Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indeterminate Sentence Law 1
Indeterminate Sentence Law 1
The Indeterminate Sentence Law is mandatory in all cases, EXCEPT if the accused will fall in any of the
following exceptions:
ISLAW applies to offenses punished by Special Law and Revised Penal Code.
In the application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law the judge will get the maximum penalty and likewise
the minimum penalty. If the accused was already able to serve the minimum term of his indeterminate
sentence and upon the approval of the Board, the accused now becomes eligible for parole. ISLAW is
favorable to the accused.
If the accused was granted parole and violated some conditions of the parole, What will happen?
A warrant of arrest will be issued by the court and the accused will be made to serve the rest of the remaining
or unexpired portion of his sentence. (But in probation you go back to number 1, serving of sentence will
be from the beginning)
Application of ISLAW:
The maximum penalty under the Indeterminate Sentence Law is reclusion temporal. But reclusion temporal
is a divisible penalty consisting of maximum, medium and minimum periods. Which period will we place the
maximum term of the Indeterminate Sentence?
Important: If your maximum penalty is wrong, it follows that the minimum penalty will also be wrong.
Suppose in the example above, 1 aggravating circumstance was proven. What is now the maximum
penalty?
It would still be reclusion temporal, but it shall be placed in the maximum period because of the presence
of 1 aggravating circumstance.
(More examples)
The preceding example is an exception to the rule. If there is a privileged mitigating circumstance, we take
it into account first in order to obtain the proper maximum penalty. Then, from that maximum penalty, we
obtain the proper minimum penalty by getting the penalty 1 degree lower. Same rule applies as to the period
of the minimum penalty.
3 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: prision mayor in the minimum period
minimum penalty: prision correctional any period
In the preceding example, there are 3 mitigating circumstance present and no aggravating circumstance.
The first two mitigating circumstance shall be a privileged mitigating circumstance. Thus, the penalty will
be reduced by 1 degree from reclusion temporal to prision mayor. The 3rd mitigating circumstance shall
place the penalty in the minimum period.
4 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: prision correctional in the medium period (2 privileged circumstance. Thus we lower by
2 degrees)
minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period
5 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: prision correctional in the minimum period
minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period
At most we can only lower by 2 degrees. Thus, if there are 6 mitigating circumstance and NO
aggravating:
maximum penalty: prision correctional in the minimum period
minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period
Under the Revised Penal Code, falsification of public documents (Article 171) is a more serious offense
punished by prision mayor than estafa (Article 315), punished only by prision correctional.
Thus, applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, the maximum penalty for estafa through falsification of
public documents shall be prision mayor in the maximum period. Minimum penalty shall be prision
correctional, any period.
Suppose there was 1 mitigating circumstance proven. Maximum penalty would still be prision mayor in the
maximum period. In pursuant to Article 48, even if there is a mitigating circumstance present, it should still
be imposed at the maximum period.
4 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: arresto mayor in its maximum period
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.) Promote the prisoner's reformation by allowing him to serve sentence under
a parole officer
2.) Decongest the jails by allowing prisoners to be admitted into parole
3.) Allow the government to save money on maintaining the jails
4.) Prevent the prisoners' economic usefulness from going to waste.
The indeterminate sentence law is an old law, dating back to the American period
-as can be seen from its number: Act 4103 as amended by Act 4225. It's "Act,"
not RA or CA. It affects all criminal laws, whether from the Revised Penal Code or
not so long as they don't fall into the instances enumerated by the indeterminate
sentence law itself. Those instances are:
Anybody who commits a crime falling under any of the above instances can't
qualify for indeterminate sentence. Consequently, a person who violated the
Dangerous Drugs Act can qualify for indeterminate sentence if the maximum
penalty he's facing isn't in life imprisonment; the death penalty was repealed in
2006 by RA 9346.
The maximum penalty is fixed in accordance with the rules of the Revised Penal
Code, taking into account the attending circumstances. The minimum penalty will
be put within the range of the penalty next lower than what the Revised Penal
Code has prescribed. In case of a complex crime (i.e. when a single act produces
2 or more crimes,) the full range of the penalty next lower in degree will be
considered in determining the minimum penalty.
The maximum term can't exceed the maximum that the law in question has
prescribed and the minimum can't be less than the prescribed minimum.
In case the penalty comes from the result of a plea-bargaining, the minimum
penalty will be the one lower than that of the downgraded offense.
Minimum and maximum penalties are specified in order to prevent unnecessary
deprivation of liberty and enhance his economic usefulness. The maximum
penalty is necessary for the imposition of accessory penalties while the minimum
penalty is important to allow the prisoner the chance for parole. In short, he is
given a chance to redeem himself.
Once the minimum term is served, the prisoner becomes eligible for parole if he
proves that he has complied with the conditions imposed on him when he was
made to serve sentence. Parole doesn't mean a person has fully served sentence,
however. It means that he is allowed to serve the remainder of his sentence out
of jail but under the supervision of an appointed parole officer. He is required to
report to this parole officer on appointed dates for the remainder of the prison
term. During parole, the prisoner released on parole must apply himself to a
legitimate occupation and prove himself to be a law-abiding citizen. His residence
will be fixed and changed from time to time under the discretion of the Board of
Indeterminate Sentence/Board of Pardons and Parole. The board can issue a final
certification of release if the paroled prisoner has proven himself to be a law-
abiding citizen.
If he violates the terms and conditions of his parole he can be arrested again. If
that happens, he will have to serve the remaining term of his prison sentence
behind bars.