Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Monterrey, Mexico
Project Description
International Bridge Technologies (IBT) was the lead designer for the bridge. The specific design
tasks included:
Main Span: Conceptual, Preliminary, and Final Design
Stay-Cables: Conceptual, Preliminary, and Final Design
Construction Methods: Conceptual, Preliminary, Final Design, and on-site support
Pylon: Conceptual, Preliminary, and Oversight of Final Design
Foundation: Conceptual, Preliminary, and Oversight of Final Design
The design of the bridge included detailed, 3-D FEM, non-linear, and time-dependent analysis.
In addition, detailed studies were performed to ensure compatibility of the extensive network of
post-tensioning tendons and non-orthogonal reinforcement.
Sistemas Optimos Constructivos S.A. (SOCSA) served as the prime consultant for the full viaduct
project. SOCSA performed preliminary analysis and final design for the pylon and foundation.
West Wind Inc. provided wind studies and cable damping requirements.
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
Original or Innovative Applications Social and Economic Considerations:
of New or Existing Techniques: The bridge project includes a long viaduct to provide
The fundamental behavior of a cable-stayed structure congestion relief to the crowded streets of Monterrey.
is well understood. Typically the bridges are Also, the Santa Catarina riverbed can crest at a level
symmetric by span and pier layout, and the balancing where most other adjacent bridges are under water.
of forces is accounted for in the basic concept. In This bridge will provide a critical escape route for
the case of this bridge, the asymmetry required the the citizens on the South side of the river. In addi-
design to go back to a more basic level to ensure tion to these benefits, the design was performed with
the structural load paths were well-established and consideration of local materials and construction skill
adequate capacities provided. Because the main span level. The bridge details were all considered in such
is reliant on the counter- a away
a to promote ease of
balance of the pylon, a construction.
co
delicate balance exists. The Complexity: The Puente
structural capacity of the de la Unidad project pre-
pylon must be considered sented many challenges due
se
in parallel with the ballast it to its complexity. Typically
provides, and these two goalss the roadway geometry is
th
did not always work in the adjusted to accommodate
ad
same direction. The Puente the bridge, but the opposite
th
de la Unidad project is a good
d example of an existing was done for this project.
project The
T complexities included
bridge concept (cable-stay) used in an alternate way large openings in the pylon at grade to allow traf-
to provide a striking visual appearance, and achieve fic flow, the introduction of a vertical curve to the
the goal of providing a single support outside of the alignment of the bridge deck, variable cross-fall at the
main riverbed. span along the pylon, and allowing for ramp connec-
Future Value to the Engineering Profes- tions on either side of the bridge. All challenges were
sion: As indicated above, this project presents a successfully incorporated into the final design.
good example how a complex project can be solved Meeting and Exceeding Owner/Client
by understanding the basic behavior and providing Needs: The primary achievement for the Puente de
reliable load paths. The value of dedicating time la Unidad project was the delivery of a design under
at the conceptual phase is reflected in this project. a very tight schedule. The design schedule was 9
Three locations on the bridge illustrate this. The first months, and the contractor selection was selected in
is the transition from the force in the edge beams to advance of the final design completion. The bridge
the pylon, the second is the resolution of axial loads construction was completed in 15 months, a time
between the pylon and main span, and third the frame rarely achieved for this complex of structure.
specially shaped spread footing to accommodate the The bridge was completed for $16.8 million, and was
monotonic loads. These solutions are shown on the within 3% of estimated costs.
following pages.
Key Features
Soil was injection grouted for added strength.
Foundation was a spread footing and post-
tensioned in primary directions.
Spread footing dimensions were optimized
for the monotonic loading. A trapezoidal
plan area was designed with a wider toe at the
Transition
T
Transi
siti
iti
tion
on S
Spa
Span
p n Fram
pa F
Frame
rame
e
front of the footing.
8000m3 (10500yd3) of concrete used for
foundation. Mass concrete casting procedures
implemented.
Large axial forces at edge beams need to be
transferred to central pylon. Well-defined
load path provided by central and diagonal
beams.
Flow
Flow o
off Forc
F
Forces
orces
es
MAIN PYLON
Key Features
Pylon is hollow with a typical width of 5m (16.4ft), which tapers to 15m (49.2ft)
from deck to foundation. The back wall of the pylon is post-tensioned.
Pylon inclination provides significant balance to main span forces.
Pylon and deck forces resolved at one location and distributed to the foundation
by twin legs.
Pedestrian access permitted through pylon.
Pylon and span designed to allow for loss of back stays (i.e. terrorist attack.)
MAIN SPAN
Key Features
Main Span cast in 12m (39.3ft) sections.
Edge beams and steel beams cast in place,
followed by pre-cast panels with CIP stitch.
In place of standard cantilever construction,
a moving casting table was used. The table
would launch to cast each segment and
be supported on the river bed. The bridge
geometry was evaluated on a real-time
basis and adjusted for each new casting.
New in-line stay damper used to suppress
cable vibrations. Completed Bridge, Elevation