted Grading Sheets,
Class Record a day after the
deadline
Submitted Grading Sheets,
Class Record two days after
the deadline
 1 Achieved 74 GSA (Did Not Meet 50% and below passed the subject at Submitted Grading Sheets,
Expectations of all students handled the end of the school year Class Record more than two
days after the deadline

Community
Involvement 10%
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5 Conducted parent-conference with Conducted 5 or more PTA meetings Conducted conferences for
June complete documentation: and parent conferences four quarters
2016- (Communication Letter/ Attendance
Sheet/Minutes of the Meeting )
4.3
April
2017 5%
4 Conducted parent-conference with one Conducted 3-4PTA meetings and Conducted conferences for
lacking document parent conferences three quarters

3.1 Conducted at least 4
parent conferences to
students needing
academic and behavioral
help.
3 Conducted parent-conference with two Conducted 2-3PTA meetings and Conducted conferences for
lacking documents parent conferences two quarters only
2 Conducted parent-conference with only Conducted 1 PTA meetings and parent Conducted conferences for 1
one document/MOV conferences quarter only
1 Have not conducted at all Have not conducted at all

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Accomplishments of set visits with

complete components (identification of
needs/problems, causes,
recommendation, and agreement)
Conducted 6 or more Home visitation Organized and facilitated on
and students were given intervention the prescribed dates
5
and showed a passing grade in the
remedial class mark

3%
4 Conducted parent-conference with Conducted 4-5 Home visitation and Organized and facilitated one
document lacking one component students were given intervention and day after prescribed dates
showed a passing grade in the
remedial class mark
3.2 Conducted at least 4
Home visitation to 3 Conducted parent-conference with Conducted 2-3Home visitation and Organized and facilitated two
students needing document lacking two components students were given intervention and days after prescribed dates
academic monitoring and showed a passing grade in the
remedial class mark
follow up within the
rating period
2 Conducted parent-conference with Conducted 1 Home visitation and Organized and facilitated
document lacking three components students were given intervention and three days after prescribed
showed a passing grade in the dates
remedial class mark

1 Have not conducted at all Have not conducted at all Organized and facilitated
four days or more after
prescribed dates

Scale Quality Efficiency

June 5 Accomplishments of Initiated projects/ 130% and above initiated Organized and facilitated on
2016- events/activities with external projects/events/activities conducted the prescribed dates
April funding/sponsorship have complete
documentation
2017 2%
 5 130% and above initiated Organized and facilitated on
projects/events/activities conducted the prescribed dates

(Activity Proposal, Attendance,

Accomplishment Report, Cert. of
Completion, Letter, Pictures)
4 Conducted parent-conference with
document lacking one component
Conducted 4-5 Home visitation and
students were given intervention and
Organized and facilitated one
day after prescribed dates
4
3.3 Initiated 1 showed a passing grade in the
project/events/activities remedial class mark
with external funding or
sponsorship within the 3 Conducted parent-conference with Conducted 2-3Home visitation and Organized and facilitated two
target date / participated document lacking two components students were given intervention and days after prescribed dates
showed a passing grade in the
in 3 community extension remedial class mark
services
 2 Conducted parent-conference with Conducted 1 Home visitation and Organized and facilitated
document lacking three components students were given intervention and three days after prescribed
showed a passing grade in the dates
remedial class mark

1 Have not conducted at all Have not conducted at all Organized and facilitated
four days or more after
prescribed dates

Professional Growth
and Development
10%
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5 Action Research conducted with full Conducted one action research Within the rating period
documentation and recognized by the
School Head

4 Action Research conducted with full Submitted Action Research Proposal

documentation recognized by the
4.1 Conducted 1 Master Teacher/Dept.Head
action research 3 Submitted Action research problem
based on students Action Research with full documentation
recognized by the other teacher
need analysis using
2 Identified classroom / learning problems Submitted intention to conduct
only 1-5 Action May with research proposals research within the rating period
Research Template. 2016-
April 1 Have not conducted at all No intention / plan to conduct Action 1
2017 2% Research
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Attended at the International or national Attended at least four (4) Arrived at the venue on or
level (seminars relevant to the assigned seminars/trainings/ workshop before the activity started
4.2 Attended at least 4 May task/ subject or expertise)
seminars/training at the 2016- 5%
school, cluster and April
2017
4
Attended at the 1 regional level / (2
Attended at least three (3) Arrived at the venue 5
minutes after the activity
5
division level, region, and division Level started
national level within the seminars/trainings/ workshop
3 Attended at least three (2) Arrived at the venue 10
rating period Attended at the 1 division level / (2 minutes after the activity
cluster/ district level) / (3 school level) seminars/trainings/ workshop started

2 Attended at least three (1) Arrived at the venue 15

Attended at the cluster / district level / minutes after the activity
(2 school level) seminars/trainings/ workshop started

1 Have not attended at all Arrived at the venue 20

Attended at the school level minutes and beyond after the
activity started

Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

4.3. Submitted 100% of May 5 Reports submitted are 100 % free from
errors
Submitted and accomplished 130%
and above therequired forms and
Submitted on or before the
deadline
the required forms and 2016 - 3% reports
reports, as prescribed by April 4
required forms and reports were
Submitted and accomplished115-129%
of the required forms and reports
Submitted one day after the
deadline
4
the school 2017 accomplished with one error
4.3. Submitted 100% of May
the required forms and 2016 -
reports, as prescribed by April
the school 2017
3 Submitted and accomplished 100- Submitted two days after the
required forms and reports were 114% of the required forms and deadline
accomplished with two errors reports
2 Submitted and accomplished 51-99% Submitted three days after
required forms and reports were of the required forms and reports the deadline
accomplished with three errors
1 Submitted and accomplished 50% and Submitted three (4) days or
required forms and reports were below of the required forms and more after the deadline
accomplished with 4 or more errors reports
5. Support to

Personnel
Administration 10%
Scale Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Without error/ erasures and/or lacking

attachments
10 DTRs/F48 were submitted (June-
March)
On the 1 day of the
st

4%
5.1 Submitted 10
DTR/CSC Form 48In a
school year every 3rd day
of the succeeding month
without error and with
complete attachments
Scale
succeeding month
5
4 With 1 error/ erasure and/or lacking 10 DTRs/F48 were submitted (June- On the 2nd day of the
attachment March) succeeding month
3 With 2 errors/ erasures and/or lacking 10 DTRs/F48 were submitted (June- On the 3rd day of the
attachments/ with 1 EFLF March) succeeding month
2 With 3 errors/ erasures and/or lacking 9 DTRs/F48 were submitted (June- On the 4th day of the
attachments March) succeeding month
1 With 4or more errors/ erasures and/or 8 and below DTRs/F48 were On the 5th day of the
lacking attachments submitted (June-March) succeeding month
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

5 Incurred no tardiness/undertime Reported 130% and above days to

school/ mandated meetings/ special
Arrived 15 minutes before the
official time
4
activities

4%
5.2 Complied 180 days of
attendance without
tardiness and/or under
time and reports on time
Scale
4 Incurred 1 tardy or 1 undertime for
personal reasons
3 Incurred 2 tardiness/ undertime (or
combination) for personal reasons
2 Incurred 3-5 tardiness/ undertime (or
combination) for personal reasons
1 Incurred 6 or more tardiness/ undertime Reported 50% and below days to
(or combination) for personal reasons
Quality
Reported 115-129% days to school/ Arrived 10-14 minutes before
mandated meetings/ special activities the official time
Reported 100-114% to school/ Arrived 9-5 minutes before
mandated meetings/ special activities the official time
Reported 51-99% to school/ Arrived 4-3 minutes before
mandated meetings/ special activities the official time
Arrived on the exact time
school/ mandated meetings/ special
activities
Efficiency Timeliness

5 Complete prescribed uniform 100% of the required days in a quarter 4

2%
5.3 Worn complete set of
prescribed uniform (ID,
Blouse/Polo, Slacks/Skirt,
Footwear) during
required days
Scale
4 One element missing (e.g. no ID) 95-99% of the required days in a
quarter
3 Two elements missing 90-94% of the required days in a
quarter
2 3 or more elements missing 85-89% of the required days in a
quarter
1 Not wearing prescribed uniform 84% or less of the required days in a
quarter
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

6. Special Task 4
Assignment (If with
Plus Factor the
following percentage
 OVER ALL
RATING

LAURA M. BUSCANO MELANIE C. CABRERA MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. MARIA INEZ ASUNCION , CE
Ratee Rater APPROVING AUTHORITY Schools Division Superinten
ND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

MELANIE C. MIJARES
MT - I
APRIL 17,2017

O BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

RATING
SCORE
E T Ave

4.8 5

4.9333 0.49
4 4

4.3333 0.43
 4 4 0.433

4.3333

4 4 4.2 0.210
4 4 0.205

4.1

4 4 0.205

4.1
4 4 0.40

3 3

3 0.3
4.3 5 0.20
4.0333
4.8 4 0.22
4.4667

5 5 0.15

4.9333
4 4

4 0.08
1 1 0.02
1

5 5 5.00 0.25

4 4 0.12
4.00
5 5 0.20
5.00

4 4 0.16
4.00

4 4 0.08
4.00

4 1 3.00 0.15
ER ALL
TING 4.31

ARIA INEZ ASUNCION , CESO V

chools Division Superintendent
 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Name of Employee : LAURA M. BUSCANO Name of Rater :
Position : TEACHER - II Position :
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT Date of Review :
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017
COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Teamwork RATEE
1 Willingly does his/her share of
Self-Management 5
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE responsibilty.
Sets personal goals and direction, needs and 5 5 4 2 Promotes collaboration and removes 5
1 4.6667
development. barriers to teamwork and goal
accomplishment across the
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors
organization
that are clear and purposive and takes into 5 5 4 4.6667 4.6667
2
account personal goals and values congruent 3
to that of the organization. Applies negotiation principles in 5
arriving at win-win agreements.
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm 4
3 5 5 5 Drives consensus and team 5
for and is challenged by higher goals
5 ownership of decisions.
5
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through 5 5 3
4 Works constructively and
gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. 4.3333 collaboratively with others and 4
across organizations to accomplish
Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals 5 5 4
5 organizational goals and objectives.
for self and others 4.6667
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE RATEE
Can explain and articulate
5 5 5 1 4
Demonstrates the values and behavior 5 organizational
Takes personaldirections, issues
responsibilty for and
enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical 2 problems.
dealing with and/or correcting
1
Standards for public officials and employee (RA costumer service issues and 5
6713). concerns
5 5 5 5 4.8667
 3
5 5 5 5 4.8667
Practices ethical and professional behavior and
2 conduct taking into account the impact of Initiates activities that promotes 5
his/her actions and decisions. advocacy for men and women
empowerment.
Maintains professional image: being 4 Participates in updating of office
trustworthy, regularity of attendance and 5 5 5 vision, mission, mandates & 4
3
punctuality, good grooming and strategies based on DepEd strategies
communication. 5 and directions.
5 Develops and adopts service
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the 5 5 3 improvement programs through 4
4
organization's needs. simplified procedures that will
4.33 further enhance service delivery.

Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility

to meet the organization's needs, improves 5 5 5
5
systems and help others improve their
effectiveness. 5
Result Focus RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE Innovation
Examines the root cause of problems RATEE
1 and suggests effective solutions.
Achieves results with optimal use of time and 4 4 5 5
1 Fosters new ideas, processes, and
resources most of the time. 4.3333 suggests bettter ways to do things
2 Demonstrates an ability to
(cost and/or operational think
efficiency).
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through "beyond the box". Continuously
2 effective work methods by placing 5 5 5 5 4.87 focuses on improving personal 4
organizational needs before personal needs. productivity to create higher value
and results.
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by 3
conforming to standard operating procedures
Promotes a creative climate and
correctly and consistently. Able to produce 5 5 5 4
3 inspires co-workers to develop
very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of
original ideas or solutions.
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with
5
no supervision required.
Expresses a desire to do better and may 4
Translates creative thinking into tangible
express frustration at waste or inefficiency. 5 5 5 changes and solutions that improve the work 4
4
May focus on new or more precise ways of unit and organization.
meeting goals set. 5
5
Makes specific changes in the system or in own
work methods toimprove performance. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish
Examples may include doing something better, 5 5 5 responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness
5 and the ability to succeed with minimal
faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or
improving quality, costumer satisfaction, resources.
morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 3
Prepares basic
Identifies compositions
different computer (parts,
e.g.,
CORE SKILLS Computer /the
letters,
turns ICT Skills
reports,
computerspreadsheets work RATEE
on/off, andand
Oral Communication graphic presentations using
on a given task with acceptable Word
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE 1 Processing and Excel.
speed and accuracy and connects 5
computer peripherals ( e.g., printers,
1 Follows instructions accurately. 4.73 modems, multi-media projectors,
5 5 5 5 2 etc.) 4
Utilizes technologies to : access
2 Prepares simple
information presentations
to enhance using
professional
Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately. 5 5 5 5 3 Powerpoint.
productivity, assists in conducting 3
research and communicate through
3 Uses appropriate medium for the message. local and global professional
4 4 4 4 4 networks. 4
 Recommends appropriate and
updated technology to enhance
4 productivity and professional
Adjust communication style to others. 5 5 5 5 5 practice. 5
Guides discussions between and among peers
5
to meet an objective. 5 5 4 4.667
Written Communication RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

Knows the different written business 5 5 5

communication formats used in the DepEd.
1 5
Writes routine
correspondence/communications, narrative
and descriptive report based on ready available 5 5 5 5 4.8
information data with minimal spelling or
grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, IPCRF OVERALL COMPETENCY
2 etc.) RATINGS 4.31
Secures information from required references
(i.e., Directories, schedules, notices, 5 5 5
3 instructions) for specific purposes. 5 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.45
Self-edits words, numbers, phonetic notation 4 4 4
4 and content, if necessary. 4
Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact,
conciseness, and effectiveness in his/her 5 5 5
5 written communications. 5 4.382
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers
ater :
MT - I
APRIL 17,2017

RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

5 4
4.6667
5 4 4.6667 3.6

4 4
4.3333

5 5
5

4 4

RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

4 4 4 4.2

4 4 4.3
5 5

4 3

3.7

4 4

4
RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

5 5
5

4 4 4 4.13

4 4 4

4 4
4

4 4 3.7
RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

4.2
5 5 5

4 4 4

3 3 3

4 4 4
5 5 5
 4.31

4.45

4.382
Rarely demonstrates

S form - DEPED form -Teachers

Name of Employee : LAURA M. BUSCANO Name of Rater : MELANIE C. MIJARES
Position : TEACHER - II Position : MT - I
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT Date of Review : APRIL 17,2017
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

PART III:SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance
Results
Accomplishments of Rating Adjectival Rating
KRAs and Objectives 4.38 VERY SATISFACTORY

Rater-Ratee Agreement
Name of employee: LAURA M. BUSCANO Name of Superior:
Marcelino C. Cabana Jr.,Ph.D.

Signature Signature

Date: April 17, 2017 Date

LAURA M. BUSCANO MELANIE C. MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD

TEACHER II MASTER TEACHER I PRINCIPAL II

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

C. MIJARES
T-I
17,2017
VIZMINDA A. BALOLOT MELANIE C. MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD
TEACHER III MASTER TEACHER I PRINCIPAL II
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
LAURA M. BUSCANO MELANIE C. MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD
TEACHER II MASTER TEACHER I PRINCIPAL II
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
Name of Employee : VIZMINDA A. BALOLOT
Position : TEACHER III
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XI
Division of Davao City
DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
WIRELESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Fr. Selga St. Davao City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER

June 2016-March 2017

EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK FORM

LOGISTICS
(MATERIALS/HU
MAN
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACTIVITY TARGET CLIENTELE STRATEGIES RESOURCES)

INCOL
KRA I MATERIALS

At least 4 and above

To facilitate learning used of indiginized,
through the use of written / contextualized and Instructional
computerized lesson (Indiginized,cont Grade 4 - 6 pupils of localized instructional materials found in
plans,modules,teaching extualized,locali Wireless Elementary materials shall have locality,recycled
guides. zed mateials School been utilized. materials
KRA II E - NAT Subject teacher and
pupils shall have the
To attain 85% MPS per Intensive review NAT
subject area in the National Grade 4 - 6 pupils of program for NAT to Reviewer,Test
Achievement Test (Extended NAT) Wireless Elem. School achieve 85% MPS. Questionaire
.KRA III
To visit parents of pupils /
students needing academic HOME V
monitoring/ follow - up
KRA IV
To conduct action research Lights Camera
plan.
KRA V
To publish an article in
National Circulation.
Feedback: Ratee
Ten Home Visitation
shall
Teacherhave been done
Adviser shall Teacher and
haveto students who
been conducted parent agreement
at least one complete form,Home
needs academic
2 Grade 4 - 6 pupils of monitoring/follow
action researched and- Visitation
GO Wireless Elem. School up. been Form,Call up slip
shall have
presented in at least Related Literature
in the Division Level Books, internet
Grade 4 - 6 pupils of Research connection,other
Action Wireless Elem School Conference/ Summit. books
Teacher adviser shall Related Literature
ARTICLE have been published Books, internet
Grade 4 - 6 pupils of an article in National connection, other
nation Wireless Elem. School Circulation. books

At least 4 and above used of indiginized, contextualized and localized instructional materials shall have been utilized.

students who needs academic monitoring/follow - up.Teacher Adviser shall have been conducted at least one complete action researched and shall

Feedback: Rater
The ratee had accomplished her midyer prformance target , and advised to go further improvement and implementation on the program/ activities that has
accomplished.

Feedback: Principal
VIZMINDA A. BALOLOT MELANIE C. MIJARES
TEACHER III MASTER TEACHER I
Rater Ratee
 Name of Rater : MELANIE C. MIJARES
Position : MT - I
Date of Review : APRIL 17,2017

LANS

M (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE TIME FRAME

Teachers
resourcefulness,p November to
arents, students February
and elders 2017
 Teacher
Adviser,Subject November to
Teacher,parents, February
pupils 2017
 Teachers, Pupils,
parents,Guidance November to
Councellor February 2017

Teacher,
respondents in the November to
study conducted February 2017

Teacher, resource November to

person February 2017

Ten Home Visitation shall have been done to .

on researched and shall have been presented

program/ activities that has not been

LANIE C. MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD
STER TEACHER I PRINCIPAL II
Ratee Approving Authority