Professional Documents
Culture Documents
September 3, 2014
ENG-106
Professor
Human Organs are needed every minute on the hour. Studies have shown that an average of
18 people die every day (Facts and Myths/ American Transplant Foundation, n.d.). The instinct
to survive has been instilled in individuals and animals since birth. The meaning of survive is to
remain alive or in existence (Websters New Students Dictionary, 1969). Society has a major
impact on the way individuals live. The marker is placed high in the eyes of our friends, family,
and co-workers. The focus is on nail art, pedicures, and the name brand styles. What extremes
will people go through to survive or exist in society? Some individuals may result in selling
various organs or fluids for their own reasons. What measures will be taken to survive by the
means of others? Some individuals may see the need to take drastic measures to survive by
stealing the organs of others. Does the need to be a survivor more important than ethical values?
The answer appears to depend on each individuals mind frame of ethics, values and beliefs. The
word survival appears to be baffling to individuals that focus on wanting to exist in a social
norm. Selling Human organs, tissues, or fluids have been the escape goat to living longer,
Transplantation, n.d.). The dying wants to survive and the seller wants to obtain existence in
society. The word survive means the same in both concepts of the word. Selling organs to get out
of debt, or prevent families from living in poverty may not be the solution. The thought appears
to anger law abiding people. How can society judge people who appear to want to help those in
need to survive? Opinions and thoughts are okay to be different that is the rights of people.
Should people always agree or agree to disagree? Agree to disagree would allow individuals to
express their point of views in a manner that creates critical thinking and problem solving as a
team. Questions of thought that consume minds that have to problem solve in drastic decision
making. Selling human organs have become the norm in the black market. The waiting list from
1991 to 2013 jumped from 23,198 people to 121,272 people (The Need is Real, Data, n.d.). The
evidence proves why individuals make decisions out the norm to survive. Society puts labels on
others performances, and gestures to others if it is not beneficial to them. The purchaser is at ease
because the need to survive has an open window. The seller feels the act of giving someone
existence is an act of kindness and awareness of the gesture. The seller needs to feel like society
Some individuals sell organs to be popular in society. Public approval appears to be important
to individuals wanting to be known by others. The desire and drive to display high fashion,
looking like a million bucks and expressing the importance of their existence in society is the
root to their decision making. The thought of displaying an image that does not show high dollar
signs is a no, no. The social class will frown on the act. Purchasing the latest styles of Michael
Kor products cost $300.00 an up. The item may consist of a purse, glasses, clothes and other
products in the outlets or stores (Michael Kor, 2014). In 1914 individuals focused on the effects
of the World War. Lives were being saved because individuals wanted to help not because they
needed clothes, jewelry, and food. Farmers grew food and raised cattle to survive. The gesture of
helping others was not to assure their place in society (World War I Facts, n.d.). The thought of
helping others gave the satisfaction needed. The role individuals play in society appears to
devour the realism of survival. The world has come to getting what is wanted by any means
instead of what is needed. Even the animal instinct appears to want the others to know their
existence by killing off reign leaders to show their superior to the tribe. Is society lowering their
ethnical values by preying on the poor and needy to feel superior? Homeless people are shamed
every day because others feel superior. Individuals at work are ridiculed because of their choice
of clothes. Children are even bullying each other because of the shoes and clothes worn. There is
hope for society to model the true meaning of survival through their existence.
Hope is the desire of fulfillment (Websters Dictionary, 1996). The acknowledgement of the
light at the end of the tunnel gives hope. People that are sick and need organs or other body
tissues become scared and willing to do whatever to survive. Everybody wants to live for one
hundred years. The impossible may appear to those dying but there is always hope. The act of
selling an organ maybe frowned on but what if the transaction was noted as a donation for giving
hope. Does this entitle the gesture as right? Things that make a person go hum! That is a good
question that has been thrown up in the air. Individuals come across jars with pictures of those in
need every day with money in them. The purpose appears to help save a life. The act is giving a
donation to assist the needy. Does one act reveal over the other if the dollar amount is considered
a donation? Another example would be abortion people did it before it came illegal because the
different scenarios it became legal. Some individuals still frown on Killing a Life. The
argument is still whether a life is within a mother or the creation of life begins. The argument
will never end because both sides have proven good points of view. The argument is judging
others choices are done by facts, emotions, or opinions? The facts are sometimes too much to
handle. The word survival has different approaches to the meaning. Society is not always right
but at the end of the day who asked their opinion. When hope is involved in giving life is the
discussion toward the life being saved or the individual giving an organ? The purchaser is
thinking of the hope to exist in society longer but the buyer is not really focusing on his life
being at jeopardy. The seller should have to come to turns that even if the life of hope is given.
The life of survival may not for the seller. All pieces of the puzzle should be turned over to put
the puzzle together. The puzzle may not come with all the pieces to utilize at that time. Then
hope goes out the window for one or two survivors. Then the picture takes on another role that
Life experiences would be easier to handle if we could look in a kaleidoscope and distinguish
between the different patterns given. The choices each individuals make on a daily basis may
offend others. The act of saving a life, or doing a gesture to draw attention from society, and
even giving hope to a person in a life threatening situation should be the focus. The thought of
offending others for taking money for these acts of survival hurts whom. Survival is something
society can agree that is needed in society. The approach taken should be re-directed by all
individuals that want to make a positive impact on all individuals that have influence on others.
The target should start by educating individuals at early ages how the decision making of life
changing situation need focus on the big picture. The puzzle pieces my start out giant size. The
experiences of life make the pieces appear smaller and smaller which narrows hope, survival and
existence in society. Knowing the issues of human organ selling and realizing the impact it has
on society now scares the thought of making it legal. The pieces of the puzzles have not all been
turned over and counted. Even children get frustrated when they do not have all the pieces to the
puzzle. Children take the time to look for the missing pieces. Society must stand back and listen
to the voices of children and observe their behaviors. The means of survival and to exist in
society is to please others and make others happy. Their way of survival appears to make sense.
Looking through the eyes of children might enhance the nature of hope and existence and of
References
www.americantransplantfoundation.org/about-transplant/facts-and-myths/
http://www.wikipedia