Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents Abstract
1 Brief Clinical History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
A 27 year old male developed osteomyelitis after
standard current treatment of an open bimalleolar
2 Preoperative Clinical Photos and Radiographs . . . . . . . . . . 281
(pilon) ankle fracture, despite successful fracture healing.
3 Preoperative Problem List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 He underwent osteomyelitis treatment, including
4 Treatment Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 hardware removal, intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy,
several further debridement procedures, and local
5 Basic Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
antibiotic delivery via CaSO4/tobramycin/vancomycin
6 Images During Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 beads. He was ultimately treated with Ilizarov fine wire
7 Technical Pearls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 external fixation frame (Ilizarov) arthrodesis. Solid fusion
8 Outcome Clinical Photos and Radiographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 occurred after 4 months in the frame. The frame was then
removed and the fusion continued to mature over time.
9 Avoiding and Managing Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
10 Cross-References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286
References and Suggested Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 1 Brief Clinical History
Fig. 3 (a and b) Twenty-one months postfracture, note tibiotalar erosion. Patient had previous hardware removal, repeat I & D, cultures + for
MSSA, IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. Continued to have pain and signs of talar erosion 1 month after previous I & D
5 Basic Principles
4 Treatment Strategy
CiernyMader staging is used to direct the principles of
The patient required a stepwise approach to fracture healing, treatment of osteomyelitis.
eradication of infection, and limb salvage. Fracture healing Patient selection is defined by the physiologic status of
was achieved first, despite noted soft tissue infection the host, ranging from A, healthy with normal healing
282 J.H. Calhoun and A.C. Sullivan
ability, to B which is compromised locally (l) and Treatment takes into account both the host classification
systemically (s) to C which is compromised where the and extent of disease, looking at the hosts ability to respond
ability to heal is very low; i.e., the treatment is worse than to the chosen management option(s). Initial treatment can be
the disease (Quote from George Cierny). used to change the stage of osteomyelitis, such as by
The anatomic extent of disease is defined by categories debridement procedures, dead space management,
14. 1 is medullary, 2 superficial (i.e., contiguous with skin stabilization of nonunion or joint destruction with internal
ulcer or wound), 3 localized (sequestrum), and 4 diffuse or external fixation, and soft tissue flaps. The host status to
(nonunion or joint). heal can also be improved with culture-directed antibiotics
Case 39: Ilizarov Ankle Fusion 283
and optimization of systemic factors such as renal failure, patients quality of life without causing overwhelmingly
diabetes, cardiac and pulmonary disease, smoking, and negative effects.
drug abuse. This both decreases the bio-burden and This case is initially stage 4Bls, signifying diffuse
improves the hosts ability to respond to physiologic osteomyelitis in host type B with local (l) compromise,
compromise caused by infectious process. The course of (due to ischemic local tissue because of scarring from his
therapy is chosen in order to produce improvement in open injury and surgery, scleroderma, and venous stasis due
284 J.H. Calhoun and A.C. Sullivan
7 Technical Pearls