Professional Documents
Culture Documents
First step involves reduction of metal ions and nucleation of reduce metal. This step is
known as activation phase. In 2nd step the small adjacent nanoparticles spontaneously coalesce
nucleation and growth, and further metal ion reduction; a process referred to as Ostwald
This step is called growth phase. The 3rd step is termination phase which gives the final shape of
There are also some other factors which affect the formation of metal ions into
nanoparticles. These factors include reaction mixture pH, incubation temperature, reaction time,
There are many physical approaches but most important among them are evaporation-
condensation and laser ablation. Different nanoparticles like silver, gold, lead sulfide, cadmium
Physical methods have advantages over chemical methods because of absence of solvent
contamination in prepared thin films and also nanoparticles distribution is uniform. Physical
method has some disadvantages in synthesizing nanoparticles using tube furnace at atmospheric
pressure, for example tube furnace occupies a large space, consumes a great amount of energy
while raising the environmental temperature around the source material, and requires a great deal
of time to achieve thermal stability. Further tube furnace requires power consumption more than
several kilowatts and a preheating time of several tens of minutes to reach a stable operating
Nanoparticles could also be synthesized using a small ceramic heater with a local heating
source. The evaporated vapor cools down at suitable rapid rate because in comparison with
temperature of tube furnace, the temperature gradient in vicinity of heater surface is very steep.
This gives formation of nanoparticles in high concentration. This physical method can be useful
as a nanoparticle generator for long-term experiments for inhalation toxicity studies, and as a
Silver nanoparticles can also be synthesized by laser ablation of metallic bulk materials in
solution [33-37]. The ablation efficiency and the characteristics of produced nanosilver particles
depend upon many factors such as the wavelength of the laser impinging the metallic target, the
duration of the laser pulses (in the femto-, pico- and nanosecond regime), the laser fluence, the
ablation time duration and the effective liquid medium, with or without the presence of
surfactants [38-41].
Chemical reduction of sliver metal ions by organic and inorganic reducing agents is most
commonly used method to synthesize silver nanoparticles. There were different reducing agents
such as sodium citrate, ascorbate, sodium borohydride (NaBH4), elemental hydrogen, polyol
process, Tollens reagent, N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and poly (ethylene glycol)-block
Copolymers were used for reduction of silver ions (Ag+) in aqueous or non-aqueous solutions.
These reducing agents reduced silver ions (Ag+) and give the formation of metallic silver (Ag0),
which was then followed by agglomeration into oligomeric clusters. These clusters eventually
Dodecanethiol capped silver nanoparticles were prepared using Brust procedure [45],
based on a phase transfer of an Au3+ complex from aqueous to organic phase in a two-phase
dodecanethiol as a stabilizing agent, binding onto the nanoparticles surfaces, thereby avoiding
their aggregation and making them soluble in certain solvents. It was reported that small changes
in synthetic factors gives interesting modifications in nanoparticle structure, average size, size
moieties, piperazine rings, tertiary amine groups and the hyper-branched structure in HPAMAM-
N(CH3)2 were found important due to its stabilizing and reducing abilities [47].
laponite clay suspensions which act as a stabilizing agent for preventing nanoparticles from
aggregation. These nanoparticles were studied as a function of UV irradiation time. When these
particles were irradiated under UV for 3 h, bimodal size distribution and relatively large silver
nanoparticles were obtained. When further irradiation was performed silver nanoparticles were
disintegrated into smaller sizes with a single distribution mode until a relatively stable size and
Silver nanoparticles (nanosphere, nanowire, and dendrite) were also prepared by an ultraviolet
and stabilizing agent). Concentration of both poly(vinylalcohol) and silver nitrate played
method could be used for converting silver nanospheres into triangular silver nanocrystals
(nanoprisms) with desired edge lengths in the range of 30-120 nm [51]. Growth of these particles
sulfonate) were used as stabilizing agents. Silver nanoparticles were also prepared by a very fast
ions to metallic silver [52]. Silver nanoparticles were also synthesized by several irradiation
methods. Silver nanoparticles of well-defined shape and size distribution were prepared by laser
sensitization synthetic method. Low laser powers at short irradiation times produced silver
nanoparticles of approximately 5 nm. Silver nanoparticles were also synthesized by using laser
and mercury lamp as a light source [54]. The photo-sensitized growth of silver nanoparticles was
performed using thiophene (sensitizing dye) and silver nanoparticle formation by illumination of
A simple one-step method called tollens method was used to synthesize silver
nanoparticles of controllable size. That green synthesis technique involved the reduction of
Ag(NH3)2+ (as a Tollens reagent) by an aldehyde [56]. In the modified Tollens procedure, silver
ions were reduced by saccharides in the presence of ammonia, which yields silver nanoparticle
films (50-200 nm), silver hydrosols (20-50 nm) and silver nanoparticles of different shapes. The
concentration of ammonia and nature of reducing agent plays important role in controlling size
temperature, by simply mixing the corresponding metal ions with reduced polyoxometalates
which act as reducing and stabilizing agents. Polyoxometalates were soluble in water and had the
structure. It was reported that silver nanoparticles could be produced by illuminating a deaerated
or 2,4-dichlorophenol) [57]. Furthermore it was also reported the green chemistry-type one-step
In recent years, silver nanoparticles of desired morphology and size prepared by green
chemistry method, becomes major focus for researchers in which natural reducing, stabilizing
and capping agents were used. Biological methods can be used to synthesize silver nanoparticles
without the use of any harsh, toxic and expensive chemical substances [59-62]. The mostly used
silver ions with a culture supernatant of nonpathogenic bacterium, Bacillus licheniformis [63].
Moreover, bacterium Bacillus licheniformis were used to synthesize well dispersed silver
reported using the reduction of aqueous Ag+ ions by culture supernatants of Klebsiella
pneumonia, E. coli, and Enterobacter cloacae (Enterobacteriacae) [64]. The preparation process
was very fast and silver nanoparticles were synthesized within 5 minutes of silver ions coming in
contact with the cell filtrate. It seems that nitroreductase enzymes might be responsible for
evidence of flocculation of the particles even a month after the reaction [65]. Proteins stabilizing
silver nanoparticles might be responsible for the long-term stability of silver nanoparticles. The
triangular shapes.
Stable silver nanoparticles were prepared by using Aspergillus flavus [66]. These
nanoparticles were stable in water for more than 3 months with no aggregation because of
surface binding of stabilizing materials secreted by the fungus [67]. Extracellular biosynthesis of
silver nanoparticles using Aspergillus fumigatus was also investigated. TEM results showed
well-dispersed silver nanoparticles (5-25 nm) with variable shapes. Most of them were spherical
in nature with some others having occasionally triangular shapes [68]. Extracellular filtrate of
Cladosporium cladosporioides biomass was used to synthesize silver nanoparticles [69]. It was
reported that proteins, organic acids and polysaccharides released by C. cladosporioides were
It was also reported that penicillium sp. J3 isolated from soil was able to produce silver
nanoparticles [70]. The bioreduction of silver ions occurred on the surface of the cells and
proteins might play a critical role in formation and stabilization of the synthesized nanoparticles.
Camellia sinensis (green tea) extract was used as a reducing and stabilizing agent for the
reported that when the amount of C. sinensis extract was increased, the resulted nanoparticles
were slightly larger and more spherical. Phenolic acid type biomolecules (e.g., caffeine and
theophylline) present in the C. sinensis extract seemed to be responsible for the formation and
stabilization of silver nanoparticles. Black tea leaf extract was used for the synthesis of silver
nanoparticles. These nanoparticles were stable and had different shapes, such as spheres,
trapezoids, prisms, and rods. Polyphenols and flavonoids seemed to be responsible for the
High density of extremely stable silver nanoparticles (16-40 nm) were synthesized by
challenging silver ions with Datura metel (Solanaceae) leaf extract [73]. The leaf extracts of this
compounds, and polysaccharides which could be used as reductant to react with silver ions, and
therefore used as scaffolds to direct the formation of silver nanoparticles in the solution. Stable
silver nanoparticles with average particle size ranging from 15 to 500 nm could be synthesized
extracellularly from Pinus desiflora, Diospyros kaki, Ginko biloba, Magnolia kobus and Platanus
orientalis leaf broths. It was noticed that M. kobus and D. kaki leaf broths, the synthesis rate and
final conversion to silver nanoparticles was faster, when the reaction temperature was increased.
But the average particle sizes produced by D. kaki leaf broth decreased from 50 nm to 16 nm,
when temperature was increased from 25 C to 95 C. It was also concluded that only 11 min
was required for more than 90% conversion at the reaction temperature of 95 C using M. kobus
Silver ions could be reduced to silver nanoparticles of different shapes by using leaf
extracts from the aquatic medicinal plant, Nelumbo nucifera (Nymphaeaceae). These synthesized
nanoparticles showed larvicidal activities against malaria (Anopheles subpictus) and filariasis
(Culex quinquefasciatus) vectors [75]. Sorbus aucuparia leaf extract were used to biosynthesized
silver nanoparticles within 15 min. These nanoparticles were found stable for more than 3
months. The sorbate ion in the leaf extract of S. aucuparia seemed to be responsible for the
Silver and gold nanoparticles have been studied extensively due to their optical, electrochemical,
and electronic properties [7779]. During the synthesis of these nanoparticles, one should also
care about their agglomeration. To get rid of agglomeration surface coating is required. Many
stabilizing species have been studied including molecules with carboxylic acids, thiol groups,
stabilization against agglomeration, conducting polymers were used because they increase
comes out to be very interesting material because it is environmental friendly and have high
conductivity and can easily be obtained [89-91]. PPy shows well characterized electrochromic
behavior due to the tunable nature of highest occupied molecular orbital and the lowest
unoccupied molecular orbital, which allows for the modulation of its optical and electrical
properties [88].
through a redox reaction between pyrrole and silver nitrate [86]. PPy-Agnanop nanocomposites
were also synthesized at the interface of water and ionic liquid using one-step UV-induced
polymerization [92].
References
Narayanan, K. B.; Sakthivel, N. Adv. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2010, 22, (156), 113.
Gan, P. P.; Ng, S. H.; Huang, Y.; Li, S. F. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 132135.
Raveendran, P.; Fu, J.; Wallen, S. L. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, (46) ,1394013941.
Sharma, H. S.; Ali, S. F.; Hussain, S. M.; Schlager, J. J.; Sharma, A. J. Nanosci.
Narayanan, S.; Sathy, B. N.; Mony, U.; Koyakutty, M.; Nair, S. V.; Menon, D. ACS.
Govindaraju, K.; Khaleel, Basha, S.; Ganesh, Kumar, V.; Singaravelu, G. J. Materials
Lengke, M. F.; Fleet, M. E.; Southam, G. Langmuir. 2007, 23, (5), 26942699.
Kowshik, M.; Deshmukh, N.; Vogel, W.; Urban, J.; Kulkarni, S.K.; Paknikar, K.
Rautaray, D.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, (48), 1465614657.
Anshup, A.; Venkataraman, J. S.; Subramaniam, C.; Kumar, R. R.; Priya, S.; Kumar, T.
R.; Omkumar, R. V.; John, A.; Pradeep, T. Langmuir. 2005, 21, (25), 1156211567.
Njagi, E. C.; Huang, H.; Stafford, L.; Genuino, H.; Galindo, H. M.; Collins, J. B.; Hoag,
Gardea-Torresdey, J. L.; Parsons, J.; Gomez, E.; Peralta-Videa, J.; Troiani, H.; Santiago,
Manceau, A.; Nagy, K. L.; Marcus, M. A.; Lanson, M.; Geoffroy, N.; Jacquet, T.;
Ghosh, S.; Patil, S.; Ahire, M.; Kitture, R.; Gurav, D. D.; Jabgunde, A. M.; Kale, S.;
Pardesi, K.; Shinde, V.; Bellare, J., J. Nanobiotechnology. 2012, 10, 17.
Khan, M.; Adil, S. F.; Tahir, M. N.; Tremel, W.; Alkhathlan, H. Z.; Al-Warthan, A.;
Shiv, Shankar, S.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19, 16271631.
Shiv, Shankar, S.; Ahmad, A.; Pasricha, R.; Sastry, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 1822
1846.
Shiv, Shankar, S.; Rai, A.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2004, 275,
496502.
Maensiri, S.; Laokul, P.; Klinkaewnarong, J.; Prokha, S.; Promark, V.; Seraphin,
1675.
Glusker, J.; Katz, A.; Bock, C., Rigak. J. 1999, 16, (2), 816.
Selvakannan, P.; Mandal, S.; Phadtare, S.; Gole, A.; Pasricha, R.; Adyanthaya, S. D.;
Willett, R. L.; Baldwin, K. W.; West, K. W.; Pfeiffer, L. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005,
Kruis, F.; Fissan, H.; Rellinghaus, B. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 2000, 69, 329-324
Magnusson, M.; Deppert, K.; Malm, J.; Bovin, J.; Samuelson, L. J. Nanoparticle Res.
1999, 1, 243-251
Jung, J.; Oh, H.; Noh, H.; Ji, J.; Kim, S. J. Aerosol Sci. 2006, 37, 1662-1670
Mafune, F.; Kohno, J.; Takeda, Y.; Kondow, T.; Sawabe, H. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001,
105, 5114-5120
Mafune, F.; Kohno, J.; Takeda, Y.; Kondow, T., Sawabe, H. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000, 104,
8333-8337
Sylvestre, J. P.; Kabashin, A. V.; Sacher, E.; Meunier, M.; Luong, J. H. T. J. Am. Chem.
Kim, S.; Yoo, B.; Chun, K.; Kang, W.; Choo, J.; Gong, M.; Joo, S. J. Mol. Catal. A.
Link, S.; Burda, C.; Nikoobakht, B.; El-Sayed, M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000, 104, 6152
6163
Tarasenko, N.; Butsen, A.; Nevar, E.; Savastenko, N. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 252, 4439-
4444
Wiley, B.; Sun, Y.; Mayers, B.; Xi, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 454-463
Merga, G.; Wilson, R.; Lynn, G.; Milosavljevic, B.; Meisel, D. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007,
111, 1222012226
Brust, M.; Kiely, C. Colloids Surf. A. Phys. Eng. Aspects. 2002, 202, 175-186
Oliveira, M.; Ugarte, D.; Zanchet, D.; Zarbin, A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 292, 429-
435
Zhang, Y.; Peng, H.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, D. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 325,
371-376
Zhou, Y.; Yu, S. H.; Wang, C. Y.; Li, X. G.; Zhu, Y. R.; Chen, Z. Y. Advanced
Shchukin, D. G.; Radtchenko, I. L.; Sukhorukov, G. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2003, 4, 1101
1103
Jin, R.; Cao, Y. C.; Hao, E.; Metraux, G. S.; Schatz, G. C.; Mirkin, C. Nature. 2003, 425,
487490
Malval, J-P.; Jin, M.; Balan, L.; Schneider, R.; Versace, D-L.; Chaumeil, H.; Defoin, A.;
Abid, J. P.; Wark, A. W.; Brevet, P. F.; Girault H. H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 792-793
Eutis, S.; Krylova, G.; Eremenko, A.; Smirnova, N.; Schill, A. W.; El-Sayed, M.
Yin, Y.; Li, Z-Y.; Zhong, Z.; Gates, B.; Venkateswaran, S. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12,
522-527
Troupis, A.; Hiskia, A.; Papaconstantinou, E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1911-1914
Zhang, G.; Keita, B.; Dolbecq, A.; Mialane, P.; Secheresse, F.; F. M.; Nadjo, L. Chem.
Ahmad, A.; Mukherjee, P.; Senapati, S.; Mandal, D.; Khan, M. I.; Kumar, R.; Sastry, M.
Shankar, S. S.; Rai, A.; Ankamwar, B.; Singh, A.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M. Nature
Ankamwar, B.; Damle, C.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2005, 5,
1665-1671
Huang, J.; Li, Q.; Sun. D.; Lu, Y.; Su, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Shao, W.; He,
Shahverdi, A. R.; Minaeian, S.; Shahverdi, H. R.; Jamalifar, H.; Nohi, A. Process
Ahmad, A.; Mukherjee, P.; Senapati, S.; Mandal, D.; Khan, M. I.; Kumar, R.; Sastry, M.
Bhainsa, K. C.; DSouza, S. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2006, 47, 160-164
Balaji, D. S.; Basavaraja, S.; Deshpande, R.; Bedre Mahesh, D.; Prabhakar, B. K.;
Maliszewska, I.; Szewczyk, K.; Waszak, K. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2009,
146, 1-6
3105
Begum, N. A.; Mondal, S.; Basu, S.; Laskar, R. A.; Mandal, D. Colloids and Surfaces B:
Kesharwani, J.; Yoon, K. Y.; Hwang, J.; Rai, M. Journal of Bionanoscience. 2009, 3, 1-6
Santhoshkumar, T.; Rahuman, A. A.; Rajakumar, G.; Marimuthu, S.; Bagavan, A.;
Jayaseelan, C.; Zahir, A. A.; Elango, G.; Kamaraj, C. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 108, 693-702
Dubey, S. P.; Lahtinen, M.; Srkk, H.; Sillanp, M. Colloids and Surfaces B:
Prodan, E.; Radloff, C.; Halas, N. J.; Nordlander, P. Science. 2003, 302, (5644), 419422,
Germany, 1995.
Bohren, C. F.; Huffman, D. R., Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles,
Masala, O.; Seshadri, R. Annual Review of Materials Research. 2004, 34, 4181.
Han, Y.; Jiang, J.; Lee, S. S.; Ying, J. Y. Langmuir. 2008, 24, (11), 58425848.
Dallas, P.; Niarchos, D.; Vrbanic, D. et al. Polymer. 2007, 48, (7), 20072013.
Chen, W.; Li, C. M.; Ming Chen, P.; Sun, C. Q. Electrochimica Acta. 2007, 52, (8),
28452849.
Liu, F.; Yuan, Y.; Li, L. et al. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2014, 69, 232236.
Loguercio, L. F.; Alves, C. C.; Thesing, A.; Ferreira, J. Physical Chemistry Chemical
(101).
Omastova, M.; Mosnackova, K.; Fedorko, P.; Trchova, M.; Stejskal, J. Synthetic
302.
Wei, Y.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Pan, G.; Yan, G.; Yu, X. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2010, 5,
(2), 433437.