You are on page 1of 1

Dangwa Transportation Co., Inc. v.

CA It is the duty of common carrier of passengers to stop their conveyances for a


reasonable length of time to give passengers an opportunity to board.
FACTS: (izzy digest) The victim became a passenger when he stepped and stood on the bus
Bus company - Dangwa Transportation Co ; Driver of the bus - Theodore Malecdan ; platform.
Heirs of Pedrito Cudiamata - private respondents
The victim was not negligent.
1. May 13, 1985: Theodore M. Lardizabal was driving a passenger bus belonging Even if it was moving, witnesses testified that the bus had just started and it
to Dangwa Transportation Co. Inc. (Dangwa) was still in slow motion when the victim was on the platform.
2. The bus was at full stop between Bunkhouses 53 and 54 when Pedro alighted It is not negligence to board a conveyance moving slowly. An ordinarily
3. Pedro Cudiamat fell from the platform of the bus when it suddenly accelerated prudent person would have attempted the same under similar circumstances.
forward Passengers alighting from slowly moving vehicles is of common experience.
4. Pedro was ran over by the rear right tires of the vehicle
5. Theodore first brought his other passengers and cargo to their respective Common carriers are bound to observe extraordinary diligence for the safety of its
destinations before bringing Pedro to Lepanto Hospital where he expired passengers. It is bound to carry the passengers safely as far as human care and
6. Private respondents filed a complaint for damages against Dangwa for the foresight can provide, using the utmost diligence of very cautious persons, with
death of Pedro Cudiamat due regard for all the circumstances.
7. Dangwa contends that it observed and continued to observe the extraordinary Carrier assumes the express obligation to transport the passenger to his
diligence required in the operation of the co. and the supervision of the destination safely and observe extraordinary diligence with a due regard for all
employees even as they are not absolute insurers of the public at large and the circumstances. Any injury suffered by the passenger is right away
that the driver and the conductor had no knowledge that the victim would ride attributable to the fault or negligence of the carrier.
on the bus since the victim did not manifest his intention to board the bus. The common carriers presumed negligence is an exception to the general rule
that negligence must be proved.
RTC: Victim was negligent and found that victim was negligent in trying to board a It is incumbent upon the carrier to prove that it exercised extraordinary
moving vehicle with one of his hands holding an umbrella and WITHOUT giving ANY diligence.
INDICATION that he wishes to board the bus. Moreover, there is still proof of their negligence. The driver and conductor
failed to bring the victim to the hospital immediately. It was even another
CA: Petitioner was negligent. The bus was at full stop when Pedro boarded, the passenger that informed the family of the victim.
victim indicated his intention to board the bus since Pedro was no longer walking
and made a sign to board the bus when the bus was still at a distance from him. Damages:
When Pedro was closing his umbrella at the platform of the bus when the driver of
Only net earnings are considered: Earnings less expenses necessary in the
the bus prematurely stepped on the accelerator and did not wait for Pedro to first
creation of the earnings and minus living expenses.
secure his seat considering also that the platform was at that time, slippery and wet
due to the drizzle.
Note: bus conductor testified that a passenger was alighting to he signaled the
driver. They saw an umbrella and he signaled again. The driver stopped and
ISSUE: Whether the bus is liable as a common carrier to the deceased who was still
Cudiamat was already lying down about 3 meters from the back of the bus.
attempting to board - YES

HELD:

Common carriers are liable for injuries suffered by boarding passengers resulting
from the sudden jerking of their conveyances.
Once it stops, a public utility bus is in effect making a continuous offer to bus
riders. It is the duty of the driver and conductor to do no act that would
increase the peril to a passenger attempting to board the bus.

You might also like