Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LITR 630
technology to assist students in developing the necessary skills for utilizing a new online literacy.
For my Online Literacy Assignment I created a Kindergarten lesson that focused on searching
for and locating information on the Internet. The goal for this lesson was that students would be
able to search for, locate, and retrieve the appropriate information on the Internet to help them
meet the Informative Writing Common Core State Standards. Students were exposed to a variety
of activities in an I Do, We Do, You Do format which allowed them to complete the activities in
ILA Standards
This lesson meets a variety of ILA Standards. The first ILA Standard is Standard 2.2:
Candidates use appropriate and varied instructional approaches, including those that develop
connections. This lesson helps students develop word recognition and reading-writing
connections especially when they are using the search engines to find information, they must
look for words they recognize to build upon their reading and build upon their writing skills
using Google Docs. The second ILA Standard is Standard 2.3: Candidates use a wide range of
texts (e.g., narrative, expository, and poetry) from traditional print, digital, and online resources.
Students had already began their Writing pieces using traditional print, but needed to be exposed
to and practice using digital and online resources to locate information about animals so they can
The third ILA Standard is Standard 3.2: Candidates select, develop, administer, and
interpret assessments, both traditional print and electronic, for specific purposes. Students had
to complete an Exit Slip Assessment using Popplet and explain 1 thing they learned during the
lesson. When I look at the Popplet at the end of the lesson, I will be able to assess their
knowledge and determine next steps for future lessons. The fourth ILA Standard is Standard 4.1:
Candidates recognize, understand, and value the forms of diversity that exist in society and their
importance in learning to read and write. Students were able to use a variety of new literacies in
order to express their thoughts and ideas based on what they know and learned about the topic of
animals. The fifth ILA Standard is Standard 5.1: Candidates design the physical environment to
optimize students use of traditional print, digital, and online resources in reading and writing
instruction. Our classroom is designed to allow for student exploration of new concepts and
ideas through a variety of print, digital, and online resources throughout reading and writing
instruction. Students are exposed these variety of sources in order to enhance their learning
during reading and writing instruction with 3 desktop computers, 2 iPads, and a SMARTBoard.
The sixth ILA Standard is Standard 5.2: Candidates design a social environment that is
low risk and includes choice, motivation, scaffolded support to optimize students opportunities
for learning to read and write. This lesson used scaffolded support to optimize students
opportunities for learning to read and write through the I Do, We Do, You Do format. Students
were able to be motivated and have choice in what animal their group wanted to research and
which question they wanted to respond to for the Popplet Exit Slip. The seventh ILA Standard is
Standard 5.3: Candidates use routines to support reading and writing instruction (e.g., time
allocation, transitions from one activity to another, discussions, and peer feedback). Our
classroom routines and procedures are established at the beginning of the school year for every
subject area, but are especially important for reading and writing instruction to be successful. For
this lesson students would have a clear understanding of expectations, routines, and procedures
in order to engage in the lesson and complete it successfully. The eighth ILA Standard is
Standard 5.4: Candidates use a variety of classroom configurations (i.e., whole class, small
group, and individual) to differentiate instruction. This lesson was using the I Do, We Do, You
ISTE Standards
This lesson meets several ISTE Standards. The first ISTE Standard is Standard 2:
and contribute to the learning of others. This lesson specifically focuses on the ISTE Standard 2a
and 2b. ISTE Standard 2a: Interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others
employing a variety of digital environments and media and ISTE Standard 2b: Communicate
information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats.
Students would meet these standards by working collaboratively in small groups that included
Nearpod, Kid-friendly search engines, Google Docs, and Popplet. Students would also meet
these standards through being able to search for and locate information on the Internet using
search engines and read the informational text within each of their small groups.
The second ISTE Standard is Standard 3: Research and Information Fluency - Students
apply digital tools to gather, evaluate, and use information. This lesson specifically focuses on
the ISTE Standard 3b. ISTE Standard 3b: Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and
ethically use information from a variety of sources and media. Students would meet this standard
engines including: KidRex, Safe Search Kids, and National Geographic Kids. Students were to
use several digital tools based on each I Do, We Do, You Do and Exit Slip sections of the lesson.
Each section included several information and digital sources in order to locate and gather the
information to complete their digital Animal Research Graphic Organizer. Students had to work
through knowing what they wanted to search for, locating it, and then incorporating it using a
The KTS Standard this lesson meets Kentucky Teacher Standard 6: The teacher
demonstrates implementation of technology, but specifically meets KTS Standards 6.1, 6.2, 6.3,
6.4, and 6.5. The first KTS Standard is KTS Standard 6.1: Uses available technology to design
and plan instruction. I had to think about the technology that was available within my classroom
before designing the lesson. Within the lesson I planned to incorporate a variety of available
iPads. The second KTS Standard is KTS Standard 6.2: Uses available technology to implement
instruction that facilitates student learning. Throughout my lesson I implemented the use of
several Web 2.0 online resources including: Nearpod, KidRex, Safe Search Kids, National
Geographic Kids, Google Docs, and Popplet. Using these resources would facilitate student
learning by keeping them engaged, focused, and be able to work collaboratively to complete the
activities.
The third KTS Standard is KTS Standard 6.3: Integrates student use of available
technology into instruction. Throughout this lesson, all students were able to have access to
technology whether it was during the Whole Group Collaborative Activity with the
SMARTBoard and teacher computer, during the Small-Groups Activity with the search engines
and Google Docs, or the Exit Slip Assessment using Popplet. Students were able to use
technology in a variety of ways during instruction. The fourth KTS Standard is KTS Standard
6.4: Uses available technology to assess and communicate student learning. Student learning
was assessed through the use of technology through students participation and collaboration to
with the various search engines, Google Docs, and Popplet. I would communicate results through
reviewing their responses on Popplet and discussing the results with them as a Whole Group to
see what next steps we would need to take. The fifth KTS Standard is KTS Standard 6.5:
Demonstrates ethical and legal use of technology. Through the I Do Mini-Lesson I am exposing
my students to how to use technology appropriately and for educational purposes only within the
classroom. This demonstrates an understanding of how to use technology, ways to stay safe in
using technology, and using it appropriately for educational use only when at school.
The Common Core State Standards that were addressed in this lesson dealt with the
Writing Standards, W.K.6, W.K.7, and W.K.8. The first CCSS is CCSS W.K.6: With guidance
and support from adults, explore a variety of digital tools to produce and publish writing,
including collaboration with peers. Using the I Do, We Do, You Do format, I was able to expose
my students to a variety of new literacies, including: SMARTBoard, Search Engines, and Web
2.0 tools such as: Google Docs and Popplet. The students were to use these new literacies in
collaborative small groups, to produce and publish writing, and did so with their Google Docs
Graphic Organizer. The second CCSS is CCSS W.K.7: Participate in shared research and
writing projects (e.g., explore a number of books by a favorite author and express opinions about
them). Throughout this lesson students were to participate in shared research through the use of
new literacy technologies. Students will explore different resources such as several search
engines and websites to gain information on their groups Animal and collaboratively publish
and share their information through an online resource, Google Docs. The third CCSS is CCSS
W.K.8: With guidance and support from adults, recall information from experiences or gather
information from provided sources to answer a question. During the We Do part of the lesson,
students had to recall information from the Non-Fiction text, A Zebras World from our Shared
Reading lesson regarding Zebras. Then, we had to review our previously-made K-W-L chart
regarding zebras and build upon their background knowledge, in order to complete the Animal
Research Graphic Organizer. Students had to have some prior knowledge of Zebras, as well as
search and locate information on the Internet, to answer the questions on the Animal Research
Graphic Organizer. Lastly, students also had to build upon their background and prior knowledge
Literature on Technology
Students have been previously introduced to the Internet and how we use specific kid-
friendly search engines to locate information about different topics. Students are now ready to
explore the Internet further to search for and locate information about animals and work
collaboratively in small-groups using various Web 2.0 tools. Throughout this course, we have
read a great deal of literature that discusses Online Literacy, and my Online Literacy lesson
revolves around research completed by Laurie A. Henry (2006), Donald J. Leu (2004), and Rindi
and Mark Baildon (2008). According to Henry (2006), Especially important among new
literacies are the skills and strategies needed to search for and locate useful information
efficiently on the Internet. The overall goal of my lesson was that students would be able to
search for, locate, and retrieve the appropriate information on the Internet to help them meet the
Informative Writing Common Core State Standards. Through modeling, practicing, and teaching
students these skills, they will be able to meet this goal within the lesson, but also in future
lessons as well. Helping students learn and develop a better understanding of the searching
process, and the availability of a variety of search engines to access information at the beginning
of the school year, will help them become more successful when searching the Internet (Henry,
2006). According to Henry (2006), Within the SEARCH Framework, the following skills are
important: Be specific-narrow your focus, Be exact-Use the words or phrase you hope to find, Be
direct-Search for one focus at a time, Be distinct-Eliminate unnecessary words, and Be concise-
Select keywords mindfully. These skills are the skills I implemented within my lesson to ensure
that students understand and possess these skills when conducting a search on the Internet.
According to Leu (2004), New literacies include the skills, strategies, and disposition
that allow us to use the Internet and other ICTs effectively to identify important questions, locate
answer those questions, and then communicate the answers to others. According to Leu (2004),
Examples of new literacies include using a search engine effectively to locate information.
Within the lesson, students had to use various search engines to efficiently and effectively locate
information about their groups animal. They had to use the appropriate skills and strategies such
as: finding keywords and phrases, pictures, and relevant information in order to complete their
According to Baildon & Baildon (2008), Guiding questions and literacy tools spur
ongoing conversations with students about issues such as readability, trustworthiness, and
usefulness, to help them become more independent readers and researchers. Within the lesson,
the teacher had to do a lot of modeling for students, while the students were being minimally
exposed to these topics of readability, trustworthiness, and usefulness, but especially usefulness.
When it came to completing the graphic organizer, students had to look at the information they
found and determine whether or not it was going to be useful with this particular activity.
Overall, it is crucial that we expose students to 21st Century Literacies and Technology, so they
can be better prepared for what technology is to come, how to use it effectively, and how to
TPACK Model
The TPACK Model is the ability for teachers to focus and connect three primary forms of
knowledge: Technology, Pedagogy, and Content to effectively integrate technology within the
classroom. According to Davies (2011), In order to properly integrate technology into a school
setting, teacher and students must gain proficiency with specific technologies and have
opportunities to select technology tools to help them accomplish their learning goals. It is not
only the students responsibility to be able to understand how various technologies work and use
them correctly, but it is also the teachers responsibility as well. Teachers have to be the
knowledgeable ones about technology in order to incorporate it into their teaching and teach
students how to use and use if effectively. According to Davies (2011), Teachers who have
TPACK choose to use specific technology because they understand the pedagogy for teaching
specific content and know how the technology can facilitate accomplishment of the intended
learning goal.
Within the lesson, I was able to use content knowledge (CK) and pedagogy knowledge
(PK) when using technology. The content knowledge represented in the lesson was having the
students perform collaborative research on different animals using the Internet. They had done
previous work with Informational print text, but had not been fully exposed to finding the similar
information on the Internet. Within the lesson I was able to use my pedagogical knowledge
through the ways in which I taught the content based on differentiated instruction and meeting
my students needs. I used the I Do, We Do, You Do format in order to implement the gradual
and then small-group collaboration in order for students to fully understand how they were to use
technology to complete the carious activities. Students were exposed to a variety of technologies
including: the Weebly, BrainPop, Kid-friendly search engines, Google Docs, and Popplet. These
were all used to enhance the students exposure and use of different technologies and help
incorporate it into Reading and Writing instruction. Overall, the TPACK Framework allows for
both teachers and students to be exposed to a variety of 21st century technologies, utilize them
effectively within the classroom through deep focus and engagement, an enhancement of
Baildon R., & Baildon B. (2008). Guiding independence: Developing a research tool to support
student decision making in selecting online information sources. The Reading Teacher,
59(7), 636-647.
Henry, L. A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading
Leu, J. D., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a Theory of New
Literacies Emerging From the Internet and Other Information and Communication