Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, Vol. 66, No.

1, March 2006

Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods

for Itoshima Peninsula Area, Fukuoka, Japan

by

Othoman ALKAEED *, Clariza FLORES **, Kenji JINNO*** and Atsushi TSUTSUMI****

Abstract

Six reference evapotranspiration (ETo) methods are compared, based on their daily
performances under the given climatic condition in the western region of Fukuoka City.
The Penman-Monteith equation standardized by the Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO56-PM) is used to compare with the Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, and Hamon methods.
The FAO56-PM method has also been used as an index for two equations: the solar
radiation (Rs) based and net radiation (Rn) based equations, which are the simplified
versions of FAO56-PM. Performance analysis for the calculated values using
meteorological data for 7 years (Jan 1996 Dec 2002) was made. The standard error of
estimates (SEE) was calculated on monthly basis. The estimated values by the
Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, and the Rs-based and Rn-based radiation methods were
all correlated with FAO56-PM having correlation (r2) values calculated by Pearsons
correlation of 0.80, 0.69, 0.48, 0.71 and 0.45 and their standard error estimates were 0.25 ,
0.25, 0.25, 0.28 and 0.24 mm mon-1, respectively. Proximity in ETo estimates by the
Hargreaves and the Rs-based methods showed that the solar radiation as input variable was
important as the FAO56-PM method. Also, the Thornthwaite method, which uses only
temperature as input variable, has been found to have highly correlated with the
FAO56-PM method. Thus, when considering the availability and reliability of the input
data, the use of all these methods are suggested as practical methods for estimating ETo if
the standard FAO56-PM equation is not applicable due to the complexity of its input
parameters.

Keywords: Reference evapotranspiration by FAO56-PM, Crop evapotranspiration, Water

budget estimation, Crop coefficient, Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System
(AMeDAS)

* Graduate Student, Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering

** Postdoctoral, Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering
*** Professor, Institute of Environmental Systems
**** GEOSCO
2 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

1. Introduction

Efficient consumption of groundwater as agricultural irrigation, drinking water and wineries is an

important issue in Itoshima Peninsula, the western region of Fukuoka City, Japan, where a new campus of
the Kyushu University is under construction. It is anticipated that the construction of the new campus
could reduce the groundwater flow toward the residential area, unless appropriate countermeasures are
taken.
Evapotranspiration (ET) is the loss of water to the atmosphere by the combined processes of
evaporation from the soil and plant surface and transpiration from plants 1). Estimation of
evapotranspiration is one of the major hydrological components for determining the water budget and is
becoming indispensable for the calculation of a reliable recharge and evaporation rate for the groundwater
flow analysis. It is therefore, reliable and consistent estimate of evapotranspiration is of great importance
for the management of water resources efficiently.
Quantification of referable reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for short grass is necessary in the
context of many issues, for example, crop production, management of water resources, scheduling of
irrigation, evaluation of the effects of changing land use on water yields, and environmental assessment 2).
In the neighboring area including the new Kyushu University campus, groundwater is consumed for
greenhouse by 700 m3d-1, for houses by 400 m3d-1, and a few 10 m3 d-1 for wineries. However, with the
construction of the new Kyushu University campus, it is anticipated that this may cause the reduction in
the groundwater flow toward the residential area unless proper groundwater management measures are
considered. Besides, the urbanization in the surrounding area may also induce the potential effect on the
local hydrologic cycle in the future. Thus, the water budget analysis is indispensable for the surface runoff
and groundwater flow analyses. It is in this regard that the reliable and consistent estimates of
evapotranspiration have to be investigated in order to understand the characteristics of the water
movement in the new campus as well as the surrounding area.
Tsutsumi et al. (2004) applied the Thornthwaite method in order to estimate the monthly crop
evapotranspiration (ETc) in the study area based on the measured mean monthly temperature. However,
uncertain estimate with this method in winter gave relatively small values. Therefore, it is worthwhile to
examine the other methods to compare with the obtained values by the Thornthwaite method in this area.
Kondo et al. (1992) presented ETc particularly in the forestry area of Japan using the heat
balance-bulk method. They showed the method which includes the effect of transpiration and direct
evaporation of the intercepted rainfall of the forest canopy. As a result, the crop evapotranspiration from
the forest in Fukuoka area accounted for 860 mm yr-1 in 1992. It should be notified that the method
developed by Kondo et al. (1992) is useful because the rainfall interception can be evaluated in their
approach and applicable for the subsequent estimation of the rainwater infiltration and surface runoff
components 3), 4). It is obvious that the estimation of rainfall interception is important for the assessment of
the possible effect of deforestation on the regional hydrologic cycle.
Based on the Thorthwaites method, Tsutsumi et al. (2004) proposed a scheme to estimates the spatial
distribution of the ETc by coupling the conventional rainwater infiltration model with the groundwater
flow analysis in the study area. They found that the mean special ETc over the study area was 831 mm yr-1
in 1999. However, the ETc calculated by the Thorthwaite method gave remarkable inconsistent vales in
winter.
Since direct measurement of referable ETo for short grass is difficult, time consuming and costly, the
most practical approach would be to estimate ETo from climatic variables, such as solar radiation, air
temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity. In connection with, various methods are available for
 Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods 3

estimating ETo, involving equations ranging from the most complex energy balance method requiring
detailed climatological data (Allen, 1989) to simpler method requiring less data (Hargreaves, 1982;
Samani, 1985). Among them, the FAO-56 based on the Penman-Monteith (PM) method
(Allen et al., 1998) is currently used and is considered to be a standard method 8). However, the major
drawback of FAO56-PM method is that this method requires air temperature, relative humidity, wind
speed, and solar radiation which could not be easily available in many meteorological stations particularly
in a given location where quality of data and difficulties in gathering all of the necessary weather
parameters can present serious limitations 9). Additionally, it also uses the complicated unit conversions
and lengthy calculations 10). On the other hand, the Thornthwaite method is considered to be a popular
method since it only requires monthly average air temperature. Mintz and Walker (1993) stated that the
Thornthwaite method was developed for temperature measured under potential conditions and it only
represents the potential evaporation when there is no soil moisture stress. Hence, this method tends to
overestimate the potential evaporation in arid regions if air surface temperature is applied. The Hargreaves
method is also quite simpler that requires only two climatic parameters: the temperature and incident
radiation. This method has been tested using some high quality lysimeter data and broad range in
climatological conditions (Hargreaves, 1994) whose results revealed as nearly accurate as PM in
estimating ETo. Therefore, the use of the Hargreaves method is recommended in cases where reliable data
are lacking. The Hamon method is also considered as one of the simplest estimates of ETo 13), and
applicable to estimate seasonal (monthly) or annual values. Haith and Shoemaker (1987) stated that the
Hamon method is applicable easily since it requires only average number of daylight hours per day and
saturated vapor pressure. Irmak et al. (2003) simplified the FAO56-PM method by expressing a
multi-linear regression function which requires less input parameters and computation. This uses only the
solar radiation (Rs), net radiation (Rn) and mean daily temperature (Tm) as input parameters to estimate the
ETo.
Although, many approaches have been developed and adapted for various applications based on
available input data, there is still a remarkable range of uncertainty related to which method is to be
adopted specifically in the calculation of reference evapotranspiration for short grass at a given area. Thus,
for the purposes of establishing a common method which can provide a more accurate ETo estimation,
these estimation methods were researched on the basis of their variability in input variables. The
performances of these methods were evaluated and compared with the FAO56-PM for estimating the ETo
particularly at the new Kyushu University Campus area whose meteorological properties are
characterized as having high humidity and heavy precipitation.
Besides, the crop coefficient for the forest canopy was discussed through the comparisons of the
presented values for the forest in the Fukuoka areas with the reference values calculated by the above six
methods.

2. Methodology

2.1 Study area and climatic characteristics

Figure 1 shows the study area (Itoshima peninsula) including new campus of Kyushu University,
located in the northern part of Kyushu Island, western region of Fukuoka City, Japan, latitude 33o 25 to
33o 40 N, longitude 130o 07 30 to 130o 16 E.
4 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

Fig. 1 Study area (Itoshima).

The total area of Itoshima is about 111.61 km2. The climate in the area is characterized as having high
humidity, high wind speed, and heavy precipitation. The meteorological data in the present study were
obtained from the Maebaru Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System (AMeDAS) station in
Maebaru City, Fukuoka, Japan, which is close to the new Kyushu University Campus,
(latitude 33o 33 36 N, longitude 130o 11 30 N) within an agricultural area. The average annual
precipitation is 1646 mm yr-1(1996-2002), approximately more than 50% of which occurs in June-August.
Air temperature ranges from 19.2oC and 31.1oC in summer and 1.7oC and 15.4oC in winter months. Daily
mean temperature in summer is 23.3 oC and 9.6 oC in winter. On the other hand, daily mean minimum and
maximum relative humidity are 37% and 92% with annual average of 67%, respectively. The observed
maximum and average daily wind speed in this period were 4.5 m s-1 and 2.8 m s-1 3).

2.2 Equations
2.2.1 The (FAO56) Penman-Monteith equation
The (FAO56) Penman-Monteith equation for predicting ETo where applied on 24-h calculation time
steps has the form:
900
0.408 ( Rn G ) + u 2 (e s e a )
ETo = T + 273 (1)
+ (1 + 0.34u 2 )

Where ETo is reference evapotranspiration [mm day-1], Rn is net radiation at the crop surface
[MJ m-2 day-1], G is soil heat flux density [MJ m-2 day-1], T is mean daily air temperature at 2 m height
[C], u2 is wind speed at 2 m height [m s-1], es is saturation vapour pressure [kPa], ea is actual vapour
pressure [kPa], es-ea is saturation vapour pressure deficit [kPa], is slope vapour pressure curve
[kPa C-1], and is psychrometric constant [kPa C-1]. In application having 24-h calculation time steps, G
is presumed to be 0 and es is computed as
 Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods 5

e 0 (Tmax ) + e 0 (Tmin )
es = (2)
2

Where e0( ) is the saturation vapor function and Tmax and Tmin are the daily maximum and minimum air
temperature. The FAO Penman-Monteith equation predicts the evapotranspiration from a hypothetical
grass reference surface that is 0.12 m in height having a surface resistance of 70 s m-1 and albedo of 0.23.
The equation provides a standard to which evapotranspiration in different periods of the year or in other
regions can be computed and to which the evapotranspiration from other crops can be related.
Standardized equations for computing all parameters in Eq. (1) are given in Allen et al. (1994ab, 1998) or
Smith et al. (1991), 15).

2.2.2 Thornthwaite equation

The Thornthwaite equation given by (Thornthwaite, W. 1948) is
a
10Ti N 1
ET0 = 16 (3)
I 12 30
1.514
12
T
I = i (4)
i =1 5

(
a = 492390 + 17920 I 771I 2 + 0.675 I 3 10 6 ) (5)

where, Ti is the mean monthly temperature [C], N is the mean monthly sunshine hour. The main
advantage of this method is that only the temperature information is needed besides the sunshine hours.
Generally, it is known that the Thornthwaite method gives the underestimate in the arid area while the
overestimate in the humid area, respectively.

2.2.3 Hargreaves equation

The Hargreaves et al. (1985) equation is expressed as

ETo = 0.0023(Tm + 17.8) Tmax Tmin Ra( ) (6)

where Tm is daily mean air temperature [C], Tmax is daily maximum air temperature [C], Tmin is daily
minimum air temperature [C], and Ra is extraterrestrial radiation [MJ m-2 day-1]. The mean air
temperature in the Hargreaves equation is calculated as an average of Tmax and Tmin and Ra is computed
from information on location of the site and time of the year. Therefore air temperature is the only
parameter that needs to be measured continuously in order to use Eq. (6) 17).

2.2.4 Hamon equation

The Hamon equation given by (Haith, D. A. and Shoemaker, L. L., 1987) is expressed as

2.1 H t es
2
ETo = (7)
(Tmean + 273.2)
where Ht [day] is average number of daylight hours per day.
6 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

2.2.5 Solar radiation (Rs) based method (Irmak et al., 2003)

ETo = 0.611 + 0.149 Rs + 0.079Tmean (8)

where Rs [MJ m-2 day-1] is solar shortwave radiation.

2.2.6 Net radiation (Rn) based method (Irmak et al., 2003)

ETo = 0.489 + 0.289 Rn + 0.023Tm ean (9)

where Rn [MJ m-2 day-1] is net radiation.

2.3 Climatic parameters required by each equation

One of the important considerations in establishing a simple method other than the standard method
such as the FAO56-PM is the high possibility of unavailability and unreliable weather data measurement
and collections. In general, a setup of the devices for the meteorological measurement at the remote areas
and at a given location is difficult. With this given scenario, accuracy of data, specifically the data of
advanced input variables such as humidity and radiation would be low. Table 1 shows the data
requirements for the FAO56-PM, Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, and Rs-based and Rn-based
equations, respectively.

Table 1 Comparison of each method in terms of the number of parameters required.

method FAO56-PM Thorthwaite Hargreaves Hamon Rs-based Rn-based
radiation radiation
variables
temperature necessary necessary necessary necessary necessary necessary
humidity necessary - - - necessary necessary
wind speed necessary - - - - -
radiation necessary - necessary - necessary necessary
no. of daylight hours - necessary - necessary necessary necessary
saturated vapour necessary - - - - -
pressure

3. Results and Discussions

3.1 Climatic data

The meteorological data of 7 years at the Maebaru AMeDAS station covering the period of January
1996 - December 2002 were analyzed for purposes of calculating evapotranspiration by the different
methods. Figure 2 shows the daily precipitation, temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, solar
radiation and net radiation data used for ETo estimations. The daily solar radiation and net solar radiation
were plotted in Fig 2(e) and Fig. 2(f). They were calculated by the procedures which are presented in the
FAO56-PM estimation 1). These variables are important for the calculation of ETo as required in the
FAO56-PM estimation. The relationship between solar radiation and net solar radiation depicts the same
trend in all years wherein the total solar radiation is doubled of that in the net radiation.
 Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods 7

0 35

C)
P recipitation (m m d -1 )

30

o
30

Average tem perature (

60
90 25
120 20
150 15
180
10
210
240 a 5 d
270 0
0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555 0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555
Time (day) Time (day)

100 35

d -1 )
Relative hum idity (% )

30

2
80

S olar radiation (M J M
25
60 20
40 15
10
d
20
b 5 e
0 0
0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555 0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555
Time (day) Time (day)

10 20
f
d -1 )

c
Wind speed (m s -1 )

8
2

15
Net radiation (M J m

6
10
4

2 5

0 0
0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555 0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 2190 2555
Time (day) Time (day)

Fig. 2 Input parameters used in the calculation of ETo by different ETo estimation methods
(a) precipitation [mm day-1]; (b) relative humidity [%]; (c) wind speed [m s-1];
(d) average temperature [oC]; (e) solar radiation [MJ m-2 day-1]; and, (f) net solar
radiation [MJ m-2 day-1], respectively.

The 7 year-daily weather data were used to validate the performances of the commonly used ETo
estimation methods.
Comparison of monthly ETo values specifically for the Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, Rs-based
and Rn-based equations and are presented in Fig. 3.
 8 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

200 200
a d
FAO56 PM ETo (mm mon-1)

Hamon ETo (mm mon-1)

175 175
150 150
125 125
100 100
75 75
50 50
25 25
0 0
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
Time (mon)
Time (mon)

200 200
Thornthwaite ETo(mm mon-1)

175 b 175 e

Rs ETo (mm mon-1)

150 150
125 125
100 100
75 75
50 50
25 25
0 0
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
Time (mon) Time (mon)

200 200
Hargreaves ETo (mm mon-1)

175 c 175 f
Rn ETo (mm mon-1)

150 150
125 125
100 100
75 75
50 50
25 25
0 0
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
Time (mon) Time (mon)

Fig. 3 Estimated ETo derived from different methods: (a) FAO56-PM (b) Thornthwaite
(c) Hargreaves (d) Hamon (e) Rs-based method (f) Rn-based method. Unit is [mm mon-1].

Although the trends of the estimated ETo are in proximity among the applied methods, it is surprising
that none of the methods show the same results. Seasonal variations in the ETo estimation reflect the
differences in the variables applied in each method. Figure 4 shows the comparisons of annual ETo
estimations.
In the present calculations, the annual sum of ETo estimations based on the solar radiation as input
variable showed the highest value among the tested methods having the values ranged from 957 mm yr-1
in 1999 1042 mm yr-1 in 2000 in Rs-based method, while 1084 mm yr-1 in 1999 1143 mm yr-1 in 2001
for Rn-based method, respectively. The ETo estimations by the Hamon method has the lowest values
ranged from 831 mm yr-1 in 1996 895 mm yr-1 in 1998 whereas the Thorntwaite method is very close
with the FAO56-PM having the values ranged from 845 mm yr-1 in 1996 916 mm yr-1 in 1998,
respectively. The low ETo values obtained by the Hamon and Thornthwaite methods having 831 mm yr-1
and 845 mm yr-1 both in 1996 were found to be close with the ETo estimations reported by Kondo (1992)
et al. and Tsutsumi et al. (2004) of 860 mm in 1992 and 831 mm in 1996 for Fukuoka area.
 Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods 9

FAO56Penman Thornthwaite Hargreave Eto Rs Eto Ra Hamon

1400

1200
Total ETo (mm yr )
-1

1000

800

600

400

200

0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 20002
Time (year)

Fig. 4 Total annual evapotranspiration estimates given by the different methods

covering the 7 year meteorological data obtained from the Maebaru AMeDAS
station, Fukuoka, Japan.

Comparisons of the Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, and the Rs- and Rn- based methods were all
correlated with FAO56-PM having r2 values, which can be calculated using Pearsons correlation
(STATSOFT, Statistica, 1999 Edition), of 0.80, 0.69, 0.48, 0.71 and 0.45 as shown in Fig. 5, respectively.
Results of the ETo estimations by the Hargreaves and Rs-based methods, which use the solar radiation,
and the Thornthwaite method by temperature as input variable, were found to be significantly correlated
with the ETo estimation by the FAO56-PM. This fact implies that these input variables are significant for
obtaining the proximate values in the ETo estimations. When considering the availability and reliability of
the input data, the use of these methods are suggested as practical methods for estimating ETo, if the
standard FAO56-PM equation can not be used due to the complexity of its input parameters.

3.2 Comparison of the performance of different methods relative to FAO56-PM

The performances of the tested methods were analyzed by computing the standard error of estimate
SEE of the monthly ETo between the FAO56-PM and other methods. The SEE is computed following the
equation presented by Irmak et al. (2003) as:

n n n n

2

n x y x y

( ) ( )
i =1
2 i i i i
SEE = 1 n y 2
n
y i =1 i =1


{n(n 2)} i =1 i i =1 i 2
(10)
n

n xi xi
2
n

i =1 i =1
where
xi ; ETo estimated using the FAO56-PM (mm mon-1)
yi ; ETo estimated using other equations (mm mon-1)
10 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

ni; sample size

The lower SEE implies the better performance of the applied method. Table 2 and Fig. 5 show the
calculated average SEE on the monthly basis for all the methods indicating the low values such as 0.25,
0.25, 0.25, 0.28 and 0.24 mm d-1 for the Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, Rs and Rn-based methods,
respectively. The calculated SEE for all the methods shows almost the same values reflecting good
performances as manifested for all the calculation years. The average ratio above and below 1.0 for
different methods indicates over- and underestimation of ETo relative to FAO56-PM method. As shown in
Table 2, the average ratio defined as the ratio of ETo method to ETo FAO56-PM gave the values of 0.89,
1.10, 1.13 and 1.32 and 0.94 for the Thornthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, Rs and Rn-based methods,
respectively. Among the methods, the Hargreaves, Hamon, and Rs-based methods resulted in the
overestimation of ETo relative to the FAO56-PM method.
The high correlation of ETo by the Hargreaves and Rs-based methods with FAO56-PM method clearly
reflects the importance of the incident solar radiation as they are calculated by using the temperature and
solar radiation. This fact is also supported by many studies which reveal that the Hargreaves method is
nearly as accurate as the FAO56-PM method in estimating ETo. Therefore, it could be recommended to
use the Hargreaves method in the case of which other reliable data are lacking 1). However, it should be
notified, as Temesgen et al. (1999) have indicated, that high humidity conditions may result in an
overestimation of ETo by the Hargreaves method whereas the conditions with high wind speed may result
in the underestimation of ETo. Moreover, the performance of the RBs-based method developed with the
aim of simplifying the calculation and input variables for the FAO56-PM method performed well and its
estimations of daily, monthly and annual ETo are close to the estimates obtained by the FAO56-PM
method. Additionally, the comparisons made for all the methods signifies that all these methods can be
successfully used to estimate the ETo specifically in areas having the same climatic conditions as the one
presented in this study.
 Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods 11

Table 2 Standard Error of Estimates (SEE) in mm mon-1 of ET, Average Ratio of ET method / ETo FAO56-PM of the
commonly used methods for estimating ET covering the years 1996-2002.

year Performance indicator Thornthwaite Hargreaves Hamon Rs Rn

1996 SEE of monthly estimate 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.28 0.23

Average ratio 0.92 1.12 1.16 1.36 0.97

1997 SEE of monthly estimate 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.29 0.24

Average ratio 0.87 1.12 1.14 1.32 0.93

1998 SEE of monthly estimate 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.25

Average ratio 0.99 1.17 1.21 1.42 1.06

1999 SEE of monthly estimate 0.25 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.23

Average ratio 0.96 1.09 1.15 1.35 1.00

2000 SEE of monthly estimate 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.29 0.24

Average ratio 0.84 1.10 1.14 1.31 0.90

2001 SEE of monthly estimate 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.29 0.24

Average ratio 0.84 1.09 1.11 1.29 0.91

2002 SEE of monthly estimate 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.26 0.24

Average ratio 0.79 1.00 1.03 1.17 0.84

Average SEE of monthly estimate 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.28 0.24

Average ratio 0.89 1.10 1.13 1.32 0.94
 12 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

240 240
a d
Thornthwaite ET o (mm mon -1)

210 210
180 y = -66.162+1.8244*X

Rs ETo (mm mon -1)

180
r 2 = 0.80 y = 7.6498+1.0027*X
150 150 r 2 = 0.71
120 120
90 90
60 60
30 30
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
FAO 56 PM ET o (m m m on-1) FAO 56 PM ET o (m m m on -1)

240 240

b e
Hargreaves ET o (mm mon -1)

210 210
y =31.985+ 0.8188*X

Ra ETo (mm mon -1)

180 y = -3.24+1.1167*X 180
r 2 = 0.45
150 r 2 = 0.69 150

120 120

90 90

60 60

30 30

0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

FAO 56 PM ET o (m m m on-1) FAO 56 PM ETo (m m m on-1)

240
210 c
Hamon ETo (mm mon -1)

180 y = -20.889+1.2133*X
150 r 2 = 0.48

120
90
60
30
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
FAO 56 PM ET o (m m m on -1)

Fig. 5 Regression analysis for the ETo estimates of (a) Thornthwaite () Hargreaves (c) Hamon
(d) Rs-based method (e) Rn-based method with FAO56-PM for evaluation years of
1996-2002 at Maebaru, Fukuoka, Japan. Unit in (mm mon-1) and n = 84.

4. Conclusions
The 7-year meteorological data derived from Maebaru AMeDAS station and Fukuoka local
meteorological station located in Fukuoka Japan was applied as input parameters for comparing different
methods to estimate ETo under existing climatic conditions in Fukuoka, Japan. The major drawback is
that the real ETo is unknown however, numerous studies have been performed wherein the FAO56 PM
method have shown to be the best method for estimating ETo in which the calculated ETo values
correspond to lysimeters and other precise devices where real ETo can best obtained. The performances of
the Thorthwaite, Hargreaves, Hamon, Rs-based and Rn-based equations for monthly ETo estimates and are
significantly correlated with the ETo estimates in FAO56-PM method although the Thorthwaite method
was found to have highly significant estimates. Among the methods used, only the Thorthwaite method
requires temperature as the only input parameter whereas other methods used radiation input to estimate
the ETo. These approaches require only few parameter inputs thus making it more dynamic for the
 Comparison of Several Reference Evapotranspiration Methods 13

application in the area when the accuracy in weather measurement is less expected as compared with
complex data input required by FAO56-PM approach. Thus, these methods could be used as a potential
method to estimate ETo.
In conclusion, it can be emphasized that the use of the FAO56-PM as a standard method remains the
most desirable method for estimating ETo if accuracy of data collection is considered to be the main
consideration. But in many cases especially in areas where accurate data collection is difficult, the
application Hargreaves and Rs-based equation could be utilized for accurate and consistent estimates of
daily ETo relative to the FAO56-PM method especially in humid climate like in Japan is to be considered.
Alternatively, reliable ETo estimates derived from Thornthwaite method can be used to calculate the ETo
when temperature is the only input parameter available. However, the differences in the ETo estimates
using these methods have provided a significant range of uncertainty. It is therefore important to
compare and validate these methods based on the precise evaluation considering the land coverage and
topographical condition.

References

1) Allen, G. R., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for
computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy,
78-86.
2) Sharma, M.L., 1985. Estimating evapotranspiration. Advances in irrigation. D. Hillel, ed.,
Academic, London, 213-281.
3) Tsutsumi, A., Jinno, K. and Berndtsson, R. 2004. Surface and subsurface water balance estimation
by the groundwater recharge model and a 3-D two-phase flow model. Hydrological Sciences
Journal. 49(2), 205-226.
4) Kondo, J., Nakazono, M., Watanabe, T., and Kuwagata, T. 1992. Hydrological climate in Japan (3)
Evapotranspiration from forest. Japan Society of. Hydrology & Water Resources, Vol. 5, No. 4.
5) Allen, G. R., Jensen, Marvin. E., Wright, James. L., and Burman, Robert. D., 1989. Operational
estimates of reference evapotranspiration. Agronomy journal. Vol. 81, 650-662 .1989.
6) Hargreaves, G. H., and Samani, Z. A. 1982. Estimating potential evapotranspiration. Journal of
Irrigation Drainage Engineering, 108(3), 225-230.
7) Hargreaves, G. H., and Samani, Z. A. 1985: Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.
Applied Engineering Agric., 1:96-99.
8) Walter, I. A., Allen, R. G., Elliott, R., Mecham, B., Jensen, M. E., Itenfisu, D., Howell, T. A., Snyder,
R., Brown, P., Eching, S., Spofford, T., Hattendorf, M., Cuenca, R. H., Wright, J. L., and Martin, D.
2000. ASCE Standardized reference rvapotranspiration equation. In:Evans RG, Benham BL, Trooien
TP (eds.) Proc. National Irrigation Symposium, ASAE, Nov. 14-16, 2000, Phoenix, AZ. pp.
209-215.
9) Irmak, S., Irmak, A., Allen, R.G., and Jones, J. W. 2003. Solar and net radiation-based equations to
estimate reference evapotranspiration in humid climates. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering. ASCE. 129(5):336-347.
10) Wu, I. 1997. A simple evapotranspiration method for Hawaii: the Hargreaves method. Engineers
Notebook 106. College of Tropical Agriculture & Human Resources (CTAHR) Fact Sheet, 1-2.
11) Mintz, Y., and Walker, G. K. 1993. Global fields of soil moisture and land surface
evapotranspiration derived from observed precipitation and surface air temperature. Journal of
14 O. ALKAEED, C. FLORES, K. JINNO and A. TSUTSUMI

Applied Meteorology, 32, 1305-1334.

12) Hargreaves, G. H., 1994. Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation
and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 120(6):1132-1139.
13) Hamon, W. R., 1961. Estimating potential evapotranspiration. Journal of the Hydraulics Division,
ASCE. 87(HY3):107-120.
14) Haith, D. A., and Shoemaker, L. L. 1987. Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow
nutrients. Water Resources Bulletin, 23:471-478.
15) Allen, G. R., 2000. Using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigation
region as part of an evapotranspiration intercomparison study. Journal of Hydrology. 229. 27-4.
16) Thornthwaite, C. W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geography.
Rev. 38.
17) Temesgen, B., Eching, S., Davifoof, B., and Frame, K. 2005. Comparison of some reference
evapotranspiration equations for California. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering.
ASCE. 0733-9437(2005) 131:1 (73).