2002 4 2002 , 4

74 Foreig n L anguages Research Serial 74

( , 200433)

: ,
,
: ; ;
:H315 :A :1005-7242(2002)04 -0001 -05

1. ,
,

40 ,
, ,
(inter-o rganism)
,
,
,
, , , ,
, , ,
60 80 ,
, , ,
, int ra-organism)
(
,
(resource)(po tential),
(sub-systems)
, (1990) :
`
, : ' (
w ell-designed) ;
`
; ;
' ,

2.

, ,
, , (a set of sentences) ,
,
,
, ,
, , ,
; , , ,
, (social m an),
, , (language development)
1
 , ,
(language acquisition),
,
, (compe- ,
tence) , ,
(language acquisit ion device);

, ,
, ,
, (Descartes)
,
,
, ,
, ,
: ,
(Protagoras)(P lato)
, (Arist otle)
(B .
M alinow ski)
(1989 :
7) , (J .
R.F irth) ,
: (Hjelmslev)
, ,
, (E .
Sapir)(B .
L.
Who rf)
, (W . L abov)
, (S .
Lamb)
(st ratificational grammar) (K .
L.
Pike)(t agmemics),
,
,
(Port-Roy al)
(Humboldt)


, ,

(Z .
Harris)



,

,


2
 3. ,
,

, ,
(tendency ) (principle)
, ,
,
, ,
, , ,
, ,
, , ,
, ,


, , ,

,
, , (
) ,
, ,
, ,

,
, (variety)
, , ,
, (dialect), (register),
, ,
, (can ,
do)(does) , ,
(meaning po tential),
4.
,

, (idealized ,
speaker) ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , (
) ,

3
 , , ,
,
, (generic ,
structure) ,


,
, , ,

,
, ; ,
,
, ,
,

, 5.
, ,
, ,
,
, ,

, , ( 1990) :

,
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
, ,
, ,
(anaphora) , ,
,
, ,
,
, , , ,
,
, ,
, , ,
, ,

, 20 ,
, ,
4
 M outon, 1957(Chomsky , N)Aspects of the T heory of

, Syntax[ M] .
Cambridge :
M I T Press, 1965 .
[ 5 ] Eggins, S .An Introduction to Systemit Functional
(R .
A.Hudson)
Linguistics[ M] .
London :
Pinter , 1994.
(R .
Faw cet t), 20
[ 6 ] Halliday , M .A .K .Explorations in the Functions of

L anguage[ M] .
London :
Edward Arnold, 1973 .
, (C .
Fillmore) [ 7 ] Halliday , M .
A .K .& R.Hasan .Cohesion in English
[ M] .
London :
Long man , 1976.
, [ 8 ] Halliday , M .
A.K .L anguage as Social Semiotic :the
, social interpretation of language and meaning [ M ] .
London :
Edw ard Arnold, 1977 .
(Cry stal 1987 :
409) , [ 9 ] Halliday , M .A .K .& R.Hasan .Language , context

and text :
aspects of language as a socio-cemantic per-
spective[ M] .
Victoria :
Deakin U niversity Press , 1985 .
,
[ 10] Hslliday , M .A .K .An I ntroduction to Functional-
,
Gram mar[ M] .
London :
Ekw ard Arnold , 1985 .

.
Halliday , M .A .K .T hing s and relations :Re-
, g ramma tizing experience as technical kno wledge[ A] .
, , , R.
J. M artin & R .
V eel (eds .
)Reading Science :
Crti-
, , cal and Functional Perspoectives on Discourses of Sci-
, ence[ M] .
London:
Edward A rnold, 1996.
, [ 11] Saussure , F .
Course in general linguistics[ M] .
(edited
by Baly , C .
& Sechehaye , A .
;translated and annotated
by Harris, R .
)London :
Duckwo rth, 1993 .
,
[ 12] Steel, R.& T hreadgold, T .
(ed .
) Language Topics

[ M] .
Amsterdam :
John Ben jamins Publishing Compa-
,
ny , 1987 .
,
[ 13] , , .
[ M] .

, :
, 1989 .
, , [ 14] , [ M] .
:

, , 1992 .
.
[ J] .
, , :
( ). , 1997 .
, [ 15] .
[ M] .
:
,
1988.

: [ 16] ().
[ M] .
:

[ 1 ] Berry , M .Introduction to Systemit L inguistic : , , 1993 .

structures and systems[ M] . Batstord , 1977a .

Londo n: [ 17] , .
[ M] .

[ 2 ] Berry , M .Introduction to Systemit Linguistics : , :

, 2000.

levels and links[ M] .

London :
Batsford , 1977b. :2001 -07 -14

[ 3 ] Butler , C.
S.Systemic L inguistics :theory and applica- : , , ,

tions[ M] . Batsford , 1985 .

London: ,

[ 4 ] Chomsky , N .Sy ntactic Structures[ M] .T he Hague : :

,

5
 Abstracts of major papers in this issue

The major differences between systemic-functional linguistics and transformational gen-

erative linguistics, by ZH U Yong-sheng , p .
1
T his paper attempts to discuss the major diff erences between systemic-functional linguistics and trans-
f orm ational-generative linguistics by examining how t hese t wo schools of linguistics look at the nat ure of
language , t he t asks of ling uists and t he research methodology .
It also touches upon the questio n w hether it is
possible for them to reach a com promise .

Bakhtin
s theory of language use :utterance , dialogue and context , by XIN Bin , p .
6
Bakhtin pio neered and advocated a sociological approach to the study of lang uage at a time when st ruc-
turalism held t he sw ay both in literature and in linguistics .While structural linguists w ere almost solely
concerned wi th the abst ract linguistic system , Bakhtin devoted himself to the specificat ion of t he dialog ic
nature of ut terance in its social context .In a sense , Bakhtin w as a f orerunner of t he present-day pragmat-
ics , discourse/conversatio n analy sis and ot her dynamic approaches to t he study of language use .

Language and gender :

the new direction in Russian linguistics, by ZHAO Rong-hui , p .
19
Language and gender has alw ay s been one of the focuses of attentio n in sociolinguistics and cultural
ling uistics , studies on which are in the ascendant in t he Russian linguistic field .The present paper intro-
duces two theoretical sources concerning t he question proper and t he major research content , summarizes
the achievements made by Russian linguists in this f ield , analyzes it s characteristic features dif ferent from
those in Europe and China , ex plains t he use of t he basic terminology , and finally makes some predictions on
the prospect s of the relevant research t heo ries and practices .

Aspects of mood as ` syntax' of interpersonal meaning , by LI Z han-zi , p .

33
T he paper ex plo res several aspects of mood as `sy nt ax' of interpersonal meaning and notes that as an
important g rammatical resource f or const ructing interpersonal meaning betw een co nversation participant s,
mood should be studied in the discourse bot h in a synoptic and in a sequential w ay .

Elements of syntactic functions and semantic roles in English , by ZHAO P u , p .

40
T here is no precise correspondence betw een sem antic roles and elements of syntactic f unctions .The se-
mantic roles of t he noun phrases are determined by t he lex ical and grammatical meanings which constitute
the proposi tional co ntent of the sentence .It is for prag mat ic purposes that the same propositional content is
expressed wi th different syntactic structures , in w hich the syntactic status of the noun phrases of particular
semantic roles may undergo changes in terms of promotion and demotion .

80