Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net
Open Access
School of Electrical & Information Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 163318, China
Abstract: With the rapid development of drilling technology, borehole becomes increasingly complex demanding
higher standards for downhole operation. The downhole mechanical analysis is an important part of the oil well
production analysis It is very important in drilling, completion and work over operations. The previous operation based on
experience has been unable to meet modern production requirement on accuracy. According to the present situation of oil
field information construction and the problems in the production process, this paper designs and implements the
downhole mechanical analysis system based on .NET. The system can provide the stress analysis results of downhole
string in the process of well production quickly and accurately, and it can provide the basis for equipment selection and
scheme selection in the production process.
The design of this system mainly includes two parts, part one is the analysis of the deformation to the tubular column with
the packer, the other part is the analysis of frictional resistance of tubular column. This system has the advantages of
simple operation, accurate calculation, clear analytical results, and comprehensive analysis.
Keywords: Friction analysis, mechanics analysis, packer.
Fh = A3 ( Pi Po ) (2)
*Address correspondence to this author at the School of Electrical &
Information Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing. The calculation of the deformation is:
Postcard: 163318, China; Tel: 0459-6503160; E-mail: wxfdqpi@163.com
Fig. (1). The analysis of the deformation to the tubular column with the packer.
192 The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2014, Volume 8 Zhao et al.
analyzes the frictional resistance of tubular column. With the effective weight of the tubular column unit; is tangent
conditions that the working condition is rotary drilling, vector; n is normal vector; m is binormal vector.
mechanical model is steel model and trajectory curve is
natural curve. The analysis of frictional resistance of tubular
column mainly includes two parts, one part is static frictional
resistance analysis and the other part is dynamic frictional
resistance analysis.
3.1. Static Frictional Resistance Analysis
Static frictional resistance analysis of the tubular column
mainly includes the calculation of the axial force, lateral
pressure and torque, In order to ensure the safety of the
tubular column, the pressure on the tubular column should be
less than the limit tension and limit torque. The axial force,
lateral pressure and torque on the tubular column are
described by the curve about the pulling force, torque and
well depth. At the same time, by checking the strength of the
drill string, it draws the safety coefficient of the tubular
column to reflect the security of the tubular column. The
inclination and the curvature are two important parameters in
Fig. (2). The tubular column unit in the three-dimensional
the analysis of frictional resistance of tubular column. In wellbore.
order to reflect its relationship with frictional resistance, it
draws these two parameters in the curve. In order to reflect When the axial force in the lower measure point of the
the bending state of the tubular column, it also draws the tubular column unit and the lateral force of the tubular
stability of the tubular column in the curve. The results of column unit are given, the calculation formula of the axial
static analysis are mainly used for the design and selection of force in the upper measure point is:
drill string. " $
3.1.1. The Calculation of the Curvature T1 = T2 + "# Ls / cos ( 2)$% )q cos ( FE + Fn )* (8)
# %
Borehole curvature is an important index for measuring
the build angle capacity. Understanding the formation, In equation 8: FE = 11.3EIK 3 ; Ls is the length of the
deflecting characteristics and evaluating the quality of the tubular column unit; qis the effective weight of the tubular
well bore is the basis of the frictional resistance analysis, and column unit; is the frictional resistance coefficient
design and monitoring of well path [8]. In the drilling between wellbore and tubular column;
problems, one often inspects the overall bending degree of
the borehole trajectory that is the calculation of average = arccos %&cos 1 cos 2 + sin 1 sin 2 cos ( 2 1 )'(
borehole curvature.
The calculation formula of the curvature is as follows: is the total angle change of the tubular column unit; 1 and
2 2
2 stand for the deviation angle in the upper measure point
# & # &
K = % ( +% 2
( sin (7) and the deviation angle in the lower measure point
$ L ' $ L ' respectively; 1 and 2 stand for the azimuth in the upper
In equation 7, = 2 1 ; = 2 1 ; L = L2 L1 ; 1 is measure point and the deviation angle in the lower measure
point respectively; FE is the lateral force caused by the
the deviation angle in the upper measure point; 2 is the
bending deformation of the wellbore; K is the curvature of
deviation angle in the lower measure point; 1 is the azimuth the tubular column unit.
in the upper measure point; 2 is the azimuth in the lower The total lateral force in the whole angle plane is:
measure point.
3.1.2. The Calculation of the Axial Force, Lateral Pressure Fndp = (T1 + T2 ) sin + n3 Ls q (9)
2
and Torque
In equation 9: n3 is the component of the normal vector
The tubular column unit in the three-dimensional
wellbore as shown in Fig. (2). in the vertical direction.
In the Fig. (2), T is axial force; is deviation angle; The total lateral force in the bi-normal direction is:
is azimuth; is total angle change of the tubular column Fnp = m3qLs (10)
unit; Ls is the length of the tubular column unit; q is the
The Design of Oil Well Downhole Mechanical Analysis System The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2014, Volume 8 193
The dimensionless frictional resistance of the fluid in the Table 1. The data of well trajectory.
tubular column is:
64 Well Depth (m) Deviation Angle () Azimuth ()
i( o ) = ( R 3103
Ri(o) i(o) ) (22) 0 17.5 260
(
i(o) = 0.3164Ri(o)0.25 Ri(o) > 3103 ) 50 18.5 262
100 17.5 263
The calculation of the Reynolds coefficient is :
150 18 268
2 i(o) ri(o) im(om) 200 19 269
Ri(o) = (23)
i 250 21 266
300 18 255
In equation 23: i is the kinematic viscosity coefficient of 350 17 265
the fluid; the significance of the other parameters is the same 400 18.5 263
as above.
450 21 265
3.1.4. The Calculation of the Stability
500 18 257
The tubing string in the wellbore often works in a 550 18.5 261
compressed state in some intervals, the precise analysis of
600 18.8 263
the stress and deformation of the tubular column is helpful
for optimizing the design [9]. 650 18 268
700 19 269
The discriminated formula of the stability of the tubular
column is as follows: 750 21 266
800 18 255
q sin
When, F < 2 EI [24], the tubular column is in a 850 17 265
Tb
900 18.5 263
linear steady state.else the tubular column is in a bend
950 17.5 257
state.
1000 16 263
In the formula: F is the axial force; EI is the flexural
rigidity; q is the line buoyant weight; is the deviation
CONCLUSION
angle; Tb is the one half of the difference between well
diameter and tubular column diameter. This system mainly uses the modern mechanics theory as
the basis model, and from two processes analyze the stress
The data of the well trajectory are shown in Table 1. condition of the tubular column. One is the analysis of the
Fig. (3) shows the interface design and experimental deformation to the tubular column with the packer; the other
results. process is the analysis of frictional resistance of tubular column.
Through the calculation of the deformation of the tubular
3.2. Dynamic Frictional Resistance Analysis column, axial force, torque and lateral force, to analyze the
Dynamic frictional resistance analyzes the pulling force stress condition of the tubular column. The calculation results of
and the torque at the wellhead. Static frictional resistance the system can be used to design construction technology, select
analyzes the drag and torque in every point of the drilling tubular column and check the security.
string, when theit drills into the well. Dynamic frictional The system has advantages of fast calculation, simple
resistance analysis calculates the wellhead pulling force and operation, friendly user interface and accurate calculation. It
wellhead torque in every well depth when the drilling string is robust and has good practicability. It can provide a
drills from the wellhead to the bottom. Therefore, by comprehensive and reliable result for the mechanical
multiple static analysis and the results of the wellhead analysis of the well. Using this system can improve the
tension and wellhead torque, we can complete the dynamic efficiency and quality of work.
analysis. The change of the dynamic load is important for
drilling designit is also the basis of designing the drilling CONFLICT OF INTEREST
string, selecting drilling plan and selecting equipment. The authors confirm that this article content has no
In this system, the result of the dynamic frictional conflict of interest.
resistance is described by the curve about the wellhead ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
pulling force, wellhead torque and well depth.
This work is supported by the National Science &
Fig. (4) shows the interface design and experimental Technology Support Plan Major Project under Grant No.
results. 2012BAH12B03.
The Design of Oil Well Downhole Mechanical Analysis System The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2014, Volume 8 195
[6] D.J. Hammerlindl, Movement, Forces, and Stress associated with [8] L. Xiushan, Average borehole curvature calculation of hole
combination tubing strings sealed in packers, Journal of trajectory, Oil Drilling & Production Technology, vol. 27, no. 5,
Petroleum Technology, pp. 195-207, 1977. pp. 11-13, 2005.
[7] G. Deli, T. Chengjin, and L. Wenyong, Research on numerical [9] L. Zifeng, Stability and criss cross curing of pipe pile of oil gas
analysis of drag and torque for xijiang extended reach wells in well, West-china Exploration Engineering (Geotechnical Drilling
South-China Sea , Oil Drilling & Production Technology, vol. 25, and Digging Mining Engineering), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 23-24, 1997.
pp. 712, 2003.
Received: July 25, 2014 Revised: August 4, 2014 Accepted: August 4, 2014