Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Butler Volmer

    Uploaded by

    jesusmachorro
    10 views2 pages
    This document contains two tables comparing current density (iT) values calculated using different approximation methods for electrode potentials (EBV and ABC) with varying voltages. The first table shows results for high field approximations with errors between 0-98% compared to the AAC method. The second table shows results for low field approximations with errors between 0-43% compared to the ABC method. Both tables are accompanied by graphs plotting the percentage error between the methods for different voltages.

    Original Description:

    AAC-ABC

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains two tables comparing current density (iT) values calculated using different approximation methods for electrode potentials (EBV and ABC) with varying voltages. The first table shows results for high field approximations with errors between 0-98% compared to the AAC method. The second table shows results for low field approximations with errors between 0-43% compared to the ABC method. Both tables are accompanied by graphs plotting the percentage error between the methods for different voltages.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Butler Volmer

    Uploaded by

    jesusmachorro
    This document contains two tables comparing current density (iT) values calculated using different approximation methods for electrode potentials (EBV and ABC) with varying voltages. The first table shows results for high field approximations with errors between 0-98% compared to the AAC method. The second table shows results for low field approximations with errors between 0-43% compared to the ABC method. Both tables are accompanied by graphs plotting the percentage error between the methods for different voltages.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Aproximaciones de Alto Campo

    iT (EBV) iT (AAC)

    y %Error

    0 0 0.001 0.00
    0.0005 1.94621952657785E-05 0.0010097784 98.07
    0.0001 3.89238008099502E-06 0.0010019481 99.61
    0.001 3.89262334461309E-05 0.0010196525 96.18
    0.005 0.0001949262 0.0011022014 82.31
    0.02 0.0007982823 0.0014758554 45.91
    0.03 0.0012351966 0.0017929398 31.11
    0.05 0.0022682082 0.00264612 14.28
    0.08 0.0045335562 0.0047443339 4.44
    0.1 0.0068591336 0.0070019509 2.04
    0.12 0.010237098 0.0103338672 0.94

    io= 0.001
    n= 1
    T= 298.15
    b= 0.5

    120.00

    100.00

    80.00
    Sobrepotencial (V)

    60.00

    Col umn E
    40.00

    20.00

    0.00
    0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
    % de Error

    Jess Manuel Machorro Contreras------Corrosin


    Aproximaciones de Bajo Campo

    iT (EBV) (ABC)
    y %ERROR

    -0.1 -0.0068591336 -0.0038923776 -43.3


    -0.08 -0.0045335562 -0.0031139021 -31.3
    -0.05 -0.0022682082 -0.0019461888 -14.2
    -0.03 -0.0012351966 -0.0011677133 -5.5
    -0.01 -0.0003916996 -0.0003892378 -0.6
    0 0 0 0
    0.01 0.0003916996 0.0003892378 0.6
    0.03 0.0012351966 0.0011677133 5.5
    0.05 0.0022682082 0.0019461888 14.2
    0.08 0.0045335562 0.0031139021 31.3
    0.1 0.0068591336 0.0038923776 43.3
    Sobrepotencial (V)

    50.0

    40.0

    30.0

    20.0

    10.0
    8; 5.5
    4; -5.5 0.0
    -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Col umn E
    -10.0

    -20.0

    -30.0

    -40.0

    -50.0
    % de error

    Jess Manuel Machorro Contreras------Corrosin

    You might also like