Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development GUIDELINES
0
The following document contains interim guidance regarding the preparation of
NCEC approved full version National Clinical Guidelines for Department of Health
publication
Guidelines will be published in the NCEC format and colours to provide for easy recognition by
the public, clinicians and service providers of National Clinical Guidelines approved by the
Minister for Health. Examples of published guidelines, guideline summaries and leaflets are
available at http://health.gov.ie/patient-safety/ncec/national-clinical-guidelines/
Guideline Development Groups will be asked to read and sign off final typeset document prior
to publication.
Box 1 outlines essential checks that guideline development groups should complete prior to
submitting the final approved guideline for typesetting.
The remainder of this document has the preferred NCEC guideline full version National Clinical
Guideline template that can be used by the Guideline Development Group(GDG) to populate
with their recommendations and findings.
A summary National Clinical Guideline document is also available from the NCEC for completion
by the GDG.
The appendices outlined in the template below can be supplemented by any additional
appendices as determined by the GDG and relevant content expertise.
More information on the process for NCEC approval can be found in the following framework:
National Clinical Effectiveness Committee Framework for Endorsement of National Clinical
Guidelines
1
http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ncec_guideline_development_manual_january13.pdf
1
Complet
e
Yes/No
1. Recommendatio List who is responsible for implementation of recommendation. This
ns may differ according to the location where care is provided (e.g.
hospital versus community setting).
Provide grade of recommendation beside each recommendation.
Check for difference between recommendations and practical
guidance.
2. Guideline Check:
editing - For typographical and grammatical errors.
- Type font used is Century Gothic, Size 11 for body of text.
- The type font of paragraphs is justified throughout.
- Technical aspects for accuracy e.g. double check dosages and
therapies recommended.
- Consistency of terminology.
- Use of capitals throughout guideline and summary document.
- All main and section headings only capitalise the first word.
- All abbreviations have been listed.
- References are in line with Harvard method. Ideally the reference
software Endnote should be utilised.
- Web links are active in both text and references.
- Numbering of sections and cross reference with table of contents.
- Any cross-referencing in and between documents is accurate.
- Website links are live and current.
- Appendices are listed numerically (1, 2, 3, etc.)
- The colour scheme is as presented in the template document
below.
3. Summary A short summary of the guideline should be presented using the
guideline template provided by the NCEC.
4. Leaflets A patient and a clinician leaflet should be developed for publication
as appropriate.
5. Copyright or Permissions for use of all diagrams etc. should be sought and copies
permissions of permissions provided to the DoH.
6. Disclaimers Include disclaimers as required.
7. Logos Supply any additional logos required.
8. Implementation Identified KPIs (guideline implementation and guideline impact)
monitoring which are suitable for incorporation in HSE Quality and Patient Safety
Accountability Framework or HSE Service Plan or other as
appropriate.
9. Abbreviations Guideline Development Group (GDG) is the term to be used
for the group developing the guideline.
National Clinical Guideline is the term to be used when
referring to the guideline in the document.
The full version National Clinical Guideline is how the main
document should be referred to.
The summary National Clinical Guideline is how the summary
document should be referred to.
10. Alignment The GDG should ensure that their National Clinical Guideline aligns
with approved National Clinical Guidelines.
2
Copyright and publication
Copyright of a National Clinical Guideline approved by NCEC and published by the Department
of Health lies with the Department of Health. However, the Department of Health
acknowledges the work and ownership of any material developed by the Guideline
Development Group (GDG). The GDG are requested to consult the Department of Health in
advance of any proposed publication. The Department of Health will have twenty (20) working
days to review and comment on the proposed publication, during which they may, acting
reasonably:
ii. require the removal of any confidential information and/or proprietary information owned by
the Department; and/or
iii. request the removal of any material which, in the opinion of the Department, is of a
sensitive nature.
Reference must be made to the full title of the published National Clinical Guideline including
ISSN and web address of on Department of Health website in all subsequent papers or
publications.
3
<Title>
National Clinical Guideline No. X
4
Guideline Development Group
<who is involved and context of members>
<GDG logos etc>
5
National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC)
Disclaimer
<Example: Healthcare staff should use clinical judgement, medical and nursing knowledge in
applying the guidance above and give due regard to individual circumstances presented by
each patient/resident and available resources.
Recommendations may not be appropriate in all circumstances and the decision to adopt
specific recommendations should be made by the practitioner taking into account the
individual circumstances presented by each patient/resident and available resources.
Therapeutic options should be discussed with xxx on a case-by-case basis as necessary.>
6
Table of Contents
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND 7
1.1 Need for National Clinical Guideline/revised National Clinical Guideline 7
1.2 Clinical and financial impact of condition/disease/topic 7
1.3 Overview of epidemiology of condition/disease/topic 7
1.4 Aim of National Clinical Guideline 7
1.5 Scope of National Clinical Guideline, target population and target audience 7
1.6 Guideline Development Group 7
1.7 Methodology and literature review 7
1.8 Grading of recommendations 7
1.9 External review 7
1.10 Procedure for update of National Clinical Guideline 7
1 . 1 1 Implementation of National Clinical Guideline 7
1. 12 Roles and responsibilities 7
1.13 Audit criteria 8
7
Section 1: Background
1.1 Need for National Clinical Guideline/revised National Clinical Guideline
9
SECTION 2. National Clinical Guideline recommendations
<summary of National recommendations>
Recommendation X
<insert recommendation>
Grade xx
2.2.1 <Sub-headings>
Recommendation X
<insert recommendation>
Grade X
Practical Guidance
<insert for above recommendation>
Rationale
<if any for the above recommendation/practical guidance.
Note:This section may not apply if there is a stated adaptation process that makes
reference back to the original adapted guideline>
Recommendation X
Grade X
Practical Guidance
<insert for above recommendation>
Rationale
<if any for the above recommendation/practical guidance.
Note:This section may not apply if there is a stated adaptation process that makes
reference back to the original guideline>
11
Appendix X: Guideline Development Group; Terms of reference,
membership, conflicts of interest and contribution of members to National
Clinical Guideline.
Terms of Reference
Conflicts of Interest
Contributions
12
Appendix X : Summary of tools to assist in Implementation of National
Clinical Guideline
<The review should be carried out using a robust methodology. The NCEC Guideline Development
Manual outlines the steps necessary to carry out a systematic literature review to support clinical
guideline development and should be used as a reference guide when completing this literature review.
In the first instance a search for relevant clinical guidelines should be carried out and if any are found,
their quality should be appraised using the rigour of development domain as described by the
National Quality Assurance Criteria for Clinical Guidelines (HIQA, 2011).
The parameters, i.e., population, interventions, comparisons, and outcomes (PICOs) are to be presented
along with the review methodology, including the search strategy, detailed search terms and methods
for quality appraisal and evidence synthesis that were used.
Evidence tables should be presented and the rationale behind the particular grade chosen for each of
the recommendations should be clearly presented.>
13
Date
Patients and
members of
the public
External
review
Clinical
leaders and
healthcare
managers
National
committees
Professional
groups
14
Appendix X: Glossary of terms and abbreviations
Abbreviations
Key message
The GDG should undertake a literature search for evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness,
cost and resource impact, including primary (research studies) and secondary (reviews and
economic evaluations) sources. The literature sources that will be searched should be
specified in the search strategy and should include relevant resources, such as trial/guideline
registries and relevant citation databases (e.g. Medline, EMBASE, Database of Abstracts of
Reviews of Effects (DARE), NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology
Assessment Database and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). The economic
literature review can be undertaken using the same search terms as derived from the clinical
literature review but with the economic filter applied.
Methods
<The search strategy >
Table 4 Economic Filter
ID Search Hits
6 *Economics/ 21479
7 *Economics, Medical/ 21559
8 *Economics, Pharmaceutical/ 5872
9 exp "Costs and Cost Analysis"/ 400064
10 exp Health Care Costs/ 224939
11 exp decision support techniques/ 64779
12 exp models, economic/ 102782
13 markov chains.sh. 8346
14 montecarlo method.sh. 35519
15 uncertainty.sh. 10158
16 quality of life.sh. 308452
17 quality-adjusted life years.sh. 5950
18 exp health economics/ 564180
19 exp economic evaluation/ 190553
20 exppharmacoeconomics/ 160770
21 exp economic aspect/ 1047120
22 quality adjusted life year/ 15615
23 quality of life/ 308452
24 exp "costs and cost analyses"/ 168352
25 (economic impact or economic value or pharmaco-economics or health care 592852
cost or economic factors or cost analysis or economic analysis or cost or
cost- effectiveness or cost effectiveness or costs or health care cost or cost
savings or cost-benefit analysis or hospital costs or medical costs or quality-
26 of-life).sh.
(econom$ or cost or costly or costing or costed or price or prices or pricing 1046158
or priced or discount or discounts or discounted or discounting or
expenditure
or expenditures or budget$ or afford$ or pharmacoeconomic or
27 pharmaco-
(cost$ adj1 economic$).ti,ab.
(util$ or effective$ or efficac$ or benefit$ or consequence$ or 212069
analy$ or minimi$ or saving$ or breakdown or lowering or estimate$ or
variable$ or allocation or control or illness or sharing or life or lives or
affordabl$ or instrument$ or technolog$ or day$ or fee or fees or charge or
28 charges).ti,ab.
(decision adj1 (tree$ or analy$ or model$)).ti,ab. 20279
29 ((value or values or valuation) adj2 (money or monetary or life or lives or 8947
costs or cost)).ti,ab.
30 (qol or qoly or qolys or hrqol or qaly or qalys or qale or qales).ti,ab. 63557
31 (sensitivity analys$s or quality-adjusted life year$ or quality adjusted life 11826
year$ or quality-adjusted life expectanc$ or quality adjusted life
32 expectanc$).ti,ab.
(unit cost or unit-cost or unit-costs or unit costs or drug cost or drug 45098
costs or hospital costs or health-care costs or health care cost or
medical cost or medical costs).ti,ab.
33 (decision adj1 (tree$ or analy$ or model$)).ti,ab. 20279
34 or/6-33 2377303
Figure X Flow chart of excluded studies for economic literature review
<Endnote>
<Harvard Style>
<Journal in Italics>
References
<Endnote>
<Harvard Style>
<Journal in Italics>
Form A
Permissions Form for Guideline Development Groups