Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Practical Guide
Paul Jones
Lewes Consult
Introduction
Since highway drainage runs from the start to the end, it impacts on almost
every aspect of the highway scheme itself, from what it will ultimately look like
to how much land-take is required, from what pollution control is required to
options for the pavement construction. Highway drainage takes up about 8-
10% of the scheme capital cost but about 20% of the design fees due to all
the stakeholders it engages with and the complexity of each element.
2 Types of Road
4 Design Considerations
7 Flow control
8 Discharge consents
9 Culvert design
12 SuDS Guidance
Appendices
1 The Basics
Highway drainage design is the umbrella term used to describe the
steps involved in producing a coherent and consistent answer to the
need to drain both the carriageway and the surrounding catchment of
rain.
All of the above simply highlight the need to remove rainfall from
carriageways as a matter of course.
Drainage ditches
The historic method for flow collection, especially
where kerbs are not installed. Water simply runs off
the carriageway into the ditch. Management of these
is usually provided by the relevant local authority
highways team as are the connecting culverts,
headwalls etc.
French drains
Grass swales
The problem lies at the cross-over; the stretch of road where the
carriageway is effectively flat. There is the risk that water will have
nowhere to go and simply lie across the carriageway. Fortunately, we
have one more tool, vertical alignment, to shift the water.
Where the carriageway is to be built above the natural site contour the
scheme is described as being on embankment.
The catchment area will include not only the carriageway but also the
faces of the embankment and the hard strip; the last two typically
forming part of the secondary drainage system.
5.4 Soakaway for areas where the underground soil type can allow
rainwater to percolate into the sub-strata, the use of soakways is a
useful mechanism to recharge groundwater levels subject to pollution
risk assessments and controls upstream.
Contemporary pollution control devices are split between full and by-
pass interceptors. The former contains 50mm of rainfall over the
catchment area while the latter contains up to 8mm on the basis that it
is this first flush which contains 90% of the pollution. (The rest is
considered diluted by the rest of the rainfall).
Principal Aquifers
These are layers of rock or drift deposits that have high intergranular and/or fracture
permeability - meaning they usually provide a high level of water storage. They may
support water supply and/or river base flow on a strategic scale. In most cases, principal
aquifers are aquifers previously designated as major aquifer.
Secondary Aquifers
These include a wide range of rock layers or drift deposits with an equally wide range of
water permeability and storage. Secondary aquifers are subdivided into two types:
Secondary B - predominantly lower permeability layers which may store and yield limited
amounts of groundwater due to localised features such as fissures, thin permeable
horizons and weathering. These are generally the water-bearing parts of the former non-
aquifers.
Secondary Undifferentiated - has been assigned in cases where it has not been possible
to attribute either category A or B to a rock type. In most cases, this means that the layer
in question has previously been designated as both minor and non-aquifer in different
locations due to the variable characteristics of the rock type
1
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/
6.5 Understanding storm frequency
If you imagine all the storms that hit an area, say Brighton, then it
becomes apparent that the rally big ones happen less frequently that
the annoying small ones. If all these storms were place on a percentile
curve then it may look something like the one below (once it has been
normalised to fit a bell-curve).
From this graph, it becomes apparent that the 100-year events produce
a higher peak intensity than the 30-year storm. This is a simplified way
of describing what is a complex subject
7 Flow control
When rainwater falls on fields several things happen:
The topsoil becomes wet, absorbing the first drops before ponding
locally around plant stems and low-spots etc.
Some soakage into the underlying soil occurs to feed roots
If the storm is severe enough, some run-off occurs on the surface
which can fill local ditches or follow the natural topography to streams
etc.
The cumulative affect of the storm profile and site conditions will
elongate the response thus reducing the peak flow rate.
The wearing course, being
relatively smooth, allows
the runoff to quickly enter
the drainage system where it is transported at speed to the discharge
point.
There will be little attenuation and an extremely high peak runoff rate
for a short time (during which, the flows can be highly destructive!)
2
Extracted from Urban Drainage, Third Edition - David Butler & John Davies
7.1 Control weir either Vee notch or flat
Along with flow rates comes pollution levels and maybe specific
guidance regarding silt removal, polishing prior to discharge and/or
local improvements to the watercourse.
It is worth noting that large pipes can and often do come under the
auspices of the structures teams within the design scheme and they
deal with the headwalls, etc. In this case, we as drainage engineers
would really just specify levels, gradients and things like that.
10 Design standards and legislation
While the basic design of each element of highway drainage is covered
under DMRB standards, many also have their own special standards to
insure that they meet site-specific standards where not used for
Highways Agency schemes.
Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) Volume 4 Geotechnics and Drainage
Section 2 Drainage (Parts 1-9)
Part 1
HA 78/96 Design of Outfalls for Surface Water Channels
HA 39/98 Edge of Pavement Details
HA 103/06 Vegetative Treatment Systems for Highway Run-off
HA 106/04 Drainage of Runoff from Natural Catchments
Part 2
TA 80/99 Surface Drainage of Wide Carriageways
Part 3
HD 33/06 Surface and Sub-surface Drainage Systems for Highways
HA 102/00 Spacing of Road Gullies
HA 105/04 Sumpless Gullies
Part 4
HA 79/97 Edge pf Pavement Details for Porous Asphalt Surface Courses
HA 37/97 Hydraulic Design of Road-Edge Surface Water Channels
HA 41/90 Permeameter for Road Drainage Layers
HA 83/99 - Safety Aspects of Road Edge Drainage Features
HD 43/04 - Drainage Data Management System for Highways Agency
HA 217/08 - Alternative Filter Media and Surface Stabilisation Techniques for Combined Surface and
Sub-Surface Drains
HA 219/09 - Determination of Pipe Roughness and Assessment of Sediment Deposition to Aid
Pipeline Design
Part 5
HA 40/01 - Determination of Pipe Roughness and Assessment of Sediment Deposition to Aid
Pipeline Design
HA 104/09 - Chamber Tops and Gully Tops for Road Drainage and Services: Installation and
Maintenance
Part 6
HA 113/05 - Combined Channel and Pipe System for Surface Water Drainage
Part 7
HA 107/04 - Design of Outfall and Culvert Details
Part 8
HA 118/06 Design of Soakaways
Part 9
HA119/06 - Grassed Surface Water Channels for Highway Runoff
CIRIA manuals are available for SuDS schemes, soakaways, pollution
Issues such as SuDS play their part, more from a pollution control and
landscaping standpoint than the realities of discharge rates and the
safety element of highway drainage is always paramount to any
environmental considerations (especially on major highways).
Climate change affects Total flows insofar as both the rainfall pattern
and the antecedent conditions on the ground become altered.
3
The revitalised FSR/FEH rainfall-run-off Method Supplementary Report No 1, Thomas, Rodding & Kjeldson
4
Highways Agency - Climate Change Risk Assessment - August 2011
12 SuDS Guidance
A recent trend in highway schemes is to incorporate flow management,
pollution control and collection into a more organic solution which is
visually less intrusive than traditional separate methods.
While attractive these schemes are not without issues, the major one
being the costs associated with maintenance and asset management
against a backdrop of serviceability, vandalism and pressures on small
sites to provide adequate parking/recreational space.
If you put lipstick on a pig you just end up with a pig wearing lipstick
This is done to calculate peak flow rates, storage volumes and flow
control devices and are based on further calculations done using
computers to calculate peak green field run-offs.
Most if not all of the above now incorporate CAD plans into the
drainage design for locations of gulleys, inspection chambers, pipes,
headwalls and the like.
13.1 WinDES
14.1 HADDMS
HAGDMS/HADDMS new functionality - 16th March 2012
The HAGDMS and HADDMS team are pleased to announce the following additions and changes to the
system. These items will be formally launched with documentation, webinars etc shortly but are
now available for use by Service Providers.
Geotechnical Incident Reporting - allows input of incidents associated with GAD observations,
input of information such as impact on the carriageway, and one-off and ongoing costs associated
with the incident. Existing GAD Editors have access to add and edit incidents and their costs,
and MAGLEs will see a new box on the main screen listing any "Preliminary" status incidents in
their Area(s) for approval.
Spills Register - allows locations and details of spillage incidents to be entered. This operates in
a similar way to the Flood Events Register. Each spill is assessed against the criteria in HD45 and
a Spill Severity Index is calculated. Existing Drainage Editors are able to add and edit spill details,
and these can be "closed" by the DLE once all required information has been entered.
The Flood Severity Index calculation methodology no longer takes into account the time of day
a flood occurred. The new definition is available for registered users to download from the
Downloads page. FSIs for all existing floods have been recalculated, which will mean that the FSI
for some flood events has increased. National FSI percentile values will be recalculated for the
March monthly drainage report, available in early April - please contact support if you require
these sooner.
New EA map layers have been added showing river catchment extents and waterbodies defined
under the Water Framework Directive. Waterbodies are shown with their current overall status
(indicated by the colour) and overall objective (displayed in a tooltip together with other details).
A number of minor improvements have also been carried out across other areas of the system to address
various user-reported issues.
14.2 EXOR the Highways Agency and local authorities both use this
database to record surface-based highway assets and schedule
maintenance/inspections. Typically, EXOR ignores assets
underground which may go some way to explain our current
predicament!
Appendix A The Wallingford Procedure
Wallingford Procedure (Wallingford)
Alternatively, design values are provided by referring to average annual rainfall for a given
location.
WRAP SOIL (%)
The WRAP SOIL percentages define the index of the water holding capacity of the soil
(0.15 tot 0.5), based on the FSR WRAP parameter obtained from FSR. The formula for
calculating the WRAP Soil index is shown below:
WRAP SOIL Index = (Soil 1 % * 0.15) + (Soil 2 % * 0.3) + (Soil 3 % * 0.4) + (Soil 4 % *
0.45) + (Soil 5 % * 0.5).
There are five possible WRAP SOIL percentages which can be input to define the sub-
catchment soil conditions. The WRAP SOIL percentages are input as fractions and the
sum of which must equal 100% (i.e.: Soil 1 % + Soil 2 %...+ Soil 5 % = 1.0). The W.R.A.P.
soil classifications are defined as follows:
1 (i) Well drained permeable sandy or loamy soils and shallower analogues over highly
permeable limestone, chalk, sandstone or related drifts.
(ii) Earthy peat soils drained by dikes and pumps
(iii) Less permeable loamy over clayey soils on plateaux adjacent to very permeable
soils in valleys.
3 (i) Relatively impermeable soils in boulder and sedimentary clays, and in alluvium,
especially in eastern England
(ii) Permeable soils with shallow ground-water in low lying areas
(iii) Mixed areas of permeable and impermeable soils, in approximately equal
proportions
4 Clayey, or loamy over clayey soils with an impermeable layer at shallow depth
5 Soils of the wet uplands, (i) with peaty or humose surface horizons and impermeable
layers at shallow depth, (ii) deep raw peat associated with gentle upland slopes or
basin sites, (iii) bare rock cliffs and screes and (iv) shallow, permeable rocky soils
on steep slopes
It is noted that while using the Wallingford Procedure runoff method the following sub-
catchment slope values are recommended:
Recommended Sub-Catchment Slope Values:
1.25% - mild slope
2.75% - medium slope
4.0% - steep slope
Appendix B The Modified Rational Method
The Modified Rational method
This method was developed by H R Wallingford, and uses four hydrological constants to
determine rainfall intensity. These are:-
Masterdrain includes images of these maps, in National Grid squares, by kind permission of
H R Wallingford. The program also contains a database of over 4000 UK locations with the
constants already extracted from the maps.
This method of calculating rainfall is an essential part of the program. A fuller explanation of
this method can be obtained from Vol. 1 of the 'Wallingford Procedure'.
Appendix C Typical gulley design to HA102/00 (example)
Appendix D Legislative framework for Highway Drainage
Highways Act (1980) Part V, Sections 100-105 Drainage of Highways
Land Drainage Act (1991) Schedule 4 Schemes for small drainage works
Planning Act (2008) Part 3, Section 22 Highways, Sections 27/28 Water and
Section 29 Wastewater
Water Industry Act (1991) Section 115 Highway drainage and sewers
New Roads and Street Works Act (1991) Sections 89 & 148 Sewers