Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9, SEPTEMBER 2003
AbstractArbitrary interconnections of passive (possibly non- reactive powerour result unveils some sort of reactive
linear) resistors, inductors, and capacitors define passive systems, power-balance.
with power port variables the external source voltages and cur- The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec-
rents, and storage function the total stored energy. In this paper,
we identify a class of RLC circuits (with convex energy function and tion II, we briefly review some fundamental results in circuits
weak electromagnetic coupling), for which it is possible to add a theory, like the classical definition of passivity and Tellegens
differentiation to the port terminals preserving passivitywith a Theorem. The new passivity property for RL and RC circuits is
new storage function that is directly related to the circuit power. To established in Section III. In Section IV, this result is extended to
establish our results, we exploit the geometric property that volt- a class of RLC circuits using the classical BraytonMoser equa-
ages and currents in RLC circuits live in orthogonal spaces, i.e., Tel-
legens theorem, and heavily rely on the seminal paper of Brayton tions. Finally, we conclude the paper with some remarks and
and Moser published in the early sixties. comments on future research.
Notation: Throughout the paper we will denote by
Index TermsBraytonMoser equations, nonlinear circuits,
passivity, Tellegens theorem. the partial derivative of a vector function with
respect to a -dimensional column vector ,
i.e.,
I. INTRODUCTION
The proof of this corollary is easily established noting that, if where . If the resistors are passive, the
(respectively, ), then, clearly also circuit defines a passive system with power port variables
(respectively, ), and then, invoking orthog- and storage function of the total resistors con-
onality of and , see also [1], [8] and the references therein. tent.
Another immediate consequence of Tellegens theorem is the Similarly, arbitrary interconnections of passive capacitors
following, slight variation of the classical result in circuit theory, with the convex energy function , voltage-controlled
see, e.g., [2, Sec. 19.3.3], whose proof is provided for the sake resistors, and sources, satisfy the power-balance inequality
of completeness.
Proposition 1: Arbitrary interconnections of inductors and (8)
capacitors with passive resistors verify the energy-balance in-
equality where . If the resistors are passive, the
circuit defines a passive system with power port variables
and storage function the total resistors co-con-
tent.
(4) Proof: The proof of the new passivity property for RL cir-
cuits is established as follows. First, differentiate the resistors
where we have defined the total stored energy
content
with and the inductor
fluxes and the capacitor charges, respectively. If, furthermore, (9)
the inductors and capacitors are also passive, then, the network
defines a passive system with power port variables Then, by using the fact that
and storage function of the total energy.
Proof: First, notice that ,
where we have used the fact that and
, and the relations
and . Then, by (1) we have that and by invoking Faradays law, i.e., , we ob-
(notice that we have adopted the tain
standard sign convention for the supplied power). Hence, noting
(10)
that for passive resistors, and integrating the latter
equations form 0 to , we obtain (4). Passivity follows from where the nonnegativity stems from the convexity assumption.
positivity of for passive inductors and capacitors. Finally, by substituting (9) and (10) into (2) of Corollary 1, with
and , and integrating form 0 to
yields the result.
III. NEW PASSIVITY PROPERTY FOR RL AND RC CIRCUITS The proof for RC circuits follows verbatim, but now using
In this section, we first consider circuits consisting solely of (3) of Corollary 1 instead of (2), the relation
inductors and current-controlled resistors and sources, denoted and the definition of the co-content.
by , and circuits consisting solely of capacitors and voltage- Remark 1: In some cases it is also possible to apply Proposi-
controlled resistors and sources, denoted by . Furthermore, tion 2 to RL (respectively, RC) circuits containing voltage-con-
to present the new passivity property, we need to define some trolled resistors in (respectively, current-controlled resistor
additional concepts that are well known in circuit theory [6], in ) under the condition that the curves are invert-
[8], and will be instrumental to formulate our results. ible. If, for example, contains a voltage-controlled resistor,
Definition 1: The content of a current-controlled resistor is say , and its constitutive relation is invert-
defined as ible, it should then be possible to rewrite the characteristic equa-
tion in terms of the current, i.e., . In the linear
case, this means that instead of writing (or in
(5)
terms of the resistors co-content: ),
we may write (Ohms law in its conventional
while, for a voltage-controlled resistors, the function form), and hence its content reads
and the new passivity property (7) can be established; see also,
(6) Fig. 1.
Remark 2: The new passivity properties of Proposition 2
is called the resistors co-content. differ from the standard result of Proposition 1 in the following
Proposition 2: Arbitrary interconnections of passive induc- respects. First, while Proposition 1 holds for general RLC cir-
tors with convex energy function , current-controlled cuits, the new properties are valid only for RL or RC systems.
resistors and sources, satisfy the power-balance inequality Using the fact that passivity is invariant with respect to negative
feedback interconnections it is, of course, possible to combine
RL and RC circuits and establish the new passivity property for
(7)
some RLC circuits. A class of RLC circuits for which a similar
1176 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMSI: FUNDAMENTAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, VOL. 50, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2003
(12)
(13)
where
, and with
.
Remark 4: Notice that the mixed-potential function contains
(b) both the content and co-content which are, due to the topo-
logical completeness assumption, described in terms of the in-
Fig. 1. (a) Resistor characteristic with invertible (i ;v ) curve. (b)
Noninvertible resistor characteristic. ductor currents and capacitor voltages, respectively. In other
words, for topologically complete circuits there exist a matrix
property holds will be identified in Section IV. Second, the con- such that, for the resistors contained in , we
dition of convexity of the energy functions required for Proposi- have that , while for the resistors contained in
tion 2 is sufficient, but not necessary for passivity of the dynamic we have , with .
L and C elements. Hence, the class of admissible dynamic ele-
ments is more restrictive. B. Generation of New Storage Function Candidates
Remark 3: It is interesting to remark that the supply rate Let us next see how the BraytonMoser equations (13), can
of the new passive systems defined by either the product be used to generate storage functions for RLC circuits. Suppose
or , relates with an alternative we multiply (13) by , i.e.,
definition of reactive power. The interested reader is referred
to, e.g., [5] and [11] for more details on this subject.
and scalar functions (if possible, positive semi- must ensure that the transformed dynamics (16) can be ex-
definite), such that the circuit dynamics (13) can be (re)written pressed in the form (13), which is equivalent to requiring that
as . This naturally restricts the freedom
in the choices for and in Proposition 3.
(16) Theorem 1: Consider a (possibly nonlinear) RLC circuit sat-
If we multiply (16) by like before, we have that isfying (13). Assume the following.
A.1. The inductors and capacitors are passive and have
strictly convex energy functions.
A.2. The voltage-controlled resistors in are passive,
linear, and time-invariant. Also, , and
thus by taking the sum of (6) we have that
Hence, if the symmetric part of is negative semi-definite,
for all .
that is, if (15) is satisfied and thus , we may state
A.3. Uniformly in , we have
(noting that ) that
does not follow directly from (14), as it requires the utilization VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS
of (3) instead of (2), as done above. Our main motivation in this paper was to establish a new pas-
sivity property for RL, RC, and a class of RLC circuits. We have
V. EXAMPLE proven that for this class of circuits it is possible to add a differ-
Consider the RLC circuit depicted in Fig. 2. For simplicity, entiation to the port variables preserving passivity with respect
assume that all the circuit elements are linear and time-invariant, to a storage function which is directly related to the circuits
except for the resistor . The voltage-current relation of power. The new supply rate naturally coincides with the defini-
is described by . The interconnection matrix tion of reactive power.
, the content and the co-content are readily Instrumental for our developments was the exploitation of
found to be , and Tellegens theorem. Dirac structures, as proposed in [9], pro-
, respectively, and thus, the mixed- vide a natural generalization to this theorem, characterizing in
potential for the circuit is an elegant geometrical language the key notion of power pre-
serving interconnections. It seems that this is the right notion to
try to extend our results beyond the realm of RLC circuits, e.g.,
to mechanical or electromechanical systems. A related question
is whether we can find BraytonMoser like models for this class
of systems.
Hence, the differential equations describing the dynamics of the There are close connections of our result and the shrinking
circuit are given by dissipation Theorem of [12], which is extensively used in analog
very large-scale integration circuit design. Exploring the rami-
fications of our research in that direction is a question of signif-
icant practical interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank R. Grio for his useful re-
The new passivity property is obtained by selecting and marks regarding the interpretation of the new storage function
, yielding that if and only as a reactive power. R. Ortega would like to express his grati-
if tude to B. E. Shi, along with whom this research was started.
(20) REFERENCES
[1] R. K. Brayton and J. K. Moser, A theory of nonlinear networksI,
Quart. App. Math., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 133, 1964.
Under the condition that and , positivity [2] C. A. Desoer and E. S. Kuh, Basic Circuit Theory. New York: Mc-
of is easily checked by calculating (18), i.e., Graw-Hill, 1969.
[3] D. Hill and P. Moylan, The stability of nonlinear dissipative systems,
IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., pp. 708711, Oct. 1976.
[4] R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.:
Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985.
[5] N. LaWhite and M. D. Ilic, Vector space decomposition of reactive
power for periodic nonsinusoidal signals, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.
I, vol. 44, pp. 338346, Apr. 1997.
[6] W. Millar, Some general theorems for nonlinear systems possesing re-
sistor, Phil. Mag., vol. 42, pp. 11501160, 1951.
[7] R. Ortega, D. Jeltsema, and J. M. A. Scherpen, Stabilization of non-
In conclusion, if (20) is satisfied, then the circuit of linear RLC circuits via power-shaping, presented at the Latin American
Conf. on Automatic Control, Guadalajara, Mxico, Dec. 2002.
Fig. 2 defines a passive system with power port variables [8] P. Penfield, R. Spence, and S. Duinker, Tellegens Theorem and Elec-
and storage function . trical Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970.
JELTSEMA et al.: ON PASSIVITY AND POWER-BALANCE INEQUALITIES OF NONLINEAR RLC CIRCUITS 1179
[9] A. J. van der Schaft, L -Gain and Passivity Techniques in Nonlinear Romeo Ortega (S76M80SM98F99) was born
Control. London, U.K.: Springer-Verlag, 2000. in Mexico. He received the B.Sc. degree in electrical
[10] L. Weiss, W. Mathis, and L. Trajkovic, A generalization of Brayton- and mechanical engineering from the National Uni-
Mosers mixed potential function, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, pp. versity of Mexico, Mexico city, Mexico, the Master
423427, Apr. 1998. of Engineering degree from the Polytechnical Insti-
[11] J. L. Wyatt and M. D. Ilic, Time-domain reactive power concepts for tute of Leningrad, Leningrad, U.S.S.R., and the Doc-
nonlinear, nonsinusoidal or nonperiodic networks, Proc. IEEE Int. teur DEtat degree from the Politechnical Institute of
Symp. Circuits Syst., vol. 1, pp. 387390, May 1990. Grenoble, Grenoble, France in 1974, 1978, and 1984,
[12] J. L. Wyatt, Little-known properties of resistive grids that are useful in respectively.
analog vision chip designs, in Vision Chips: Implementing Vision Algo- He then joined the National University of Mexico,
rithms with Analog VLSI Circuits, C. Koch and H. Li, Eds. Piscataway, where he worked until 1989. He was a Visiting Pro-
NJ: IEEE Computer Science Press, 1995. fessor at the University of Illinois Urbana, in 19871988 and at the McGill Uni-
versity, Montreal, QC, Canada, in 19911992. Currently, he is with the Labora-
toire de Signaux et Systemes (SUPELEC), Paris, France. His research interests
are in the fields of nonlinear and adaptive control, with special emphasis on ap-
plications.
Dr. Ortega is a member of the IFAC Technical Board and chairman of the
IFAC Coordinating Committee on Systems and Signals, and has been a member
of the French National Researcher Council (CNRS) since June 1992, and a
Fellow of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science in 19901991. He is an
Associate Editor of Systems and Control Letters, the International Journal of
Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, the European Journal of Control and
the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY.
Dimitri Jeltsema (S03) received the B.Sc. degree Jacquelien M. A. Scherpen received the M.Sc. and
in electrical engineering from the Rotterdam School Ph.D. degrees in applied mathematics from the Uni-
of Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and versity of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands, in 1990
the M.Sc. degree in systems and control engineering and 1994, respectively.
from the University of Hertfordshire, Hertford, Currently, she is an Associate Professor at the
U.K., in 1996 and 2000, respectively. He is currently Delft Center for Systems and Control, Delft Uni-
working toward the Ph.D. degree at the Delft versity of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. She
Center of Systems and Control, Delft University of has held visiting research positions at the Universite
Technology, The Netherlands. de Compiegne, Compiegne, France, Laboratoire de
During his studies, he worked as an Engineer in Signaux et Systemes (SUPELEC), Gif-sur-Yvette,
several electrical engineering companies. During France, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, the
2002, he was a visiting student at the Laboratoire de Signaux et Systemes Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, and the University of Twente. Her
(SUPELEC), Paris, France. His research interests are nonlinear circuit theory, research interests include nonlinear model reduction methods, realization
power electronics, switched-mode networks, and physical modeling and theory, nonlinear control methods, with in particular modeling and control of
control techniques. physical systems with applications to electrical circuits.
Mr. Jeltsema is a student member of the Dutch Institute of Systems and Con- Dr. Scherpen is an Associate Editor of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
trol (DISC). AUTOMATIC CONTROL.