Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Robert Brkljaa & Sylvia Urban (2011): RECENT ADVANCEMENTS IN HPLC-NMR
AND APPLICATIONS FOR NATURAL PRODUCT PROFILING AND IDENTIFICATION, Journal of Liquid
Chromatography & Related Technologies, 34:13, 1063-1076
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation
that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any
instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary
sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings,
demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 34:10631076, 2011
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 1082-6076 print/1520-572X online
DOI: 10.1080/10826076.2011.587748
& This review provides a summary of the recent advances in high pressure liquid chromato-
graphy (HPLC) coupled to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Significant improve-
ments have included the miniaturization of NMR components as well as the use of cryogenically
cooled probes. Further hyphenated applications such as HPLC-SPE-NMR, column trapping and
HPLC-NMR-MS are also discussed. Finally, an overview of the application of these methodologies
to the profiling and dereplication of natural products is provided.
INTRODUCTION
High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (HPLC-NMR) was developed in
1978[1] but has taken many years to evolve and become a more routine
method for analysis. The initial draw-back for the hyphenated technique
included the initial high costs and the lack of sensitivity.[1] Over the years,
developments in probe design and suppression techniques have enabled
it to evolve into an effective method for principle component mixture
analysis.[1]
HPLC-NMR has various modes of operation, the two primary being
on-flow and stop-flow, respectively.[2] On-flow HPLC-NMR acquires solely
1
H NMR data and, as such, is most suitable for rapid identification of prin-
ciple components. Stop-flow HPLC-NMR allows for longer acquisitions to
HPLC-NMR-MS
HPLC-NMR provides invaluable spectroscopic data (UV profiles and
NMR spectra), which is crucial in identifying compounds. Unfortunately,
in many instances, NMR data alone (in conjunction with the UV data
obtained from the HPLC) is insufficient to completely identify a com-
pound, especially for new chemical entities. Further information such as
mass spectrometry (MS) can assist further in compound identification.
Previously MS had to be conducted off-line and separately from the
HPLC-NMR process. However, in recent years, successful hyphenation of
HPLC-NMR-MS has been achieved whereby all of the NMR and MS data
is obtained in a single acquisition.[19] The HPLC-NMR-MS hyphenation
technique utilizes a splitter to divert the eluant from the HPLC column
to both the NMR flow probe and to the MS [2] and this set-up is known
as a parallel configuration (Figure 3).[20]
Owing to the vast differences in the sensitivities of MS and NMR, the
splitter is set-up to divert considerably higher amounts of the analyte to
1068 R. Brkljaca and S. Urban
Downloaded by [University of Western Cape] at 15:16 18 November 2012
FIGURE 3 Schematic of HPLC-NMR-MS showing parallel (A) and series (B) configurations.
the NMR than the MS. Using a splitting ratio of 20:1 allows for the MS to
operate at optimal conditions and for sufficient amounts of the analyte
to be detected by the NMR spectrometer.[20]
HPLC-NMR-MS can also be run in the series configuration (Figure 3)
whereby the splitter and MS are placed after the NMR spectrometer.[20]
This set up has the advantage of being a simpler system which can be easily
disconnected to allow for separate NMR and MS analyses to be conduc-
ted.[20] The disadvantage of the series configuration in HPLC-NMR-MS is
that it introduces the opportunity for the peaks to disperse or for the reten-
tion times of the peaks to drift as they reach the MS.[20] Despite which con-
figuration is employed, HPLC-NMR-MS is unquestionably a powerful and
valuable technique for both rapid compound identification=profiling and
for complex mixture analysis.
FIGURE 5 2D-HPLC-NMR contour plot with extracted WET-1D 1H NMR of isoallolaurinterol (2).
1070 R. Brkljaca and S. Urban
NMR analysis to resolve the two closely eluting secondary metabolites (5)
and (6).[21]
These analyses were able to demonstrate successful natural product
profiling using crude extracts for the HPLC-NMR analyses, whereas others
have demonstrated the use of enriched fractions in their HPLC-NMR
studies.[24]
CapNMR Analyses
In 2005, CapNMR was successful in identifying thirteen new
steroids from fireflies such as compound (13) (Figure 9).[27] Using this
methodology, 2D NMR data could be acquired for each fraction of
interest.[27]
CapNMR has also been used successfully to identify new halichondrin
derivatives from a New Zealand marine sponge, Lissodendoryx sp.[28] This
particular sponge had previously been investigated, but as a result of the
improvements in NMR sensitivity (acquisition of the CapNMR probe), the
sponge extract was re-examined. This resulted in four new halichondrin
Downloaded by [University of Western Cape] at 15:16 18 November 2012
FIGURE 10 Chemical structures of halichondrin B (18) and the new halichondrin derivatives (1417).
Natural Product Profiling and Identification Advancements 1073
HPLC-SPE-NMR Analyses
In 2007 HPLC-SPE-NMR was applied for the rapid identification of the
major constituents in the plant Hubertia sp., including three new quinic
acids (19), (20), and (21) (Figure 11).[15]
Also in 2007, it was demonstrated that the HPLC-SPE-NMR technique
was able to identify and determine structures of compounds comprising
<0.5% of the extract.[29]
A 2008 study, which focused on the metabolism of a synthesized com-
pound, was able to successfully demonstrate the use of a HPLC-SPE-
NMR-MS system. New compounds formed after metabolism were identified
Downloaded by [University of Western Cape] at 15:16 18 November 2012
HPLC-NMR-MS Analyses
In 2008, a parallel HPLC-NMR-MS system was utilized to identify active
metabolites in Fischerella ambigua, a strain of cyanobacteria.[10] A bioactive
FIGURE 11 Chemical structures of the three new quinic acids (1921) identified from the plant
Hubertia sp.
1074 R. Brkljaca and S. Urban
CONCLUSION
The incorporation of the advancements in HPLC-NMR have enabled
the methodology to become a robust and powerful technique for rapidly
profiling and dereplicating mixtures such as natural product extracts and
enriched fractions. It is now possible to determine chemical structures from
much smaller quantities and this, in turn, has resulted in the identification
of a number of new compounds. The recent advancements have also
reduced analysis time, allowing for faster throughput of samples.
HPLC-NMR is an especially relevant methodology to employ in the study
of unstable or light sensitive compounds. A search conducted in the
Scifinder database clearly indicates that the number of publications utiliz-
ing HPLC-NMR and closely related hyphenated spectroscopic techniques,
as discussed in this review, have steadily increased since its development
and implementation. A review of the application of HPLC-NMR methodol-
ogies tends to suggest that interest peaked in approximately 2003, but has
not shown any signs of abating. It is expected that further future advance-
ments in the hyphenated technique will also have a large impact on the
ability to employ the methodology even more successfully, with further
improvements to the limits of detection anticipated.
REFERENCES
1. Urban, S.; Separovic, F. Developments in Hyphenated Spectroscopic Methods in Natural Product
Profiling. Front. Drug Des. Discovery 2005, 1, 113166.
2. Cazes, J. Encyclopedia of Chromatography, 3rd ed., CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2010.
3. Urban, S. LC-NMR: Profiling and Dereplication of Natural Product Extracts. Chem. Aust. 2006,
73 (8), 1517.
4. Wolfender, J.-L.; Marti, G.; Queiroz, E. F. Advances in Techniques for Profiling Crude Extracts and
for the Rapid Identification of Natural Products: Dereplication, Quality Control and Metabolomics.
Curr. Org. Chem. 2010, 14 (16), 18081832.
5. Corcoran, O.; Spraul, M. LC-NMR-MS in Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8 (14), 624631.
Natural Product Profiling and Identification Advancements 1075
Mannapro XII: 12th International Symposium on Marine Natural Products, Queenstown, New
Zealand, Feb. 49, 2007.
12. Staerk, D.; Lambert, M.; Jaroszewski, J. W. HPLC-NMR Techniques for Plant Extract Analysis. Med.
Plant Biotech. 2007, 1, 2948.
13. Martin, G. E. Small-Volume and High-Sensitivity NMR Probes. Ann. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 2005, 56,
196.
14. Molinski, T. F. Nanomole-Scale Natural Products Discovery. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery 2009, 12 (2),
197206.
15. Sprogoe, K.; Staerk, D.; Jaeger, A. K.; Adsersen, A.; Hansen, S. H.; Witt, M.; Landbo, A.-K. R.; Meyer,
A. S.; Jaroszewski, J. W. Targeted Natural Product Isolation Guided by HPLC-SPE-NMR: Constituents
of Hubertia Species. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70 (9), 14721477.
16. Jaroszewski, J. W. Hyphenated NMR Methods in Natural Products Research, Part 2: HPLC-SPE-NMR
and Other New Trends in NMR Hyphenation. Planta Med. 2005, 71 (9), 795802.
17. Djukovic, D.; Liu, S.; Henry, I.; Tobias, B.; Raftery, D. Signal Enhancement in HPLC=Microcoil NMR
Using Automated Column Trapping. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78 (20), 71547160.
18. Schlotterbeck, G.; Ceccarelli, S. M. LC-SPE-NMR-MS: A Total Analysis System for Bioanalysis. Bio-
analysis 2009, 1 (3), 549559.
19. Down, S. LC-NMR=MS. Spectrosc. Eur. 2004, 16 (3), 8, 10, 12, 14.
20. Yang, Z. Online Hyphenated Liquid Chromatography-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy-
Mass Spectrometry for Drug Metabolite and Nature Product Analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
2006, 40 (3), 516527.
21. Dias, D. A.; Urban, S. Phytochemical Analysis of the Southern Australian Marine Alga, Plocamium
mertensii Using HPLC-NMR. Phytochem. Anal. 2008, 19, 453470.
22. Dias, D. A.; Urban, S. Application of HPLC-NMR for the Rapid Chemical Profiling of a Southern
Australian Sponge, Dactylospongia sp. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32 (4), 542548.
23. Dias, D. A.; White, J. M.; Urban, S. Laurencia filiformis: Phytochemical Profiling by Conventional and
HPLC-NMR Approaches. Nat. Prod. Comm. 2009, 4 (2), 157172.
24. Wolfender, J.-L.; Ndjoko, K.; Hostettmann, K. The Potential of LC-NMR in Phytochemical Analysis.
Phytochem. Anal. 2001, 12, 222.
25. Exarchou, V.; Krucker, M.; van Beek, T. A.; Vervoort, J.; Gerothanassis, I. P.; Albert, K. LC-NMR
Coupling Technology: Recent Advancements and Applications in Natural Products Analysis. Magn.
Reson. Chem. 2005, 43 (9), 681687.
26. Krucker, M.; Lienau, A.; Putzbach, K.; Grynbaum, M. D.; Schuler, P.; Albert, K. Hyphenation of
Capillary HPLC to Microcoil 1H NMR Spectroscopy for the Determination of Tocopherol Homolo-
gues. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76 (9), 26232628.
27. Gronquist, M.; Meinwald, J.; Eisner, T.; Schroeder, F. C. Exploring Uncharted Terrain in Natures
Structure Space Using Capillary NMR Spectroscopy: 13 Steroids from 50 Fireflies. J. Amer. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127 (31), 1081010811.
28. Hickford, S. J. H.; Blunt, J. W.; Munro, M. H. G. Antitumour Polyether Macrolides: Four New
Halichondrins from the New Zealand Deep-Water Marine Sponge Lissodendoryx sp. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2009, 17, 21992203.
1076 R. Brkljaca and S. Urban
29. Lambert, M.; Wolfender, J. -L.; Strk, D.; Christensen, S. B.; Hostettmann, K.; Jaroszewski, J. W. Identification
of Natural Products Using HPLC-SPE Combined with CapNMR. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79 (2), 727735.
30. Ceccarelli, S. M.; Schlotterbeck, G.; Boissin, P.; Binder, M.; Buettelmann, B.; Hanlon, S.; Jaeschke,
G.; Kolczewski, S.; Kupfer, E.; Peters, J.-U.; Porter, R. H. P.; Prinssen, E. P.; Rueher, M.; Ruf, I.;
Spooren, W.; Stampfli, A.; Vieira, E. Metabolite Identification via LC-SPE-NMR-MS of the in vitro
Biooxidation Products of a Lead mGlu5 Allosteric Antagonist and Impact on the Improvement
of Metabolic Stability in the Series. Chem. Med. Chem. 2008, 3 (1), 136144.
31. Mo, S.; Krunic, A.; Chlipala, G.; Orjala, J. Antimicrobial Ambiguine Isonitriles from the Cyanobac-
terium Fischerella ambigua. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72 (5), 894899.
32. Mo, S.; Krunic, A.; Santarsiero, B.; Franzblau, S.; Orjala, J. Hapalindole-Related Alkaloids from the
Cultured Cyanobacterium Fischerella ambigua. Phytochemistry 2010, 71 (1718), 21162123.
Downloaded by [University of Western Cape] at 15:16 18 November 2012