Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SECTION - I
Q.1 Objective Type Questions: 15
A) Match the Following: (i vi) 06
Probable
Q. Write Your
Answer
No.: Answer Here
Keys
i. Values a) Corporate standards of behavior i. -
expected of professionals.
ii. Peace b) Code of Values ii. -
iii. Patriotism c) Universal Value iii. -
iv. Civil Values d) Creates complexity in society iv. -
v. Democratic e) Social Value v. -
Values
vi. Professional f) Motivating Power behind vi. -
Ethics purposeful action
g) Provides platform for open
dialogues and debates
h) Learn to respect as citizen
i) social system that shares a set of
common values
xi. _____________is the branch of study dealing with what is the proper course of action for
man.
A. Ethics B. Values C. Moral D. None of these
SECTION - II
Q.2 Discuss the significance of Values and Ethics in our life with suitable examples. 10
OR
Q.2 Differentiate between Values and Ethics. Give suitable examples. 10
Q.3 What is Universal Values? Describe any four core Universal Values. 10
Q.4 Discuss your reasons for the necessity of Value Education in Academic Institutions. 10
OR
Q.4 What is Organizational Ethics? Discuss the components of Organizational Ethics. 10
Q.5 What is Ethical Leadership? Write a note on Swami Vivekananda as an Ethical Leader. 10
Isobel Stevenson Peter, a 32 year old, suffered horrific injuries as the result of the collapse of
a bridge over which he was driving his car. He has been classified as being in a persistent
brain dead state for the past five years. Although Peters brain stem is still functioning, his
heart is beating and he can breathe spontaneously, he is dependent on oral feeding for the
continuation of his life. The doctors in charge of his case have come to the decision that
Peters life is no longer of value to him and have requested that they be allowed to withdraw
his food supply. It is legal for doctors to withdraw medical support, however, feeding a
patient is regarded as part of palliative care and not a medical treatment. Peters parents have
taken the case to court in order to prevent his doctors from withdrawing his feeding tubes.
The debate over whether to withdraw Peters food supply in the above case arises from the
conflicting values of his parents and his doctors. Peters perspective is central to evaluating
the case; the withdrawal of his feeding tubes violates his right to life. The constraint of
Peters role is that being in a persistent vegetative state, he is unable to exercise his autonomy
and indicate what value he believes should be placed on his life.
Questions
1. What decision would you advise the judges to make in this case? Why? 8
2. How would you justify doctors decision of withdrawing medical support of Isobel? 7
Justify your answer in context of professional ethics?
____________________________________________________________________________________