Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION
SUBMITTED TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
Offsite construction is made possible under controlled plant conditions, using the
same materials and designing to the same codes and standards as
conventionally built facilities but in about half the time. Buildings are produced
in modules that when put together on site, reflect the identical design intent
and specifications of the most sophisticated site-built facility without
compromise.
Overall, growth in off-site has been stymied by high costs, fluctuating demand
and the need for industry culture change in order to get the best of it.
The claim of those promoting off-site construction is that it offers faster build to a
higher quality with fewer defects. This is achieved by moving from a construction
to a manufacturing approach, using production-line techniques. In addition, its
proponents see it as a solution to the growing skills crisis, by replacing the need
for skilled tradesmen such as bricklayers and joiners with a much smaller number
of semi-skilled factory operatives.
OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AND MATERIALS
PROCESS
Predesign: Does off-site aid in meeting the cost, time, labor, site and
programmatic goals for the project?
Develop: Is the design of the project developed so that work is structured for
what is done on-site and what is manufactured in the factory?
Order: Are design changes reduced and are orders placed in a short time
frame to reduce cost?
Deliver: Are site deliveries made just-in time, loaded and delivered to minimize
handling?
MATERIALS USED
Piping Concrete
Mechanical Insulation
Structural assemblies Carpeting
Equipment Finishes
Ironworks Furnishings
Instrumentation Masonry
Welding Roofing
Electrical Plastics
OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
The gap between the selected manufacturers and general contractors is the
greatest in a design bid-build contract because they do not have a professional
relationship, so extra care is taken to define separate scopes. With the design-
build scenario, the client hires the architect, the manufacturer, and the general
contractor as a preassembled team (or one entity having capabilities for all
functions), who collectively assumes responsibility for both design and
construction. A collaborative design effort is typically preferred by modular
manufacturers because each has its own system for the design and
construction of modular frames. Building costs are more rigid since there is no
competitive bidding process involved.
NEGOTIATIED-BID CONTRACT
Each contract structure has different advantages. For example, the needs for
custom projects differ significantly from standard, pre-designed projects. So at
the beginning of each project, the roles and responsibilities of all collaborating
parties must be carefully considered.
DRAWING DUPLICATION
SHOP DRAWINGS
Factory workers will manage all of the work for a particular task (walls, floor, roof,
structure, etc.) depending on the volume of work passing through the factory.
The shop drawings reflect the precise requirements of the task at hand. Theyre
additionally used for third-party approvals, and for a financial check,
representing expected material orders. Drawings issued on the factory floor are
limited to the individual activities performed (on sheet per station), preventing
time being wasted searching for the appropriate drawings. The best way to
prevent duplicate drawings from being produced in the shop drawings set and
the construction documents set requires early coordination and constant
dialogue throughout design development. Most architects are unaccustomed
to the detail required for shop drawings, and factory workers lack a familiarity
with different drawing formats. Drawing collaboration through BIM (Building
Information Modeling) provides distinct advantages in both regards. Three
dimensional screenshots and walkthroughs can be easily created for the clients
benefit, while pre-defined sheet layouts with dynamic dimensioning and
scheduling can appropriately capture the detail required for factory
production.
BIM/3D-CAD
PAPERLESS PRODUCTION
The use of the BIM model on the factory floor as a supplement to the shop
drawings and for inspections of craftsmanship and accuracy raises the potential
for a completely paperless production process. This however requires more time
upfront to develop a comprehensive 3-D model, more so than the time required
for an accurate 2-D set. For instance, even if mechanical ducts and plumbing
lines are to be concealed within floor and ceiling plenums, time is still invested
into their representation in 3-dimensions so that workers can accurately judge
how and where systems cross mate lines. Another challenge is the legal
approval process because the shop drawings are currently the only documents
that will stand up in court as the argument for completed work. The dimensions
on the shop drawings are historically considered the commands for
construction; there is no model for the BIM model being a legally accountable
entity.
Since the project is built off site in a controlled environment, there will be no
weather delays on the construction schedule. All materials are ordered and
stored in a dry warehouse so there is no material loss due to on-site damage or
theft. The biggest contributing factor for the shortened construction schedule is
that the site development occurs simultaneously while the building is being
constructed at the plant, cutting down the time to complete the project by as
much as 50%.
Having the building arrive on site up to 90% complete, will result in fewer
construction pollutants and better protection of the surrounding green space.
Reduced on-site activity also allows for a greater reduction in disruption to the
ongoing business, and to the surrounding neighbourhood. In the education
market, when there are students, teachers and parents present during the
construction process, less on site disturbance is not only a sustainable building
practice, but also allows for greater site safety.
LESS ON SITE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC
Building off-site brings greater control of many factors. There are fewer small
material deliveries to site because commodities such as drywall can be ordered
by the truckload and then stored in a warehouse until they are needed at the
plant. Running multiple construction projects at the same time in one plant
location significantly reduces workforce time and travel and when the building
does arrive at the site, its about 90% complete so travel to the site location is
further reduced.
Compared to on-site construction, the reduced time and activity that occurs as
a result of the shortened construction schedule, and the fact that modules
arrive on site up to 90% complete, naturally improves site safety and security.
DISADVANTAGE OF OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION
Use of small test sites by clients to reduce innovation risk increases the likelihood
that an Offsite construction pilot project will not deliver the expected benefits,
and will not be implemented on a wider basis.
PLANNING
Clients and project teams need to understand the properties and constraints of
the selected system and the revised project process. The whole project team
also needs the ability to collaborate effectively.