Professional Documents
Culture Documents
image
Caitrin Daly
Hiroshi Yoshinaga
Jenny Kim
Katerina Krasteva
Kelvin Lui
Li Ting Khoo
Matt Whitehead
Natalia Lesmana
Philip Papas
Simone Ling
image (s)
Akre e t y P r a d h a n , N a t a l i a L e smana
Architecture studio 5, Interior Design Studio 3
The main concept for our intervention was to bring In Yanaka, the experience was like a ‘Maze’; we en-
in a spatial quality into the site. We tried to push the tered into the site from an open space to a more con-
idea of an interior perspective into an outdoor envi- strained and complexed area, where it was difficult to
ronment using a framed box. The box serves as a rep- find our way out. However, in Ginza, the journey was
lica of a window on how we look at things in Tokyo. more about going from the outside to the inside; as
we walked along the wide streets, we discovered hid-
The strings refers to our first-hand experience den, narrows laneways.
throughout Yanaka and Ginza in particular. The “In-
side-Outside” concept for the intervention is based
on the mappings of the two sites.
99 yen ga r d e n
Caitr i n D a l y , K a t e r i n a K r a s t eva
Landscape Architecture studio 3, Architecture Studio 4
+ + + + + +
Conflict of spaces require negotiations, as found in Intangible boundaries that exist in between these
Yanaka where the cemetery is a public space formed conflicts of spaces are then compared to the intan-
by a number of individual private spaces, our site, gible boundaries of personal spaces of the public
ONDI where it is a private property but preferred by people in Tokyo. Our analysis argued that the amount
the owner to be utilized by the public, or even the of people in the crowd affects intangible voids that
street where a conflict is created when the vehicle co-exist and the sizes of these voids are then related
gives priority to the pedestrians who walks on the back to the amount of people in the crowd.
road instead of the associated pathway. Our intervention on the ONDI site is a representation
of our studies on different types of intangible spaces
in various location situated in Tokyo.
spa ce is a f l u i d
Floating spaces between differnt forces Does not feel fully inside nor outside although it is
obvious to see that it is a part of a building.
YANAKA It is like a floating space in the middle of nowhere
Transformation of atmosphere at Yanaka. which rises yourself a question.
Can feel the hidden force pushing Yanaka away from
the rest of the city, isolating and defining itself. CONCEPT OF OUR DESIGN INSTALLATION
‘Space is a Fluid’
GINZA it is always floating in between forces like a
Inside out, outside in. Parachute
The FAKE transformation spot in the ginza laneway.
Y = (G + E x ) + R
Emergence of the organism and equation Yanaka was are grouped together within a district.
found to be a heavily built environment. Further re- Therefore, Yanaka has been likened to an organism
search led to the discovery that Yanaka’s houses and structure. A structure that too germinates, grows,
temples by law, are to be torn down and replaced. decay and diminish.
This meant a constant shift in void space within
Yanaka where void spaces will temporarily appear This Yanaka organism is thus represented by
and disappear as according to when buildings are to the following equation: Y = (G + Ex ) + R
be destroyed and renewed. Furthermore, mappings [Yanaka = (Geomancy+Existing Built Environment to
of site revealed the idea of geomancy governing the the power of Local/Micro use od space)+Renewal
town planning where types of buildings or programs cycle]
M a t t Whitehead, Philip Papas
Landscape Architecture studio 3, Architecture studio 5
Our aim was to create a space which acted as a shel- The concept worked with variying levels of success,
ter as well as be interactive. We proposed to do this it kept us drier then the tent, but was voilitle when it
by putting up string lines across the site and asking came to the wind.
people to bring their umbrellas, hanging them on the
string lines when they arrive at the site.